Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation

    Robustness of extracting quasinormal mode information from black hole merger simulations

    Leda Gao1,*, Gregory B. Cook1,†, Lawrence E. Kidder2, Harald P. Pfeiffer3, Mark A. Scheel4, Nils Deppe5, William Throwe2, Nils L. Vu4, Kyle C. Nelli4 et al.

    Jordan Moxon4 and Michael Boyle2

    • *Contact author: gaol18@wfu.edu
    • †Contact author: cookgb@wfu.edu

    Phys. Rev. D 112, 024025 – Published 8 July, 2025

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3jj6-jc8q

    Abstract

    In linear perturbation theory, the ringdown of a gravitational wave (GW) signal is described by a linear combination of quasinormal modes (QNMs). Detecting QNMs from GW signals is a promising way to test GR, central to the developing field of black-hole spectroscopy. More robust black hole spectroscopy tests could also consider the ringdown amplitude-phase consistency. That requires an accurate understanding of the excitation and stability of the QNM expansion coefficients. In this paper, we investigate the robustness of the extracted m=2 QNM coefficients obtained from a high-accuracy numerical relativity waveform. We explore a framework to assess the robustness of QNM coefficients. Within this framework, we not only consider the traditional criterion related to the constancy of a QNM’s expansion coefficients over a window in time, but also emphasize the importance of consistency among fitting models. In addition, we implement an iterative greedy approach within which we fix certain QNM coefficients. We apply this approach to linear fitting, and to nonlinear fitting where the properties of the remnant black hole are treated as unknown variables. We find that the robustness of overtone coefficients is enhanced by our greedy approach, particularly for the (2,2,2,+) overtone. Based on our robustness criteria applied to the m=2 signal modes, we find the (2∼4,2,0,+) and (2,2,1∼2,+) modes are robust, while the (3,2,1,+) subdominant mode is only marginally robust. After we subtract the contributions of the (2∼4,2,0,+) and (2∼3,2,1,+) QNMs from signal mode (4, 2), we also find evidence for the quadratic QNM (2,1,0,+)×(2,1,0,+).

    Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

    Authorization Required

    We need you to provide your credentials before accessing this content.

    References (Subscription Required)

    Outline

    Information

    Sign In to Your Journals Account

    Filter

    Filter

    Article Lookup

    Enter a citation