- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

First constraint on the weak mixing angle using direct detection experiments

Tarak Nath Maity1,* and Céline Bœhm1,2,†

  • *Contact author: tarak.maity.physics@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: celine.boehm@sydney.edu.au
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 112, 053001 – Published 2 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/1lgl-bx7v

Abstract

Current ton-scale dark matter direct detection experiments have reached an important milestone with the detection of solar neutrinos. In this paper, we show that these data can be used to determine a critical parameter of the Standard Model in particle physics, across an energy regime that has never been probed before. In particular, we show that the value of the weak mixing angle (θW) which relates the mass of the W and Z bosons can be derived from (1) the recent measurements of coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering by PandaX-4T and XENONnT in the sub-GeV energy range—a regime which is usually only probed by low energy neutrino experiments—and from (2) XENONnT electron recoil data through neutrino-electron scattering at energy scale ≃0.1  MeV, corresponding to a momentum transfer region over an order of magnitude smaller than that explored by atomic parity violation experiments. Now that an indicative measurement of the weak mixing angle exists at these lowest energy frontier, the challenge for the next generation of such experiments will be to provide a more precise measurement in the keV–MeV energy range.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (112)

  1. M. W. Goodman and E. Witten, Detectability of certain dark matter candidates, Phys. Rev. D 31, 3059 (1985).
  2. A. Drukier and L. Stodolsky, Principles and applications of a neutral current detector for neutrino physics and astronomy, Phys. Rev. D 30, 2295 (1984).
  3. Z. Bo et al. (PandaX Collaboration), First indication of solar B8 neutrinos through coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering in PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 191001 (2024).
  4. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), First indication of solar B8 neutrinos via coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering with XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 191002 (2024).
  5. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Search for new physics in electronic recoil data from XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 161805 (2022).
  6. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Search for new physics in low-energy electron recoils from the first LZ exposure, Phys. Rev. D 108, 072006 (2023).
  7. X. Zeng et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Exploring new physics with PandaX-4T low energy electronic recoil data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 041001 (2025).
  8. A. K. Drukier, K. Freese, and D. N. Spergel, Detecting cold dark matter candidates, Phys. Rev. D 33, 3495 (1986).
  9. J. Monroe and P. Fisher, Neutrino backgrounds to dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 76, 033007 (2007).
  10. L. E. Strigari, Neutrino coherent scattering rates at direct dark matter detectors, New J. Phys. 11, 105011 (2009).
  11. A. Gutlein, C. Ciemniak, F. von Feilitzsch, N. Haag, M. Hofmann, C. Isaila, T. Lachenmaier, J.-C. Lanfranchi, L. Oberauer, and S. Pfister, Solar and atmospheric neutrinos: Background sources for the direct dark matter search, Astropart. Phys. 34, 90 (2010).
  12. J. Billard, L. Strigari, and E. Figueroa-Feliciano, Implication of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next generation dark matter direct detection experiments, Phys. Rev. D 89, 023524 (2014).
  13. A. Gütlein et al., Impact of coherent neutrino nucleus scattering on direct dark matter searches based on CaWO4 crystals, Astropart. Phys. 69, 44 (2015).
  14. F. Ruppin, J. Billard, E. Figueroa-Feliciano, and L. Strigari, Complementarity of dark matter detectors in light of the neutrino background, Phys. Rev. D 90, 083510 (2014).
  15. C. A. J. O’Hare, Dark matter astrophysical uncertainties and the neutrino floor, Phys. Rev. D 94, 063527 (2016).
  16. C. A. J. O’Hare, New definition of the neutrino floor for direct dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 251802 (2021).
  17. S. Weinberg, A model of leptons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264 (1967).
  18. D. Z. Freedman, Coherent neutrino nucleus scattering as a probe of the weak neutral current, Phys. Rev. D 9, 1389 (1974).
  19. S. Sarantakos, A. Sirlin, and W. J. Marciano, Radiative corrections to neutrino-lepton scattering in the SU(2)L⊗ U(1) theory, Nucl. Phys. B217, 84 (1983).
  20. K. G. Wilson, Renormalization group and critical phenomena. I. Renormalization group and the Kadanoff scaling picture, Phys. Rev. B 4, 3174 (1971).
  21. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  22. C. Y. Prescott et al., Further measurements of parity nonconservation in inelastic electron scattering, Phys. Lett. B 84, 524 (1979).
  23. P. L. Anthony et al. (SLAC E158 Collaboration), Precision measurement of the weak mixing angle in Moller scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 081601 (2005).
  24. Jefferson Lab Qweak Collaboration, Precision measurement of the weak charge of the proton, Nature (London) 557, 207 (2018).
  25. D. Akimov et al. (COHERENT Collaboration), Observation of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, Science 357, 1123 (2017).
  26. D. Akimov et al. (COHERENT Collaboration), First measurement of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering on argon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 012002 (2021).
  27. V. De Romeri, O. G. Miranda, D. K. Papoulias, G. Sanchez Garcia, M. Tórtola, and J. W. F. Valle, Physics implications of a combined analysis of COHERENT CsI and LAr data, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2023) 035.
  28. J. Colaresi, J. I. Collar, T. W. Hossbach, C. M. Lewis, and K. M. Yocum, Measurement of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering from reactor antineutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 211802 (2022).
  29. D. Aristizabal Sierra, V. De Romeri, and D. K. Papoulias, Consequences of the Dresden-II reactor data for the weak mixing angle and new physics, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 076.
  30. M. Alpízar-Venegas, L. J. Flores, E. Peinado, and E. Vázquez-Jáuregui, Exploring the standard model and beyond from the evidence of CEνNS with reactor antineutrinos in CONUS+, Phys. Rev. D 111, 053001 (2025).
  31. V. De Romeri, D. K. Papoulias, and G. Sanchez Garcia, Implications of the first CONUS+measurement of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075025 (2025).
  32. N. Ackermann et al., First observation of reactor antineutrinos by coherent scattering, Nature (London) 643, 1229 (2025).
  33. E. Aprile, C. E. Dahl, L. DeViveiros, R. Gaitskell, K. L. Giboni, J. Kwong, J. Kwong, P. Majewski, K. Ni, T. Shutt, and M. Yamashita, Simultaneous measurement of ionization and scintillation from nuclear recoils in liquid xenon as target for a dark matter experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 081302 (2006).
  34. R. Essig, A. Manalaysay, J. Mardon, P. Sorensen, and T. Volansky, First direct detection Limits on sub-GeV dark matter from XENON10, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 021301 (2012).
  35. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Light dark matter search with ionization signals in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 251801 (2019).
  36. S. Li et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Search for light dark matter with ionization signals in the PandaX-4T experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 261001 (2023).
  37. R. Essig, M. Sholapurkar, and T.-T. Yu, Solar neutrinos as a signal and background in direct-detection experiments searching for Sub-GeV dark matter with electron recoils, Phys. Rev. D 97, 095029 (2018).
  38. J. Wyenberg and I. M. Shoemaker, Mapping the neutrino floor for direct detection experiments based on dark matter-electron scattering, Phys. Rev. D 97, 115026 (2018).
  39. G. Herrera, A neutrino floor for the Migdal effect, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 288.
  40. B. Carew, A. R. Caddell, T. N. Maity, and C. A. J. O’Hare, Neutrino fog for dark matter-electron scattering experiments, Phys. Rev. D 109, 083016 (2024).
  41. D. S. Akerib et al., Snowmass2021 cosmic frontier dark matter direct detection to the neutrino fog, in Snowmass 2021 (2022).
  42. H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee, and W. J. Marciano, Muon g−2, rare kaon decays, and parity violation from dark bosons, Phys. Rev. D 89, 095006 (2014).
  43. M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, and E. Picciau, Muon and electron g−2 and proton and cesium weak charges implications on dark Zd models, Phys. Rev. D 104, 011701 (2021).
  44. H. Davoudiasl, K. Enomoto, H.-S. Lee, J. Lee, and W. J. Marciano, Searching for new physics effects in future W mass and sin2θW(Q2) determinations, Phys. Rev. D 108, 115018 (2023).
  45. C. A. J. O’Hare, Can we overcome the neutrino floor at high masses?, Phys. Rev. D 102, 063024 (2020).
  46. W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, Radiative corrections to neutrino induced neutral current phenomena in the SU(2)L×U(1) Theory, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2695 (1980).
  47. J. N. Bahcall, M. Kamionkowski, and A. Sirlin, Solar neutrinos: Radiative corrections in neutrino—electron scattering experiments, Phys. Rev. D 51, 6146 (1995).
  48. J. Erler and S. Su, The weak neutral current, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 71, 119 (2013).
  49. O. Tomalak, P. Machado, V. Pandey, and R. Plestid, Flavor-dependent radiative corrections in coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 097.
  50. J.-W. Chen, H.-C. Chi, C. P. Liu, and C.-P. Wu, Low-energy electronic recoil in xenon detectors by solar neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 774, 656 (2017).
  51. M. Atzori Corona, W. M. Bonivento, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, and F. Dordei, New constraint on neutrino magnetic moment and neutrino millicharge from LUX-ZEPLIN dark matter search results, Phys. Rev. D 107, 053001 (2023).
  52. S. Goswami and A. Y. Smirnov, Solar neutrinos and 1-3 leptonic mixing, Phys. Rev. D 72, 053011 (2005).
  53. P. A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  54. J. Erler and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, The weak mixing angle at low energies, Phys. Rev. D 72, 073003 (2005).
  55. J. Erler and R. Ferro-Hernández, Weak mixing angle in the Thomson limit, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 196.
  56. M. Szydagis et al., A review of basic energy reconstruction techniques in liquid Xenon and argon detectors for dark matter and neutrino physics using NEST, Instruments 5, 13 (2021).
  57. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), XENON1T dark matter data analysis: Signal and background models and statistical inference, Phys. Rev. D 99, 112009 (2019).
  58. G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1554 (2011).
  59. D. Baxter et al., Recommended conventions for reporting results from direct dark matter searches, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 907 (2021).
  60. F. Reines, H. S. Gurr, and H. W. Sobel, Detection of anti-electron-neutrino e scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 315 (1976).
  61. C. Boehm, Implications of a new light gauge boson for neutrino physics, Phys. Rev. D 70, 055007 (2004).
  62. A. N. Khan, Global analysis of the source and detector nonstandard interactions using the short baseline ν−e and ν−−e scattering data, Phys. Rev. D 93, 093019 (2016).
  63. B. C. Canas, E. A. Garces, O. G. Miranda, M. Tortola, and J. W. F. Valle, The weak mixing angle from low energy neutrino measurements: A global update, Phys. Lett. B 761, 450 (2016).
  64. A. N. Khan and D. W. McKay, sin2θW estimate and bounds on nonstandard interactions at source and detector in the solar neutrino low-energy regime, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2017) 143.
  65. A. N. Khan, sin2θW Estimate and neutrino electromagnetic properties from low-energy solar data, J. Phys. G 46, 035005 (2019).
  66. B. C. Cañas, E. A. Garcés, O. G. Miranda, and A. Parada, Future perspectives for a weak mixing angle measurement in coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering experiments, Phys. Lett. B 784, 159 (2018).
  67. S. K. Agarwalla et al. (Borexino Collaboration), Constraints on flavor-diagonal non-standard neutrino interactions from Borexino Phase-II, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2020) 038.
  68. A. de Gouvea, P. A. N. Machado, Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, and Z. Tabrizi, Measuring the weak mixing angle in the DUNE near detector complex, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 051803 (2020).
  69. O. G. Miranda, D. K. Papoulias, G. Sanchez Garcia, O. Sanders, M. Tórtola, and J. W. F. Valle, Implications of the first detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEvNS) with Liquid Argon, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 130.
  70. M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, E. Picciau C. A. Ternes, and Y. Y. Zhang, New insights into nuclear physics and weak mixing angle using electroweak probes, Phys. Rev. C 104, 065502 (2021).
  71. D. Akimov et al. (COHERENT Collaboration), Measurement of the coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering cross section on CsI by COHERENT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 081801 (2022).
  72. A. Majumdar, D. K. Papoulias, R. Srivastava, and J. W. F. Valle, Physics implications of recent Dresden-II reactor data, Phys. Rev. D 106, 093010 (2022).
  73. M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, and G. Masia, Nuclear neutron radius and weak mixing angle measurements from latest COHERENT CsI and atomic parity violation Cs data, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 683 (2023).
  74. M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, and C. Giunti, Refined determination of the weak mixing angle at low energy, Phys. Rev. D 110, 033005 (2024).
  75. L. Chen, S. Iguro, and Y. Hamada, Determining weak-mixing angle at μTRISTAN, arXiv:2406.04500.
  76. V. De Romeri, D. K. Papoulias, and C. A. Ternes, Bounds on new neutrino interactions from the first CEνNS data at direct detection experiments, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2025) 012.
  77. R. Harnik, J. Kopp, and P. A. N. Machado, Exploring nu signals in dark matter detectors, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2012) 026.
  78. D. G. Cerdeño, M. Fairbairn, T. Jubb, P. A. N. Machado, A. C. Vincent, and C. Bœhm, Physics from solar neutrinos in dark matter direct detection experiments, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2016) 118.
  79. E. Bertuzzo, F. F. Deppisch, S. Kulkarni, Y. F. Perez Gonzalez, and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Dark matter and exotic neutrino interactions in direct detection searches, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2017) 073.
  80. B. Dutta, S. Liao, L. E. Strigari, and J. W. Walker, Non-standard interactions of solar neutrinos in dark matter experiments, Phys. Lett. B 773, 242 (2017).
  81. M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Neutrino discovery limit of dark matter direct detection experiments in the presence of non-standard interactions, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 019.
  82. C. Bœhm, D. G. Cerdeño, P. A. N. Machado, A. Olivares-Del Campo, E. Perdomo, and E. Reid, How high is the neutrino floor?, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2019) 043.
  83. G.-Y. Huang and S. Zhou, Constraining neutrino lifetimes and magnetic moments via solar neutrinos in the large xenon detectors, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2019) 024.
  84. J. M. Link and X.-J. Xu, Searching for BSM neutrino interactions in dark matter detectors, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2019) 004.
  85. C. Boehm, D. G. Cerdeno, M. Fairbairn, P. A. N. Machado, and A. C. Vincent, Light new physics in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. D 102, 115013 (2020).
  86. D. W. P. d. Amaral, D. G. Cerdeno, P. Foldenauer, and E. Reid, Solar neutrino probes of the muon anomalous magnetic moment in the gauged U(1)Lμ−Lτ, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 155.
  87. D. Aristizabal Sierra, V. De Romeri, L. J. Flores, and D. K. Papoulias, Light vector mediators facing XENON1T data, Phys. Lett. B 809, 135681 (2020).
  88. A. N. Khan, Can nonstandard neutrino interactions explain the XENON1T spectral excess?, Phys. Lett. B 809, 135782 (2020).
  89. S. Karmakar and S. Pandey, XENON1T constraints on neutrino non-standard interactions, arXiv:2007.11892.
  90. O. Seto and T. Shimomura, Signal from sterile neutrino dark matter in extra U(1) model at direct detection experiment, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135880 (2020).
  91. A. N. Khan, Constraints on general light mediators from PandaX-II electron recoil data, Phys. Lett. B 819, 136415 (2021).
  92. A. Majumdar, D. K. Papoulias, and R. Srivastava, Dark matter detectors as a novel probe for light new physics, Phys. Rev. D 106, 013001 (2022).
  93. Y.-F. Li and S.-y. Xia, Constraining light mediators via detection of coherent elastic solar neutrino nucleus scattering, Nucl. Phys. B977, 115737 (2022).
  94. A. N. Khan, Light new physics and neutrino electromagnetic interactions in XENONnT, Phys. Lett. B 837, 137650 (2023).
  95. ShivaSankar K. A., A. Majumdar, D. K. Papoulias, H. Prajapati, and R. Srivastava, Implications of first LZ and XENONnT results: A comparative study of neutrino properties and light mediators, Phys. Lett. B 839, 137742 (2023).
  96. D. W. P. Amaral, D. Cerdeno, A. Cheek, and P. Foldenauer, A direct detection view of the neutrino NSI landscape, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 071.
  97. C. Giunti and C. A. Ternes, Testing neutrino electromagnetic properties at current and future dark matter experiments, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095044 (2023).
  98. M. Demirci and M. F. Mustamin, Solar neutrino constraints on light mediators through coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, Phys. Rev. D 109, 015021 (2024).
  99. V. De Romeri, D. K. Papoulias, and C. A. Ternes, Light vector mediators at direct detection experiments, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 165.
  100. D. Aristizabal Sierra, N. Mishra, and L. Strigari, Implications of first neutrino-induced nuclear recoil measurements in direct detection experiments, Phys. Rev. D 111, 055007 (2025).
  101. G. Herrera and P. Huber, Anapole moment of neutrinos and radioactive sources near liquid xenon detectors, Phys. Rev. D 111, 073008 (2025).
  102. J. Aalbers et al. (DARWIN Collaboration), Solar neutrino detection sensitivity in DARWIN via electron scattering, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1133 (2020).
  103. J. Aalbers et al., A next-generation liquid xenon observatory for dark matter and neutrino physics, J. Phys. G 50, 013001 (2023).
  104. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Energy resolution and linearity of XENON1T in the MeV energy range, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 785 (2020).
  105. M. Agostini et al. (Borexino Collaboration), First simultaneous precision spectroscopy of pp, Be7, and pep solar neutrinos with Borexino Phase-II, Phys. Rev. D 100, 082004 (2019).
  106. A. Allega et al. (SNO+ Collaboration), Measurement of the B8 solar neutrino flux using the full SNO+water phase, Phys. Rev. D 110, 122003 (2024).
  107. A. Abdukerim et al. (PandaX Collaboration), PandaX-xT—A deep underground multi-ten-tonne liquid xenon observatory, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68, 221011 (2025).
  108. J. Aalbers et al. (XLZD Collaboration), The XLZD design book: Towards the next-generation liquid Xenon observatory for dark matter and neutrino physics, arXiv:2410.17137.
  109. C. E. Aalseth et al. (DarkSide-20k Collaboration), DarkSide-20k: A 20 tonne two-phase LAr TPC for direct dark matter detection at LNGS, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133, 131 (2018).
  110. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (Oscura Collaboration), The Oscura experiment, arXiv:2202.10518.
  111. J. L. Newstead, L. E. Strigari, and R. F. Lang, Detecting CNO solar neutrinos in next-generation xenon dark matter experiments, Phys. Rev. D 99, 043006 (2019).
  112. A. de Gouvêa, E. McGinness, I. Martinez-Soler, and Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, pp solar neutrinos at DARWIN, Phys. Rev. D 106, 096017 (2022).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 112, 053001– Published 2 September, 2025
  • Received 29 September 2024
  • Accepted 29 July 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation