Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Light dilaton near critical points in top-down holography

Daniel Elander1,*, Antón F. Faedo2,3,†, Maurizio Piai4,5,‡, Ronnie Rodgers6,§, and Javier G. Subils7,∥

  • *Contact author: daniel.elander@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: anton.faedo@uniovi.es
  • ‡Contact author: m.piai@swansea.ac.uk
  • §Contact author: ronnie.rodgers@su.se
  • ∥Contact author: j.gomezsubils@uu.nl

Phys. Rev. D 112, 126020 – Published 19 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/1wqc-vk7q

Abstract

We study a class of UV-complete, strongly coupled, confining three-dimensional field theories, that exhibit a novel stabilization mechanism for the mass of the lightest scalar composite state, relying on the existence of a critical point. The theories admit a holographic dual description in terms of regular backgrounds in 11-dimensional supergravity, which retains its rigorous microscopic interpretation in field theory. The phase diagram includes a line of first-order phase transitions ending at the critical point, where the transition becomes of second order. We calculate the mass spectrum of bound states of the field theory, by considering fluctuations around the background solutions, and find that, near the critical point, a hierarchy of scales develops, such that one state becomes parametrically light. We identify this state as the dilaton, the pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson associated with the spontaneous breaking of approximate scale invariance, demonstrating the emergence of this composite state in an ab initio calculation that has a field theory origin. A stabilization mechanism of this type might be exploited to address hierarchy problems in particle and astroparticle physics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (119)

