Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Sound-horizon-free measurement of the Hubble constant from DESI DR2 baryon acoustic oscillations using artificial neural networks

Gaurav N. Gadbail* and Kazuharu Bamba†

  • *Contact author: gauravgadbail6@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: bamba@sss.fukushima-u.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 114, 043551 – Published 28 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/29rq-lgby

Abstract

We present a model-independent, sound-horizon-free measurement of the Hubble constant H0 using baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) tracers from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument data release 2 (DESI DR2). The function reconstructions are performed using the artificial neural network method, which is a completely data-driven approach that avoids the mild Λ cold dark matter prior dependence. Our approach is based on the distance duality relation and combines three complementary observational probes, such as type Ia supernovae (SNe), cosmic chronometer, and DESI DR2 BAO—without requiring any knowledge of the sound horizon scale rd or any assumption about the absolute luminosity of SNe Ia. We obtain a joint constraint of H0=71.5±2.2  km s−1  Mpc−1 at 68% confidence for 1000 bootstrap realizations and 4096 neurons, which is consistent with the tip of the red giant branch result and the SH0ES measurement within 0.6σ, consistent with the Planck 2020 result within 2σ. Our results favor a higher value of H0 compared to the Planck cosmic microwave background inference, adding independent support for the reality of the Hubble tension.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
  2. A. G. Riess et al. (SH0ES Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett. 934, L7 (2022).
  3. W. L. Freedman, B. F. Madore, T. Hoyt, I. S. Jang, R. Beaton, M. G. Lee, A. Monson, J. Neeley, and J. Rich, Astrophys. J. 891, 57 (2020).
  4. W. L. Freedman, Astrophys. J. 919, 16 (2021).
  5. M. Levi et al., arXiv:1308.0847.
  6. M. Abdul Karim et al. (DESI Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 112, 083514 (2025).
  7. M. Abdul Karim et al. (DESI Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 112, 083515 (2025).
  8. F. Renzi and A. Silvestri, Phys. Rev. D 107, 023520 (2023).
  9. W. Guo, Q. Wang, S. Cao, M. Biesiada, T. Liu, Y. Lian, X. Jiang, C. Mu, and D. Cheng, Astrophys. J. Lett. 978, L33 (2025).
  10. J. Q. Jiang, D. Pedrotti, S. S. da Costa, and S. Vagnozzi, Phys. Rev. D 110, 123519 (2024).
  11. Yi-Min Zhang et al., arXiv:2510.12627.
  12. G.-J. Wang, X.-J. Ma, S.-Y. Li, and J.-Q. Xia, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 246, 13 (2020).
  13. J. Fluri, T. Kacprzak, A. Lucchi, A. Refregier, A. Amara, T. Hofmann, and A. Schneider, Phys. Rev. D 100, 063514 (2019).
  14. D. George and E. A. Huerta, Phys. Rev. D 97, 044039 (2018).
  15. C. Escamilla-Rivera, M. A. C. Quintero, and S. Capozziello, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2020) 008.
  16. Eoin O Colgáin and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 892 (2021).
  17. S. Cao and N. Liang, Research in Astron. Astrophys. 11, 1199 (2011).
  18. S. Cao, M. Biesiada, X. Zheng, and Z.-H. Zhu, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 457, 281 (2016).
  19. J.-Z. Qi et al., Phys. Rev. D 99, 063507 (2019).
  20. X. Zheng et al., Astrophys. J. 892, 103 (2020).
  21. T. Liu et al., Phys. Lett. B 838, 137687 (2023).
  22. D. Brout et al., Astrophys. J. 938, 110 (2022).
  23. A. G. Riess et al., Astrophys. J. 826, 56 (2016).
  24. R. Jimenez and A. Loeb, Astrophys. J. 573, 37 (2002).
  25. C. Zhang, Z. Han, Y. Shuo, L. Siqi, Z. Tong-Jie, and S. Yan-Chun, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 14, 1221 (2014).
  26. D. Stern, R. Jimenez, L. Verde, M. Kamionkowski, and S. A. Stanford, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2010) 008.
  27. M. Moresco et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2012) 006.
  28. M. Moresco et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2016) 014.
  29. A. L. Ratsimbazafy et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 467, 3239 (2017).
  30. M. Moresco, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 450, L16 (2015).
  31. J.-Z. Qi, P. Meng, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 108, 063522 (2023).
  32. D.-A. Clevert, T. Unterthiner, and S. Hochreiter, arXiv:1511.07289.
  33. S. Ioffe and C. Szegedy, arXiv:1502.03167.
  34. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, arXiv:1412.6980.
  35. C. Krishnan, E. O. Colgain, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and T. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 103, 103509 (2021).
  36. C. Krishnan et al., Phys. Rev. D 102, 103525 (2020).
  37. E. O. Colgain, S. Pourojaghi, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and L. Yin, Phys. Dark Universe 52, 102268 (2026).
  38. Ž. Ivezić et al., Astrophys. J. 873, 111 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation