Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Complete catalog of laser locking configurations for LISA

Gerhard Heinzel*, Javier Álvarez-Vizoso, and Miguel Dovale-Álvarez

  • *Contact author: gerhard.heinzel@aei.mpg.de

Phys. Rev. D 112, 062002 – Published 15 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/4xbx-4dz4

Abstract

The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) will enable direct observations of low-frequency gravitational waves, offering unprecedented insight into astrophysical and cosmological phenomena. LISA’s heterodyne interferometric measurement system requires phase-locking five of its six onboard lasers with tunable frequency offsets to ensure that all beatnotes remain within the metrology system’s operational range, despite Doppler-induced frequency shifts. The selection of these offset frequencies—collectively forming a frequency plan—is a complex optimization problem constrained by the spacecraft’s orbital dynamics and instrument limitations. While previous work established an algorithmic solution for deriving time-dependent frequency plans, this study takes a complementary approach by systematically analyzing and cataloging all possible laser locking configurations. We present an automated method to explore, validate, and classify viable locking schemes, identifying 36 unique non-frequency-swapping configurations and 72 additional frequency-swapping configurations for an arbitrary choice of primary laser. This exhaustive classification provides a foundation for frequency planning across the full range of operational scenarios.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Frequency planning for LISA

Gerhard Heinzel, Javier Álvarez-Vizoso, Miguel Dovale-Álvarez, and Karsten Wiesner
Phys. Rev. D 110, 042002 (2024)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (10)

  1. M. C. Miller and N. Yunes, Nature (London) 568, 469 (2019).
  2. LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015).
  3. F. Acernese, M. Agathos, K. Agatsuma, D. Aisa, N. Allemandou, A. Allocca, J. Amarni, P. Astone, G. Balestri, G. Ballardin et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2014).
  4. B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
  5. B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017).
  6. R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, A. Adams, C. Adams, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, C. Affeldt et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 915, L5 (2021).
  7. C. Cahillane and G. Mansell, Galaxies 10, 36 (2022).
  8. P. Amaro-Seoane, J. Andrews, M. Arca Sedda, A. Askar, Q. Baghi, R. Balasov, I. Bartos, S. S. Bavera, J. Bellovary, C. P. L. Berry et al., Living Rev. Relativity 26, 2 (2023).
  9. G. Heinzel, J. Álvarez-Vizoso, M. Dovale-Álvarez, and K. Wiesner, Phys. Rev. D 110, 042002 (2024).
  10. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/4xbx-4dz4 for the complete catalog of laser locking configurations for LISA.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation