Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation

    Dark degeneracy in DESI DR2 data: Interacting or evolving dark energy?

    Vitor Petri1,*, Valerio Marra2,3,4, and Rodrigo von Marttens5

    • *Contact author: vitorpetrisilva@gmail.com

    Phys. Rev. D 113, 023504 – Published 6 January, 2026

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3k93-p1n8

    Abstract

    The standard ΛCDM model, despite its success, is challenged by persistent observational tensions in the Hubble constant (H0) and the matter clustering amplitude (S8), motivating the exploration of alternative cosmological scenarios. We investigate a dark energy model with a phenomenological interaction in the dark sector, constructed to be exactly degenerate at the background level with the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parametrization. This setup allows us to test whether models with identical expansion histories but distinct physical mechanisms can be distinguished by cosmological data. We perform a Bayesian analysis using a combination of recent datasets: Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument data release 2 baryon acoustic oscillation measurements, Dark Energy Survey year 5 supernovae, and cosmic microwave background data from Planck and Atacama Cosmology Telescope. We find that both the interacting model and the CPL model provide significantly better fits to the data than ΛCDM. Although indistinguishable in background observables, the interacting model predicts a distinct matter-sector evolution driven by a late-time sign change in the dark sector interaction at z≈0.8, corresponding to the w=−1 crossing in the CPL description. In this sense, the interacting picture may be considered more physical, since it avoids the problematic crossing by construction. The resulting decay of dark energy into dark matter lowers S8, potentially alleviating the weak-lensing S8 tension. At the same time, it predicts a sharp suppression of the growth rate fσ8(z) at z≲0.8, which is in tension with current measurements of structure formation. This indicates that the model may not simultaneously reconcile the expansion history and the observed growth of cosmic structure, highlighting the need for a more comprehensive analysis to fully assess its viability.

    Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

    Authorization Required

    We need you to provide your credentials before accessing this content.

    References (Subscription Required)

    Outline

    Information

    Sign In to Your Journals Account

    Filter

    Filter

    Article Lookup

    Enter a citation