  1. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012).
  2. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012).
  3. S. Coleman, Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1985).
  4. W. D. Goldberger, B. Grinstein, and W. Skiba, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 111802 (2008).
  5. D. K. Hong, S. D. H. Hsu, and F. Sannino, Phys. Lett. B 597, 89 (2004).
  6. D. D. Dietrich, F. Sannino, and K. Tuominen, Phys. Rev. D 72, 055001 (2005).
  7. L. Vecchi, Phys. Rev. D 82, 076009 (2010).
  8. M. Hashimoto and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rev. D 83, 015008 (2011).
  9. L. Del Debbio and R. Zwicky, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 007.
  10. R. Zwicky, arXiv:2306.12914.
  11. R. Zwicky, Phys. Rev. D 110, 014048 (2024).
  12. E. Eichten, K. Lane, and A. Martin, arXiv:1210.5462.
  13. D. Elander and M. Piai, Nucl. Phys. B867, 779 (2013).
  14. Z. Chacko and R. K. Mishra, Phys. Rev. D 87, 115006 (2013).
  15. B. Bellazzini, C. Csaki, J. Hubisz, J. Serra, and J. Terning, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2333 (2013).
  16. T. Abe, R. Kitano, Y. Konishi, K.-y. Oda, J. Sato, and S. Sugiyama, Phys. Rev. D 86, 115016 (2012).
  17. B. Bellazzini, C. Csaki, J. Hubisz, J. Serra, and J. Terning, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2790 (2014).
  18. P. Hernandez-Leon and L. Merlo, Phys. Rev. D 96, 075008 (2017).
  19. B. Holdom and J. Terning, Phys. Lett. B 187, 357 (1987).
  20. B. Holdom and J. Terning, Phys. Lett. B 200, 338 (1988).
  21. T. Appelquist and Y. Bai, Phys. Rev. D 82, 071701 (2010).
  22. B. Grinstein and P. Uttayarat, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2011) 038.
  23. J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
  24. S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B 428, 105 (1998).
  25. E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998).
  26. O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, Phys. Rep. 323, 183 (2000).
  27. E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 505 (1998).
  28. I. R. Klebanov and M. J. Strassler, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2000) 052.
  29. J. M. Maldacena and C. Nunez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 588 (2001).
  30. A. Butti, M. Grana, R. Minasian, M. Petrini, and A. Zaffaroni, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2005) 069.
  31. C. Nunez, M. Oyarzo, and R. Stuardo, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 080.
  32. D. Chatzis, A. Fatemiabhari, C. Nunez, and P. Weck, Nucl. Phys. B1006, 116659 (2024).
  33. D. Chatzis, A. Fatemiabhari, C. Nunez, and P. Weck, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 041.
  34. M. Bianchi, M. Prisco, and W. Mueck, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2003) 052.
  35. M. Berg, M. Haack, and W. Mueck, Nucl. Phys. B 736, 82 (2006).
  36. M. Berg, M. Haack, and W. Mueck, Nucl. Phys. B 789, 1 (2008).
  37. D. Elander, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2010) 114.
  38. D. Elander and M. Piai, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2011) 026.
  39. D. Elander, Phys. Rev. D 91, 126012 (2015).
  40. D. Elander, M. Piai, and J. Roughley, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 101.
  41. D. Elander, M. Piai, and J. Roughley, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 177; 12 (2020) 109(E).
  42. W. D. Goldberger and M. B. Wise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4922 (1999).
  43. O. DeWolfe, D. Z. Freedman, S. S. Gubser, and A. Karch, Phys. Rev. D 62, 046008 (2000).
  44. W. D. Goldberger and M. B. Wise, Phys. Lett. B 475, 275 (2000).
  45. C. Csaki, M. L. Graesser, and G. D. Kribs, Phys. Rev. D 63, 065002 (2001).
  46. N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Porrati, and L. Randall, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2001) 017.
  47. R. Rattazzi and A. Zaffaroni, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2001) 021.
  48. L. Kofman, J. Martin, and M. Peloso, Phys. Rev. D 70, 085015 (2004).
  49. D. Elander, C. Nunez, and M. Piai, Phys. Lett. B 686, 64 (2010).
  50. D. Elander and M. Piai, Nucl. Phys. B864, 241 (2012).
  51. D. Elander and M. Piai, Nucl. Phys. B871, 164 (2013).
  52. D. Kutasov, J. Lin, and A. Parnachev, Nucl. Phys. B 863, 361 (2012).
  53. N. Evans and K. Tuominen, Phys. Rev. D 87, 086003 (2013).
  54. D. Elander, A. F. Faedo, C. Hoyos, D. Mateos, and M. Piai, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2014) 003.
  55. C. Hoyos, U. Kol, J. Sonnenschein, and S. Yankielowicz, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2013) 181.
  56. E. Megias and O. Pujolas, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2014) 081.
  57. D. Elander, R. Lawrance, and M. Piai, Nucl. Phys. B 897, 583 (2015).
  58. E. Megias, O. Pujolas, and M. Quiros, EPJ Web Conf. 126, 05010 (2016).
  59. A. Athenodorou, E. Bennett, G. Bergner, D. Elander, C. J. D. Lin, B. Lucini, and M. Piai, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2016) 114.
  60. D. Elander and M. Piai, Phys. Lett. B 772, 110 (2017).
  61. D. Elander and M. Piai, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2017) 003.
  62. D. Elander, A. F. Faedo, D. Mateos, D. Pravos, and J. G. Subils, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2019) 175.
  63. A. Pomarol, O. Pujolas, and L. Salas, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 202.
  64. J. Cruz Rojas, D. K. Hong, S. H. Im, and M. Järvinen, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 204.
  65. A. Pomarol and L. Salas, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 149.
  66. D. Elander, A. Fatemiabhari, and M. Piai, Phys. Rev. D 108, 015021 (2023).
  67. A. Fatemiabhari, C. Nunez, M. Piai, and J. Rucinski, Phys. Rev. D 111, 066009 (2025).
  68. D. Elander, M. Piai, and J. Roughley, Phys. Rev. D 103, 106018 (2021).
  69. D. Elander, M. Piai, and J. Roughley, Phys. Rev. D 103, 046009 (2021).
  70. D. Elander, M. Piai, and J. Roughley, Phys. Rev. D 104, 046003 (2021).
  71. A. F. Faedo, C. Hoyos, M. Piai, R. Rodgers, and J. G. Subils, Phys. Rev. D 110, 126017 (2024).
  72. A. F. Faedo, D. Mateos, D. Pravos, and J. G. Subils, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2017) 153.
  73. D. Elander, A. F. Faedo, D. Mateos, and J. G. Subils, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 131.
  74. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/1wqc-vk7q for details of the holographic model, including equations of motion and boundary conditions for fluctuations, and details of our numerical procedure.
  75. A. F. Faedo, C. Hoyos, and J. G. Subils, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 218.
  76. M. Bianchi, D. Z. Freedman, and K. Skenderis, Nucl. Phys. B631, 159 (2002).
  77. K. Skenderis, Classical Quantum Gravity 19, 5849 (2002).
  78. I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis, IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys. 8, 73 (2005).
  79. J. P. Boyd, Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1989).
  80. C. Cresswell-Hogg, D. F. Litim, and R. Zwicky, arXiv:2502.00107.
  81. B. Lucini, A. Patella, A. Rago, and E. Rinaldi, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 106.
  82. S. Matsuzaki and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 082002 (2014).
  83. M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, Phys. Rev. D 94, 054502 (2016).
  84. A. Kasai, K.-i. Okumura, and H. Suzuki, arXiv:1609.02264.
  85. M. Hansen, K. Langæble, and F. Sannino, Phys. Rev. D 95, 036005 (2017).
  86. M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, Phys. Rev. D 95, 016003 (2017).
  87. T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby, and M. Piai, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2017) 035.
  88. T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby, and M. Piai, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 039.
  89. O. Catà, R. J. Crewther, and L. C. Tunstall, Phys. Rev. D 100, 095007 (2019).
  90. M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, Phys. Rev. D 98, 056025 (2018).
  91. O. Catà and C. Müller, Nucl. Phys. B952, 114938 (2020).
  92. T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby, and M. Piai, Phys. Rev. D 101, 075025 (2020).
  93. M. Golterman, E. T. Neil, and Y. Shamir, Phys. Rev. D 102, 034515 (2020).
  94. M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114507 (2020).
  95. T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby, and M. Piai, Universe 9, 10 (2023).
  96. G. K. Karananas and M. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Rev. D 97, 045009 (2018).
  97. G. Cuomo, L. Rastelli, and A. Sharon, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 144.
  98. M. R. Gaberdiel, A. Konechny, and C. Schmidt-Colinet, J. Phys. A 42, 105402 (2009).
  99. Z. Komargodski and D. Simmons-Duffin, J. Phys. A 50, 154001 (2017).
  100. T. Appelquist et al. (LSD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, L091505 (2023).
  101. T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby, and M. Piai, Phys. Rev. D 110, 035013 (2024).
  102. D. B. Kaplan and H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. 136B, 183 (1984).
  103. H. Georgi and D. B. Kaplan, Phys. Lett. 145B, 216 (1984).
  104. M. J. Dugan, H. Georgi, and D. B. Kaplan, Nucl. Phys. B254, 299 (1985).
  105. T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby, and M. Piai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 191804 (2021).
  106. T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby, and M. Piai, Nucl. Phys. B983, 115930 (2022).
  107. L. Vecchi, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2017) 094.
  108. T. Ma and G. Cacciapaglia, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2016) 211.
  109. D. Buarque Franzosi, G. Cacciapaglia, and A. Deandrea, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 28 (2020).
  110. R. Contino, in Physics of the Large and the Small (World Scientific, Singapore, 2011), pp. 235–306.
  111. G. Panico and A. Wulzer, Lect. Notes Phys. 913, 1 (2016).
  112. O. Witzel, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2018 (2019) 006 [arXiv:1901.08216].
  113. G. Cacciapaglia, C. Pica, and F. Sannino, Phys. Rep. 877, 1 (2020).
  114. E. Bennett, J. Holligan, D. K. Hong, H. Hsiao, J.-W. Lee, C. J. D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Mesiti, M. Piai, and D. Vadacchino, Universe 9, 236 (2023).
  115. G. Ferretti and D. Karateev, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2014) 077.
  116. G. Ferretti, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2016) 107.
  117. G. Cacciapaglia, G. Ferretti, T. Flacke, and H. Serôdio, Front. Phys. 7, 22 (2019).
  118. A. Anabalon and S. F. Ross, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 015.
  119. D. Elander, A. Faedo, M. Piai, R. Rodgers, and J. Subils, Light dilaton near critical points in top-down holography—data release (2025), 10.5281/zenodo.15004579.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation