Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

X(3872) and hidden charmed tetraquarks

You-You Lin, Ji-Ying Wang, and Ailin Zhang*

  • *Contact author: zhangal@shu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, 034036 – Published 28 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3vbj-jmfn

Abstract

In a constituent quark model, a hidden charmed tetraquark is assumed consisting of a cq diquark and an c¯q¯ antidiquark or vice versa. The Semay-Silvestre-Brac potentials are employed to calculate the masses of cq (q=u, d) diquarks. The mass of the cq diquark or c¯q¯ antidiquark with spin-0 is predicted with ∼2175  MeV, and the spin-1 one is predicted with ∼2220  MeV. The masses of hidden charmed tetraquarks from 1S to 2P excitations are systematically calculated in terms of the same potentials. It is found that the mass of hidden charmed tetraquarks without radial excitation grows higher in 1+−,1++,1−−,0−+,0−−,1−+,… sequence, and the tetraquarks with exotic JPC=0−−,1−+ have higher masses. The hidden charmed tetraquarks with radial excitations have masses greater than 4300 MeV. The 1S−1P and 1S−2S mass splittings of the hidden charmed tetraquarks are about 390–400 and 550–570 MeV, respectively, which are about 50 and 40 MeV smaller than those of normal charmoniums. The 1P−2P and 2S−2P mass splittings are similar to those for conventional cc¯ charmonium mesons. Based on our predicted masses for hidden charmed tetraquarks, some XYZ exotics are analyzed and tentatively assigned. X*(3860) is possibly the 0++ tetraquark. Zc(3900) and X(3940) are possibly the 1+− tetraquarks, and X(3872) is possibly a 1++ tetraquark. X(4250) may be a 0−+, 0++, or 1−+ tetraquark, X(4240) may be a 0−− tetraquark. With radial excitations, X(4350) may be a 0++ tetraquark, Zc(4430) may be a 1+− tetraquark, X(4630) may be a 0−+ or 1−+ tetraquark, and X(Y)(4660) may be the 1−− tetraquark. Y(4008) or Y(4390) seems impossible to be the 1−− tetraquark. In experiments, for the identification of a normal charmonium or a charmonium-like exotic, it is also important to take into account the mixing of normal charmoniums with hidden-flavor charmonium-like exotics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (108)

  1. S. K. Choi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusive B±→K±π+π−J/ψ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003).
  2. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of sizeable ω contribution to χc1(3872)→π+π−J/ψ decays, Phys. Rev. D 108, L011103 (2023).
  3. K. Abe et al. (Belle Collaboration), Evidence for X(3872)→γJ/ψ and the sub-threshold decay X(3872)→ωJ/ψ (22nd International Symposium on Lepton-Photon Interactions at High Energy LP 2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0505037.
  4. C. P. Shen et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for charmonium and charmonium-like states in ϒ(1S) radiative decays, Phys. Rev. D 82, 051504 (2010).
  5. X. L. Wang et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for charmonium and charmonium-like states in ϒ(2S) radiative decays, Phys. Rev. D 84, 071107 (2011).
  6. P. del Amo Sanchez et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Evidence for the decay X(3872)→J/ψω, Phys. Rev. D 82, 011101 (2010).
  7. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Study of e+e−→γωJ/ψ and Observation of X(3872)→ωJ/ψ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 232002 (2019).
  8. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  9. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observation of the Y(4220) and Y(4360) in the process e+e−→ηJ/ψ, Phys. Rev. D 102, 031101 (2020).
  10. D. Acosta et al. (CDF Collaboration), Observation of the narrow state X(3872)→J/ψπ+π− in p¯p collisions at s=1.96  TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 072001 (2004).
  11. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Study of the B→J/ψK−π+π− decay and measurement of the B→X(3872)K− branching fraction, Phys. Rev. D 71, 071103 (2005).
  12. A. Abulencia et al. (CDF Collaboration), Analysis of the quantum numbers JPC of the X(3872), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 132002 (2007).
  13. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Evidence for X(3872)→ψ2Sγ in B±→X(3872)K± decays, and a study of B→cc¯γK, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 132001 (2009).
  14. V. Bhardwaj et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of X(3872)→J/ψγ and search for X(3872)→ψ′γ in B decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 091803 (2011).
  15. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Measurement of the X(3872) production cross section via decays to J/ψπ+π− in pp collisions at s=7  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2013) 154.
  16. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Determination of the X(3872) meson quantum numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 222001 (2013).
  17. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observation of e+e−→γX(3872) at BESIII, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 092001 (2014).
  18. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Quantum numbers of the X(3872) state and orbital angular momentum in its ρ0Jψ decay, Phys. Rev. D 92, 011102 (2015).
  19. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Study of the lineshape of the χc1(3872) state, Phys. Rev. D 102, 092005 (2020).
  20. F. E. Close and P. R. Page, The D*0D¯0 threshold resonance, Phys. Lett. B 578, 119 (2004).
  21. M. B. Voloshin, Interference and binding effects in decays of possible molecular component of X(3872), Phys. Lett. B 579, 316 (2004).
  22. N. A. Tornqvist, Isospin breaking of the narrow charmonium state of Belle at 3872 MeV as a deuson, Phys. Lett. B 590, 209 (2004).
  23. M. B. Voloshin, Heavy quark spin selection rule and the properties of the X(3872), Phys. Lett. B 604, 69 (2004).
  24. E. Braaten and M. Kusunoki, Low-energy universality and the new charmonium resonance at 3870 MeV, Phys. Rev. D 69, 074005 (2004).
  25. C.-Y. Wong, Molecular states of heavy quark mesons, Phys. Rev. C 69, 055202 (2004).
  26. H. Hogaasen, J. M. Richard, and P. Sorba, A Chromomagnetic mechanism for the X(3872) resonance, Phys. Rev. D 73, 054013 (2006).
  27. E. Braaten and M. Lu, Line shapes of the X(3872), Phys. Rev. D 76, 094028 (2007).
  28. P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Coupled channel approach to the structure of the X(3872), Phys. Rev. D 81, 054023 (2010).
  29. M.-Z. Liu, T.-W. Wu, M. Pavon Valderrama, J.-J. Xie, and L.-S. Geng, Heavy-quark spin and flavor symmetry partners of the X(3872) revisited: What can we learn from the one boson exchange model?, Phys. Rev. D 99, 094018 (2019).
  30. M.-Z. Liu, Y.-W. Pan, F.-Z. Peng, M. Sánchez Sánchez, L.-S. Geng, A. Hosaka, and M. Pavon Valderrama, Emergence of a complete heavy-quark spin symmetry multiplet: Seven molecular pentaquarks in light of the latest LHCb analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 242001 (2019).
  31. L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, Diquark-antidiquarks with hidden or open charm and the nature of X(3872), Phys. Rev. D 71, 014028 (2005).
  32. D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Masses of heavy tetraquarks in the relativistic quark model, Phys. Lett. B 634, 214 (2006).
  33. K. Terasaki, A new tetra-quark interpretation of X(3872), Prog. Theor. Phys. 118, 821 (2007).
  34. S. Dubnicka, A. Z. Dubnickova, M. A. Ivanov, and J. G. Korner, Quark model description of the tetraquark state X(3872) in a relativistic constituent quark model with infrared confinement, Phys. Rev. D 81, 114007 (2010).
  35. R. T. Kleiv, T. G. Steele, A. Zhang, and I. Blokland, Heavy-light diquark masses from QCD sum rules and constituent diquark models of tetraquarks, Phys. Rev. D 87, 125018 (2013).
  36. L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, The Z(4430) and a new paradigm for spin interactions in tetraquarks, Phys. Rev. D 89, 114010 (2014).
  37. L. Zhao, W.-Z. Deng, and S.-L. Zhu, Hidden-charm tetraquarks and charged Zc states, Phys. Rev. D 90, 094031 (2014).
  38. M. N. Anwar, J. Ferretti, and E. Santopinto, Spectroscopy of the hidden-charm [qc][q¯c¯] and [sc][s¯c¯] tetraquarks in the relativized diquark model, Phys. Rev. D 98, 094015 (2018).
  39. B. Grinstein, L. Maiani, and A. D. Polosa, Radiative decays of X(3872) discriminate between the molecular and compact interpretations, Phys. Rev. D 109, 074009 (2024).
  40. B. A. Li, Is X(3872) a possible candidate of hybrid meson, Phys. Lett. B 605, 306 (2005).
  41. E. Braaten, How the Zc(3900) Reveals the spectra of quarkonium hybrid and tetraquark mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 162003 (2013).
  42. T. Barnes and S. Godfrey, Charmonium options for the X(3872), Phys. Rev. D 69, 054008 (2004).
  43. M. Suzuki, The X(3872) boson: Molecule or charmonium, Phys. Rev. D 72, 114013 (2005).
  44. Y. Yang, C. Deng, J. Ping, and T. Goldman, S-wave QQq¯q¯ state in the constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. D 80, 114023 (2009).
  45. Y. S. Kalashnikova, Coupled-channel model for charmonium levels and an option for X(3872), Phys. Rev. D 72, 034010 (2005).
  46. Y. S. Kalashnikova and A. V. Nefediev, Nature of X(3872) from data, Phys. Rev. D 80, 074004 (2009).
  47. I. V. Danilkin and Y. A. Simonov, Dynamical origin and the pole structure of X(3872), Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 102002 (2010).
  48. M. Gell-Mann, A schematic model of baryons and mesons, Phys. Lett. 8, 214 (1964).
  49. M. Ida and R. Kobayashi, Baryon resonances in a quark model, Prog. Theor. Phys. 36, 846 (1966).
  50. D. B. Lichtenberg and L. J. Tassie, Baryon mass splitting in a boson-fermion model, Phys. Rev. 155, 1601 (1967).
  51. S. Fleck, B. Silvestre-Brac, and J. M. Richard, Search for diquark clustering in baryons, Phys. Rev. D 38, 1519 (1988).
  52. A. Selem and F. Wilczek, Hadron systematics and emergent diquarks, in Ringberg Workshop on New Trends in HERA Physics 2005 (World Scientific, Hackensack, USA, 2006), pp. 337–356.
  53. B. Chen, D.-X. Wang, and A. Zhang, JP assignments of Λc+ baryons, Chin. Phys. C 33, 1327 (2009).
  54. J. Ferretti, A. Vassallo, and E. Santopinto, Relativistic quark-diquark model of baryons, Phys. Rev. C 83, 065204 (2011).
  55. D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Spectroscopy and Regge trajectories of heavy baryons in the relativistic quark-diquark picture, Phys. Rev. D 84, 014025 (2011).
  56. B. Chen, K.-W. Wei, and A. Zhang, Assignments of ΛQ and ΞQ baryons in the heavy quark-light diquark picture, Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 82 (2015).
  57. K. Kumakawa and D. Jido, Excitation energy spectra of the Λc and Λb baryons in a finite-size diquark model, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2017, 123D01 (2017).
  58. C. Rosenzweig, Have mesons composed of charmed diquarks been discovered?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 697 (1976).
  59. M. Anselmino, E. Predazzi, S. Ekelin, S. Fredriksson, and D. B. Lichtenberg, Diquarks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 1199 (1993).
  60. R. L. Jaffe and F. Wilczek, Diquarks and exotic spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 232003 (2003).
  61. M. Karliner and H. J. Lipkin, A diquark—triquark model for the KN pentaquark, Phys. Lett. B 575, 249 (2003).
  62. L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, A new look at scalar mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 212002 (2004).
  63. R. L. Jaffe, Exotica, Phys. Rep. 409, 1 (2005).
  64. L. Maiani, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, The new pentaquarks in the diquark model, Phys. Lett. B 749, 289 (2015).
  65. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rep. 639, 1 (2016).
  66. R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell, and E. S. Swanson, Heavy-quark QCD exotica, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93, 143 (2017).
  67. L. Maiani, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, A theory of X and Z multiquark resonances, Phys. Lett. B 778, 247 (2018).
  68. S. L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki, and D. Zieminska, Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: Experimental evidence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015003 (2018).
  69. M. Y. Barabanov et al., Diquark correlations in hadron physics: Origin, impact and evidence, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 116, 103835 (2021).
  70. M. Niiyama et al. (Belle Collaboration), Production cross sections of hyperons and charmed baryons from e+e− annihilation near s=10.52  GeV, Phys. Rev. D 97, 072005 (2018).
  71. K. S. Sateesh, An experimental signal for diquarks in quark gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D 45, 866 (1992).
  72. D. B. Leinweber, Do quarks really form diquark clusters in the nucleon?, Phys. Rev. D 47, 5096 (1993).
  73. L. Y. Glozman and K. Varga, Is there diquark clustering in the nucleon?, Phys. Rev. D 61, 074008 (2000).
  74. R. T. Cahill, C. D. Roberts, and J. Praschifka, Calculation of diquark masses in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 36, 2804 (1987).
  75. A. Bender, C. D. Roberts, and L. Von Smekal, Goldstone theorem and diquark confinement beyond rainbow ladder approximation, Phys. Lett. B 380, 7 (1996).
  76. P. Maris, Effective masses of diquarks, Few Body Syst. 32, 41 (2002).
  77. H. L. L. Roberts, L. Chang, I. C. Cloet, and C. D. Roberts, Masses of ground and excited-state hadrons, Few Body Syst. 51, 1 (2011).
  78. D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, V. O. Galkin, and A. P. Martynenko, Mass spectra of doubly heavy baryons in the relativistic quark model, Phys. Rev. D 66, 014008 (2002).
  79. D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Masses of heavy baryons in the relativistic quark model, Phys. Rev. D 72, 034026 (2005).
  80. E. Santopinto and J. Ferretti, Strange and nonstrange baryon spectra in the relativistic interacting quark-diquark model with a Gürsey and Radicati-inspired exchange interaction, Phys. Rev. C 92, 025202 (2015).
  81. Y.-Y. Lin, J.-Y. Wang, and A. Zhang, Mass spectra of doubly charmed tetraquarks Tcc, Phys. Rev. D 111, 014015 (2025).
  82. M. B. Hecht, M. Oettel, C. D. Roberts, S. M. Schmidt, P. C. Tandy, and A. W. Thomas, Nucleon mass and pion loops, Phys. Rev. C 65, 055204 (2002).
  83. T. Schäfer, E. V. Shuryak, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Baryonic correlators in the random instanton vacuum, Nucl. Phys. B412, 143 (1994).
  84. A. Zhang, T. Huang, and T. G. Steele, Diquark and light four-quark states, Phys. Rev. D 76, 036004 (2007).
  85. S. Esau, A. Palameta, R. T. Kleiv, D. Harnett, and T. G. Steele, Axial vector cc and bb diquark masses from QCD Laplace sum-rules, Phys. Rev. D 100, 074025 (2019).
  86. T. de Oliveira, D. Harnett, R. Kleiv, A. Palameta, and T. G. Steele, Light-quark SU(3) flavour splitting of heavy-light constituent diquark masses and doubly-strange diquarks from QCD sum-rules, Phys. Rev. D 108, 054036 (2023).
  87. K. Watanabe, Quark-diquark potential and diquark mass from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 105, 074510 (2022).
  88. A. Francis, P. de Forcrand, R. Lewis, and K. Maltman, Diquark properties from full QCD lattice simulations, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2022) 062.
  89. E. Braaten and M. Lu, The effects of charged charm mesons on the line shapes of the X(3872), Phys. Rev. D 77, 014029 (2008).
  90. M. Cleven, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, Q. Wang, and Q. Zhao, Employing spin symmetry to disentangle different models for the XYZ states, Phys. Rev. D 92, 014005 (2015).
  91. A. Esposito, L. Maiani, A. Pilloni, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, From the line shape of the X(3872) to its structure, Phys. Rev. D 105, L031503 (2022).
  92. M. Berwein, N. Brambilla, A. Mohapatra, and A. Vairo, Hybrids, tetraquarks, pentaquarks, doubly heavy baryons, and quarkonia in Born-Oppenheimer effective theory, Phys. Rev. D 110, 094040 (2024).
  93. Z.-L. She, A.-K. Lei, Y.-L. Yan, D.-M. Zhou, L. Zheng, W.-C. Zhang, H. Zheng, Y.-L. Xie, G. Chen, and B.-H. Sa, Identifying an X(3872) tetraquark state versus a molecular state by formation time, velocity, and temperature in relativistic nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C 110, 014910 (2024).
  94. D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, V. O. Galkin, and W. Lucha, Masses of tetraquarks with two heavy quarks in the relativistic quark model, Phys. Rev. D 76, 114015 (2007).
  95. C. Semay and B. Silvestre-Brac, Diquonia and potential models, Z. Phys. C 61, 271 (1994).
  96. B. Silvestre-Brac, Spectrum and static properties of heavy baryons, Few Body Syst. 20, 1 (1996).
  97. A. De Rujula, H. Georgi, and S. L. Glashow, Hadron masses in a gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 12, 147 (1975).
  98. J. F. Giron, R. F. Lebed, and C. T. Peterson, The dynamical diquark model: Fine structure and isospin, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2020) 124.
  99. E. Hiyama, Y. Kino, and M. Kamimura, Gaussian expansion method for few-body systems, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51, 223 (2003).
  100. K. Chilikin et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of an alternative χc0(2P) candidate in e+e−→J/ψDD¯, Phys. Rev. D 95, 112003 (2017).
  101. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Amplitude analysis of the B+→D+D−K+ decay, Phys. Rev. D 102, 112003 (2020).
  102. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Observation of a broad structure in the π+π−J/ψ mass spectrum around 4.26−GeV/c2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 142001 (2005).
  103. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Precise measurement of the e+e−→π+π−J/ψ cross section at center-of-mass energies from 3.77 to 4.60 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 092001 (2017).
  104. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Measurement of e+e−→π+π−ψ(3686) from 4.008 to 4.600 GeV and observation of a charged structure in the π±ψ(3686) mass spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 96, 032004 (2017); 99, 019903(E) (2019).
  105. C. Z. Yuan et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of e+e→π+π−J/ψ cross-section via initial state radiation at Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 182004 (2007).
  106. M. Piotrowska, F. Giacosa, and P. Kovacs, Can the ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with Y(4008)?, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 98 (2019).
  107. T. Barnes, S. Godfrey, and E. S. Swanson, Higher charmonia, Phys. Rev. D 72, 054026 (2005).
  108. Y.-Y. Lin, J.-Y. Wang, and A. Zhang, Mass spectrum of fully charmed [cc][c¯c¯] tetraquarks, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 139, 707 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation