Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Numerical simulation of lunar response to gravitational waves and its 3D topographic effect using the spectral-element method

Lei Zhang1, Han Yan2, Jinhai Zhang1,*, and Xian Chen2,3

  • 1Center for Deep Earth Technology and Equipment, Key Laboratory of Deep Petroleum Intelligent Exploration and Development, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
  • 2Department of Astronomy, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • 3Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

  • *Contact author: zjh@mail.iggcas.ac.cn

Phys. Rev. D 113, 023031 – Published 20 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/4rrr-w4tm

Abstract

The Moon has been regarded as a natural Weber bar capable of amplifying gravitational waves (GWs) for detecting events across a wide range of frequencies. However, accurately determining the amplification effects remains challenging due to the absence of 3D numerical simulation methods. In this study, we develop a high-order 3D finite element method (spectral-element method, SEM) to numerically simulate the lunar response to GWs below 20 mHz. We verify the accuracy of our method by comparing the resonant peaks of our results with those from semianalytical solutions and find that the frequency deviation is less than 3% for the first peak at about 1 mHz and less than 0.8% for the subsequent peaks up to 10 mHz. Using this method, we evaluate the amplification of GW signals due to 3D topographic effects of the Moon, and we find enhancements at a series of specific frequency components. These results highlight the non-negligible effect of surface topography on the lunar response to GWs, as a fundamental factor that holds significant implications across both global and regional analyses. Our work paves the way for a comprehensive evaluation of the Moon’s resonant response to GWs, helpful for the strategic planning of lunar GW detections.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (47)

  1. B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott et al., Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
  2. P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley, S. Babak et al., Laser interferometer space antenna, arXiv:1702.00786.
  3. J. Luo, L. Chen, H. Duan et al., TianQin: A space-borne gravitational wave detector, Classical Quantum Gravity 33, 035010 (2016).
  4. Z. Luo, Y. Wang, Y. Wu, W. Hu, and G. Jin, The Taiji program: A concise overview, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 05A108 (2021).
  5. Y. Gong, J. Luo, and B. Wang, Concepts and status of Chinese space gravitational wave detection projects, Nat. Astron. 5, 881 (2021).
  6. G. Agazie et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr data set: Observations and timing of 68 millisecond pulsars, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L9 (2023).
  7. J. Antoniadis et al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array: V. Search for continuous gravitational wave signals, Astron. Astrophys. 690, A118 (2024).
  8. D. J. Reardon et al., Search for an isotropic gravitational-wave background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L6 (2023).
  9. H. Xu et al., Searching for the nano-hertz stochastic gravitational wave background with the Chinese pulsar timing array data release I, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 23, 075024 (2023).
  10. R. Schnabel, N. Mavalvala, D. E. McClelland, and P. K. Lam, Quantum metrology for gravitational wave astronomy, Nat. Commun. 1, 121 (2010).
  11. I. Bartos, Z. Haiman, Z. Marka, B. Metzger, N. Stone, and S. Marka, Gravitational-wave localization alone can probe origin of stellar-mass black hole mergers, Nat. Commun. 8, 831 (2017).
  12. G. Pratten, P. Schmidt, and T. Hinderer, Gravitational-wave asteroseismology with fundamental modes from compact binary inspirals, Nat. Commun. 11, 2553 (2020).
  13. J. Harms et al., Lunar gravitational-wave antenna, Astrophys. J. 910, 1 (2021).
  14. M. Branchesi et al., Lunar gravitational-wave detection, Space Sci. Rev. 219, 67 (2023).
  15. P. Ajith et al., The lunar gravitational-wave antenna: Mission studies and science case, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2025) 108.
  16. J. Li, F. Liu, Y. Pan, Z. Wang, M. Cao, M. Wang, F. Zhang, J. Zhang, and Z.-H. Zhu, Detecting gravitational wave with an interferometric seismometer array on lunar nearside, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 66, 109513 (2023).
  17. X. Bi and J. Harms, Response of the moon to gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 110, 064025 (2024).
  18. H. Yan, X. Chen, J. Zhang, F. Zhang, M. Wang, and L. Shao, Towards a consistent calculation of the lunar response to gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 109, 064092 (2024).
  19. M. Kachelrieß and M. Nødtvedt, Lunar response to gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 110, 064034 (2024).
  20. J. Majstorović, L. Vidal, and P. Lognonné, Modeling lunar response to gravitational waves using normal-mode approach and tidal forcing, Phys. Rev. D 111, 044061 (2025).
  21. L. Zhang, H. Yan, X. Chen, and J. Zhang, 2D numerical simulation of lunar response to gravitational waves using finite element method, Phys. Rev. D 111, 063014 (2025).
  22. https://pds-geosciences.wustl.edu/missions/lro/lola.htm.
  23. F. J. Dyson, Seismic response of the earth to a gravitational wave in the 1-Hz band, Astrophys. J. 156, 529 (1969).
  24. A. Ben-Menahem, Excitation of the earth’s eigenvibrations by gravitational radiation from astrophysical sources, Il Nuovo Cimento C 6, 49 (1983).
  25. J. Majstorović, S. Rosat, and Y. Rogister, Earth’s spheroidal motion induced by a gravitational wave in flat spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 100, 044048 (2019).
  26. abaqus Analysis User’s Manual, Version 6.14 (Dassault Systèmes Simulia, Inc., Providence, RI, 2014).
  27. D. Komatitsch and J. Tromp, Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation-I. Validation, Geophys. J. Int. 149, 390 (2002).
  28. D. Komatitsch and J. Tromp. Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation-II. 3-D models, oceans, rotation, and self-gravitation, Geophys. J. Int. 150, 303 (2002).
  29. D. Komatitsch, J. Ritsema, and J. Tromp. The spectral-element method, Beowulf computing, and global seismology, Science 298, 1737 (2002).
  30. R. S. Park, A. Berne, A. S. Konopliv et al., Thermal asymmetry in the moon’s mantle inferred from monthly tidal response, Nature (London) 641, 1188 (2025).
  31. M. Ohtake et al., Asymmetric crustal growth on the moon indicated by primitive farside highland materials, Nat. Geosci. 5, 384 (2012).
  32. J. H. Woodhouse and F. A. Dahlen, The effect of a general aspherical perturbation on the free oscillations of the earth, Geophys. J. Int. 53, 335 (1978).
  33. G. Masters, J. Park, and F. Gilbert, Observations of coupled spheroidal and toroidal modes, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 88, 10285 (1983).
  34. A. Deuss and J. H. Woodhouse, Theoretical free-oscillation spectra: The importance of wide band coupling, Geophys. J. Int. 146, 833 (2001).
  35. J. Zhang, Y. Lin, and Z. Yao, Detection of lunar interior structures and the challenge on its key technology, Bull. Natl. Nat. Sci. Found. China 36, 888 (2022), https://www.nsfc.gov.cn/csc/20345/20348/pdf/2022/202206-888-894.pdf.
  36. M. Panning et al., Farside Seismic Suite: Update on the status of the first seismic station on the farside of the moon. in 55th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2024 (LPI Contribution No. 3040, The Woodlands, Texas, 2024), p. 2354.
  37. D. DellaGiustina et al., LEMS-A3: The lunar environmental monitoring station—an Artemis III deployed instrument, LPI contribution 3090, 2410 (2025), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025LPICo3090.2410D/abstract.
  38. L. Zhang, J. T. Wang, Y. J. Xu, C. H. He, and C. H. Zhang, A procedure for 3D seismic simulation from rupture to structures by coupling SEM and FEM, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 110, 1134 (2020).
  39. L. Zhang and J. Zhang, Local wavefield refinement using Fourier interpolation and boundary extrapolation for finite-element method based on domain reduction method, Geophysics 87, T251 (2022).
  40. R. Rufu, O. Aharonson, and H. B. Perets, A multiple-impact origin for the moon, Nat. Geosci. 10, 89 (2017).
  41. J. Zhang et al., Lunar regolith and substructure at Chang’E-4 landing site in south pole-Aitken basin, Nat. Astron. 5, 25 (2021).
  42. N. Hosono, S.-i. Karato, J. Makino, and T. R. Saitoh, Terrestrial magma ocean origin of the Moon, Nat. Geosci. 12, 418 (2019).
  43. Q. L. Li et al., Two-billion-year-old volcanism on the moon from Chang’e-5 basalts, Nature (London) 600, 54 (2021).
  44. B. W. Wang et al., Returned samples indicate volcanism on the moon 120 million years ago, Science 385, 1077 (2024).
  45. Q. W. Zhang et al., Lunar farside volcanism 2.8 billion years ago from Chang’e-6 basalts, Nature (London) 643, 356 (2025).
  46. J. Zhang et al., Volcanic history of the Imbrium basin: A close-up view from the lunar rover Yutu, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 5342 (2015).
  47. https://github.com/zhanglei911/LunarResponse2GW_SEM3D.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation