Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Discriminating tauphilic leptoquark explanations of the B anomalies via K→πνν¯ and B→Kνν¯

Andreas Crivellin1,*, Syuhei Iguro2,3,4,†, and Teppei Kitahara5,3,‡

  • 1Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH–8057 Zürich, Switzerland
  • 2Institute for Advanced Research, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
  • 3Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute for the Origin of Particles and the Universe, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan
  • 4KEK Theory Center, IPNS, KEK, Tsukuba 305-0801, Japan
  • 5Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan

  • *Contact author: andreas.crivellin@cern.ch
  • †Contact author: igurosyuhei@gmail.com
  • ‡Contact author: kitahara@chiba-u.jp

Phys. Rev. D 112, 095016 – Published 13 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/4dpx-h5vm

Abstract

Leptoquark models are prime candidates for new physics (NP) explanations of the longstanding anomalies in semileptonic B decays; b→cτν¯ [encoded in R(D(*))] and b→sℓℓ¯(ℓ=e,μ) transitions. Furthermore, Belle II and NA62 reported weaker-than-expected limits on B+→K+νν¯ and K+→π+νν¯, respectively. While the R(D(*)) and b→sℓℓ¯ measurements can be explained with NP contributions at the O(10%) level, the neutrino channels suggest that the NP effect could be comparable in size to the Standard Model one. In this context, we consider the two types of leptoquark models with minimal sets of the couplings that can best describe the semileptonic B anomalies and lead at the same time to effects in the neutrino modes, the singlet-triplet scalar leptoquark model (S1+S3) and the singlet vector leptoquark model (U1). More specifically, the neutrino channels pose nontrivial constraints on the parameter space, and we find that large effects (i.e., accounting for the current central value) in B→K(*)νν¯ are only possible in the S1+S3 setup, while both models can account for the central value of K+→π+νν¯.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (132)

  1. A. Dainese et al., Report from Working Group 4: Opportunities in flavour physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7, 867 (2019).
  2. A. J. Buras, Expedition to the zeptouniverse, arXiv:2403.02387.
  3. S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, and L. Maiani, Weak interactions with lepton-hadron symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1285 (1970).
  4. M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, CP violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interaction, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
  5. A. J. Buras, Kaon theory: 50 years later arXiv:2307.15737.
  6. NA62 Collaboration, New measurement of the K+→π+νν¯ decay by the NA62 Experiment,. https://indico.cern.ch/event/1447422/.
  7. NA62 Collaboration, Observation of the K+→π+νν¯ decay and measurement of its branching ratio, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 191.
  8. A. J. Buras, D. Buttazzo, J. Girrbach-Noe, and R. Knegjens, K+→π+νν¯ and KL→π0νν¯ in the standard model: Status and perspectives, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2015) 033.
  9. J. Brod, M. Gorbahn, and E. Stamou, Updated standard model prediction for K→πνν¯ and εK, Proc. Sci., BEAUTY2020 (2021) 056 [arXiv:2105.02868].
  10. A. J. Buras and E. Venturini, The exclusive vision of rare K and B decays and of the quark mixing in the standard model, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 615 (2022).
  11. G. D’Ambrosio, A. M. Iyer, F. Mahmoudi, and S. Neshatpour, Anatomy of kaon decays and prospects for lepton flavour universality violation, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 148.
  12. L. Allwicher, M. Bordone, G. Isidori, G. Piazza, and A. Stanzione, Probing third-generation new physics with K→πνν¯ and B→K(*)νν¯, Phys. Lett. B 861, 139295 (2025).
  13. KOTO Collaboration, Search for the KL→π0νν¯ decay at the J-PARC KOTO experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 081802 (2025).
  14. KOTO Collaboration, Proposal of the KOTO II experiment, arXiv:2501.14827.
  15. Belle-II Collaboration, Evidence for B+→K+νν¯ decays, Phys. Rev. D 109, 112006 (2024).
  16. Belle Collaboration, Search for B→h(*)νν¯ with the full Belle ϒ(4S) data sample, Phys. Rev. D 87, 111103 (2013).
  17. Belle Collaboration, Search for B→hνν¯ decays with semileptonic tagging at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 96, 091101 (2017); Belle Collaboration97, 099902(A) (2018).
  18. BABAR Collaboration, Search for the rare decay B→Kνν¯, Phys. Rev. D 82, 112002 (2010).
  19. BABAR Collaboration, Search for B→K(*)νν¯ and invisible quarkonium decays, Phys. Rev. D 87, 112005 (2013).
  20. D. Bečirević, G. Piazza, and O. Sumensari, Revisiting B→K(*)νν¯ decays in the standard model and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 252 (2023).
  21. B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, and J. Matias, Review of semileptonic B anomalies, Eur. Phys. J. ST 1, 20 (2023).
  22. S. Fajfer, N. Košnik, and L. Vale Silva, Footprints of leptoquarks: From RK(*) to K→πνν¯, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 275 (2018).
  23. S. Descotes-Genon, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, Implications of b→sμμ anomalies for future measurements of B→K(*)νν¯ and K→πνν¯, Phys. Lett. B 809, 135769 (2020); 840, 137830(A) (2023).
  24. L. Allwicher, D. Becirevic, G. Piazza, S. Rosauro-Alcaraz, and O. Sumensari, Understanding the first measurement of B(B→Kνν¯), Phys. Lett. B 848, 138411 (2024).
  25. C.-H. Chen and C.-W. Chiang, Flavor anomalies in leptoquark model with gauged U(1)Lμ−Lτ, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075004 (2024).
  26. S. Rosauro-Alcaraz and L. P. S. Leal, Disentangling left and right-handed neutrino effects in B→K(*)νν, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 795 (2024).
  27. C.-H. Chen, C.-W. Chiang, and L. M. G. de la Vega, Leptoquark-mediated Dirac neutrino mass and its impact on B→Kνν¯ and K→πνν¯ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2025) 055.
  28. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group, HFLAV Collaborations, Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2021, Phys. Rev. D 107, 052008 (2023).
  29. M. Bordone, M. Jung, and D. van Dyk, Theory determination of B¯→D(*)ℓ−ν¯ form factors at O(1/mc2), Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 74 (2020).
  30. M. Bordone, N. Gubernari, D. van Dyk, and M. Jung, Heavy-quark expansion for B¯s→Ds(*) form factors and unitarity bounds beyond the SU(3)F limit, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 347 (2020).
  31. S. Iguro and R. Watanabe, Bayesian fit analysis to full distribution data of B¯→D(*)ℓν¯:|Vcb| determination and new physics constraints, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 006.
  32. F. U. Bernlochner et al., Constrained second-order power corrections in HQET: R(D(*)),|Vcb|, and new physics, Phys. Rev. D 106, 096015 (2022).
  33. S. Iguro, T. Kitahara, and R. Watanabe, Global fit to b→cτν anomalies as of Spring 2024, Phys. Rev. D 110, 075005 (2024).
  34. Belle II Collaboration, Measurements of semileptonic and leptonic B decays at Belle II, https://indico.in2p3.fr/event/35965/contributions/152372/.
  35. Belle-II Collaboration, Test of lepton flavor universality with measurements of R(D+) and R(D*+) using semileptonic B tagging at the Belle II experiment, Phys. Rev. D 112, 032010 (2025).
  36. LHCb Collaboration, Measurement of form-factor-independent observables in the decay B0→K*0μ+μ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 191801 (2013).
  37. LHCb Collaboration, Angular analysis of the B0→K*0μ+μ− decay using 3  fb−1 of integrated luminosity, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2016) 104.
  38. S. Descotes-Genon, T. Hurth, J. Matias, and J. Virto, Optimizing the basis of B→K*ll observables in the full kinematic range, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 137.
  39. CMS Collaboration, Angular analysis of the B0→ K*(892)0μ+μ− decay in proton-proton collisions at s=13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 864, 139406 (2025).
  40. LHCb Collaboration, Differential branching fractions and isospin asymmetries of B→K(*)μ+μ− decays, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2014) 133.
  41. LHCb Collaboration, Measurements of the S-wave fraction in B0→K+π−μ+μ− decays and the B0→K*(892)0μ+μ− differential branching fraction, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2016) 047; LHCb Collaboration04 (2017) 142(E).
  42. HPQCD Collaboration, Standard model predictions for B→Kℓ+ℓ−, B→Kℓ1−ℓ2+ and B→Kνν− using form factors from Nf=2+1+1 lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014511 (2023); HPQCD Collaboration107, 119903(E) (2023).
  43. LHCb Collaboration, Branching fraction measurements of the rare Bs0→ϕμ+μ− and Bs0→f2′(1525)μ+μ−- Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151801 (2021).
  44. HPQCD Collaboration, B→K and D→K form factors from fully relativistic lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014510 (2023).
  45. N. Gubernari, M. Reboud, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, Improved theory predictions and global analysis of exclusive b→sμ+μ− processes, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 133.
  46. G. Isidori, Z. Polonsky, and A. Tinari, Semi-inclusive b→sℓ−ℓ transitions at high q2, Phys. Rev. D 108, 093008 (2023).
  47. LHCb Collaboration, Test of lepton universality in b→sℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 051803 (2023).
  48. LHCb Collaboration, Angular analysis of B0→K*0e+e− decays, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 140.
  49. M. Algueró, J. Matias, B. Capdevila, and A. Crivellin, Disentangling lepton flavor universal and lepton flavor universality violating effects in b→sℓ+ℓ− transitions, Phys. Rev. D 105, 113007 (2022).
  50. M. Algueró et al., To (b)e or not to (b)e: No electrons at LHCb, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 648 (2023).
  51. T. Hurth, F. Mahmoudi, and S. Neshatpour, B anomalies in the post RK(*) era, Phys. Rev. D 108, 115037 (2023).
  52. Particle Data Group Collaboration, Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  53. L. Calibbi, A. Crivellin, and T. Ota, Effective field theory approach to b→sℓℓ(′), B→K(*)νν¯ and B→D(*)τν with third generation couplings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 181801 (2015).
  54. D. Buttazzo, A. Greljo, G. Isidori, and D. Marzocca, B-physics anomalies: A guide to combined explanations, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2017) 044.
  55. M. Fedele et al., Impact of Λb→Λcτν measurement on new physics in b→clν transitions, Phys. Rev. D 107, 055005 (2023).
  56. I. Ray and S. Nandi, Test of new physics effects in B¯→(D(*).π)ℓ−ν¯ℓ decays with heavy and light leptons, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 022.
  57. M. Fedele et al., Discriminating B→D*ℓν form factors via polarization observables and asymmetries, Phys. Rev. D 108, 055037 (2023).
  58. C. Bobeth, U. Haisch, A. Lenz, B. Pecjak, and G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi, On new physics in ΔΓd, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2014) 040.
  59. A. Crivellin, C. Greub, D. Müller, and F. Saturnino, Importance of loop effects in explaining the accumulated evidence for new physics in B decays with a vector leptoquark, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 011805 (2019).
  60. A. Crivellin, D. Müller, and T. Ota, Simultaneous explanation of R(D(*)) and b→sμ+μ−: The last scalar leptoquarks standing, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2017) 040.
  61. A. Crivellin, D. Müller, and F. Saturnino, Flavor phenomenology of the leptoquark singlet-triplet model, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 020.
  62. V. Gherardi, D. Marzocca, and E. Venturini, Low-energy phenomenology of scalar leptoquarks at one-loop accuracy, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 138.
  63. R. Barbieri, C. W. Murphy, and F. Senia, B-decay anomalies in a composite leptoquark model, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 8 (2017).
  64. L. Calibbi, A. Crivellin, and T. Li, Model of vector leptoquarks in view of the B-physics anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 98, 115002 (2018).
  65. M. Bordone, C. Cornella, J. Fuentes-Martin, and G. Isidori, A three-site gauge model for flavor hierarchies and flavor anomalies, Phys. Lett. B 779, 317 (2018).
  66. M. Blanke and A. Crivellin, B meson anomalies in a Pati-Salam model within the Randall-Sundrum background, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 011801 (2018).
  67. S. Iguro and Y. Omura, Status of the semileptonic B decays and muon g-2 in general 2HDMs with right-handed neutrinos, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 173.
  68. A. Crivellin, D. Müller, and C. Wiegand, b→sℓ+ℓ− transitions in two-Higgs-doublet models, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2019) 119.
  69. A. Crivellin and S. Iguro, Accumulating hints for flavor-violating Higgs bosons at the electroweak scale, Phys. Rev. D 110, 015014 (2024).
  70. A. Crivellin and M. Kirk, Diquark explanation of b→sℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. D 108, L111701 (2023).
  71. M. Bauer and M. Neubert, Minimal leptoquark explanation for the RD(*), RK, and (g−2)μ anomalies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 141802 (2016).
  72. A. Crivellin, B. Fuks, and L. Schnell, Explaining the hints for lepton flavour universality violation with three S2 leptoquark generations, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2022) 169.
  73. CMS Collaboration, Search for a third-generation leptoquark coupled to a τ lepton and a b quark through single, pair, and nonresonant production in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 311.
  74. ATLAS Collaboration, Combination of searches for pair-produced leptoquarks at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 854, 138736 (2024).
  75. D. Marzocca, Addressing the B-physics anomalies in a fundamental composite Higgs model, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 121.
  76. M. Bordone, O. Catà, T. Feldmann, and R. Mandal, Constraining flavour patterns of scalar leptoquarks in the effective field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 122.
  77. L. Da Rold and F. Lamagna, Model for the singlet-triplet leptoquarks, Phys. Rev. D 103, 115007 (2021).
  78. D. Marzocca, S. Trifinopoulos, and E. Venturini, From B-meson anomalies to kaon physics with scalar leptoquarks, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 320 (2022).
  79. A. Bhaskar, A. A. Madathil, T. Mandal, and S. Mitra, Combined explanation of W-mass, muon g−2, RK(*) and RD(*) anomalies in a singlet-triplet scalar leptoquark model, Phys. Rev. D 106, 115009 (2022).
  80. I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, and O. Sumensari, Muon g−2 and scalar leptoquark mixing, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 089.
  81. A. Crivellin, C. Greub, D. Müller, and F. Saturnino, Scalar leptoquarks in leptonic processes, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 182.
  82. A. Crivellin, D. Müller, and F. Saturnino, Leptoquarks in oblique corrections and Higgs signal strength: Status and prospects, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 094.
  83. R. Alonso, B. Grinstein, and J. Martin Camalich, Lepton universality violation and lepton flavor conservation in B-meson decays, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2015) 184.
  84. S. Fajfer and N. Košnik, Vector leptoquark resolution of RK and RD(*) puzzles, Phys. Lett. B 755, 270 (2016).
  85. J. C. Pati and A. Salam, Lepton number as the fourth color, Phys. Rev. D 10, 275 (1974); 11, 703(E) (1975).
  86. G. Hiller, D. Loose, and K. Schönwald, Leptoquark flavor patterns & B decay anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 027.
  87. B. Bhattacharya, A. Datta, J.-P. Guévin, D. London, and R. Watanabe, Simultaneous explanation of the RK and RD(*) puzzles: A model analysis, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2017) 015.
  88. J. Kumar, D. London, and R. Watanabe, Combined explanations of the b→sμ+μ− and b→cτ−ν¯ anomalies: A general model analysis, Phys. Rev. D 99, 015007 (2019).
  89. R. Barbieri, G. Isidori, A. Pattori, and F. Senia, Anomalies in B-decays and U(2) flavour symmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 67 (2016).
  90. N. Assad, B. Fornal, and B. Grinstein, Baryon number and lepton universality violation in leptoquark and diquark models, Phys. Lett. B 777, 324 (2018).
  91. L. Di Luzio, A. Greljo, and M. Nardecchia, Gauge leptoquark as the origin of B-physics anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 96, 115011 (2017).
  92. R. Barbieri and A. Tesi, B-decay anomalies in Pati-Salam SU(4), Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 193 (2018).
  93. A. Greljo and B. A. Stefanek, Third family quark–lepton unification at the TeV scale, Phys. Lett. B 782, 131 (2018).
  94. M. Bordone, C. Cornella, J. Fuentes-Martín, and G. Isidori, Low-energy signatures of the PS3 model: From B-physics anomalies to LFV, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 148.
  95. S. Matsuzaki, K. Nishiwaki, and K. Yamamoto, Simultaneous interpretation of K and B anomalies in terms of chiral-flavorful vectors, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2018) 164.
  96. L. Di Luzio, J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Greljo, M. Nardecchia, and S. Renner, Maximal flavour violation: A cabibbo mechanism for leptoquarks, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2018) 081.
  97. S. Balaji, R. Foot, and M. A. Schmidt, Chiral SU(4) explanation of the b→s anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 99, 015029 (2019).
  98. C. Cornella, J. Fuentes-Martin, and G. Isidori, Revisiting the vector leptoquark explanation of the B-physics anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2019) 168.
  99. S. Balaji and M. A. Schmidt, Unified SU(4) theory for the RD(*) and RK(*) anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 101, 015026 (2020).
  100. J. Fuentes-Martín and P. Stangl, Third-family quark-lepton unification with a fundamental composite Higgs, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135953 (2020).
  101. D. Guadagnoli, M. Reboud, and P. Stangl, The dark side of 4321, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 084.
  102. M. J. Dolan, T. P. Dutka, and R. R. Volkas, Lowering the scale of Pati-Salam breaking through seesaw mixing, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 199.
  103. S. Iguro, J. Kawamura, S. Okawa, and Y. Omura, TeV-scale vector leptoquark from Pati-Salam unification with vectorlike families, Phys. Rev. D 104, 075008 (2021).
  104. S. F. King, Twin Pati-Salam theory of flavour with a TeV scale vector leptoquark, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 161.
  105. S. Iguro, J. Kawamura, S. Okawa, and Y. Omura, Importance of vector leptoquark-scalar box diagrams in Pati-Salam unification with vector-like families, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 022.
  106. M. Fernández Navarro and S. F. King, B-anomalies in a twin Pati-Salam theory of flavour including the 2022 LHCb RK(*) analysis, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 188.
  107. J. Fuentes-Martín, G. Isidori, M. König, and N. Selimović, Vector leptoquarks beyond tree level III: Vector-like fermions and flavor-changing transitions, Phys. Rev. D 102, 115015 (2020).
  108. O. L. Crosas, G. Isidori, J. M. Lizana, N. Selimovic, and B. A. Stefanek, Flavor non-universal vector leptoquark imprints in K→πνν− and ΔF=2 transitions, Phys. Lett. B 835, 137525 (2022).
  109. C. Cornella, D. A. Faroughy, J. Fuentes-Martin, G. Isidori, and M. Neubert, Reading the footprints of the B-meson flavor anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2021) 050.
  110. B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, and J. Matias, Searching for new physics with b→sτ+τ− processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 181802 (2018).
  111. S. Iguro and T. Kitahara, Electric dipole moments as probes of the RD(*) anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 110, 075008 (2024).
  112. G. Finauri and P. Gambino, The q2 moments in inclusive semileptonic B decays, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 206.
  113. G. Martinelli, S. Simula, and L. Vittorio, Updates on the determination of |Vcb|,R(D*) and |Vub|/|Vcb|, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 400 (2024).
  114. M. Bordone and A. Juttner, New strategies for probing B→D*ℓν¯ℓ lattice and experimental data, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 129 (2025).
  115. UTfit Collaboration, New utfit analysis of the unitarity triangle in the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa scheme, Rend. Lincei Sci. Fis. Nat. 34, 37 (2023).
  116. UTfit Collaboration, Updates on unitarity triangle fits, https://indico.cern.ch/event/1291157/contributions/5903548/.
  117. Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG) Collaboration, FLAG review 2024, arXiv:2411.04268.
  118. X. Zuo et al., Prospects for Bc+ and B+→τ+ντ at FCC-ee, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 87 (2024).
  119. Belle-II Collaboration, Measurement of B+→τ+ντ branching fraction with a hadronic tagging method at Belle II, Phys. Rev. D 112, 072002 (2025).
  120. Belle II Collaboration, Recent updates and future prospects of the belle II experiment, https://conference-indico.kek.jp/event/278/contributions/6384/.
  121. W.-F. Duan, S. Iguro, X.-Q. Li, R. Watanabe, and Y.-D. Yang, Sum rules for semi-leptonic b→c and b→u decays: accuracy checks and implications, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 166.
  122. F. Mahmoudi, T. Hurth, and S. Neshatpour, Global flavour fits to rare B decay observables, Proc. Sci., BEAUTY2023 (2024) 045.
  123. M. Ciuchini et al., Constraints on lepton universality violation from rare B decays, Phys. Rev. D 107, 055036 (2023).
  124. M. Bona et al., Unitarity triangle global fits beyond the standard model: UTfit 2021 NP update, Proc. Sci., EPS-HEP2021 (2022) 500.
  125. S. Iguro, T. Kitahara, Y. Omura, R. Watanabe, and K. Yamamoto, D* polarization vs. RD(*) anomalies in the leptoquark models, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 194.
  126. A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, and J. M. Roney, Toward testing the magnetic moment of the tau at one part per million, Phys. Rev. D 106, 093007 (2022).
  127. W. Dekens, J. de Vries, M. Jung, and K. K. Vos, The phenomenology of electric dipole moments in models of scalar leptoquarks, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 069.
  128. A. Crivellin and F. Saturnino, Correlating tauonic B decays with the neutron electric dipole moment via a scalar leptoquark, Phys. Rev. D 100, 115014 (2019).
  129. C. Alexandrou et al., Nucleon axial, tensor, and scalar charges and σ-terms in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 102, 054517 (2020).
  130. L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, F. Jaffredo, O. Sumensari, and F. Wilsch, highpt: A tool for high-pT Drell-Yan tails beyond the standard model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 289, 108749 (2023).
  131. E. Coluccio Leskow, G. D’Ambrosio, A. Crivellin, and D. Müller, (g−2)μ, lepton flavor violation, and Z decays with leptoquarks: Correlations and future prospects, Phys. Rev. D 95, 055018 (2017).
  132. E. Kou and P. Urquijo, The Belle II physics book, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 123C01 (2019); 2020, 029201(E) (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation