Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Universality of pseudoentropy for deformed spheres in dS/CFT

Giorgos Anastasiou1, Ignacio J. Araya2, Avijit Das3,4, and Javier Moreno5,6

  • 1Departamento de Ciencias, Facultad de Artes Liberales, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Avenida Diagonal Las Torres 2640, 7941169, Peñalolén, Chile
  • 2Departamento de Física y Astronomía, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Andres Bello, Sazié 2212, Piso 7, Santiago, Chile
  • 3Instituto de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Arturo Prat, Avenida Playa Brava 3256, 1111346, Iquique, Chile
  • 4Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Arturo Prat, Avenida Arturo Prat Chacón 2120, 1110939, Iquique, Chile
  • 5Center for Gravitational Physics and Quantum Information, Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa Oiwakecho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
  • 6Departament de Física Quàntica i Astrofísica, Institut de Ciències del Cosmos, Universitat de Barcelona, Martí i Franquès 1, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain

Phys. Rev. D 113, L121903 – Published 9 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/432s-d9j8

Abstract

We determine the universal part of pseudoentropy for small shape deformations of spherical entangling surfaces in the context of de Sitter/conformal field theory (dS/CFT) correspondence. The leading correction at quadratic order in the deformation parameter is controlled by the analytic continuation of the coefficient of the two-point stress-energy tensor correlator in AdS/CFT (i.e., L⋆|AdS→−i L⋆|dS), thereby establishing the sphere as a local extremum. The same structure holds in higher-curvature theories, as we check explicitly for quadratic curvature gravity, suggesting a universal behavior across nonunitary holographic CFTs. Our findings extend the Mezei formula to the dS/CFT setting and indicate that the shape dependence of pseudoentropy in dS holography resembles that of entanglement entropy in AdS space. Thus, we conjecture this coefficient to be the CT for the nonunitary CFT dual.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (83)

  1. L. Bombelli, R. K. Koul, J. Lee, and R. D. Sorkin, Phys. Rev. D 34, 373 (1986).
  2. M. Srednicki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 666 (1993).
  3. P. Calabrese and J. L. Cardy, J. Stat. Mech. (2004) P06002.
  4. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 181602 (2006).
  5. M. Van Raamsdonk, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 42, 2323 (2010).
  6. A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2013) 090.
  7. Y. Nakata, T. Takayanagi, Y. Taki, K. Tamaoka, and Z. Wei, Phys. Rev. D 103, 026005 (2021).
  8. K. Doi, J. Harper, A. Mollabashi, T. Takayanagi, and Y. Taki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 031601 (2023).
  9. K. Doi, J. Harper, A. Mollabashi, T. Takayanagi, and Y. Taki, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 052.
  10. R. Couvreur, J. L. Jacobsen, and H. Saleur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 040601 (2017).
  11. L. Herviou, N. Regnault, and J. H. Bardarson, SciPost Phys. 7, 069 (2019).
  12. P.-Y. Chang, J.-S. You, X. Wen, and S. Ryu, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033069 (2020).
  13. C.-M. Jian, B. Bauer, A. Keselman, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Phys. Rev. B 106, 134206 (2022).
  14. A. Strominger, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2001) 034.
  15. E. Witten, in Strings 2001: International Conference (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0106109.
  16. J. M. Maldacena, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2003) 013.
  17. J. M. Maldacena, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999); Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
  18. S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B 428, 105 (1998).
  19. E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998).
  20. D. Anninos, T. Hartman, and A. Strominger, Classical Quantum Gravity 34, 015009 (2017).
  21. A. Mollabashi, N. Shiba, T. Takayanagi, K. Tamaoka, and Z. Wei, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033254 (2021).
  22. Y. Hikida, T. Nishioka, T. Takayanagi, and Y. Taki, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2022) 129.
  23. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2006) 045.
  24. T. Nishioka, S. Ryu, and T. Takayanagi, J. Phys. A 42, 504008 (2009).
  25. Additionally, the recently proposed timelike entanglement entropy, defined for timelike-separated regions in Lorentzian field theories, can also take complex values and is naturally interpreted as a pseudoentropy [8, 9, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30].

  26. M. P. Heller, F. Ori, and A. Serantes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 131601 (2025).
  27. A. Das, S. Sachdeva, and D. Sarkar, Phys. Rev. D 109, 066007 (2024).
  28. K. Narayan and H. K. Saini, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 499 (2024).
  29. B. Liu, H. Chen, and B. Lian, Phys. Rev. B 110, 144306 (2024).
  30. K. Narayan, Phys. Rev. D 107, 126004 (2023).
  31. F. Sanches and S. J. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 94, 084034 (2016).
  32. C. Arias, F. Diaz, and P. Sundell, Classical Quantum Gravity 37, 015009 (2020).
  33. S.-M. Ruan and Y.-k. Suzuki, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2026) 044.
  34. The compact Euclidean direction tE∈[0,π] serves as one of the angular coordinates on the global boundary Sd. It arises from performing Wick rotation on the Lorentzian time t in the AdS formulation.

  35. The mixed nature of the bulk manifold is a consequence of the Hartle-Hawking geometry associated with the “no-boundary proposal” in dS/CFT holography [14, 16].

  36. H. Osborn and A. C. Petkou, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 231, 311 (1994).
  37. Throughout this Letter we use: (i) α, β, γ, δ for indices in the conformal field theory, (ii) μ, ν, ρ, σ as indices for the dual gravity theory, and (iii) a, b for the codimension-two surface ΣA and i, j for normal directions to ΣA.

  38. H. Osborn and A. Stergiou, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2016) 079.
  39. M. Flohr, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18, 4497 (2003).
  40. A. Buchel, J. Escobedo, R. C. Myers, M. F. Paulos, A. Sinha, and M. Smolkin, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2009) 111.
  41. R. C. Myers, M. F. Paulos, and A. Sinha, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2010) 035.
  42. A. Allais and M. Mezei, Phys. Rev. D 91, 046002 (2015).
  43. M. Mezei, Phys. Rev. D 91, 045038 (2015).
  44. The piecewise construction is not generically valid in higher dimensions or for arbitrary subsystems; in particular, it can fail for strip-like regions even in AdS [9]. However, for spherical subregions, it provides a consistent representative of the relevant saddle in pure dS [9, 45]. We posit that this is still the case for small deformations thereof.

  45. K. Narayan (unpublished).
  46. Notice that the extrinsic curvature along the θ direction vanishes identically, Kθab=haμhbθ∇μnθθ=0 since, for any value of b, hbθ=0.

  47. In the case of the undeformed sphere, the second junction (regularity) condition is unnecessary, since the final pseudoentropy is independent of the coefficient that would otherwise remain undetermined by this additional requirement [9].

  48. W. Israel, Nuovo Cimento B 44, 1 (1966); 48, 463(E) (1967).
  49. The surface takes on a geometry reminiscent of a shuttlecock, with ℓ corresponding to the number of feathers in its skirt.

  50. T. Faulkner, R. G. Leigh, and O. Parrikar, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2015) 088.
  51. A. Ghodsi, B. Khavari, and A. Naseh, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2014) 137.
  52. J. Maldacena (unpublished).
  53. A. Hell, D. Lust, and G. Zoupanos, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 168.
  54. K. K. Nanda, K. Narayan, S. Porey, and G. Yadav, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2025) 095.
  55. X. Dong, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2013) 044.
  56. J. Camps, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2013) 070.
  57. While, for generic entangling surfaces, cubic curvature invariants are affected by the splitting problem [58, 59, 60], which introduces ambiguities in the regularization of the conical singularity—and hence in the resulting holographic entropy functional, this issue does not arise at the perturbative level [55, 56, 61, 62, 63].

  58. R.-X. Miao, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2015) 049.
  59. R.-X. Miao and W.-z. Guo, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2014) 031.
  60. J. Camps and W. R. Kelly, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2014) 061.
  61. D. V. Fursaev, A. Patrushev, and S. N. Solodukhin, Phys. Rev. D 88, 044054 (2013).
  62. P. Bueno, J. Camps, and A. V. López, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 145.
  63. G. Anastasiou, I. J. Araya, J. Moreno, R. Olea, and D. Rivera-Betancour, Phys. Rev. D 104, 086003 (2021).
  64. G. Anastasiou, M. Bravo, and R. Olea, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2025) 093.
  65. K. Doi, N. Ogawa, K. Shinmyo, Y.-k. Suzuki, and T. Takayanagi, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 093.
  66. K. Fujiki, M. Kohara, K. Shinmyo, Y.-k. Suzuki, and T. Takayanagi, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2026) 072.
  67. P. Fonda, D. Seminara, and E. Tonni, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2015) 037.
  68. G. Anastasiou, J. Moreno, R. Olea, and D. Rivera-Betancour, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 173.
  69. P. Bueno, H. Casini, O. L. Andino, and J. Moreno, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 179.
  70. J. S. Dowker, arXiv:1012.1548.
  71. H. Casini, M. Huerta, and R. C. Myers, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2011) 036.
  72. P. Bueno, H. Casini, O. L. Andino, and J. Moreno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 171601 (2023).
  73. P. Bueno, A. F. García, F. Gentile, O. Lasso Andino, and J. Moreno (unpublished).
  74. G. Anastasiou, I. J. Araya, A. Argandoña, and R. Olea, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 031.
  75. P. Bueno and W. Witczak-Krempa, Phys. Rev. B 93, 045131 (2016).
  76. Z. Chen, arXiv:2302.14303.
  77. W.-z. Guo, S. He, and Y.-X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 112, 086020 (2025).
  78. S. Grieninger, K. Ikeda, and D. E. Kharzeev, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 030.
  79. X. Jiang, P. Wang, H. Wu, and H. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 108, 046004 (2023).
  80. Z. Li, Z.-Q. Xiao, and R.-Q. Yang, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2022) 004.
  81. G. Anastasiou, I. J. Araya, A. Das, and J. Moreno (unpublished).
  82. G. Anastasiou, I. J. Araya, and R. Olea, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 123.
  83. G. Anastasiou, I. J. Araya, P. Bueno, J. Moreno, R. Olea, and A. Vilar Lopez, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 081.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation