- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Robust neutrino energy estimators for high W events in LArTPCs

Christopher Thorpe and Elena Gramellini

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 012008 – Published 8 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3n56-2bzk

Abstract

Accurate determination of the neutrino energy is central to precision oscillation measurements. In this work, we introduce the W2-based estimator, a new neutrino energy estimator based on the measurement of the final-state hadronic invariant mass. This estimator is particularly designed to be employed in liquid-argon time-projection chambers exposed to broadband beams that span the challenging transition region between shallow inelastic scattering and deep inelastic scattering. The performance of the W2-based estimator is compared to four other commonly used estimators. The impact of the estimator choice is evaluated by performing measurements of δCP and Δm232 in a toy long-baseline oscillation analysis. We find that the W2-based estimator shows the smallest bias as a function of true neutrino energy and it is particularly stable against the mismodeling of lepton scattering angle and momentum, missing energy, hadronic invariant mass and final state interactions. However, studies of the resolution of each estimator as a function of true neutrino energy show this is somewhat offset by worse energy resolution when perfect modeling of these quantities is assumed. This estimator is valid for events with at least one proton and any number of pions; an inclusive channel that complements the strength of more exclusive methods that optimize the energy resolution. By providing a detailed analysis of the strengths, weaknesses and domain of applicability of each estimator, this work informs the combined use of energy estimators in any future LArTPC-based oscillation analysis.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (48)

  1. K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Constraint on the matter–antimatter symmetry-violating phase in neutrino oscillations, Nature (London) 580, 339 (2020); 583, E16(E) (2020).
  2. R. Acciarri et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration, LAr1-ND Collaboration, and ICARUS-WA104 Collaboration), A proposal for a three detector short-baseline neutrino oscillation program in the Fermilab booster neutrino beam, arXiv:1503.01520.
  3. P. A. Machado, O. Palamara, and D. W. Schmitz, The short-baseline neutrino program at Fermilab, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69, 363 (2019).
  4. R. Acciarri et al. (DUNE Collaboration), Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF) and Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE): Conceptual design report, Volume 2: The physics program for DUNE at LBNF, arXiv:1512.06148.
  5. R. Acciarri et al. (DUNE Collaboration), Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF) and Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE): Conceptual design report, Volume 1: The LBNF and DUNE projects, arXiv:1601.05471.
  6. A. P. Furmanski and J. T. Sobczyk, Neutrino energy reconstruction from one muon and one proton events, Phys. Rev. C 95, 065501 (2017).
  7. A. M. Ankowski, O. Benhar, P. Coloma, P. Huber, C.-M. Jen, C. Mariani, D. Meloni, and E. Vagnoni, Comparison of the calorimetric and kinematic methods of neutrino energy reconstruction in disappearance experiments, Phys. Rev. D 92, 073014 (2015).
  8. V. De Romeri, E. Fernandez-Martinez, and M. Sorel, Neutrino oscillations at DUNE with improved energy reconstruction, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2016) 030.
  9. J. Kopp, P. Machado, M. MacMahon, and I. Martinez-Soler, Improving neutrino energy reconstruction with machine learning, arXiv:2405.15867.
  10. C. Andreopoulos et al., The GENIE neutrino Monte Carlo generator, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 614, 87 (2010).
  11. J. Nieves, J. E. Amaro, M. Valverde, and E. Oset, Inclusive quasielastic neutrino reactions, in 5th RCCN International Workshop on Sub-dominant Oscillation Effects in Atmospheric Neutrino Experiments (2005), pp. 165–181.
  12. R. Bradford, A. Bodek, H. S. Budd, and J. Arrington, A new parameterization of the nucleon elastic form-factors, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 159, 127 (2006).
  13. D. Rein and L. M. Sehgal, Neutrino excitation of baryon resonances and single pion production, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 133, 79 (1981).
  14. C. Berger and L. M. Sehgal, Lepton mass effects in single pion production by neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 76, 113004 (2007).
  15. J. E. Sobczyk, J. Nieves, and F. Sánchez, Exclusive-final-state Hadron observables from neutrino-nucleus multinucleon knockout, Phys. Rev. C 102, 024601 (2020).
  16. J. Nieves, I. Ruiz Simo, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Inclusive charged–current neutrino–nucleus reactions, Phys. Rev. C 83, 045501 (2011).
  17. R. Gran, J. Nieves, F. Sanchez, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Neutrino-nucleus quasielastic and 2p2h interactions up to 10 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 88, 113007 (2013).
  18. A. Bodek, I. Park, and U.-k. Yang, Improved low Q**2 model for neutrino and electron nucleon cross sections in few GeV region, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 139, 113 (2005).
  19. T. Yang, C. Andreopoulos, H. Gallagher, K. Hoffmann, and P. Kehayias, A Hadronization Model for few-GeV Neutrino Interactions, Eur. Phys. J. C 63, 1 (2009).
  20. J. Sobczyk, A. Ankowski, K. Graczyk, C. Juszczak, K. Niewczas, R. Banerjee, H. Prasad et al., NuWro: Monte Carlo neutrino event generator user’s guide, https://nuwro.github.io/user-guide/ (2024), (accessed 2025).
  21. C. H. Llewellyn Smith, Neutrino reactions at accelerator energies, Phys. Rep. 3, 261 (1972).
  22. T. Cai et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Measurement of the axial vector form factor from antineutrino–proton scattering, Nature (London) 614, 48 (2023).
  23. Q. Yan, K. Niewczas, A. Nikolakopoulos, R. González-Jiménez, N. Jachowicz, X. Lu, J. Sobczyk, and Y. Zheng, The Ghent Hybrid model in NuWro: A new neutrino single-pion production model in the GeV regime, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 141.
  24. T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 026.
  25. T. Golan, C. Juszczak, and J. T. Sobczyk, Final state interactions effects in neutrino-nucleus interactions, Phys. Rev. C 86, 015505 (2012).
  26. Y. Hayato, NEUT, Acta Phys. Pol. B 33, 2469 (2002).
  27. Y. Hayato and L. Pickering, The NEUT neutrino interaction simulation program library, Eur. Phys. J. ST 230, 4469 (2021).
  28. M. Derrick et al., Properties of the Hadronic system resulting from anti-Muon-neutrino p interactions, Phys. Rev. D 17, 1 (1978).
  29. B. Jongejans et al. (WA25 Collaboration), Multiplicity distributions of charged Hadrons produced in (Anti)-neutrino deuterium charged and neutral current interactions, Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 101A, 435 (1989).
  30. T. Sjostrand, High-energy physics event generation with PYTHIA 5.7 and JETSET 7.4, Comput. Phys. Commun. 82, 74 (1994).
  31. O. Buss, T. Gaitanos, K. Gallmeister, H. van Hees, M. Kaskulov, O. Lalakulich, A. Larionov, T. Leupold, J. Weil, and U. Mosel, Transport-theoretical description of nuclear reactions, Phys. Rep. 512, 1 (2012).
  32. A. Friedland and S. W. Li, Understanding the energy resolution of liquid argon neutrino detectors, Phys. Rev. D 99, 036009 (2019).
  33. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Measurement of single charged pion production in charged-current νμ-Ar interactions with the MicroBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. D 113, 032007 (2026).
  34. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Measurement of the differential cross section for neutral pion production in charged-current muon neutrino interactions on argon with the MicroBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. D 110, 092014 (2024).
  35. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), First study of neutrino angle reconstruction using quasielasticlike interactions in MicroBooNE, Phys. Rev. D 111, 113007 (2025).
  36. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Differential cross section measurement of charged current νe interactions without pions in MicroBooNE, Phys. Rev. D 106, L051102 (2022).
  37. C. Adams et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Calibration of the charge and energy loss per unit length of the MicroBooNE liquid argon time projection chamber using muons and protons, J. Instrum. 15, P03022 (2020).
  38. O. Lalakulich, U. Mosel, and K. Gallmeister, Energy reconstruction in quasielastic scattering in the MiniBooNE and T2K experiments, Phys. Rev. C 86, 054606 (2012).
  39. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), New CC0π GENIE model tune for MicroBooNE, Phys. Rev. D 105, 072001 (2022).
  40. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Search for an anomalous excess of charged-current νe interactions without pions in the final state with the MicroBooNE experiment, Phys. Rev. D 105, 112004 (2022).
  41. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration)*, MicroBooNE Collaboration), Search for an anomalous production of charged-current νe interactions without visible pions across multiple kinematic observables in MicroBooNE, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 081802 (2025).
  42. D. S. Ayres et al. (NOvA Collaboration), The NOvA Technical Design Report, Report No. FERMILAB-DESIGN-2007-01, 2007, 10.2172/935497.
  43. L. Aliaga et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Design, calibration, and performance of the MINERvA detector, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 743, 130 (2014).
  44. M. A. Acero et al. (NOvA Collaboration), Measurement of the double-differential muon-neutrino charged-current inclusive cross section in the NOvA near detector, Phys. Rev. D 107, 052011 (2023).
  45. P. A. Rodrigues et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Identification of nuclear effects in neutrino-carbon interactions at low three-momentum transfer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 071802 (2016); 121, 209902(A) (2018).
  46. A. Achterberg et al. (IceCube Collaboration), First year performance of the IceCube neutrino telescope, Astropart. Phys. 26, 155 (2006).
  47. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/3n56-2bzk for the complete set of response matrices and the bias calculations with all four generators, and the event distributions used in the χ2 comparisons.
  48. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 012008– Published 8 July, 2026
  • Received 17 November 2025
  • Accepted 8 June 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation