Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Cosmological signature and light dark matter in Dirac Lμ−Lτ model

Pritam Das*

  • *Contact author: prtmdas9@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 114, 075016 – Published 14 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3vg5-y65n

Abstract

We revisit an anomaly-free extension of the Standard Model viz. the gauged Lμ−Lτ model in the Dirac framework, where the local U(1)Lμ−Lτ symmetry breaks and gives rise to a new gauge boson Z′ and corresponding gauge coupling gμτ. Three additional heavy vectorlike fermions, three light right-handed neutrinos and two heavy singlet scalars are added to complete the model framework for Dirac neutrinos. Another singlet vectorlike fermion is added with a new gauge charge, which serves as a viable dark matter (DM) candidate, and the correct relic abundance is obtained via the resonance effect. The resonance effect triggers early kinetic decoupling of the DM candidate, which significantly influences the cosmological sector of this study. The parameter space is considered after satisfying the current bounds on MZ′ and the gauge coupling gμτ. The influence of dark radiations coming from the additional light degrees of freedoms are studied in connection with the dark matter. After imposing the relevant theoretical and experimental constraints, the viable parameter space is found to be significantly restricted while remaining accessible to ongoing and near-future experiments. The framework provides a consistent setting in which neutrino masses, dark matter, and cosmological observables can be studied simultaneously. In particular, we identify viable regions of the parameter space that satisfy the constraints from neutrino masses, dark matter relic abundance, and cosmological observables.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (113)

  1. G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor, T. Pinto, O. Pisanti, and P. D. Serpico, Relic neutrino decoupling including flavor oscillations, Nucl. Phys. B729, 221 (2005).
  2. E. Grohs, G. M. Fuller, C. T. Kishimoto, M. W. Paris, and A. Vlasenko, Neutrino energy transport in weak decoupling and big bang nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. D 93, 083522 (2016).
  3. P. F. de Salas and S. Pastor, Relic neutrino decoupling with flavour oscillations revisited, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2016) 051.
  4. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020). 652, C4(E) (2021).
  5. R. H. Cyburt, B. D. Fields, K. A. Olive, and T.-H. Yeh, Big bang nucleosynthesis: 2015, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015004 (2016).
  6. K. Abazajian et al., CMB-S4 science case, reference design, and project plan, arXiv:1907.04473.
  7. D. Nanda and D. Borah, Connecting light Dirac neutrinos to a multi-component dark matter scenario in gauged B−L model, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 557 (2020).
  8. S.-P. Li, X.-Q. Li, X.-S. Yan, and Y.-D. Yang, Cosmological imprints of Dirac neutrinos in a keV-vacuum 2HDM*, Chin. Phys. C 47, 043109 (2023).
  9. K. N. Abazajian and J. Heeck, Observing Dirac neutrinos in the cosmic microwave background, Phys. Rev. D 100, 075027 (2019).
  10. P. Fileviez Pérez, C. Murgui, and A. D. Plascencia, Neutrino-dark matter connections in gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 100, 035041 (2019).
  11. C. Han, M. L. López-Ibáñez, B. Peng, and J. M. Yang, Dirac dark matter in U(1)B−L with the Stueckelberg mechanism, Nucl. Phys. B959, 115154 (2020).
  12. X. Luo, W. Rodejohann, and X.-J. Xu, Dirac neutrinos and Neff, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2020) 058.
  13. P. Adshead, Y. Cui, A. J. Long, and M. Shamma, Unraveling the Dirac neutrino with cosmological and terrestrial detectors, Phys. Lett. B 823, 136736 (2021).
  14. X. Luo, W. Rodejohann, and X.-J. Xu, Dirac neutrinos and Neff. Part II. The freeze-in case, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2021) 082.
  15. D. Mahanta and D. Borah, Low scale Dirac leptogenesis and dark matter with observable ΔNeff, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 495 (2022).
  16. A. Biswas, D. Borah, and D. Nanda, Light Dirac neutrino portal dark matter with observable ΔNeff, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2021) 002.
