- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Phenomenology of secluded dark matter in three minimal BSM scenarios

Mattia Di Mauro1,* and Yanhan Wang2,†

  • *Contact author: dimauro.mattia@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: yanhan_wang@brown.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 113, 075003 – Published 1 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/44ls-ss78

Abstract

We present a comprehensive study of secluded dark matter (DM) χ, where the relic abundance is set by annihilations into lighter dark mediators ϕ that couple only feebly to the Standard Model (SM). In contrast to canonical weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), which are now strongly constrained by direct and indirect searches, secluded models still achieve the observed relic abundance via thermal freeze-out into hidden-sector mediators, while predicting highly suppressed present-day signals. We analyze three minimal models: (i) a U(1)X gauge boson (A′) with kinetic mixing; (ii) a scalar DM candidate S with a scalar mediator K that has a trilinear vertex; and (iii) a Dirac fermion χ whose mass arises from a Higgs–mixed singlet Hp. For each model we derive annihilation and scattering rates in both WIMP-like and secluded regimes, and solve the Boltzmann equations: a single-species equation for the WIMP case and a coupled χ−ϕ system for the secluded case to account for possible early departure of the mediator from thermal equilibrium with the SM bath. In this regard, we provide explicit lower limits on the portal coupling ε required to keep the mediator in thermal equilibrium with the SM bath and to ensure mediator decay before big bang nucleosynthesis. We show that for portal couplings ε≪10−3 the relic density is dominantly controlled by DM annihilation into mediator pairs, while spin-independent scattering lies well below current limits and remains viable even for future experiments approaching the irreducible neutrino background floor. Indirect constraints are typically weak due to p-wave suppression, off-resonance s-channels, and cascade spectra controlled by ε2. Finally, we highlight the most promising collider tests, which remain sensitive despite tiny portal couplings.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (90)

  1. J. Silk et al., Particle Dark Matter: Observations, Models and Searches (Cambridge Universe Press, Cambridge, England, 2010).
  2. Gianfranco Bertone and Dan Hooper, History of dark matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045002 (2018).
  3. Marco Cirelli, Alessandro Strumia, and Jure Zupan, Dark matter, arXiv:2406.01705.
  4. N. Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  5. Douglas Clowe, Marusa Bradac, Anthony H. Gonzalez, Maxim Markevitch, Scott W. Randall, Christine Jones, and Dennis Zaritsky, A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter, Astrophys. J. Lett. 648, L109 (2006).
  6. Gianfranco Bertone, Dan Hooper, and Joseph Silk, Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rep. 405, 279 (2005).
  7. Benjamin W. Lee and Steven Weinberg, Cosmological lower bound on heavy neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 165 (1977).
  8. J. E. Gunn, B. W. Lee, I. Lerche, D. N. Schramm, and G. Steigman, Some astrophysical consequences of the existence of a heavy stable neutral lepton, Astrophys. J. 223, 1015 (1978).
  9. J. Wess and B. Zumino, Supergauge transformations in four dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B70, 39 (1974).
  10. H. Goldberg, Constraint on the photino mass from cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1419 (1983).
  11. John R. Ellis, J. S. Hagelin, Dimitri V. Nanopoulos, Keith A. Olive, and M. Srednicki, Supersymmetric relics from the big bang, Nucl. Phys. B238, 453 (1984).
  12. Gary Steigman and Michael S. Turner, Cosmological constraints on the properties of weakly interacting massive particles, Nucl. Phys. B253, 375 (1985).
  13. Marc Schumann, Direct detection of WIMP dark matter: Concepts and status, J. Phys. G 46, 103003 (2019).
  14. Antonio Boveia and Caterina Doglioni, Dark matter searches at colliders, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68, 429 (2018).
  15. Jennifer M. Gaskins, A review of indirect searches for particle dark matter, Contemp. Phys. 57, 496 (2016).
  16. N. Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, arXiv:1807.06209.
  17. J. Aalbers et al., First dark matter search results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023).
  18. E. Aprile et al., First dark matter search with nuclear recoils from the XENONnT experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041003 (2023).
  19. J. Aalbers et al., Dark matter search results from 4.2 tonne-years of exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011802 (2025).
  20. Giorgio Arcadi, Maíra Dutra, Pradipta Ghosh, Manfred Lindner, Yann Mambrini, Mathias Pierre, Stefano Profumo, and Farinaldo S. Queiroz, The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 203 (2018).
  21. Giorgio Arcadi, Abdelhak Djouadi, and Martti Raidal, Dark matter through the Higgs portal, Phys. Rep. 842, 1 (2020).
  22. Mattia Di Mauro, Chiara Arina, Nicolao Fornengo, Jan Heisig, and Daniele Massaro. Dark matter in the Higgs resonance region, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095008 (2023).
  23. Giorgio Arcadi, David Cabo-Almeida, Maíra Dutra, Pradipta Ghosh, Manfred Lindner, Yann Mambrini, Jacinto P. Neto, Mathias Pierre, Stefano Profumo, and Farinaldo S. Queiroz, The waning of the WIMP: Endgame? arXiv:2403.15860.
  24. Mattia Di Mauro and Bohan Xie, Dark matter simplified models in the resonance region, arXiv:2510.08677.
  25. J. Aalbers et al., DARWIN: Towards the ultimate dark matter detector, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2016) 017.
  26. Maxim Pospelov, Adam Ritz, and Mikhail B. Voloshin, Secluded WIMP dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 662, 53 (2008).
  27. Maxim Pospelov and Adam Ritz, Astrophysical signatures of secluded dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 671, 391 (2009).
  28. Masahiro Kawasaki, Kazunori Kohri, Takeo Moroi, and Yoshitaro Takaesu, Revisiting big-bang nucleosynthesis constraints on long-lived decaying particles, Phys. Rev. D 97, 023502 (2018).
  29. Alex McDaniel, Marco Ajello, Christopher M. Karwin, Mattia Di Mauro, Alex Drlica-Wagner, and Miguel A. Sánchez-Conde, Legacy analysis of dark matter annihilation from the Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies with 14 years of Fermi-LAT data, Phys. Rev. D 109, 063024 (2024).
  30. Yu-Hang Su, Chengfeng Cai, and Hong-Hao Zhang, Constraining secluded and catalyzed-annihilation dark matter models with Fermi-LAT and Planck data, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075013 (2025).
  31. Clara Xu, Wenzer Qin, and Tracy R. Slatyer, CMB limits on decaying dark matter beyond the ionization threshold, Phys. Rev. D 110, 123529 (2024).
  32. Bob Holdom, Two U(1)’s and epsilon charge shifts, Phys. Lett. 166B, 196 (1986).
  33. Rouven Essig et al., Working group report: New light weakly coupled particles, 2013, https://inspirehep.net/literature/1263039.
  34. Jordan Koechler and Mattia Di Mauro, Leptophilic dark matter in U(1)Li−Lj models: A solution to the Fermi-LAT Galactic Center Excess consistent with cosmological and laboratory observations, arXiv:2508.02775.
  35. Roel Aaij et al., Search for dark photons produced in 13 TeV pp collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 061801 (2018).
  36. Martin Bauer, Patrick Foldenauer, and Joerg Jaeckel, Hunting all the hidden photons, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 094.
  37. Chiara Arina, Impact of cosmological and astrophysical constraints on dark matter simplified models, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 5, 30 (2018).
  38. V. Silveira and A. Zee, Scalar phantoms, Phys. Lett. 161B, 136 (1985).
  39. John McDonald, Gauge singlet scalars as cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3637 (1994).
  40. C. P. Burgess, M. Pospelov, and T. ter Veldhuis, The minimal model of nonbaryonic dark matter: A singlet scalar, Nucl. Phys. B619, 709 (2001).
  41. Seungwon Baek, P. Ko, and Wan-Il Park, Search for the Higgs portal to a singlet fermionic dark matter at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2012) 047.
  42. B. Kors and P. Nath, A Stueckelberg extension of the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 586, 366 (2004).
  43. D. Feldman, B. Kors, and P. Nath, Extra-weakly interacting dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 75, 023503 (2007).
  44. H. Ruegg and M. Ruiz-Altaba, The Stueckelberg field, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19, 3265 (2004).
  45. Edward W. Kolb and Michael S. Turner, The Early Universe (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1990), Vol. 69.
  46. Joakim Edsjo and Paolo Gondolo, Neutralino relic density including coannihilations, Phys. Rev. D 56, 1879 (1997).
  47. Tobias Binder, Torsten Bringmann, Michael Gustafsson, and Andrzej Hryczuk, Early kinetic decoupling of dark matter: when the standard way of calculating the thermal relic density fails, Phys. Rev. D 96, 115010 (2017); 101, 099901(E) (2020).
  48. Paolo Gondolo and Graciela Gelmini, Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis, Nucl. Phys. B360, 145 (1991).
  49. Edward W. Kolb and Michael S. Turner, The Early Universe (Addison-Wesley, Reading MA, 1990).
  50. Gary Steigman, Basudeb Dasgupta, and John F. Beacom, Precise relic WIMP abundance and its impact on searches for dark matter annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 86, 023506 (2012).
  51. Torsten Bringmann, Paul Frederik Depta, Marco Hufnagel, and Kai Schmidt-Hoberg, Precise dark matter relic abundance in decoupled sectors, Phys. Lett. B 817, 136341 (2021).
  52. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, micromegas 2.0: A program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176, 367 (2007).
  53. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, micromegas_3: A program for calculating dark matter observables, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 960 (2014).
  54. D. Barducci, G. Belanger, J. Bernon, F. Boudjema, J. Da Silva, S. Kraml, U. Laa, and A. Pukhov, Collider limits on new physics within micromegas_4.3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 222, 327 (2018).
  55. Geneviève Bélanger, Fawzi Boudjema, Andreas Goudelis, Alexander Pukhov, and Bryan Zaldivar, micromegas5.0: Freeze-in, Comput. Phys. Commun. 231, 173 (2018).
  56. Celine Degrande, Claude Duhr, Benjamin Fuks, David Grellscheid, Olivier Mattelaer, and Thomas Reiter, UFO—The Universal feynrules Output, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 1201 (2012).
  57. Alexander Belyaev, Neil D. Christensen, and Alexander Pukhov, calchep 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the standard model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1729 (2013).
  58. Adam Alloul, Neil D. Christensen, Céline Degrande, Claude Duhr, and Benjamin Fuks, feynrules 2.0—A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2250 (2014).
  59. Mihailo Backovic, Kyoungchul Kong, and Mathew McCaskey, maddm v.1.0: Computation of dark matter relic abundance using MadGraph5, Phys. Dark Universe 5–6, 18 (2014).
  60. Federico Ambrogi, Chiara Arina, Mihailo Backovic, Jan Heisig, Fabio Maltoni, Luca Mantani, Olivier Mattelaer, and Gopolang Mohlabeng, maddm v.3.0: A comprehensive tool for dark matter studies, Phys. Dark Universe 24, 100249 (2019).
  61. Chiara Arina, Jan Heisig, Fabio Maltoni, Daniele Massaro, and Olivier Mattelaer. Indirect dark-matter detection with maddm v3.2—lines and loops, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 241 (2023).
  62. Chiara Arina, Mattia Di Mauro, Nicolao Fornengo, Jan Heisig, Adil Jueid, and Roberto Ruiz de Austri, CosmiXs: Cosmic messenger spectra for indirect dark matter searches, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2024) 035.
  63. Mattia Di Mauro, Nicolao Fornengo, Adil Jueid, Roberto Ruiz de Austri, and Francesca Bellini, Nailing down the theoretical uncertainties of D¯ spectrum produced from dark matter, arXiv:2411.04815.
  64. G. Alguero, G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, S. Chakraborti, A. Goudelis, S. Kraml, A. Mjallal, and A. Pukhov, micromegas 6.0: N-component dark matter, Comput. Phys. Commun. 299, 109133 (2024).
  65. S. Cassel. Sommerfeld, factor for arbitrary partial wave processes, J. Phys. G 37, 105009 (2010).
  66. Jonathan L. Feng, Manoj Kaplinghat, and Hai-Bo Yu, Sommerfeld enhancements for thermal relic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 82, 083525 (2010).
  67. Haipeng An, Mark B. Wise, and Yue Zhang, Effects of bound states on dark matter annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 93, 115020 (2016).
  68. Andrea Mitridate, Michele Redi, Juri Smirnov, and Alessandro Strumia, Cosmological implications of dark matter bound states, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2017) 006.
  69. Benedict von Harling and Kalliopi Petraki, Bound-state formation for thermal relic dark matter and unitarity, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2014) 033.
  70. Juliette Alimena et al., Searching for long-lived particles beyond the standard model at the large hadron collider, J. Phys. G 47, 090501 (2020).
  71. Jonathan L. Feng et al., The forward search experiment at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 99, 095011 (2019).
  72. David Curtin et al., Long-lived particles at the energy frontier: The MATHUSLA physics case. Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 116201 (2019).
  73. David Curtin, Rouven Essig, Stefania Gori, and Jessie Shelton, Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 90, 075004 (2014).
  74. S. Abrahamyan et al., Search for a new gauge boson in electron-nucleus fixed-target scattering by the APEX experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 191804 (2011).
  75. HPS Collaboration, Search for a heavy photon decaying to electron-positron pairs, Phys. Rev. D 100, 112004 (2019).
  76. T. Åkesson et al., Light dark matter experiment (LDMX), arXiv:1808.05219.
  77. D. Banerjee et al., Search for invisible decays of sub-GeV dark photons in missing-energy events at the CERN SPS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 011802 (2017).
  78. M. Anelli et al., A facility to search for hidden particles (ship) at the CERN SPS, arXiv:1504.04956.
  79. E. Kou and others (Belle II Collaboration), The Belle II physics book, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 123C01 (2019).
  80. Tania Robens and Tim Stefaniak, Status of the Higgs singlet extension of the standard model after LHC run 1. Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 104 (2015).
  81. M. Cepeda et al., Report from Working Group 2: Higgs Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7, 221 (2019).
  82. Sean Tulin and Hai-Bo Yu, Dark matter self-interactions and small scale structure, Phys. Rep. 730, 1 (2018).
  83. S. Vegetti and L. V. E. Koopmans, Bayesian strong gravitational-lens modelling on adaptive grids: Objective detection of mass substructure in galaxies, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 392, 945 (2009).
  84. Chiara Caprini et al., Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: An update, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2020) 024.
  85. Pau Amaro-Seoane et al., Laser interferometer space antenna, arXiv:1702.00786.
  86. Tracy R. Slatyer, Indirect detection of dark matter, arXiv:2109.02696.
  87. Jens Chluba and Rashid A. Sunyaev, The evolution of μ-type distortions in the cosmic microwave background, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 419, 1294 (2012).
  88. Jens Chluba, Green’s function of the cosmological thermalization problem, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 434, 352 (2013).
  89. A. Kogut et al., The primordial inflation explorer (PIXIE): A nulling polarimeter for cosmic microwave background observations, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2011) 025.
  90. Philippe Andr’e et al., Prism (polarized radiation imaging and spectroscopy mission): An extended white paper, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2014) 006.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 113, 075003– Published 1 April, 2026
  • Received 3 November 2025
  • Accepted 26 February 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation