Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Deflection angle in the strong deflection limit: A perspective from local geometrical invariants and matter distributions

Takahisa Igata*

  • *Contact author: takahisa.igata@gakushuin.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 113, 044042 – Published 17 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/55vp-97gp

Abstract

In static, spherically symmetric spacetimes, the deflection angle of photons in the strong deflection limit exhibits a logarithmic divergence. We introduce an analytical framework that clarifies the physical origin of this divergence by employing local, coordinate-invariant geometric quantities alongside the properties of the matter distribution. In contrast to conventional formulations—where the divergence rate a¯ is expressed via coordinate-dependent metric functions—our approach relates a¯ to the components of the Einstein tensor in an orthonormal basis adapted to the spacetime symmetry. By applying the Einstein equations, we derive the expression a¯=118πRm2(ρm+Πm), where ρm and Πm denote the local energy density and tangential pressure evaluated at the photon sphere of areal radius Rm. This result reveals that a¯ is intrinsically governed by the local matter distribution, with the universal value a¯=1 emerging when ρm+Πm=0. Notably, this finding resolves the long-standing puzzle of obtaining a¯=1 in a class of spacetimes supported by a massless scalar field. Furthermore, these local properties are reflected in the frequencies of quasinormal modes, suggesting a profound connection between strong gravitational lensing and the dynamical response of gravitational wave signals.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Strong-deflection expansion of the deflection angle near a degenerate photon sphere

Takahisa Igata, Tadashi Sasaki, and Naoki Tsukamoto
Phys. Rev. D 113, 104022 (2026)

Article Text

References (47)

  1. K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L1 (2019).
  2. K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett. 930, L12 (2022).
  3. C. M. Claudel, K. S. Virbhadra, and G. F. R. Ellis, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 42, 818 (2001).
  4. C. Darwin, Proc. R. Soc. A 249, 180 (1959).
  5. V. Bozza, Phys. Rev. D 66, 103001 (2002).
  6. N. Tsukamoto, Phys. Rev. D 95, 064035 (2017).
  7. R. Shaikh, P. Banerjee, S. Paul, and T. Sarkar, Phys. Rev. D 99, 104040 (2019).
  8. V. Bozza, S. Capozziello, G. Iovane, and G. Scarpetta, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 33, 1535 (2001).
  9. E. F. Eiroa, G. E. Romero, and D. F. Torres, Phys. Rev. D 66, 024010 (2002).
  10. N. Tsukamoto and Y. Gong, Phys. Rev. D 95, 064034 (2017).
  11. E. F. Eiroa and C. M. Sendra, Classical Quantum Gravity 28, 085008 (2011).
  12. D. Chen, Y. Chen, P. Wang, T. Wu, and H. Wu, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 584 (2024).
  13. K. Sarkar and A. Bhadra, Classical Quantum Gravity 23, 6101 (2006).
  14. N. Tsukamoto, Phys. Rev. D 94, 124001 (2016).
  15. K. K. Nandi, R. N. Izmailov, A. A. Yanbekov, and A. A. Shayakhmetov, Phys. Rev. D 95, 104011 (2017).
  16. R. Shaikh, P. Banerjee, S. Paul, and T. Sarkar, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2019) 028; 12 (2023) E01(E).
  17. K. K. Nandi, Y. Z. Zhang, and A. V. Zakharov, Phys. Rev. D 74, 024020 (2006).
  18. J. M. Tejeiro S. and E. A. Larranaga R., Rom. J. Phys. 57, 736 (2012).
  19. A. Bhattacharya and A. A. Potapov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 34, 1950040 (2019).
  20. R. N. Izmailov, E. R. Zhdanov, A. Bhattacharya, A. A. Potapov, and K. K. Nandi, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134, 384 (2019).
  21. T. Kubo and N. Sakai, Phys. Rev. D 93, 084051 (2016).
  22. A. R. Soares, R. L. L. Vitória, and C. F. S. Pereira, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084004 (2024).
  23. S. Chakraborty and S. SenGupta, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2017) 045.
  24. A. Ishihara, Y. Suzuki, T. Ono, and H. Asada, Phys. Rev. D 95, 044017 (2017).
  25. K. Takizawa and H. Asada, Phys. Rev. D 103, 104039 (2021).
  26. F. Feleppa, V. Bozza, and O. Y. Tsupko, Phys. Rev. D 111, 044018 (2025).
  27. V. Cardoso, A. S. Miranda, E. Berti, H. Witek, and V. T. Zanchin, Phys. Rev. D 79, 064016 (2009).
  28. I. Z. Stefanov, S. S. Yazadjiev, and G. G. Gyulchev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 251103 (2010).
  29. B. Raffaelli, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 48, 16 (2016).
  30. C. W. Misner and D. H. Sharp, Phys. Rev. 136, B571 (1964).
  31. S. A. Hayward, Phys. Rev. D 53, 1938 (1996).
  32. S. Kinoshita, Phys. Rev. D 110, 044056 (2024).
  33. O. Y. Tsupko and G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, Phys. Rev. D 87, 124009 (2013).
  34. V. Perlick, O. Y. Tsupko, and G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, Phys. Rev. D 92, 104031 (2015).
  35. G. W. Gibbons and C. M. Warnick, Phys. Lett. B 763, 169 (2016).
  36. P. V. P. Cunha, E. Berti, and C. A. R. Herdeiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251102 (2017).
  37. R. Kudo and H. Asada, Phys. Rev. D 105, 084014 (2022).
  38. C. A. R. Herdeiro and E. Radu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, 1542014 (2015).
  39. A. I. Janis, E. T. Newman, and J. Winicour, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 878 (1968).
  40. M. Wyman, Phys. Rev. D 24, 839 (1981).
  41. H. G. Ellis, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 14, 104 (1973).
  42. K. A. Bronnikov, Acta Phys. Pol. B 4, 251 (1973).
  43. R. A. Konoplya and Z. Stuchlík, Phys. Lett. B 771, 597 (2017).
  44. J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 106.
  45. K. Hashimoto and N. Tanahashi, Phys. Rev. D 95, 024007 (2017).
  46. E. Gallo and T. Mädler, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 299 (2025).
  47. T. Harada, T. Igata, H. Saida, and Y. Takamori, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 32, 2350098 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation