Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Comprehensive study of the charged Higgs boson in the two Higgs doublet type-II seesaw model

Brahim Ait-Ouazghour1,*, Abdesslam Arhrib2,3,†, Mohamed Chabab1,4,‡, and Khalid Goure1,§

  • *Contact author: b.ouazghour@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: aarhrib@gmail.com
  • ‡Contact author: mchabab@uca.ac.ma
  • §Contact author: khalidgoure01@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 113, 075006 – Published 6 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3dj6-zg7v

Abstract

We investigate the phenomenology of the charged Higgs boson within the two-Higgs-doublet type-II seesaw model (2HDMcT type-III) at future μ+μ− colliders. Focusing on 2→2 processes such as μ+μ−→H1+S− (S−=H1−,H2−) and μ+μ−→H1+W−, we incorporate both theoretical and experimental constraints to assess their production prospects. We find that σ(μ+μ−→H1+H1−) can reach or exceed the corresponding e+e− cross section, while σ(μ+μ−→H1+H2−) is roughly 18 times smaller but can be enhanced up to 0.62 fb upon relaxing electroweak precision observables constraints. Moreover, we observe that the cross section for μ+μ−→H1+W− is significantly enhanced due to the large tanβ amplification characteristic of the type-III scenario. Furthermore, we conduct a signal-background analysis and determine the discovery (5σ) regions at a 3 TeV muon collider for the μ+μ−→H1+H1−, μ+μ−→H1+H2−, and μ+μ−→W±H1∓ processes.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (109)

  1. F. Zwicky, Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln, Helv. Phys. Acta 6, 110 (1933).
  2. V. C. Rubin and W. K. Ford, Jr., Rotation of the andromeda nebula from a spectroscopic survey of emission regions, Astrophys. J. 159, 379 (1970).
  3. M. J. G. Veltman, The infrared—ultraviolet connection, Acta Phys. Pol. B 12, 437 (1981).
  4. T. Kajita, Nobel lecture: Discovery of atmospheric neutrino oscillations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 030501 (2016).
  5. A. B. McDonald, Nobel lecture: The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory: Observation of flavor change for solar neutrinos, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 030502 (2016).
  6. N. G. Deshpande and E. Ma, Pattern of symmetry breaking with two Higgs doublets, Phys. Rev. D 18, 2574 (1978).
  7. S. L. Glashow and S. Weinberg, Natural conservation laws for neutral currents, Phys. Rev. D 15, 1958 (1977).
  8. G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher, and J. P. Silva, Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rep. 516, 1 (2012).
  9. S. Dawson, C. Englert, and T. Plehn, Higgs physics: It ain’t over till it’s over, Phys. Rep. 816, 1 (2019).
  10. I. P. Ivanov, Building and testing models with extended Higgs sectors, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 95, 160 (2017).
  11. S. Weinberg, Baryon- and lepton-nonconserving processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1566 (1979).
  12. A. Melfo, M. Nemevsek, F. Nesti, G. Senjanovic, and Y. Zhang, Type II seesaw at LHC: The roadmap, Phys. Rev. D 85, 055018 (2012).
  13. A. Arhrib, R. Benbrik, M. Chabab, G. Moultaka, M. C. Peyranere, L. Rahili, and J. Ramadan, The Higgs potential in the type II seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D 84, 095005 (2011).
  14. C.-H. Chen and T. Nomura, Two-Higgs-doublet type-II seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D 90, 075008 (2014).
  15. B. Ait Ouazghour, A. Arhrib, R. Benbrik, M. Chabab, and L. Rahili, Theory and phenomenology of a two-Higgs-doublet type-II seesaw model at the LHC run 2, Phys. Rev. D 100, 035031 (2019).
  16. B. Ait Ouazghour and M. Chabab, The two Higgs doublet type-II seesaw model: Naturalness and B−Xsγ versus heavy Higgs masses, Phys. Lett. B 846, 138241 (2023).
  17. B. A. Ouazghour, M. Chabab, and K. Goure, Higgs photon associated production in a two Higgs doublet type-II seesaw model at future electron-positron colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 879 (2024).
  18. B. Ait-Ouazghour, M. Chabab, and K. Goure, Unified interpretation of 95 GeV excesses in the two Higgs doublet type II seesaw model, arXiv:2410.11140.
  19. C.-H. Chen and T. Nomura, Inert dark matter in type-II seesaw, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2014) 120.
  20. P. Fileviez Perez, T. Han, G.-y. Huang, T. Li, and K. Wang, Neutrino masses and the CERN LHC: Testing type II seesaw, Phys. Rev. D 78, 015018 (2008).
  21. Y. Cai, T. Han, T. Li, and R. Ruiz, Lepton number violation: Seesaw models and their collider tests, Front. Phys. 6, 40 (2018).
  22. S. F. King, Models of neutrino mass, mixing and CP violation, J. Phys. G 42, 123001 (2015).
  23. S. Ashanujjaman and K. Ghosh, Revisiting type-II see-saw: Present limits and future prospects at LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 195.
  24. M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, The electroweak phase transition: A collider target, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 179.
  25. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for additional heavy neutral Higgs and gauge bosons in the ditau final state produced in 36  fb−1 of pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2018) 055.
  26. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for new phenomena in high-mass diphoton final states using 37  fb−1 of proton–proton collisions collected at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 775, 105 (2017).
  27. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for a new scalar resonance decaying to a pair of Z bosons in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 127; 03 (2019) 128(E).
  28. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for a heavy Higgs boson decaying into a Z boson and another heavy Higgs boson in the ℓℓbb final state in pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 783, 392 (2018).
  29. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying to a top quark pair in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 171; 03 (2022) 187(E).
  30. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for MSSM Higgs bosons decaying to μ+μ− in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Phys. Lett. B 798, 134992 (2019).
  31. CMS Collaboration, Search for a charged Higgs boson decaying into a heavy neutral Higgs boson and a W boson in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 032.
  32. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for charged Higgs bosons produced in top-quark decays or in association with top quarks and decaying via H±−>τ± ντ in 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 111, 072006 (2025).
  33. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for a heavy charged Higgs boson decaying into a W boson and a Higgs boson in final states with leptons and b-jets in S=13  TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 143.
  34. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for non-resonant Higgs boson pair production in final states with leptons, taus, and photons in pp collisions at S=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 164.
  35. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for a light charged Higgs boson in t→H±b decays, with H±→cs, in pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2025) 153.
  36. I. Bejar Alonso and L. Rossi, HiLumi LHC Technical Design Report: Deliverable: D1.10.
  37. A. G. Akeroyd et al., Prospects for charged Higgs searches at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 276 (2017).
  38. M. A. Arroyo-Ureña, E. A. Herrera-Chacón, S. Rosado-Navarro, and H. Salazar, Hunting for a charged Higgs boson pair in proton-proton collisions, Phys. Rev. D 111, 015023 (2025).
  39. S. Komamiya, Searching for charged Higgs bosons at O (1/2-tev to 1-teV)e+e− colliders, Phys. Rev. D 38, 2158 (1988).
  40. A. Arhrib and G. Moultaka, Radiative corrections to e+e−→H+H−: THDM versus MSSM, Nucl. Phys. B558, 3 (1999).
  41. J. Guasch, W. Hollik, and A. Kraft, Radiative corrections to pair production of charged Higgs bosons in e+e− collisions, Nucl. Phys. B596, 66 (2001).
  42. A. Arhrib, M. Capdequi Peyranere, W. Hollik, and G. Moultaka, Associated H−W+ production in high-energy e+e− collisions, Nucl. Phys. B581, 34 (2000); 679, 400(E) (2004).
  43. S. Kanemura, Possible enhancement of the e+ e−−>H+−W−+ cross-section in the two Higgs doublet model, Eur. Phys. J. C 17, 473 (2000).
  44. B. A. Ouazghour, A. Arhrib, K. Cheung, E.-s. Ghourmin, and L. Rahili, Comparison between μ−μ+ and e−e+ colliders for charged Higgs production in the 2HDM, Phys. Rev. D 109, 115009 (2024).
  45. S. Heinemeyer and C. Schappacher, Charged Higgs boson production at e+e− colliders in the complex MSSM: A full one-loop analysis, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 535 (2016).
  46. O. Brein and T. Hahn, On MSSM charged Higgs boson production in association with an electroweak W boson at electron positron colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 52, 397 (2007).
  47. H. E. Logan and S.-f. Su, Variation of the cross section for e+e−→W+H− in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 67, 017703 (2003).
  48. T. Abe et al., Linear collider physics resource book for snowmass 2001, arXiv:hep-ex/0106055.
  49. T. Abe et al. (Linear Collider American Working Group Collaboration), Linear collider physics resource book for snowmass 2001—part 2: Higgs and supersymmetry studies, in APS/DPF/DPB Summer Study on the Future of Particle Physics (2001), 5, arXiv:hep-ex/0106056.
  50. T. Abe et al. (Linear Collider American Working Group Collaboration), Linear collider physics resource book for snowmass 2001—part 3: Studies of exotic and standard model physics, arXiv:hep-ex/0106057.
  51. K. Fujii et al. (LCC Physics Working Group Collaboration), Tests of the standard model at the International Linear Collider, arXiv:1908.11299.
  52. R. S. Gupta, H. Rzehak, and J. D. Wells, How well do we need to measure the Higgs boson mass and self-coupling?, Phys. Rev. D 88, 055024 (2013).
  53. J. Baglio and C. Weiland, The triple Higgs coupling: A new probe of low-scale seesaw models, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2017) 038.
  54. J. Tian and K. Fujii (ILC Physics, Detector Study Collaboration), Measurement of Higgs boson couplings at the International Linear Collider, Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 273–275, 826 (2016).
  55. C. F. Dürig, Measuring the Higgs self-coupling at the International Linear Collider. PhD thesis, Hamburg U., Hamburg, 2016.
  56. T. Liu, K.-F. Lyu, J. Ren, and H. X. Zhu, Probing the quartic Higgs boson self-interaction, Phys. Rev. D 98, 093004 (2018).
  57. E. Accomando et al. (CLIC Physics Working Group Collaboration), Physics at the CLIC multi-TeV linear collider, in 11th International Conference on Hadron Spectroscopy, CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs (2004), 6, arXiv:hep-ph/0412251.
  58. A Multi-TeV Linear Collider Based on CLIC Technology: CLIC Conceptual Design Report,.
  59. F. An et al., Precision Higgs physics at the CEPC, Chin. Phys. C 43, 043002 (2019).
  60. A. Arbey et al., Physics at the e+e− linear collider, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 371 (2015).
  61. S. Bhattacharya, S. Jahedi, and J. Wudka, Optimal determination of new physics couplings: A comparative study, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 026.
  62. A. Abada et al. (FCC Collaboration), FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 2, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 228, 261 (2019).
  63. M. Bicer et al. (TLEP Design Study Working Group Collaboration), First look at the physics case of TLEP, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2014) 164.
  64. J. P. Delahaye, M. Diemoz, K. Long, B. Mansoulié, N. Pastrone, L. Rivkin, D. Schulte, A. Skrinsky, and A. Wulzer, Muon colliders, arXiv:1901.06150.
  65. T. Han, Y. Ma, and K. Xie, High energy leptonic collisions and electroweak parton distribution functions, Phys. Rev. D 103, L031301 (2021).
  66. K. Long, D. Lucchesi, M. Palmer, N. Pastrone, D. Schulte, and V. Shiltsev, Muon colliders: Opening new horizons for particle physics, Nat. Phys. 17, 289 (2021).
  67. N. Chakrabarty, T. Han, Z. Liu, and B. Mukhopadhyaya, Radiative return for heavy Higgs boson at a muon collider, Phys. Rev. D 91, 015008 (2015).
  68. R. Capdevilla, D. Curtin, Y. Kahn, and G. Krnjaic, A no-lose theorem for discovering the new physics of (g−2)μ at muon colliders, Phys. Rev. D 105, 015028 (2022).
  69. W. Liu and K.-P. Xie, Probing electroweak phase transition with multi-TeV muon colliders and gravitational waves, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 015.
  70. G. Huang, F. S. Queiroz, and W. Rodejohann, Gauged Lμ−Lτ at a muon collider, Phys. Rev. D 103, 095005 (2021).
  71. W. Yin and M. Yamaguchi, Muon g−2 at multi-TeV muon collider, Phys. Rev. D 106, 033007 (2022).
  72. D. Buttazzo and P. Paradisi, Probing the muon g-2 anomaly at a muon collider, Phys. Rev. D 104, 075021 (2021).
  73. R. Capdevilla, D. Curtin, Y. Kahn, and G. Krnjaic, A guaranteed discovery at future muon colliders, Phys. Rev. D 103, 075028 (2021).
  74. T. Han, D. Liu, I. Low, and X. Wang, Electroweak couplings of the Higgs boson at a multi-TeV muon collider, Phys. Rev. D 103, 013002 (2021).
  75. T. Han, Z. Liu, L.-T. Wang, and X. Wang, WIMPs at high energy muon colliders, Phys. Rev. D 103, 075004 (2021).
  76. A. Costantini, F. De Lillo, F. Maltoni, L. Mantani, O. Mattelaer, R. Ruiz, and X. Zhao, Vector boson fusion at multi-TeV muon colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 080.
  77. T. Han, S. Li, S. Su, W. Su, and Y. Wu, Heavy Higgs bosons in 2HDM at a muon collider, Phys. Rev. D 104, 055029 (2021).
  78. N. Vignaroli, Charged resonances and MDM bound states at a multi-TeV muon collider, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 121.
  79. A. G. Akeroyd, A. Arhrib, and C. Dove, Charged and pseudoscalar Higgs production at a muon collider, Phys. Rev. D 61, 071702 (2000).
  80. M. Hashemi, Charged Higgs observability through associated production with W at a muon collider, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2207 (2012).
  81. A. G. Akeroyd and S. Baek, Single charged Higgs production as a probe of CP violation at a muon collider, Phys. Lett. B 500, 142 (2001).
  82. B. A. Ouazghour, A. Arhrib, K. Cheung, E. Ghourmin, M. Krab, and L. Rahili, Searching for charged Higgs bosons via e+e−→H±W∓S at the ILC, Phys. Rev. D 112, 055022 (2025).
  83. B. A. Ouazghour, A. Arhrib, K. Cheung, E. Ghourmin, and L. Rahili, Associated charged Higgs production within the 2HDM: e−e+ versus μ−μ+ colliders, Phys. Rev. D 110, 095026 (2024).
  84. H. Bahl, T. Biekötter, S. Heinemeyer, C. Li, S. Paasch, G. Weiglein, and J. Wittbrodt, higgstools: BSM scalar phenomenology with new versions of higgsbounds and higgssignals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 291, 108803 (2023).
  85. P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stål, T. Stefaniak, and G. Weiglein, HiggsSignals: Confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with measurements at the Tevatron and the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2711 (2014).
  86. P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stål, T. Stefaniak, and G. Weiglein, Probing the standard model with Higgs signal rates from the tevatron, the LHC and a future ILC, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2014) 039.
  87. P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, T. Klingl, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein, and J. Wittbrodt, higgssignals-2: Probing new physics with precision Higgs measurements in the LHC 13 TeV era, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 145 (2021).
  88. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein, and K. E. Williams, higgsbounds: Confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with exclusion bounds from LEP and the tevatron, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 138 (2010).
  89. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein, and K. E. Williams, higgsbounds 2.0.0: Confronting neutral and charged Higgs sector predictions with exclusion bounds from LEP and the tevatron, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 2605 (2011).
  90. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stål, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein, and K. E. Williams, HiggsBounds−4: Improved tests of extended Higgs sectors against exclusion bounds from LEP, the tevatron and the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2693 (2014).
  91. P. Bechtle, D. Dercks, S. Heinemeyer, T. Klingl, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein, and J. Wittbrodt, higgsbounds-5: Testing Higgs sectors in the LHC 13 TeV era, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1211 (2020).
  92. M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev. D 46, 381 (1992).
  93. W. Grimus, L. Lavoura, O. M. Ogreid, and P. Osland, The oblique parameters in multi-Higgs-doublet models, Nucl. Phys. B801, 81 (2008).
  94. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  95. Y. S. Amhis et al. (HFLAV Collaboration), Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2021, Phys. Rev. D 107, 052008 (2023).
  96. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012).
  97. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012).
  98. T. Hahn and C. Schappacher, The implementation of the minimal supersymmetric standard model in FeynArts and FormCalc, Comput. Phys. Commun. 143, 54 (2002).
  99. T. Hahn and M. Perez-Victoria, Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118, 153 (1999).
  100. J. Kublbeck, M. Bohm, and A. Denner, Feyn arts: Computer algebraic generation of Feynman graphs and amplitudes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 60, 165 (1990).
  101. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
  102. T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 852 (2008).
  103. J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi (DELPHES 3 Collaboration), DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 057.
  104. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, The anti-kt jet clustering algorithm, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2008) 063.
  105. G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1554 (2011); 73, 2501(E) (2013).
  106. R. Mertig, M. Bohm, and A. Denner, FEYN CALC: Computer algebraic calculation of Feynman amplitudes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 64, 345 (1991).
  107. V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, New developments in FeynCalc 9.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 207, 432 (2016).
  108. V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, FeynCalc 9.3: New features and improvements, Comput. Phys. Commun. 256, 107478 (2020).
  109. V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, FeynCalc 10: Do multiloop integrals dream of computer codes?, Comput. Phys. Commun. 306, 109357 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation