Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Comprehensive analyses of rare Λb→Λℓ+ℓ−, Σb→Σℓ+ℓ− and Ξb→Ξℓ+ℓ− decays in the 2HDM

Z. Tavukoğlu1, A. T. Olgun1, and K. Azizi2,3,*

  • 1Vocational School, Istanbul Okan University, Tuzla Campus, 34959 Istanbul, Türkiye
  • 2Department of Physics, University of Tehran, North Karegar Avenue, Tehran 14395-547, Iran
  • 3Department of Physics, Dogus University, Dudullu-Ümraniye, 34775 Istanbul, Türkiye

  • *Contact author: kazem.azizi@ut.ac.ir

Phys. Rev. D 114, 014039 – Published 20 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/21j2-12b7

Abstract

We investigate rare special dileptonic decays of Λb, Σb, and Ξb baryons in the standard model and context of the general two-Higgs-doublet model with Type III. Specifically, we consider the decays Λb→Λℓ+ℓ−, Σb→Σℓ+ℓ−, and Ξb→Ξℓ+ℓ−, where ℓ represents μ or τ lepton. By studying these rare decays, we aim to assess the impact of the two-Higgs-doublet model with Type III on various observables, such as the differential decay width, the total decay width, the differential branching ratio, the total branching ratio, and lepton forward-backward asymmetries using the decay amplitude and the transition matrix elements in terms of form factors calculated via light cone QCD in full theory. We compare our results to those of the standard model, as well as existing lattice QCD predictions and experimental data, to assess the agreement and viability of the two-Higgs-doublet model with Type III. Furthermore, we highlight the potential for experimental investigations of these decay channels in the near future. The soon-to-be updated LHCb and/or Belle II detectors, renowned for their capabilities in studying rare decays, present excellent opportunities for probing the predicted branching ratios.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (60)

  1. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012).
  2. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012).
  3. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for a standard model-like Higgs boson in the mass range between 70 and 110 GeV in the diphoton final state in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Phys. Lett. B 860, 139067 (2025).
  4. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for diphoton resonances in the 66 to 110 GeV mass range using pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2025) 053.
  5. S. Morović (CMS Collaboration), CMS detector: Run 3 status and plans for Phase-2, arXiv:2309.02256.
  6. J. F. Gunion, H. E. Haber, G. L. Kane, and S. Dawson, Errata for the Higgs hunter’s guide, arXiv:hep-ph/9302272.
  7. G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher, and J. P. Silva, Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rep. 516, 1 (2012).
  8. T. P. Cheng and M. Sher, Mass matrix ansatz and flavor nonconservation in models with multiple Higgs doublets, Phys. Rev. D 35, 3484 (1987).
  9. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Observation of the baryonic flavor-changing neutral current decay Λb→Λμ+μ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 201802 (2011).
  10. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Observation of the baryonic flavor-changing neutral current decay Λb→Λμ+μ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 201802 (2011).
  11. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of Λb0→Λμ+μ− decays, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2015) 115; 09 (2018) 145(E).
  12. N. Katirci and K. Azizi, Semileptonic transition of Σb→Σμ+μ− in family non-universal Z′ model, J. Phys. G 40, 085005 (2013).
  13. K. Azizi, Y. Sarac, and H. Sundu, Light cone QCD sum rules study of the semileptonic heavy ΞQ and ΞQ′ transitions to Ξ and Σ baryons, Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 2 (2012).
  14. T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, and M. Savci, Analysis of the Λb→Λℓ+ℓ− decay in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 81, 056006 (2010).
  15. K. Azizi, S. Kartal, A. T. Olgun, and Z. Tavukoglu, Analysis of the semileptonic Λb→Λℓ+ℓ− transition in the topcolor-assisted technicolor model, Phys. Rev. D 88, 075007 (2013).
  16. T. Gutsche, M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Korner, V. E. Lyubovitskij, and P. Santorelli, Rare baryon decays Λb→Λl+l−(l=e,μ,τ) and Λb→Λγ: Differential and total rates, lepton- and hadron-side forward-backward asymmetries, Phys. Rev. D 87, 074031 (2013).
  17. P. Böer, T. Feldmann, and D. van Dyk, Angular analysis of the decay Λb→Λ(→Nπ)ℓ+ℓ−, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2015) 155.
  18. W. Detmold and S. Meinel, Λb→Λℓ+ℓ− form factors, differential branching fraction, and angular observables from lattice QCD with relativistic b quarks, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074501 (2016).
  19. R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, Semileptonic decays of Λb baryons in the relativistic quark model, Phys. Rev. D 94, 073008 (2016).
  20. D. Das, On the angular distribution of Λb→Λ(→Nπ)τ+τ− decay, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 063.
  21. S. Sahoo and R. Mohanta, Effects of scalar leptoquark on semileptonic Λb decays, New J. Phys. 18, 093051 (2016).
  22. G. Kumar and N. Mahajan, Asymmetries and observables for Λb→Λℓ+ℓ−, arXiv:1511.00935.
  23. R. M. Wang, Y. G. Xu, C. Hua, and X. D. Cheng, Studying B1(12+)→B2(12+)ℓ+ℓ− semileptonic weak baryon decays with the SU(3) flavor symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 103, 013007 (2021).
  24. W. H. Tan, H. M. Yang, and H. X. Chen, Predicted Ξb(6087)0 and further predictions, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 382 (2024).
  25. K. Azizi, A. T. Olgun, and Z. Tavukoglu, Impact of scalar leptoquarks on heavy baryonic decays, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2017, 7435876 (2017).
  26. K. Azizi, A. T. Olgun, and Z. Tavukoğlu, Comparative analysis of the Λb→Λℓ+ℓ− decay in the SM, SUSY and RS model with custodial protection, Phys. Rev. D 92, 115025 (2015).
  27. K. Azizi, S. Kartal, A. T. Olgun, and Z. Tavukoglu, Comparative analysis of the semileptonic Λb→Λℓ+ℓ− transition in SM and different SUSY scenarios using form factors from full QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2012) 118.
  28. K. Azizi, S. Kartal, N. Katirci, A. T. Olgun, and Z. Tavukoglu, Constraint on compactification scale via recently observed baryonic Λb→Λℓ+ℓ− channel and analysis of the Σb→Σℓ+ℓ− transition in SM and UED scenario, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2012) 024.
  29. K. Azizi and N. Katirci, Analysis of Λb→Λℓ+ℓ− Transition in SM4 using Form Factors from Full QCD, Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 73 (2012).
  30. S. Iguro and Y. Omura, Status of the semileptonic B decays and muon g-2 in general 2HDMs with right-handed neutrinos, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 173.
  31. A. Crivellin, D. Müller, and C. Wiegand, b→sℓ+ℓ− transitions in two-Higgs-doublet models, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2019) 119.
  32. S. Iguro, Conclusive probe of the charged Higgs solution of P5’ and RD(*) discrepancies, Phys. Rev. D 107, 095004 (2023).
  33. A. Crivellin and S. Iguro, Accumulating hints for flavor-violating Higgs bosons at the electroweak scale, Phys. Rev. D 110, 015014 (2024).
  34. G. Coloretti, A. Crivellin, and S. Iguro, Searching for di-Higgs signatures of light charged scalars, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2026) 016.
  35. A. Arhrib, P. M. Ferreira, and R. Santos, Are there hidden scalars in LHC Higgs results?, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2014) 053.
  36. S. Davidson and H. E. Haber, Basis-independent methods for the two-Higgs-doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 72, 035004 (2005); 72, 099902(E) (2005).
  37. D. Atwood, L. Reina, and A. Soni, Phenomenology of two Higgs doublet models with flavor changing neutral currents, Phys. Rev. D 55, 3156 (1997).
  38. C. S. Kim, Y. W. Yoon, and X. B. Yuan, Exploring top quark FCNC within 2HDM type III in association with flavor physics, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2015) 038.
  39. N. Ahmed, I. Ahmed, and M. J. Aslam, Analysis of forward–backward and lepton polarization asymmetries in B→K1ℓ+ℓ− decays in the two-Higgs-doublet model, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2015, 113B06 (2015).
  40. R. F. Alnahdi, T. Barakat, and H. A. Alhendi, Rare Λb→Λℓ+ℓ− decay in the two-Higgs doublet model of type-III, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2017, 073B04 (2017).
  41. Y. B. Dai, C. S. Huang, and H. W. Huang, B→ Xsτ+τ−  in a two Higgs doublet model, Phys. Lett. B 390, 257 (1997); 513, 429(E) (2001).
  42. I. Ahmed, M. J. Aslam, and M. A. Paracha, Asymmetries in B→K*ℓ+ℓ− decays and two Higgs doublet model, arXiv:1602.02400
  43. G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, Weak decays beyond leading logarithms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1125 (1996).
  44. F. Borzumati and C. Greub, 2HDMs predictions for anti-B→Xsγ in NLO QCD, Phys. Rev. D 58, 074004 (1998).
  45. T. M. Aliev and M. Savci, Exclusive Λb→Λℓ+ℓ− decay in two Higgs doublet model, J. Phys. G 26, 997 (2000).
  46. A. J. Buras, M. Misiak, M. Munz, and S. Pokorski, Theoretical uncertainties and phenomenological aspects of B→Xsγ decay, Nucl. Phys. B424, 374 (1994).
  47. P. Colangelo, C. A. Dominguez, G. Nardulli, and N. Paver, Radiative B→ K*γ  transition in QCD, Phys. Lett. B 317, 183 (1993).
  48. A. J. Buras and M. Munz, Effective Hamiltonian for B→ Xse+e−  beyond leading logarithms in the NDR and HV schemes, Phys. Rev. D 52, 186 (1995).
  49. B. Grinstein, Critical reanalysis of CP asymmetries in B0 decays to CP eigenstates, Phys. Lett. B 229, 280 (1989).
  50. H. Ma et al. (e865 Collaboration), A New measurement of the rare decay K+→π+μ+μ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2580 (2000).
  51. K. Azizi, M. Bayar, A. Ozpineci, Y. Sarac, and H. Sundu, Semileptonic transition of Σb to Σ in light cone QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 85, 016002 (2012).
  52. T. Feldmann and M. W. Y. Yip, Form factors for Λb→Λ transitions in the soft-collinear effective theory, Phys. Rev. D 85, 014035 (2012); 86, 079901(E) (2012).
  53. Y. M. Wang and Y. L. Shen, Perturbative corrections to Λb→Λ form factors from QCD light-cone sum rules, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2016) 179.
  54. C. Farrell and S. Meinel, Ξb→Ξ form factors from lattice QCD and Standard-Model predictions for Ξb→Ξμ+μ− and Ξb→Ξγ decays, Phys. Rev. D 113, 114521 (2026).
  55. M. Ciuchini, G. Degrassi, P. Gambino, and G. F. Giudice, Next-to-leading QCD corrections to B→Xsγ: Standard model and two Higgs doublet model, Nucl. Phys. B527, 21 (1998).
  56. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  57. M. Misiak, H. M. Asatrian, R. Boughezal, M. Czakon, T. Ewerth, A. Ferroglia, P. Fiedler, P. Gambino, C. Greub, U. Haisch et al., Updated NNLO QCD predictions for the weak radiative B-meson decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 221801 (2015).
  58. A. Crivellin, C. Greub, and A. Kokulu, Explaining B→Dτν, B→D*τν and B→τν in a 2HDM of type III, Phys. Rev. D 86, 054014 (2012).
  59. F. Mahmoudi and O. Stal, Flavor constraints on the two-Higgs-doublet model with general Yukawa couplings, Phys. Rev. D 81, 035016 (2010).
  60. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of the differential branching fraction of the decay Λb0→Λμ+μ−, Phys. Lett. B 725, 25 (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation