- Open Access
Machine-learning-inspired SMEFT simplified template cross sections: A case study in production
Phys. Rev. D 114, 015037 – Published 24 July, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/4zz1-dv63
Abstract
The simplified template cross section (STXS) program has become the standard interface between Higgs measurements and global fits, but its fixed one-dimensional boundaries are not guaranteed to align with the phase-space directions to which the Standard Model effective field theory (SMEFT) is most sensitive. We propose a machine-learning-inspired extension of STXS in which supervised classifiers are used only at the design stage to identify simple, publishable phase-space boundaries. Using associated Higgs production, , as a case study and a benchmark momentum-dependent bosonic SMEFT deformation, we show that the relevant signal-background separation is well captured by a linear boundary in the plane. We construct such boundaries with a linear support vector machine and with a deep-neural-network-assisted distillation procedure, and compare them directly with the standard STXS bins through a common single-region Asimov-significance analysis. In this proof-of-concept setup, the machine-learning-inspired regions systematically outperform the corresponding STXS regions, with the largest gains appearing in the boosted regime where SMEFT effects are concentrated. The final observable remains a simple linear cut, preserving the transparency and experimental portability that make STXS useful.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (28)
- J. Ellis, M. Madigan, K. Mimasu, V. Sanz, and T. You, Top, Higgs, diboson and electroweak fit to the Standard Model effective field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 279.
- A. Falkowski and D. Straub, Flavourful SMEFT likelihood for Higgs and electroweak data, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 066.
- T. Giani, G. Magni, and J. Rojo, SMEFiT: a flexible toolbox for global interpretations of particle physics data with effective field theories, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 393 (2023).
- J. de Blas et al., Current and future constraints on Higgs couplings in the nonlinear Effective Theory, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 048.
- J. Ellis and T. You, Updated global analysis of Higgs couplings, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2013) 103.
- J. Ellis, V. Sanz, and T. You, Prima Facie Evidence against Spin-Two Higgs Impostors, Phys. Lett. B 726, 244 (2014).
- J. Ellis, V. Sanz, and T. You, The effective Standard Model after LHC Run I, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2015) 157.
- J. Ellis, V. Sanz, and T. You, Complete Higgs sector constraints on dimension-6 operators, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 036.
- A. Azatov, R. Contino, and J. Galloway, Model-independent bounds on a light Higgs, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2012) 127.
- A. Azatov and R. Contino, New prospects for Higgs compositeness in , Phys. Rev. D 88, 075019 (2013).
- F. Bishara, R. Contino, and J. Rojo, Higgs pair production in vector-boson fusion at the LHC and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 481 (2017).
- A. Biekötter, A. Knochel, R. Kogler, T. Plehn, and A. Voigt, The Global Higgs Picture at 27 TeV, SciPost Phys. 6, 024 (2019).
- I. Brivio, T. Corbett, and M. Trott, The Higgs width in the SMEFT, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 056.
- D. de Florian et al. (LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group), Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 2, 1 (2017).
- ATLAS Collaboration, Observation of decays and VH production with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 786, 59 (2018).
- CMS Collaboration, Measurements of Higgs boson production cross sections and couplings in the diphoton decay channel at , Phys. Rev. D 104, 092013 (2021).
- C. Hays, V. Sanz Gonzalez, and G. Zemaityte, Constraining EFT parameters using simplified template cross sections, Technical Report LHCHXSWG-2019-004, CERN, Geneva, 2019.
- J. Brehmer, S. Dawson, S. Homiller, F. Kling, and T. Plehn, Benchmarking simplified template cross sections in WH production, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2019) 034.
- J. Brehmer, K. Cranmer, G. Louppe, and J. Pavez, Constraining effective field theories with machine learning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111801 (2018).
- J. Brehmer, K. Cranmer, G. Louppe, and J. Pavez, A guide to constraining effective field theories with machine learning, Phys. Rev. D 98, 052004 (2018).
- K. Cranmer, J. Pavez, and G. Louppe, Approximating likelihood ratios with calibrated discriminative classifiers, arXiv:1506.02169.
- G. Kasieczka, B. Nachman, and D. Shih, The LHC Olympics 2020 a community challenge for anomaly detection in high energy physics, Rep. Prog. Phys. 84, 124201 (2021).
- F. F. Freitas, C. K. Khosa, and V. Sanz, Exploring the standard model EFT in VH production with machine learning, Phys. Rev. D 100, 035040 (2019).
- J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
- I. Brivio and M. Trott, Scheming in the SMEFT... and a reparameterization invariance!, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2017) 148; 05 (2018) 136(A).
- R. D. Ball et al. (NNPDF Collaboration), Parton distributions from high-precision collider data, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 663 (2017).
- G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1554 (2011).
- M. G. Folgado, V. Sanz, and D. E. Conde Villatoro, Machine-learning-inspired SMEFT simplified template cross sections: A case study in ZH production, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.19368109 (2026).