  17. D. Borah, S. Mahapatra, D. Nanda, and N. Sahu, Type II Dirac seesaw with observable ΔNeff in the light of W-mass anomaly, Phys. Lett. B 833, 137297 (2022).
  18. D. Borah, A. Dasgupta, C. Majumdar, and D. Nanda, Observing left-right symmetry in the cosmic microwave background, Phys. Rev. D 102, 035025 (2020).
  19. A. Biswas, D. K. Ghosh, and D. Nanda, Concealing Dirac neutrinos from cosmic microwave background, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2022) 006.
  20. A. Biswas, D. Borah, N. Das, and D. Nanda, Freeze-in dark matter via a light Dirac neutrino portal, Phys. Rev. D 107, 015015 (2023).
  21. D. Borah, P. Das, and D. Nanda, Observable ΔNeff in Dirac scotogenic model, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 140 (2024).
  22. D. P. Aguillard et al. (Muon g−2 Collaboration), Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 127 ppb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 101802 (2025).
  23. R. Aliberti et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the standard model: An update, Phys. Rep. 1143, 1 (2025).
  24. L. Di Luzio, A. Keshavarzi, A. Masiero, and P. Paradisi, Model-independent tests of the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g−2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011902 (2025).
  25. D. W. Hertzog and M. Hoferichter, The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon: Status and perspectives, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 76, 343 (2026).
  26. M. Hoferichter, J. Lüdtke, L. Naterop, M. Procura, and P. Stoffer, Improved evaluation of the electroweak contribution to muon g−2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 201801 (2025).
  27. S. Kuberski, M. Cè, G. von Hippel, H. B. Meyer, K. Ottnad, A. Risch, and H. Wittig, Hadronic vacuum polarization in the muon g−2: The short-distance contribution from lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 172.
  28. G. Arcadi, L. Calibbi, M. Fedele, and F. Mescia, Muon g−2 and B-anomalies from dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 061802 (2021).
  29. B. Zhu and X. Liu, Probing the flavor-specific scalar mediator for the muon (g−2) deviation, the proton radius puzzle and the light dark matter production, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 65, 231011 (2022).
  30. X.-F. Han, T. Li, H.-X. Wang, L. Wang, and Y. Zhang, Lepton-specific inert two-Higgs-doublet model confronted with the new results for muon and electron g−2 anomaly and multi-lepton searches at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 104, 115001 (2021).
  31. S. Baum, M. Carena, N. R. Shah, and C. E. M. Wagner, The Tiny (g−2) Muon Wobble from Small-μ Supersymmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2022) 025.
  32. Y. Bai and J. Berger, Muon g−2 in lepton portal dark matter, arXiv:2104.03301.
  33. P. Das, M. Kumar Das, and N. Khan, The FIMP-WIMP dark matter and muon g−2 in the extended singlet scalar model, Nucl. Phys. B975, 115677 (2022).
  34. C.-T. Lu, R. Ramos, and Y.-L. Sming Tsai, Shedding light on dark matter with recent muon g−2 and Higgs exotic decay measurements, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2021) 073.
  35. S.-F. Ge, X.-D. Ma, and P. Pasquini, Probing the dark axion portal with muon anomalous magnetic moment, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 787 (2021).
  36. V. Brdar, S. Jana, J. Kubo, and M. Lindner, Semi-secretly interacting ALP as an explanation of Fermilab muon g−2 measurement, Phys. Lett. B 820, 136529 (2021).
  37. M. A. Buen-Abad, J. Fan, M. Reece, and C. Sun, Challenges for an axion explanation of the muon g−2 measurement, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 101.
  38. L. Zu, X. Pan, L. Feng, Q. Yuan, and Y.-Z. Fan, Constraining U(1)Lμ−Lτ charged dark matter model for muon g−2 anomaly with AMS-02 electron and positron data, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2022) 028.
  39. D. W. P. Amaral, D. G. Cerdeño, A. Cheek, and P. Foldenauer, Distinguishing U(1)Lμ−Lτ from U(1)Lμ as a solution for (g−2)μ with neutrinos, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 861 (2021).
  40. J. Heeck, Unbroken B−L symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 739, 256 (2014).
  41. M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, S. Iwamoto, and T. Kitahara, Supersymmetric Interpretation of the Muon g−2 Anomaly, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 075.
  42. W. Ahmed, I. Khan, J. Li, T. Li, S. Raza, and W. Zhang, The natural explanation of the muon anomalous magnetic moment via the electroweak supersymmetry from the GmSUGRA in the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 827, 136879 (2022).
  43. A. Greljo, P. Stangl, A. E. Thomsen, and J. Zupan, On (g−2)μ from gauged U(1)X, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 098.
  44. M. Abdughani, Y.-Z. Fan, L. Feng, Y.-L. Sming Tsai, L. Wu, and Q. Yuan, A common origin of muon g−2 anomaly, galaxy center GeV excess and AMS-02 anti-proton excess in the NMSSM, Sci. Bull. 66, 2170 (2021).
  45. M. Van Beekveld, W. Beenakker, M. Schutten, and J. De Wit, Dark matter, fine-tuning and (g−2)μ in the pMSSM, SciPost Phys. 11, 049 (2021).
  46. P. Cox, C. Han, and T. T. Yanagida, Muon g−2 and co-annihilating dark matter in the MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 104, 075035 (2021).
  47. F. Wang, L. Wu, Y. Xiao, J. M. Yang, and Y. Zhang, GUT-scale constrained SUSY in light of E989 muon g−2 measurement, Nucl. Phys. B970, 115486 (2021).
  48. Y. Gu, N. Liu, L. Su, and D. Wang, Heavy bino and slepton for muon g−2 anomaly, Nucl. Phys. B969, 115481 (2021).
  49. J. Cao, J. Lian, Y. Pan, D. Zhang, and P. Zhu, Imporved (g−2)μ Measurement and Singlino dark matter in the general NMSSM, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 175.
  50. W. Yin, Muon g−2 anomaly in anomaly mediation, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 029.
  51. C. Han, Muon g−2 and CP violation in MSSM, arXiv:2104.03292.
  52. A. Aboubrahim, M. Klasen, and P. Nath, What Fermilab (g−2)μ experiment tells us about discovering SUSY at HL-LHC and HE-LHC, Phys. Rev. D 104, 035039 (2021).
  53. J.-L. Yang, H.-B. Zhang, C.-X. Liu, X.-X. Dong, and T.-F. Feng, Muon (g−2) in the B-LSSM, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2021) 086.
  54. M. Chakraborti, L. Roszkowski, and S. Trojanowski, GUT-constrained supersymmetry and dark matter in light of the new (g−2)μ determination, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 252.
  55. P. M. Ferreira, B. L. Gonçalves, F. R. Joaquim, and M. Sher, (g−2)μ in the 2HDM and slightly beyond—an updated view, Phys. Rev. D 104, 053008 (2021).
  56. H.-X. Wang, L. Wang, and Y. Zhang, Revisiting the μ−τ-philic Higgs doublet in light of the muon g−2 anomaly, τ decays, and multi-lepton searches at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 1007 (2021).
  57. T. Li, J. Pei, and W. Zhang, Muon anomalous magnetic moment and Higgs potential stability in the 331 model from E6, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 671 (2021).
  58. M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, and E. Picciau, Muon and electron g−2, proton and cesium weak charges implications on dark Zd models, Phys. Rev. D 104, 011701 (2021).
  59. L. Calibbi, M. L. López-Ibáñez, A. Melis, and O. Vives, Implications of the muon g−2 result on the flavour structure of the lepton mass matrix, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 929 (2021).
  60. J. Chen, Q. Wen, F. Xu, and M. Zhang, Flavor anomalies accommodated in A flavor gauged two Higgs doublet model, arXiv:2104.03699.
  61. P. Escribano, J. Terol-Calvo, and A. Vicente, (g−2)e,μ in an extended inverse type-III seesaw, Phys. Rev. D 103, 115018 (2021).
  62. E. J. Chun and T. Mondal, Leptophilic bosons and muon g−2 at lepton colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 044.
  63. G. Arcadi, A. S. De Jesus, T. B. De Melo, F. S. Queiroz, and Y. S. Villamizar, A 2HDM for the g−2 and dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B982, 115882 (2022).
  64. C.-H. Chen, C.-W. Chiang, and T. Nomura, Muon g−2 in two-Higgs-doublet model with type-II seesaw mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 104, 055011 (2021).
  65. T. Nomura and H. Okada, Explanations for anomalies of muon anomalous magnetic dipole moment, b→sμμ¯ and radiative neutrino masses in a leptoquark model, Phys. Rev. D 104, 035042 (2021).
  66. S. Mahapatra, R. N. Mohapatra, and N. Sahu, Gauged Le−Lμ−Lτ symmetry, fourth generation, neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 843, 138011 (2023).
  67. D. Borah, S. Mahapatra, N. Sahu, and V. S. Thounaojam, Light thermal dark matter models in the light of DAMIC-M 2025 constraints, Phys. Rev. D 113, 015026 (2026).
  68. B. De, Exploring the null results in the direct detection experiments, (g−2)ℓ and neutrino mass in an extended U(1)Lμ−Lτ model constrained through the Z→ℓ+ℓ− decays, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 075.
  69. B. De, The revival of U(1)Le−Lμ: A natural solution for (g−2)μ with a sub-GeV dark matter, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 81 (2025).
  70. P. Figueroa, G. Herrera, and F. Ochoa, Direct detection of light dark matter charged under a Lμ−Lτ symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 110, 095018 (2024).
  71. X. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew, and R. Volkas, NEW Z-prime PHENOMENOLOGY, Phys. Rev. D 43, 22 (1991).
  72. X.-G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew, and R. R. Volkas, Simplest Z-prime model, Phys. Rev. D 44, 2118 (1991).
  73. Z. A. Borboruah, D. Borah, L. Malhotra, and U. Patel, Minimal Dirac seesaw dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 112, 015022 (2025).
  74. S.-P. Chen and P.-H. Gu, Undemocratic Dirac seesaw, Nucl. Phys. B985, 116028 (2022).
  75. D. Borah and B. Karmakar, A4 flavour model for Dirac neutrinos: Type I and inverse seesaw, Phys. Lett. B 780, 461 (2018).
  76. C. L. Bennett et al. (WMAP Collaboration), Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final maps and results, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 208, 20 (2013).
  77. C. L. Bennett et al. (WMAP Collaboration), First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: Preliminary maps and basic results, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 148, 1 (2003).
  78. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), First dark matter search results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023).
  79. J. Beacham et al., Physics beyond colliders at CERN: Beyond the standard model working group report, J. Phys. G 47, 010501 (2020).
  80. P. Ilten et al., Experiments and facilities for accelerator-based dark sector searches, in Snowmass 2021 (2022), 6, arXiv:2206.04220.
  81. R. Essig et al., Snowmass2021 cosmic frontier: The landscape of low-threshold dark matter direct detection in the next decade, in Snowmass 2021 (2022), 3, arXiv:2203.08297.
  82. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  83. P. Du, D. Egana-Ugrinovic, R. Essig, and M. Sholapurkar, Sources of low-energy events in low-threshold dark-matter and neutrino detectors, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011009 (2022).
  84. D. Baumann, D. Green, and B. Wallisch, Searching for light relics with large-scale structure, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2018) 029.
  85. D. K. Ghosh, P. Ghosh, S. Jeesun, and R. Srivastava, Neff at CMB challenges U(1)X light gauge boson scenarios, Phys. Rev. D 110, 075032 (2024).
  86. M. Blennow, E. Fernandez-Martinez, O. Mena, J. Redondo, and P. Serra, Asymmetric dark matter and dark radiation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2012) 022.
  87. T.-H. Yeh, J. Shelton, K. A. Olive, and B. D. Fields, Probing physics beyond the standard model: Limits from BBN and the CMB independently and combined, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2022) 046.
  88. M. Breitbach, J. Kopp, E. Madge, T. Opferkuch, and P. Schwaller, Dark, cold, and noisy: Constraining secluded hidden sectors with gravitational waves, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2019) 007.
  89. P. A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  90. M. Escudero, D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic, and M. Pierre, Cosmology with a very light Lμ−Lτ gauge boson, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 071.
  91. S. J. Brodsky and E. De Rafael, Suggested boson—lepton pair couplings and the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Phys. Rev. 168, 1620 (1968).
  92. S. Baek and P. Ko, Phenomenology of U(1)(L(mu)-L(tau)) charged dark matter at PAMELA and colliders, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2009) 011.
  93. F. S. Queiroz and W. Shepherd, New physics contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment: A numerical code, Phys. Rev. D 89, 095024 (2014).
  94. W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, M. Pospelov, and I. Yavin, Neutrino trident production: A powerful probe of new physics with neutrino beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 091801 (2014).
  95. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Search for a muonic dark force at BABAR, Phys. Rev. D 94, 011102 (2016).
  96. M. Bauer, P. Foldenauer, and J. Jaeckel, Hunting all the hidden photons, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 094.
  97. A. Kamada, K. Kaneta, K. Yanagi, and H.-B. Yu, Self-interacting dark matter and muon g−2 in a gauged U(1)Lμ−Lτ model, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 117.
  98. D. Akimov et al. (COHERENT Collaboration), First measurement of coherent elastic Neutrino-Nucleus scattering on argon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 012002 (2021).
  99. Y. M. Andreev et al. (NA64 Collaboration), First results in the search for dark sectors at NA64 with the CERN SPS high energy muon beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 211803 (2024).
  100. J. Heeck and H. Zhang, Exotic charges, multicomponent dark matter and light sterile neutrinos, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 164.
  101. W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, Explaining dark matter and B decay anomalies with an Lμ−Lτ model, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 106.
  102. I. Holst, D. Hooper, and G. Krnjaic, Simplest and most predictive model of muon g−2 and thermal dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 141802 (2022).
  103. P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis, Nucl. Phys. B360, 145 (1991).
  104. M. Ibe, H. Murayama, and T. T. Yanagida, Breit-Wigner enhancement of dark matter annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 79, 095009 (2009).
  105. N. Sabti, J. Alvey, M. Escudero, M. Fairbairn, and D. Blas, Refined bounds on MeV-scale thermal dark sectors from BBN and the CMB, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2020) 004.
  106. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (DAMIC Collaboration), Constraints on light dark matter particles interacting with electrons from DAMIC at SNOLAB, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 181802 (2019).
  107. L. Barak et al. (SENSEI Collaboration), SENSEI: Direct-detection results on sub-GeV dark matter from a new Skipper-CCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 171802 (2020).
  108. C. Cheng et al. (PandaX-II Collaboration), Search for light dark matter-electron scatterings in the PandaX-II experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 211803 (2021).
  109. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Light dark matter search with ionization signals in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 251801 (2019).
  110. M. Drees and W. Zhao, U(1)Lμ−Lτ for light dark matter, gμ2, the 511 keV excess and the Hubble tension, Phys. Lett. B 827, 136948 (2022).
  111. R. Essig, M. Fernandez-Serra, J. Mardon, A. Soto, T. Volansky, and T.-T. Yu, Direct detection of sub-GeV dark matter with semiconductor targets, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2016) 046.
  112. T. Binder, T. Bringmann, M. Gustafsson, and A. Hryczuk, Early kinetic decoupling of dark matter: When the standard way of calculating the thermal relic density fails, Phys. Rev. D 96, 115010 (2017); 101, 099901(E) (2020).
  113. C. Boehm, M. J. Dolan, and C. McCabe, A lower bound on the mass of cold thermal dark matter from Planck, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2013) 041.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation