Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Study of the connected four-point correlation function of galaxies from the DESI Data Release 1 luminous red galaxy sample

J. Hou1,2,3,4,*, R. N. Cahn5, J. Aguilar5, S. Ahlen7, D. Bianchi8,9, D. Brooks10, T. Claybaugh5, P. Doel10, S. Ferraro5,12 et al.

J. E. Forero-Romero13,14, E. Gaztañaga15,16,17, L. Le Guillou29, G. Gutierrez18, K. Honscheid19,20,21, D. Huterer22,23, M. Ishak24, R. Joyce25, S. Juneau25, R. Kehoe26, D. Kirkby27, T. Kisner5, A. Kremin5, C. Lamman28, M. Landriau5, A. de la Macorra11, M. Manera30,31, A. de Mattia6, R. Miquel31,32, E. Mueller33, S. Nadathur16, G. Niz34,35, W. J. Percival36,37,38, F. Prada39, I. Pérez-Ràfols40, A. J. Ross19,21,41, G. Rossi42, E. Sanchez43, D. Schlegel5, M. Schubnell22,23, H. Seo44, J. Silber5, Z. Slepian4,5, D. Sprayberry25, G. Tarlé23, B. A. Weaver25, and H. Zou45

  • *Contact author: jiamin.hou@ast.cam.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. D 112, 122005 – Published 15 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/1wyy-758f

Abstract

We present a measurement of the non-Gaussian four-point correlation function (4PCF) from the DESI DR1 luminous red galaxy (LRG) sample. For the gravitationally induced parity-even 4PCF, we detect a signal with a significance of 14.7σ using our fiducial setup. We assess the robustness of this detection through a series of validation tests, including auto and cross-correlation analyses, sky partitioning across multiple patch combinations, and variations in radial scale cuts. Due to the low completeness of the sample, we find that differences in fiber assignment implementation schemes can significantly impact estimation of the covariance and introduce biases in the data vector. After correcting for these effects, all tests yield consistent results. This is one of the first measurements of the connected 4PCF on the DESI LRG sample; the good agreement between the simulation and the data implies that the amplitude of the density fluctuation inferred from the connected 4PCF is consistent with the Planck ΛCDM cosmology. The methodology and diagnostic framework established in this work provide a foundation for interpreting parity-odd 4PCF.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (78)

  1. J. Maldacena, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2003) 013.
  2. N. Bartolo, E. Komatsu, S. Matarrese, and A. Riotto, Phys. Rep. 402, 103 (2004).
  3. X. Chen, Adv. Astron. 2010, 638979 (2010).
  4. I. Szapudi, Astrophys. J. Lett. 605, L89 (2004).
  5. Z. Slepian and D. J. Eisenstein, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 454, 4142 (2015).
  6. R. Scoccimarro, Phys. Rev. D 92, 083532 (2015).
  7. N. S. Sugiyama, S. Saito, F. Beutler, and H.-J. Seo, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 484, 364 (2018).
  8. G. D’Amico, Y. Donath, M. Lewandowski, L. Senatore, and P. Zhang, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2024) 059.
  9. O. H. E. Philcox and M. M. Ivanov, Phys. Rev. D 105, 043517 (2022).
  10. A. Eggemeier, N. Lee, R. Scoccimarro, B. Camacho-Quevedo, A. Pezzotta, M. Crocce, and A. G. Sánchez, Phys. Rev. D 112, 063532 (2025).
  11. M. Schmittfull and A. M. Dizgah, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2021) 020.
  12. A. M. Dizgah, H. Lee, M. Schmittfull, and C. Dvorkin, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2020) 011.
  13. J. Hou, A. Moradinezhad Dizgah, C. Hahn, and E. Massara, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2023) 045.
  14. J. Hou, A. M. Dizgah, C. Hahn, M. Eickenberg, S. Ho, P. Lemos, E. Massara, C. Modi, L. Parker, and B. R.-S. Blancard, Phys. Rev. D 109, 103528 (2024).
  15. E. Paillas, Y.-C. Cai, N. Padilla, and A. G. Sánchez, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 505, 5731 (2021).
  16. M. Eickenberg et al., arXiv:2204.07646.
  17. B. Régaldo-Saint Blancard, C. Hahn, S. Ho, J. Hou, P. Lemos, E. Massara, C. Modi, A. Moradinezhad Dizgah, L. Parker, Y. Yao, and M. Eickenberg, Phys. Rev. D 109, 083535 (2024).
  18. G. Valogiannis and C. Dvorkin, Phys. Rev. D 105, 103534 (2022).
  19. M. White, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2016) 057.
  20. R. K. Sheth, A. J. Connolly, and R. Skibba, arXiv:astro-ph/0511773.
  21. R. N. Cahn, Z. Slepian, and J. Hou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 201002 (2023).
  22. J. Hou, Z. Slepian, and R. N. Cahn, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 522, 5701 (2023).
  23. O. H. E. Philcox, Phys. Rev. D 106, 063501 (2022).
  24. D. Jamieson, A. Caravano, J. Hou, Z. Slepian, and E. Komatsu, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 533, 2582 (2024).
  25. D. Jeong and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 251301 (2012).
  26. D. Gualdi, H. Gil-Marin, and L. Verde, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2021) 008.
  27. O. H. E. Philcox, J. Hou, and Z. Slepian, arXiv:2108.01670.
  28. K. S. Dawson et al., Astron. J. 145, 10 (2013).
  29. M. Levi, C. Bebek, T. Beers, R. Blum, R. Cahn, D. Eisenstein, B. Flaugher, K. Honscheid, R. Kron, O. Lahav, P. McDonald, N. Roe, and D. Schlegel (DESI Collaboration), arXiv:1308.0847.
  30. A. Aghamousa et al. (DESI Collaboration), arXiv:1611.00036.
  31. A. Aghamousa et al. (DESI Collaboration), arXiv:1611.00037.
  32. B. Abareshi et al. (DESI Collaboration), Astron. J. 164, 207 (2022).
  33. M. Abdul-Karim et al. (DESI Collaboration), arXiv:2503.14745.
  34. A. G. Adame et al. (DESI Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2025) 028.
  35. M. Abdul-Karim et al. (DESI Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 112, 083515 (2025).
  36. E. F. Schlafly et al. (DESI Collaboration), Astron. J. 166, 259 (2023).
  37. C. Poppett et al., Astron. J. 168, 245 (2024).
  38. J. Guy et al., Astron. J. 165, 144 (2023).
  39. A. D. Myers et al., Astron. J. 165, 50 (2023).
  40. C. Hahn et al., Astron. J. 165, 253 (2023).
  41. R. Zhou et al., Astron. J. 165, 58 (2023).
  42. A. Raichoor et al., Astron. J. 165, 126 (2023).
  43. E. Chaussidon et al., Astrophys. J. 944, 107 (2023).
  44. T. N. Miller et al. (DESI Collaboration), Astron. J. 168, 95 (2024).
  45. A. G. Adame et al. (DESI Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2025) 008.
  46. A. Dey et al., Astron. J. 157, 168 (2019).
  47. H. Zou, X. Zhou, X. Fan, T. Zhang, Z. Zhou, J. Nie, X. Peng, I. McGreer, L. Jiang, A. Dey, D. Fan, B. He, Z. Jiang, D. Lang, M. Lesser, J. Ma, S. Mao, D. Schlegel, and J. Wang, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 129, 064101 (2017).
  48. B. Flaugher et al. (DES Collaboration), Astron. J. 150, 150 (2015).
  49. The Dark Energy Survey Collaboration, arXiv:astro-ph/0510346.
  50. E. L. Wright et al., Astron. J. 140, 1868 (2010).
  51. D. Lang, Astron. J. 147, 108 (2014).
  52. J. Lasker et al. (DESI Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2025) 127.
  53. A. G. Adame et al. (DESI Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2025) 017.
  54. C.-H. Chuang, F.-S. Kitaura, F. Prada, C. Zhao, and G. Yepes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 446, 2621 (2015).
  55. C. Zhao et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 503, 1149 (2021).
  56. L. H. Garrison, D. J. Eisenstein, and P. A. Pinto, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485, 3370 (2019).
  57. N. A. Maksimova, L. H. Garrison, D. J. Eisenstein, B. Hadzhiyska, S. Bose, and T. P. Satterthwaite, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 508, 4017 (2021).
  58. A. G. Adame et al. (DESI Collaboration), Astron. J. 168, 58 (2024).
  59. S. Yuan et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 530, 947 (2024).
  60. For the abacus-Complete mocks, we additionally downsample it to match the number density of the altMTL mocks, so that their statistical fluctuations are comparable as those in the real data.

  61. R. N. Cahn and Z. Slepian, J. Phys. A 56, 325204 (2023).
  62. In the large-Ng limit, with typical number of galaxies of modern galaxy surveys reaches O(106), the algorithm scales linearly with the number of objects. This is because the computational cost is dominated by assembling all galaxy quartets for each primary galaxy, whereas the computation of the harmonic expansion coefficients is sub-dominant (see also [63]).

  63. O. H. E. Philcox, Z. Slepian, J. Hou, C. Warner, R. N. Cahn, and D. J. Eisenstein, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 509, 2457 (2021).
  64. Z. Slepian and D. J. Eisenstein, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 454, 4142 (2015).
  65. We use the GPU version of the public code https://github.com/oliverphilcox/encore with extensions including ℓmax for the 4PCF measurement.

  66. H. A. Feldman, N. Kaiser, and J. A. Peacock, Astrophys. J. 426, 23 (1994).
  67. J. Hou, R. N. Cahn, O. H. E. Philcox, and Z. Slepian, Phys. Rev. D 106, 043515 (2022).
  68. Here we apply the Einstein summation notation.

  69. A. Krolewski, S. May, K. Smith, and H. Hopkins, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2024) 044.
  70. E. B. Wilson and M. M. Hilferty, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 17, 684 (1931).
  71. J. Hartlap, P. Simon, and P. Schneider, Astron. Astrophys. 464, 399 (2007).
  72. E. Sellentin and A. F. Heavens, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 456, L132 (2016).
  73. W. Press, Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing, Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007).
  74. D. Forero-Sánchez et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2025) 055.
  75. D. Bianchi et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2025) 074.
  76. E. Chaussidon, C. Yèche, A. de Mattia, C. Payerne, P. McDonald et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2025) 029.
  77. https://www.desi.lbl.gov/collaborating-institutions.
  78. 10.5281/zenodo.16729072.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation