Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Vlasov perturbation theory and the role of higher cumulants

Mathias Garny1,* and Román Scoccimarro2,†

  • 1Physik Department T31, Technische Universität München, James-Franck-Straße 1, D-85748 Garching, Germany
  • 2Center for Cosmology and Particle Physics, Department of Physics, New York University, New York 10003, New York, USA

  • *Contact author: mathias.garny@tum.de
  • †Contact author: rs123@nyu.edu

Phys. Rev. D 111, 123509 – Published 9 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3pfk-ff5m

Abstract

We develop a new approach to Vlasov Perturbation Theory (VPT) that solves for the hierarchy of cumulants of the phase-space distribution function to arbitrarily high truncation order in the context of cosmological structure formation driven by collisionless dark matter. We investigate the impact of higher cumulants on density and velocity power spectra as well as the bispectrum, and compare to scale-free N-body simulations. While there is a strong difference between truncation at the first cumulant, i.e., standard perturbation theory (SPT), and truncation at the second (i.e., including the velocity dispersion tensor), the third cumulant has a small quantitative impact and fourth and higher cumulants only have a minor effect on these summary statistics at weakly non-linear scales. We show that spurious exponential growth is absent in vector and tensor modes if scalar-mode constraints on the non-Gaussianity of the background distribution function that results from shell crossing are satisfied, guaranteeing the screening of UV modes for all fluctuations of any type, as expected physically. We also show analytically that loop corrections to the power spectrum are finite within VPT for any initial power spectra consistent with hierarchical clustering, unlike SPT. Finally, we discuss the relation to and contrast our predictions with effective field theory (EFT), and discuss how the advantages of VPT and EFT approaches could be combined.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (48)

  1. S. Pueblas and R. Scoccimarro, Phys. Rev. D 80, 043504 (2009).
  2. F. Bernardeau, S. Colombi, E. Gaztanaga, and R. Scoccimarro, Phys. Rep. 367, 1 (2002).
  3. D. Blas, M. Garny, and T. Konstandin, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2014) 010.
  4. P. J. E. Peebles, The Large-Scale Structure of the Universe (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1980).
  5. T. Nishimichi, F. Bernardeau, and A. Taruya, Phys. Lett. B 762, 247 (2016).
  6. T. Nishimichi, F. Bernardeau, and A. Taruya, Phys. Rev. D 96, 123515 (2017).
  7. A. Aghamousa et al. (DESI Collaboration), arXiv:1611.00036.
  8. Y. Mellier et al. (Euclid Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 697, A1 (2025).
  9. D. Baumann, A. Nicolis, L. Senatore, and M. Zaldarriaga, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2012) 051.
  10. M. Garny, D. Laxhuber, and R. Scoccimarro, Phys. Rev. D 107, 063539 (2023).
  11. M. Garny, D. Laxhuber, and R. Scoccimarro, Phys. Rev. D 107, 063540 (2023).
  12. P. McDonald, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2011) 032.
  13. A. Aviles, Phys. Rev. D 93, 063517 (2016).
  14. P. McDonald and Z. Vlah, Phys. Rev. D 97, 023508 (2018).
  15. A. Erschfeld and S. Floerchinger, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2019) 039.
  16. G. Cusin, V. Tansella, and R. Durrer, Phys. Rev. D 95, 063527 (2017).
  17. A. Erschfeld and S. Floerchinger, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2024) 053.
  18. C. Uhlemann, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2018) 030.
  19. C. Nascimento and M. Loverde, arXiv:2410.05389.
  20. U. Seljak and P. McDonald, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2011) 039.
  21. T. Okumura, U. Seljak, P. McDonald, and V. Desjacques, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2012) 010.
  22. T. Okumura, U. Seljak, and V. Desjacques, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2012) 014.
  23. Z. Vlah, U. Seljak, P. McDonald, T. Okumura, and T. Baldauf, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2012) 009.
  24. Z. Vlah, U. Seljak, T. Okumura, and V. Desjacques, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2013) 053.
  25. Z. Vlah, N. E. Chisari, and F. Schmidt, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2020) 025.
  26. Z. Vlah, N. E. Chisari, and F. Schmidt, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2021) 061.
  27. T. Matsubara, Phys. Rev. D 110, 063543 (2024).
  28. T. Bakx, T. Kurita, N. E. Chisari, Z. Vlah, and F. Schmidt, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2023) 005.
  29. Z. Slepian and D. J. Eisenstein, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 454, 4142 (2015).
  30. C.-P. Ma and E. Bertschinger, Astrophys. J. 455, 7 (1995).
  31. R. Scoccimarro and J. Frieman, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 105, 37 (1996).
  32. D. Blas, M. Garny, and T. Konstandin, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2013) 024.
  33. C. Pichon and F. Bernardeau, Astron. Astrophys. 343, 663 (1999).
  34. G. Jelic-Cizmek, F. Lepori, J. Adamek, and R. Durrer, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2018) 006.
  35. E. Pajer and M. Zaldarriaga, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2013) 037.
  36. L. Mercolli and E. Pajer, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2014) 006.
  37. M. Mirbabayi, F. Schmidt, and M. Zaldarriaga, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2015) 030.
  38. A. Akbar Abolhasani, M. Mirbabayi, and E. Pajer, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2016) 063.
  39. T. Baldauf, M. Garny, P. Taule, and T. Steele, Phys. Rev. D 104, 123551 (2021).
  40. V. Desjacques, D. Jeong, and F. Schmidt, Phys. Rep. 733, 1 (2018).
  41. C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 63, 114020 (2001).
  42. M. Beneke, A. P. Chapovsky, M. Diehl, and T. Feldmann, Nucl. Phys. B643, 431 (2002).
  43. M. Beneke, M. Garny, R. Szafron, and J. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 001.
  44. J. J. M. Carrasco, M. P. Hertzberg, and L. Senatore, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2012) 082.
  45. T. Baldauf, L. Mercolli, M. Mirbabayi, and E. Pajer, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2015) 007.
  46. R. E. Angulo, S. Foreman, M. Schmittfull, and L. Senatore, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2015) 039.
  47. R. Scoccimarro and J. Frieman, Astrophys. J. 473, 620 (1996).
  48. J. A. Peacock and S. J. Dodds, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 280, L19 (1996).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation