- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Vector dark matter in a U(1)X extended 2HDM

Nandini Das1,*, Juhi Dutta2,3,†, Dilip Kumar Ghosh1,‡, and Santosh Kumar Rai4,§

  • *Contact author: nandinidas.rs@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: juhidutta@imsc.res.in
  • ‡Contact author: tpdkg@iacs.res.in
  • §Contact author: skrai@hri.res.in
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 112, 115036 – Published 23 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3l8z-hgt4

Abstract

We investigate the possibility of having a vector boson dark matter in a U(1)X extended two-Higgs doublet model (2HDM) setup. The gauge boson gains mass when a Standard Model (SM) singlet complex scalar, which is charged under the dark U(1)X symmetry, acquires a vacuum expectation value. This scalar acts as the connection between the SM sector and DM via the Higgs portal. An additional exact charge conjugation symmetry inhibits the mixing of this gauge boson with the photon, thereby confirming the stability of DM. On the other hand, 2HDM with type-I Z2 restriction can offer a nonstandard Higgs in the lighter mass range. This freedom allows us to accommodate dark matter mass in the (40–60)-GeV regime where the direct detection constraints are strongest. We study the dark matter phenomenology of such a model while taking care of all possible theoretical and experimental constraints.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (87)

  1. F. Zwicky, Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln, Helv. Phys. Acta 6, 110 (1933).
  2. V. C. Rubin and W. K. Ford, Jr., Rotation of the andromeda nebula from a spectroscopic survey of emission regions, Astrophys. J. 159, 379 (1970).
  3. R. Barrena, A. Biviano, M. Ramella, E. E. Falco, and S. Seitz, The dynamical status of the cluster of galaxies 1e0657-56, Astron. Astrophys. 386, 816 (2002).
  4. D. Clowe, M. Bradac, A. H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S. W. Randall, C. Jones et al., A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter, Astrophys. J. Lett. 648 (2006) L109
  5. Planck Collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
  6. WMAP Collaboration, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) three year results: Implications for cosmology, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 170, 377 (2007).
  7. E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, The Early Universe (Taylor and Francis, London, 2019), Vol. 69, 10.1201/9780429492860.
  8. LZ Collaboration, The LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 953, 163047 (2020).
  9. LZ Collaboration, First dark matter search results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023).
  10. LZ Collaboration, Dark matter search results from 4.2  tonne−years of exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011802 (2025).
  11. PandaX-II Collaboration, Dark matter results from first 98.7 days of data from the PandaX-II experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 121303 (2016).
  12. PandaX-II Collaboration, Dark matter results from 54-ton-day exposure of PandaX-II experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 181302 (2017).
  13. XENON Collaboration, Dark matter search results from a one ton-year exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111302 (2018).
  14. XENON Collaboration, First dark matter search with nuclear recoils from the XENONnT experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041003 (2023).
  15. DARWIN Collaboration, DARWIN: Towards the ultimate dark matter detector, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2016) 017.
  16. T. Hambye, Hidden vector dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2009) 028.
  17. T. Hambye and M. H. G. Tytgat, Confined hidden vector dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 683, 39 (2010).
  18. C. Arina, T. Hambye, A. Ibarra, and C. Weniger, Intense gamma-ray lines from hidden vector dark matter decay, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2010) 024.
  19. O. Lebedev, H. M. Lee, and Y. Mambrini, Vector Higgs-portal dark matter and the invisible Higgs, Phys. Lett. B 707, 570 (2012).
  20. T. Abe, M. Kakizaki, S. Matsumoto, and O. Seto, Vector WIMP miracle, Phys. Lett. B 713, 211 (2012).
  21. Y. Farzan and A. R. Akbarieh, VDM: A model for vector dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2012) 026.
  22. K.-Y. Choi, H. M. Lee, and O. Seto, Vector Higgs-portal dark matter and Fermi-LAT gamma ray line, Phys. Rev. D 87, 123541 (2013).
  23. N. Bernal, X. Chu, C. Garcia-Cely, T. Hambye, and B. Zaldivar, Production regimes for self-interacting dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2016) 018.
  24. S. Bhattacharya, S. Chakraborti, and D. Pradhan, Electroweak symmetry breaking and WIMP-FIMP dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 091.
  25. S. Yaser Ayazi, M. Hosseini, S. Paktinat Mehdiabadi, and R. Rouzbehi, Vector dark matter and LHC constraints, including a 95 GeV light Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 110, 055004 (2024).
  26. K. Yamashita, Higgs-portal spin-1 dark matter with parity-violating interaction, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 205.
  27. S. Khan, J. Kim, and H. M. Lee, Higgs-portal vector dark matter at a low reheating temperature, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2025) 040.
  28. B. Barman, S. Bhattacharya, S. K. Patra, and J. Chakrabortty, Non-Abelian vector boson dark matter, its unified route and signatures at the LHC, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2017) 021.
  29. A. Biswas, S. Choubey, L. Covi, and S. Khan, Common origin of baryon asymmetry, dark matter and neutrino mass, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2019) 193.
  30. V. Q. Tran, T. T. Q. Nguyen, and T.-C. Yuan, Self-interacting vectorial dark matter in a SM-like dark sector, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2024) 015.
  31. L. Covi, S. Dey, S. Khan, and S. K. Rai, Multicomponent dark matter with collider implications, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 046.
  32. A. Belyaev, A. Deandrea, S. Moretti, L. Panizzi, D. A. Ross, and N. Thongyoi, Fermionic portal to vector dark matter from a new gauge sector, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095001 (2023).
  33. N. Das, T. Jha, and D. Nanda, Vector dark matter with Higgs portal in type II seesaw framework, Phys. Rev. D 109, 115020 (2024).
  34. G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher, and J. P. Silva, Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rep. 516, 1 (2012).
  35. J. F. Gunion and H. E. Haber, Conditions for CP-violation in the general two-Higgs-doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 72, 095002 (2005).
  36. L. Lopez Honorez, E. Nezri, J. F. Oliver, and M. H. G. Tytgat, The inert doublet model: An archetype for dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2007) 028.
  37. G. Arcadi, 2HDM portal for singlet-doublet dark matter, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 864 (2018).
  38. W. Chao and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Hidden from view: Neutrino masses, dark matter, and TeV-scale leptogenesis in a neutrinophilic two-Higgs-doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 89, 033007 (2014).
  39. G. Arcadi, M. Lindner, F. S. Queiroz, W. Rodejohann, and S. Vogl, Pseudoscalar mediators: A WIMP model at the neutrino floor, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2018) 042.
  40. D. A. Camargo, M. D. Campos, T. B. de Melo, and F. S. Queiroz, A two Higgs doublet model for dark matter and neutrino masses, Phys. Lett. B 795, 319 (2019).
  41. P. K. Das, S. Dey, S. Kundu, and S. K. Rai, Revisiting the inert scalar dark matter with vector-like quarks, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 027.
  42. X.-M. Jiang, C. Cai, Z.-H. Yu, Y.-P. Zeng, and H.-H. Zhang, Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter and two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rev. D 100, 075011 (2019).
  43. T. Biekötter, P. Gabriel, M. O. Olea-Romacho, and R. Santos, Direct detection of pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter in a two Higgs doublet plus singlet extension of the SM, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 126.
  44. X.-M. Jiang, C. Cai, Y.-H. Su, and H.-H. Zhang, Freeze-in production of Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter model with a real scalar, arXiv:2302.02418.
  45. T. Biekötter and M. O. Olea-Romacho, Reconciling Higgs physics and pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter in the S2HDM using a genetic algorithm, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 215.
  46. M. Aoki, S. Kanemura, and O. Seto, Multi-Higgs portal dark matter under the CDMS II results, Phys. Lett. B 685, 313 (2010).
  47. N. Okada and O. Seto, Galactic Center gamma-ray excess from two-Higgs-doublet-portal dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 90, 083523 (2014).
  48. N. Okada and O. Seto, Gamma ray emission in Fermi bubbles and Higgs portal dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 89, 043525 (2014).
  49. C. Bonilla, D. Sokolowska, N. Darvishi, J. L. Diaz-Cruz, and M. Krawczyk, IDMS: Inert Dark Matter model with a complex singlet, J. Phys. G 43, 065001 (2016).
  50. A. Goudelis, B. Herrmann, and O. Stål, Dark matter in the Inert Doublet Model after the discovery of a Higgs-like boson at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2013) 106.
  51. E. M. Dolle and S. Su, Inert dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 80, 055012 (2009).
  52. A. Drozd, B. Grzadkowski, J. F. Gunion, and Y. Jiang, Extending two-Higgs-doublet models by a singlet scalar field—the case for dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2014) 105.
  53. A. Arhrib, R. Benbrik, M. El Kacimi, L. Rahili, and S. Semlali, Extended Higgs sector of 2HDM with real singlet facing LHC data, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 13 (2020).
  54. A. Dey, J. Lahiri, and B. Mukhopadhyaya, LHC signals of a heavy doublet Higgs as dark matter portal: Cut-based approach and improvement with gradient boosting and neural networks, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2019) 004.
  55. J. Dutta, G. Moortgat-Pick, and M. Schreiber, Phenomenology of the dark matter sector in the 2HDM extended with complex scalar singlet, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 140, 87 (2025).
  56. J. Herms, S. Jana, V. P. K., and S. Saad, Minimal realization of light thermal dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 091803 (2022).
  57. J. Dutta, J. Lahiri, C. Li, G. Moortgat-Pick, S. F. Tabira, and J. A. Ziegler, Dark matter phenomenology in 2HDMS in light of the 95 GeV excess, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 926 (2024).
  58. J. Dutta, J. Lahiri, C. Li, G. Moortgat-Pick, S. F. Tabira, and J. A. Ziegler, Search for dark matter in 2HDMS at LHC and future lepton colliders, arXiv:2504.14529.
  59. W. Abdallah, A. K. Barik, S. K. Rai, and T. Samui, Heavy neutrino as dark matter in a neutrinophilic U(1) model, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1087 (2024).
  60. Y. Cai and T. Li, Singlet dark matter in a type II two Higgs doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 88, 115004 (2013).
  61. C.-F. Chang, X.-G. He, and J. Tandean, Two-Higgs-doublet-portal dark-matter models in light of direct search and LHC data, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2017) 107.
  62. E. Bertuzzo, T. Sassi, and A. Tesi, Complex dark photon dark matter EFT, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 109.
  63. S. Heinemeyer, C. Li, F. Lika, G. Moortgat-Pick, and S. Paasch, Phenomenology of a 96 GeV Higgs boson in the 2HDM with an additional singlet, Phys. Rev. D 106, 075003 (2022).
  64. E. Ma, Inception of self-interacting dark matter with dark charge conjugation symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 772, 442 (2017).
  65. K. Kannike, Vacuum stability conditions from copositivity criteria, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2093 (2012).
  66. BABAR Collaboration,Precision measurement of the B→Xsγ photon energy spectrum, branching fraction, and direct CP asymmetry ACP(B→Xs+dγ), Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 191801 (2012).
  67. LHCb Collaboration, Measurement of the Bs0→μ+μ− branching fraction and search for B0→μ+μ− decays at the LHCb experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 101805 (2013).
  68. CMS Collaboration, Measurement of the Bs0→μ+μ− branching fraction and search for B0→μ+μ− with the CMS experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 101804 (2013).
  69. Belle-II Collaboration, Measurement of B+→τ+ντ branching fraction with a hadronic tagging method at Belle II, Phys. Rev. D 112, 072002 (2025).
  70. F. Mahmoudi and O. Stal, Flavor constraints on the two-Higgs-doublet model with general Yukawa couplings, Phys. Rev. D 81, 035016 (2010).
  71. T. Enomoto and R. Watanabe, Flavor constraints on the two Higgs doublet models of Z2 symmetric and aligned types, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2016) 002.
  72. A. Arbey, F. Mahmoudi, O. Stal, and T. Stefaniak, Status of the charged Higgs boson in two Higgs doublet models, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 182 (2018).
  73. BABAR Collaboration, Precision measurement of the B→Xsγ photon energy spectrum, branching fraction, and direct CP asymmetry ACP(B→Xs+dγ), Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 191801 (2012).
  74. ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, and LEP Collaborations, Search for charged Higgs bosons: Combined results using LEP data, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2463 (2013).
  75. R. L. Workman et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  76. ATLAS Collaboration, Combination of searches for invisible decays of the Higgs boson using 139  fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at s=13  TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Lett. B 842, 137963 (2023).
  77. CMS Collaboration, A search for decays of the Higgs boson to invisible particles in events with a top-antitop quark pair or a vector boson in proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 933 (2023).
  78. ATLAS Collaboration, Summary plots for beyond Standard Model Higgs boson benchmarks for direct and indirect searches, Report No. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2022-043, 2022.
  79. Particle Data Group, Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  80. W. Grimus, L. Lavoura, O. M. Ogreid, and P. Osland, A precision constraint on multi-Higgs-doublet models, J. Phys. G 35, 075001 (2008).
  81. W. Grimus, L. Lavoura, O. M. Ogreid, and P. Osland, The oblique parameters in multi-Higgs-doublet models, Nucl. Phys. B801, 81 (2008).
  82. A. Belyaev, N. D. Christensen, and A. Pukhov, calchep 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the standard model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1729 (2013).
  83. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs 2.0: A program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176, 367 (2007).
  84. L. J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell, and S. M. West, Freeze-in production of FIMP dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2010) 080.
  85. D. Gilman, S. Birrer, A. Nierenberg, T. Treu, X. Du, and A. Benson, Warm dark matter chills out: Constraints on the halo mass function and the free-streaming length of dark matter with eight quadruple-image strong gravitational lenses, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 491, 6077 (2020).
  86. V. Iršič, M. Viel, M. G. Haehnelt, J. S. Bolton, M. Molaro, E. Puchwein et al., Unveiling dark matter free streaming at the smallest scales with the high redshift Lyman-alpha forest, Phys. Rev. D 109, 043511 (2024).
  87. N. Das, Data for the figures of Vector dark matter in a U(1)X extended 2HDM, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.17953273 (2025).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 112, 115036– Published 23 December, 2025
  • Received 18 June 2025
  • Accepted 4 December 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation