Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Test of the GENIE neutrino event generator against reduced cross sections extracted from O16(e,e′p) data

A. V. Butkevich and S. V. Luchuk

Phys. Rev. D 113, 053006 – Published 23 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/326r-sr5s

Abstract

The reduced cross section of the semiexclusive (l,l′p) lepton scattering process irrespective of the type of interaction is determined mainly by the bound nucleon momentum distribution in the target and nucleon final state interaction with the residual nucleus. These cross sections can be identified with distorted nuclear spectral functions and therefore, they are similar up to Coulomb corrections for neutrino and electron scattering on nuclei. In this article, we exploit this similarity and use data with precise kinematics and large statistics for semiexclusive electron scattering on an oxygen target to test models employed in the genie neutrino event generator. We find that these models cannot reproduce well the measured reduced cross sections in all allowed kinematic regions and the genie event generator needs to describe better both the nuclear ground states and nucleon final state interaction. The approach presented in this paper provides a great opportunity to better test the accuracy of nuclear models of quasielastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, employed in neutrino event generators.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (41)

  1. M. A. Acero et al. (NOvA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 151803 (2019).
  2. K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 171802 (2018).
  3. R. Acciarri et al. (DUNE Collaboration), Report No. FERMILAB-DESIGN-2016-03.
  4. K. Abe et al. (Hyper-Kamiokande Collaboration) arXiv:1805.04163.
  5. M. Antonello et al. (MicroBooNE, LAr1-ND, ICARUS-WA104 Collaborations), arXiv:1503.01520.
  6. P. Adamson et al. (NOvA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 151802 (2017).
  7. A. M. Ankowski and A. Friedland, Phys. Rev. D 102, 053001 (2020).
  8. A. Papadopoulou et al. (e4v Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 103, 113003 (2021).
  9. M. Khachatryan, A. Papapdopoulou, A. Ashkenazi, F. Hauenstein, L. B. Weinstein, O. Hen, E. Piasetzky (CLAS and e4v Collaborations), Nature (London) 599, 565 (2021).
  10. L. Avarez-Ruso et al. (genie Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 230, 4449 (2021).
  11. A. Picklesimer, J. W. Van Orden, and S. J. Wallace, Phys. Rev. C 32, 1312 (1985).
  12. J. M. Udias, P. Sarriguren, E. Moya de Guerra, E. Garrido, and J. A. Caballero, Phys. Rev. C 51, 3246 (1995).
  13. James J. Kelly, Phys. Rev. C 59, 3256 (1999).
  14. A. V. Butkevich and S. A. Kulagin, Phys. Rev. C 76, 045502 (2007).
  15. A. V. Butkevich, Phys. Rev. C 80, 014610 (2009).
  16. A. V. Butkevich, Phys. Rev. C 85, 065501 (2012).
  17. A. V. Butkevich, Phys. Rev. C 109, 045502 (2024).
  18. C. Andreopoulos, A. Bell, D. Bhattacharya, F. Cavanna, J. Dobson, S. Dytman, H. Gallagher, P. Guzowski, R. Hatcher, P. Kehayias et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 614, 87 (2010).
  19. The genie Event Generator, http://genie-mc.org.
  20. A. V. Butkevich and S. V. Luchuk, Phys. Rev. D 112, 093005 (2025).
  21. T. deForest, Nucl. Phys. A392, 232 (1983).
  22. J. A. Caballero, T. W. Donnelly, E. Moya de Guerra, and J. M. Udias, Nucl. Phys. A632, 323 (1998).
  23. M. Bernheim et al., Nucl. Phys. A375, 381 (1982).
  24. C. De Vries, C. W. De Jager, L. Lapikas, G. Luijckx, R. Maas, H. De Vries, and P. K. A. De Witt Huberts, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 223, 1 (1984).
  25. M. Leuschner et al., Phys. Rev. C 49, 955 (1994).
  26. L. Lapikas and E. Jans (private communication).
  27. S. Frullani and J. Mougey, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 14, 1 (1984).
  28. C. Andreopoulos, C. Barry, S. Dytman, H. Gallagher, T. Golan, R. Hatcher, G. Perdue, and J. Yarba, arXiv:1510.05494.
  29. L. Alvarez-Russo et al. (genie Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 230, 4449 (2021).
  30. J. Tena-Vidal et al. (genie Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 106, 112001 (2022).
  31. S. J. Mashnik, A. J. Sierk, K. K. Gudima, and M. I. Baznat, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 41, 340 (2006).
  32. A. Bodek and J. L. Ritchie, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1070 (1981).
  33. C. Llewellyn Smith, Phys. Rep. 3, 261 (1972).
  34. J. Nieves, I. Ruiz Simo, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Phys. Lett. B 707, 72 (2012).
  35. J. Nieves, J. E. Amaro, and M. Valverde, Phys. Rev. C 70, 055503 (2004); 72, 019902(E) (2005).
  36. R. Gran, J. Nieves, F. Sanchez, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Phys. Rev. D 88, 113007 (2013).
  37. S. Dolan, G. D. Megias, and S. Bolognesi, Phys. Rev. D 101, 033003 (2020).
  38. A. Bodek, H. S. Budd, and M. E. Christy, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1726 (2011).
  39. A. Bodek, H. S. Budd, M. E. Christy, and B. Coopersmith, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3091 (2014).
  40. K. G. Fissum et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 034606 (2004).
  41. J. McKean, R. Gonzalez-Jimenez, M. Kabirnezhad, and J. M. Udias, Phys. Rev. D 112, 032009 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation