Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Evolving dark sector and the dark dimension scenario

Alek Bedroya1, Georges Obied2, Cumrun Vafa3, and David H. Wu3

Phys. Rev. D 114, 103506 – Published 4 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/1rsq-cv2m

Abstract

String theory naturally leads to the expectation that dark energy is not stable, and may be evolving as captured by the Swampland de Sitter conjectures. Moreover, motivated by the distance conjecture, a unification of dark sector has been proposed, where the smallness of dark energy leads to one extra dimension of micron size with dark matter being the Kaluza-Klein graviton excitations in this extra dimension. We consider the natural possibility that the radius of the dark dimension varies as the energy decreases, leading to the variation of the dark matter mass. This correlates the variation of the dark energy with the variation of the dark matter mass as they depend on the variations of a scalar field ϕ controlling the radius of the extra dimension. A simple realization of this idea for small range of ϕ is adequately captured by choosing a potential which is locally of the form V=V0exp(−cϕ) and dark matter mass mDM=m0exp(−c′ϕ) as was proposed in [1]. We find excellent agreement with recent experimental data from DESI DR2 combined with SN measurements (from DES, Union3 or Pantheon+) and reproduces the same significance as Chevallier–Polarski–Linder parametrization with the added benefit of providing a natural explanation for the apparent phantom behavior (w<−1) reported by DESI and DES based on a physical model. DESI and SN datasets independently favor nonzero values of c′ and c, respectively, both lying within the expected O(1) range suggested by the Swampland criteria. Moreover, our best fit value c′≃0.05±0.01 is remarkably consistent with the experimental upper bound of c′≲0.2 demanded by the lack of detection of fifth force in the dark sector.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (71)

  1. P. Agrawal, G. Obied, and C. Vafa, Phys. Rev. D 103, 043523 (2021).
  2. N. B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M. J. Kang, and C. Vafa, arXiv:2212.06187.
  3. M. van Beest, J. Calderón-Infante, D. Mirfendereski, and I. Valenzuela, Phys. Rep. 989, 1 (2022).
  4. E. Palti, Fortschr. Phys. 67, 1900037 (2019).
  5. T. M. C. Abbott et al. (DES Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett. 973, L14 (2024).
  6. M. Abdul Karim et al. (DESI Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 112, 083515 (2025).
  7. K. Lodha et al. (DESI Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 112, 083511 (2025).
  8. H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B766, 21 (2007).
  9. D. Lüst, E. Palti, and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134867 (2019).
  10. S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, and T. Weigand, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2022) 190.
  11. M. Montero, C. Vafa, and I. Valenzuela, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 022.
  12. E. Gonzalo, M. Montero, G. Obied, and C. Vafa, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 109.
  13. G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko, and C. Vafa, arXiv:1806.08362.
  14. A. Bedroya and C. Vafa, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 123.
  15. C. Vafa, arXiv:2402.00981.
  16. C. Vafa, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 57, 19 (2025).
  17. P. Agrawal, G. Obied, P. J. Steinhardt, and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. B 784, 271 (2018).
  18. H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu, and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. B 788, 180 (2019).
  19. S. K. Garg and C. Krishnan, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2019) 075.
  20. S. Chen, D. van de Heisteeg, and C. Vafa, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 258.
  21. D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, M. Wiesner, and D. H. Wu, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 175.
  22. D. Andriot and L. Horer, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 020.
  23. T. Rudelius, Phys. Rev. D 104, 126023 (2021).
  24. A. Bedroya, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 016.
  25. A. Bedroya, H. Lee, and P. Steinhardt, arXiv:2504.13260.
  26. A. Bedroya, Q. Lu, and P. Steinhardt, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 007.
  27. L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, and D. Lust, Phys. Lett. B 868, 139632 (2025).
  28. R. Brandenberger, arXiv:2503.17659.
  29. D. Andriot, Phys. Dark Universe 49, 102000 (2025).
  30. L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, N. Cribiori, A. Hasar, D. Lust, J. Masias, and M. Scalisi, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2025) 128.
  31. M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, S. Kaya, Y. Qiu, and T. Rudelius, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2022) 114.
  32. D. Andriot, N. Cribiori, and D. Erkinger, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 162.
  33. A. Higuchi, Nucl. Phys. B282, 397 (1987).
  34. D. Andriot, D. Tsimpis, and T. Wrase, Phys. Rev. D 108, 123515 (2023).
  35. A. Bedroya, C. Vafa, and D. H. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 113, 106011 (2026).
  36. A. Herráez, D. Lüst, and C. Montella, Phys. Rev. D 112, 086006 (2025).
  37. L. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, and D. Lust, Fortschr. Phys. 73, e70015 (2025).
  38. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. R. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 429, 263 (1998).
  39. G. Obied, C. Dvorkin, E. Gonzalo, and C. Vafa, Phys. Rev. D 109, 063540 (2024).
  40. J. A. P. Law-Smith, G. Obied, A. Prabhu, and C. Vafa, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 047.
  41. K. R. Dienes and B. Thomas, Phys. Rev. D 85, 083523 (2012); 85, 083524 (2012), .
  42. L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, and D. Lust, Phys. Rev. D 107, 083530 (2023).
  43. L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, and D. Lust, Phys. Lett. B 840, 137844 (2023).
  44. L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, and D. Lust, Phys. Rev. D 106, 086001 (2022).
  45. L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, and D. Lust, Phys. Rev. D 109, 095008 (2024).
  46. J.-P. Uzan, Living Rev. Relativity 28, 6 (2025).
  47. I. D. Gialamas, G. Hütsi, M. Raidal, J. Urrutia, M. Vasar, and H. Veermäe, Phys. Rev. D 112, 063551 (2025).
  48. H. Stefancic, Eur. Phys. J. C 36, 523 (2004).
  49. G. Huey and B. D. Wandelt, Phys. Rev. D 74, 023519 (2006).
  50. S. Das, P. S. Corasaniti, and J. Khoury, Phys. Rev. D 73, 083509 (2006).
  51. C. van de Bruck and C. C. Thomas, Phys. Rev. D 100, 023515 (2019).
  52. A. Chakraborty, P. K. Chanda, S. Das, and K. Dutta, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2025) 047.
  53. J. Khoury, M.-X. Lin, and M. Trodden, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 181001 (2025).
  54. D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues, and T. Tram, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2011) 034.
  55. L. Amendola, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 312, 521 (2000).
  56. V. Miranda, M. Carrillo González, E. Krause, and M. Trodden, Phys. Rev. D 97, 063511 (2018).
  57. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/1rsq-cv2m for additional details and figures.
  58. J. Torrado and A. Lewis, Cobaya: Bayesian analysis in cosmology, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1910.019 (2019).
  59. J. Torrado and A. Lewis, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2021) 057.
  60. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  61. T. Louis et al. (ACT Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2025) 062.
  62. J. Carron, M. Mirmelstein, and A. Lewis, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2022) 039.
  63. E. Rosenberg, S. Gratton, and G. Efstathiou, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 517, 4620 (2022).
  64. D. Rubin et al., Astrophys. J. 986, 231 (2025).
  65. D. Scolnic et al., Astrophys. J. 938, 113 (2022).
  66. Y. Akrami, G. Alestas, and S. Nesseris, arXiv:2504.04226.
  67. M. Kesden and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 131303 (2006).
  68. S. Bottaro, E. Castorina, M. Costa, D. Redigolo, and E. Salvioni, Phys. Rev. D 112, 023525 (2025).
  69. B. Popovic et al. (DES Collaboration), Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 548, stag632 (2026).
  70. T. J. Hoyt, D. Rubin, G. Aldering, S. Perlmutter, A. Cuceu, and R. Gupta, arXiv:2601.19424.
  71. D. Rubin, T. Hoyt, G. Aldering, and S. Perlmutter, arXiv:2601.19854.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation