Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Shear and bulk viscosities of the gluon plasma across the transition temperature from lattice QCD

Heng-Tong Ding, Hai-Tao Shu*, and Cheng Zhang†

  • *Contact author: hai-tao.shu@ccnu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: chengzhang@mails.ccnu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 113, 074503 – Published 3 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/1h7r-clj7

Abstract

We investigate the temperature dependence of the shear viscosity (η) and bulk viscosity (ζ) of the gluon plasma using lattice QCD over the range 0.76−2.25Tc, extending from below the transition temperature Tc across the transition region and into the deconfined phase. At each temperature, we employ three large, fine lattices, which enables controlled continuum extrapolations of the energy-momentum tensor correlators. Using gradient flow together with a recently developed blocking technique, we achieve percent-level precision for these correlators, providing strong constraints for a model-based spectral analysis. Since the inversion to real-time information is intrinsically ill posed, we extract viscosities by fitting spectral functions whose ultraviolet behavior is matched to the best available perturbative result, while the infrared region is described by a Lorentzian transport peak. The dominant modeling uncertainty associated with the transport peak width is bracketed by varying it over a physically motivated range set by thermal scales. We find that the shear-viscosity-to-entropy-density ratio, η/s, exhibits a minimum near the transition temperature Tc and increases for T>Tc, whereas the bulk-viscosity-to-entropy-density ratio, ζ/s, decreases monotonically over the entire temperature range studied.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (90)

  1. D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. C 68, 034913 (2003).
  2. P. Kovtun, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 111601 (2005).
  3. R. A. Lacey, N. N. Ajitanand, J. M. Alexander, P. Chung, W. G. Holzmann, M. Issah, A. Taranenko, P. Danielewicz, and H. Stoecker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 092301 (2007).
  4. L. P. Csernai, J. I. Kapusta, and L. D. McLerran, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 152303 (2006).
  5. H. B. Meyer, Phys. Rev. D 76, 101701 (2007).
  6. H. B. Meyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 162001 (2008).
  7. D. Kharzeev and K. Tuchin, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2008) 093.
  8. R. Marty, E. Bratkovskaya, W. Cassing, J. Aichelin, and H. Berrehrah, Phys. Rev. C 88, 045204 (2013).
  9. N. Christiansen, M. Haas, J. M. Pawlowski, and N. Strodthoff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 112002 (2015).
  10. N. Astrakhantsev, V. Braguta, and A. Kotov, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2017) 101.
  11. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, M. Giordano, S. D. Katz, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, A. Schafer, K. K. Szabo, and C. Toth, Phys. Rev. D 98, 014512 (2018).
  12. J. Ghiglieri, G. D. Moore, and D. Teaney, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 179.
  13. N. Astrakhantsev, V. Braguta, and A. Kotov, Phys. Rev. D 98, 054515 (2018).
  14. V. Mykhaylova, M. Bluhm, K. Redlich, and C. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 100, 034002 (2019).
  15. E. Itou and Y. Nagai, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 007.
  16. V. Mykhaylova and C. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014007 (2021).
  17. L. Altenkort, A. M. Eller, A. Francis, O. Kaczmarek, L. Mazur, G. D. Moore, and H.-T. Shu, Phys. Rev. D 108, 014503 (2023).
  18. A. Adare et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 172301 (2007).
  19. H.-J. Drescher, A. Dumitru, C. Gombeaud, and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Phys. Rev. C 76, 024905 (2007).
  20. K. Dusling and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. C 77, 034905 (2008).
  21. P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 172301 (2007).
  22. Z. Xu, C. Greiner, and H. Stocker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 082302 (2008).
  23. M. Luzum and P. Romatschke, Phys. Rev. C 78, 034915 (2008).
  24. A. K. Chaudhuri, Phys. Lett. B 681, 418 (2009).
  25. K. Aamodt et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 032301 (2011).
  26. J. E. Bernhard, J. S. Moreland, and S. A. Bass, Nat. Phys. 15, 1113 (2019).
  27. C. Shen, B. Schenke, and W. Zhao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 072301 (2024).
  28. H. Song, S. A. Bass, U. Heinz, T. Hirano, and C. Shen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 192301 (2011).
  29. P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2003) 051.
  30. P. B. Arnold, C. Dogan, and G. D. Moore, Phys. Rev. D 74, 085021 (2006).
  31. M. Lüscher and P. Weisz, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2001) 010.
  32. M. Cè, L. Giusti, and S. Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D 95, 034503 (2017).
  33. L. Giusti and M. Saccardi, Phys. Lett. B 829, 137103 (2022).
  34. L. Barca, S. Schaefer, and J. Finkenrath, Phys. Rev. D 113, 034505 (2026).
  35. R. Narayanan and H. Neuberger, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2006) 064.
  36. M. Lüscher, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2010) 071.
  37. M. Lüscher, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2013) 123.
  38. M. Kitazawa, T. Iritani, M. Asakawa, and T. Hatsuda, Phys. Rev. D 96, 111502 (2017).
  39. L. Altenkort, A. M. Eller, O. Kaczmarek, L. Mazur, G. D. Moore, and H.-T. Shu, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014511 (2021).
  40. L. Altenkort, A. M. Eller, O. Kaczmarek, L. Mazur, G. D. Moore, and H.-T. Shu, Phys. Rev. D 103, 114513 (2021).
  41. L. Altenkort, D. de la Cruz, O. Kaczmarek, G. D. Moore, and H.-T. Shu, Phys. Rev. D 109, 114505 (2024).
  42. L. Altenkort, A. M. Eller, O. Kaczmarek, L. Mazur, G. D. Moore, and H.-T. Shu, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094505 (2022).
  43. S. Jeon, Phys. Rev. D 52, 3591 (1995).
  44. K. Yagi, T. Hatsuda, and Y. Miake, Quark-Gluon Plasma: From Big Bang to Little Bang (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005), Vol. 23.
  45. H. B. Meyer, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2009) 077.
  46. L. Giusti and M. Pepe, Phys. Rev. D 91, 114504 (2015).
  47. M. Dalla Brida, L. Giusti, and M. Pepe, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 043.
  48. H. Suzuki, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2013, 083B03 (2013).
  49. H. Suzuki and H. Takaura, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 073B02 (2021).
  50. Y. Zhu and A. Vuorinen, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2013) 002.
  51. A. Vuorinen and Y. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2015) 138.
  52. G. Aarts and J. M. Martinez Resco, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2002) 053.
  53. K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2445 (1974).
  54. A. Vladikas, Phys. Lett. 169B, 93 (1986).
  55. M. Creutz, Phys. Rev. D 36, 515 (1987).
  56. S. L. Adler, Phys. Rev. D 37, 458 (1988).
  57. R. Sommer, Nucl. Phys. B411, 839 (1994).
  58. A. Francis, O. Kaczmarek, M. Laine, T. Neuhaus, and H. Ohno, Phys. Rev. D 91, 096002 (2015).
  59. Y. Burnier, H. T. Ding, O. Kaczmarek, A. L. Kruse, M. Laine, H. Ohno, and H. Sandmeyer, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2017) 206.
  60. M. Lüscher and P. Weisz, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2011) 051.
  61. M. Luscher and P. Weisz, Commun. Math. Phys. 98, 433 (1985).
  62. M. Luscher and P. Weisz, Phys. Lett. B 158, 250 (1985).
  63. A. Ramos and S. Sint, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 15 (2016).
  64. C. Gattringer and C. B. Lang, Quantum Chromodynamics on the Lattice (Springer, Berlin, 2010), Vol. 788.
  65. Y. Taniguchi, S. Ejiri, R. Iwami, K. Kanaya, M. Kitazawa, H. Suzuki, T. Umeda, and N. Wakabayashi (WHOT-QCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 96, 014509 (2017).
  66. R. V. Harlander, Y. Kluth, and F. Lange, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 944 (2018).
  67. T. Iritani, M. Kitazawa, H. Suzuki, and H. Takaura, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 023B02 (2019).
  68. R. V. Harlander and T. Neumann, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2016) 161.
  69. Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, D. Nogradi, and C. H. Wong, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2012) 007.
  70. A. Hasenfratz and O. Witzel, Phys. Rev. D 101, 034514 (2020).
  71. G. H. Golub, P. C. Hansen, and D. P. O’Leary, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 21, 185 (1999).
  72. V. Gimenez, L. Giusti, S. Guerriero, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, S. Petrarca, J. Reyes, B. Taglienti, and E. Trevigne, Phys. Lett. B 598, 227 (2004).
  73. M. Asakawa, Y. Nakahara, and T. Hatsuda, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 46, 459 (2001).
  74. G. Backus and F. Gilbert, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 16, 169 (1968).
  75. H.-T. Ding, O. Kaczmarek, S. Mukherjee, H. Ohno, and H. T. Shu, Phys. Rev. D 97, 094503 (2018).
  76. D. Dudal, O. Oliveira, and P. J. Silva, Phys. Rev. D 89, 014010 (2014).
  77. Y. Burnier and A. Rothkopf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 182003 (2013).
  78. S. Y. Chen, H. T. Ding, F. Y. Liu, G. Papp, and C. B. Yang, arXiv:2110.13521.
  79. M. Laine, A. Vuorinen, and Y. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2011) 084.
  80. K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Nucl. Phys. B503, 357 (1997).
  81. F. Herren and M. Steinhauser, Comput. Phys. Commun. 224, 333 (2018).
  82. K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kuhn, and M. Steinhauser, Comput. Phys. Commun. 133, 43 (2000).
  83. H. B. Meyer, Eur. Phys. J. A 47, 86 (2011).
  84. L. Giusti, M. Hirasawa, M. Pepe, and L. Virzì, Phys. Lett. B 868, 139775 (2025).
  85. J. Engels, F. Karsch, and T. Scheideler, Nucl. Phys. B564, 303 (2000).
  86. S. Borsanyi, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szabo, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2012) 056.
  87. H.-T. Ding, H.-T. Shu, and C. Zhang, Dataset for shear and bulk viscosities of gluon plasma across the transition temperature from lattice QCD, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.18976353 (2026).
  88. L. Altenkort, D. Bollweg, D. A. Clarke, O. Kaczmarek, L. Mazur, C. Schmidt, P. Scior, and H.-T. Shu, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2021 (2022) 196 [arXiv:2111.10354].
  89. L. Mazur, Ph.D. thesis, Bielefeld University, 2021, 10.4119/unibi/2956493.
  90. L. Mazur et al. (HotQCD Collaboration), Comput. Phys. Commun. 300, 109164 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation