Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Nonperturbative effects in TT¯-deformed conformal field theories: A toy model for Planckian physics

Shinji Hirano1,2,* and Vinayak Raj1,†

  • *Contact author: shinji.hirano@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: vinayak.hep.th@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 114, 026005 – Published 6 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/4yg6-4dtv

Abstract

We propose a nonperturbative completion of two-point correlators in TT¯-deformed conformal field theories (CFTs) and analyze their behavior at distance scales shorter than the fundamental length scale set by the TT¯ deformation. Building on the interpretation of the TT¯ deformation as a coupling to two-dimensional quantum gravity with a unique built-in length scale, we advance the study of TT¯-deformed CFTs as a toy model for Planckian physics. As we probe shorter distances, trans-Planckian oscillations are followed by a super-Planckian regime in which correlations are typically suppressed by geometric randomness, in contrast to the power-law growth characteristic of CFTs. Moreover, their dependence on distance becomes exponentially weaker, suggesting that the underlying geometric structure has been largely erased—a behavior broadly consistent with expectations for quantum spacetime in this regime.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (41)

  1. S. Weinberg, in 14th International School of Subnuclear Physics: Understanding the Fundamental Constitutents of Matter (Springer, Boston, MA, 1976).
  2. S. Weinberg, Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theories of gravitation, in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980), pp. 790–831.
  3. R. Percacci, arXiv:0709.3851.
  4. R. Percacci, An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety (World Scientific, Singapore, 2017), https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/10369.
  5. M. Reuter and F. Saueressig, New J. Phys. 14, 055022 (2012).
  6. M. Reuter and F. Saueressig, Quantum Gravity and the Functional Renormalization Group: The Road towards Asymptotic Safety, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2019).
  7. A. Eichhorn, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 5, 47 (2019).
  8. A. B. Zamolodchikov, arXiv:hep-th/0401146.
  9. F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Nucl. Phys. B915, 363 (2017).
  10. A. Cavaglià, S. Negro, I. M. Szécsényi, and R. Tateo, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2016) 112.
  11. Y. Jiang, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73, 057201 (2021).
  12. S. He, Y. Li, H. Ouyang, and Y. Sun, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68, 101001 (2025).
  13. S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko, and M. Mirbabayi, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2017) 136.
  14. S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko, and G. Hernández-Chifflet, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2018) 158.
  15. A. J. Tolley, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 050.
  16. O. Aharony and N. Barel, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 035.
  17. N. Barel, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 167.
  18. W. Cui, H. Shu, W. Song, and J. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2024) 017.
  19. L. Chen, Z. Du, K. Liu, and W. Song, arXiv:2507.08588.
  20. O. Aharony, S. Datta, A. Giveon, Y. Jiang, and D. Kutasov, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 086.
  21. L. Griguolo, R. Panerai, J. Papalini, and D. Seminara, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 221601 (2022).
  22. L. Griguolo, R. Panerai, J. Papalini, and D. Seminara, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 134.
  23. J. Gu, Y. Jiang, and H. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 081601 (2025).
  24. J. Gu, Y. Jiang, and H. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 112, 045007 (2025).
  25. O. Lauscher and M. Reuter, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2005) 050.
  26. L. Modesto and P. Nicolini, Phys. Rev. D 81, 104040 (2010).
  27. J. Cardy, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 186.
  28. S. Hirano and V. Raj, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2025) 142.
  29. J. Cardy, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2019) 160.
  30. S. Hirano and M. Shigemori, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 108.
  31. S. Hirano and M. Shigemori, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 190.
  32. M. Mariño, An introduction to resurgence in quantum theory, https://www.marcosmarino.net/uploads/1/3/3/5/133535336/resurgence-course.pdf, last visited on July 29, 2025.
  33. B. Chen, L. Chen, and P.-X. Hao, Phys. Rev. D 98, 086025 (2018).
  34. S. He and H. Shu, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2020) 088.
  35. S. He, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 64, 291011 (2021).
  36. W.-X. Lai, H. Wang, and Y. Xu, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2026) 100.
  37. J. J. Atick and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B310, 291 (1988).
  38. J. Ambjorn, J. Jurkiewicz, and R. Loll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 171301 (2005).
  39. L. Modesto, Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 242002 (2009).
  40. P. Horava, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 161301 (2009).
  41. S. Carlip, AIP Conf. Proc. 1196, 72 (2009).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation