Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Interpretable unsupervised representation learning for high-precision measurements in particle physics

Xing-Jian Lv1,2, De-Xing Miao1,2,*, Zi-Jun Xu1, and Jian-Chun Wang1

  • *Contact author: miaodx@ihep.ac.cn

Phys. Rev. D 114, 012007 – Published 8 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/35nc-8xbk

Abstract

Unsupervised learning has been widely applied to various tasks in particle physics. However, existing models lack precise control over their learned representations, limiting physical interpretability and hindering their use for accurate measurements. We propose the histogram autoencoder (HistoAE), an unsupervised representation learning network featuring a custom histogram-based loss that enforces a physically structured latent space. Applied to silicon microstrip detectors, HistoAE learns an interpretable two-dimensional latent space corresponding to the particle’s charge and impact position. After simple postprocessing, it achieves a charge resolution of 0.25e and a position resolution of 3  μm on beam-test data, comparable to the conventional approach. These results demonstrate that unsupervised deep learning models can enable physically meaningful and quantitatively precise measurements. Moreover, the generative capacity of HistoAE enables straightforward extensions to fast detector simulations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (56)

  1. Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, Nature (London) 521, 436 (2015).
  2. J. Schmidhuber, Neural Netw. 61, 85 (2015).
  3. L. Lonnblad, C. Peterson, and T. Rognvaldsson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1321 (1990).
  4. B. H. Denby, Comput. Phys. Commun. 49, 429 (1988).
  5. K. Cranmer, U. Seljak, and K. Terao, in Review of Particle Physics, edited by R. L. Workman et al. (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2023), Chap. 41, pp. 711–744, https://pdg.lbl.gov/2023/reviews/rpp2023-rev-machine-learning.pdf.
  6. G. Carleo, I. Cirac, K. Cranmer, L. Daudet, M. Schuld, N. Tishby, L. Vogt-Maranto, and L. Zdeborová, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 045002 (2019).
  7. A. Radovic, M. Williams, D. Rousseau, M. Kagan, D. Bonacorsi, A. Himmel, A. Aurisano, K. Terao, and T. Wongjirad, Nature (London) 560, 41 (2018).
  8. D. Guest, K. Cranmer, and D. Whiteson, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68, 161 (2018).
  9. L. Yu, J. Wang, R. Qiao, K. Gong, W. Peng, J. Wei, B. Lu, D. Guo, Y. Liu, X. Liu et al., Astron. Comput. 53, 100986 (2025).
  10. G. Ambrosi, V. Choutko, C. Delgado, A. Oliva, Q. Yan, and Y. Li, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 869, 29 (2017).
  11. Y. Jia, Q. Yan, V. Choutko, H. Liu, and A. Oliva, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 972, 164169 (2020).
  12. Y. Bengio, A. Courville, and P. Vincent, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 35, 1798 (2013).
  13. L. Jing and Y. Tian, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 43, 4037 (2021).
  14. J. F. Rodriguez-Nieva and M. S. Scheurer, Nat. Phys. 15, 790 (2019).
  15. M. S. Scheurer and R.-J. Slager, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 226401 (2020).
  16. K. Kottmann, P. Huembeli, M. Lewenstein, and A. Acín, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 170603 (2020).
  17. C. L. Cheng, G. Singh, and B. Nachman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 021801 (2025).
  18. R. Iten, T. Metger, H. Wilming, L. del Rio, and R. Renner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 010508 (2020).
  19. B. Hou, J. Wu, and D. Y. Qiu, Nat. Commun. 15, 9481 (2024).
  20. S. Kolouri, P. E. Pope, C. E. Martin, and G. K. Rohde, in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (ICLR, New Orleans, LA, USA, 2019).
  21. K. Fraser, S. Homiller, R. K. Mishra, B. Ostdiek, and M. D. Schwartz, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 066.
  22. S. Seidel, Phys. Rep. 828, 1 (2019).
  23. J.-J. Wei, J.-H. Guo, and Y.-M. Hu, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 31, 97 (2020).
  24. M. Aguilar et al. (AMS Collaboration), Phys. Rep. 894, 1 (2021).
  25. X. Zhou and J. Yang (HIAF project Team Collaboration), AAPPS Bull. 32, 35 (2022).
  26. J. Pata, J. Duarte, J.-R. Vlimant, M. Pierini, and M. Spiropulu, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 381 (2021).
  27. D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams, Learning internal representations by error propagation, in Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 1: Foundations (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1986), p. 318–362.
  28. P. Baldi and K. Hornik, Neural Netw. 2, 53 (1989).
  29. D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (ICLR, Banff, AB, Canada, 2014).
  30. D. J. Rezende, S. Mohamed, and D. Wierstra, in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (PMLR, Beijing, China, 2014), pp. 1278–1286.
  31. I. Tolstikhin, O. Bousquet, S. Gelly, and B. Schölkopf, in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (ICLR, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2018).
  32. A. A. Alves et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. Instrum. 3, S08005 (2008).
  33. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. Instrum. 3, S08004 (2008).
  34. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), J. Instrum. 3, S08003 (2008).
  35. R. He et al., Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 205 (2023).
  36. S. Straulino et al. (PAMELA Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 530, 168 (2004).
  37. Y.-F. Dong, F. Zhang, R. Qiao, W.-X. Peng, R.-R. Fan, K. Gong, D. Wu, and H.-Y. Wang, Chin. Phys. C 39, 116202 (2015).
  38. J. T. Vievering, L. Glesener, P. S. Athiray, J. C. Buitrago-Casas, S. Musset, D. Ryan, S.-n. Ishikawa, J. Duncan, S. Christe, and S. Krucker, Astrophys. J. 913, 15 (2021).
  39. K. Lubelsmeyer et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 654, 639 (2011).
  40. M. Duranti (AMS 02 Tracker Collaboration), Proc. Sci., Vertex2012 (2013) 052.
  41. D. Miao et al., arXiv:2505.23050.
  42. H. A. Bethe, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 397, 325 (1930).
  43. M. Boronat, C. Marinas, A. Frey, I. García, B. Schwenker, M. Vos, and F. Wilk, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 62, 381 (2015).
  44. X. Altuna, C. Arimatea, R. Bailey, P. Baudrenghien, G. Crockford, G. De Rijk, C. Despas, A. Faugier et al., A momentum calibration of the SPS proton beam, Technical Report, CERN-SL-92-32-OP, CERN, 1992.
  45. F. Charton, arXiv:2308.15594.
  46. S. Golkar, M. Pettee, M. Eickenberg, A. Bietti, M. Cranmer, G. Krawezik, F. Lanusse, M. McCabe, R. Ohana, L. Parker et al., arXiv:2310.02989.
  47. S. Ioffe and C. Szegedy, in Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (PMLR, Lille, France, 2015), Vol. 37, pp. 448–456.
  48. A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer, J. Bradbury, G. Chanan, T. Killeen, Z. Lin, N. Gimelshein, L. Antiga, A. Desmaison, A. Kopf, E. Yang, Z. DeVito, M. Raison, A. Tejani, S. Chilamkurthy, B. Steiner, L. Fang, J. Bai, and S. Chintala, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (NeurIPS 2019) (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, 2019), pp. 8024–8035.
  49. I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter, in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (ICLR, New Orleans, LA, USA, 2019).
  50. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2015), pp. 1026–1034.
  51. P. Goyal, P. Dollár, R. Girshick, P. Noordhuis, L. Wesolowski, A. Kyrola, A. Tulloch, Y. Jia, and K. He, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops (2017), arXiv:1706.02677.
  52. I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter, in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (ICLR, Toulon, France, 2017).
  53. torch.amp.GradScaler.
  54. R. Turchetta, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 335, 44 (1993).
  55. J. Apostolakis et al., Front. Phys. 10, 913510 (2022).
  56. B. Hashemi and C. Krause, Rev. Phys. 12, 100092 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation