Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Identifying triple-strangeness Ω hyperons in light of recent experimental results

Si-Qiang Luo1,2,3,* and Xiang Liu1,2,4,3,†

  • 1School of Physical Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • 2Lanzhou Center for Theoretical Physics, Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics of Gansu Province, Key Laboratory of Quantum Theory and Applications of MoE, Gansu Provincial Research Center for Basic Disciplines of Quantum Physics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • 3Research Center for Hadron and CSR Physics, Lanzhou University and Institute of Modern Physics of CAS, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • 4MoE Frontiers Science Center for Rare Isotopes, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

  • *Contact author: luosq15@lzu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: xiangliu@lzu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, 014047 – Published 31 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/18md-j4bf

Abstract

In this work, we systematically calculate the mass spectra and decay widths of Ω baryons with N≤3, where N=2nρ+2nλ+lρ+lλ is the shell of the three-body harmonic oscillator. In our scheme, the newly observed Ω(2109) is identified as a N=2 candidate, with its quantum numbers tentatively assigned as Ω(2S,3/2+). However, the experimentally measured mass exhibits a deviation of approximately 50 MeV below the theoretical predictions. The possible reason for this deviation, along with the suggestion for experiments, are discussed in this paper. Additionally, we give possible assignments of Ω(2012)−, Ω(2250)−, Ω(2380)−, and Ω(2470)−. Furthermore, we calculate the masses and widths of other missing Ω states, which could provide valuable clues for experimental searches aimed at discovering these states.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (53)

  1. M. Gell-Mann, A schematic model of baryons and mesons, Phys. Lett. 8, 214 (1964).
  2. G. Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. Version 1 (1964), 10.17181/CERN-TH-401.
  3. G. Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking, Version 2 (1964), 10.17181/CERN-TH-412.
  4. V. E. Barnes et al., Observation of a hyperon with strangeness minus three, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 204 (1964).
  5. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  6. D. Aston et al., Observation of Ω*− production in K−p interactions at 11  GeV/c, Phys. Lett. B 194, 579 (1987).
  7. S. F. Biagi et al., First observation of Ω* resonances, Z. Phys. C 31, 33 (1986).
  8. D. Aston et al., Observation of a new Ω*− at 2.47  GeV/c2 in K−p interactions at 11  GeV/c, Phys. Lett. B 215, 799 (1988).
  9. J. Yelton et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of an excited Ω− baryon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 052003 (2018).
  10. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Evidence for two excited Ω− Hyperons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 131903 (2025).
  11. S. Jia et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for Ω(2012)→KΞ(1530)→KπΞ at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 100, 032006 (2019).
  12. S. Jia et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of Ω(2012)−→Ξ(1530)K¯ and measurement of the effective couplings of Ω(2012)− to Ξ(1530)K¯ and ΞK¯, Phys. Lett. B 860, 139224 (2025).
  13. L. Y. Xiao and X. H. Zhong, Possible interpretation of the newly observed Ω(2012) state, Phys. Rev. D 98, 034004 (2018).
  14. Z. Y. Wang, L. C. Gui, Q. F. Lü, L. Y. Xiao, and X. H. Zhong, Newly observed Ω(2012) state and strong decays of the low-lying Ω excitations, Phys. Rev. D 98, 114023 (2018).
  15. M. S. Liu, K. L. Wang, Q. F. Lü, and X. H. Zhong, Ω baryon spectrum and their decays in a constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. D 101, 016002 (2020).
  16. T. Hyodo and M. Niiyama, QCD and the strange baryon spectrum, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120, 103868 (2021).
  17. R. J. Hudspith, M. F. M. Lutz, and D. Mohler, Precise Omega baryons from lattice QCD, arXiv:2404.02769.
  18. L. Hockley, W. Kamleh, D. Leinweber, and A. Thomas, Exploring the Ω− spectrum in lattice QCD, J. Phys. G 52, 065103 (2025).
  19. V. Crede and J. Yelton, 70 years of hyperon spectroscopy: A review of strange Ξ, Ω baryons, and the spectrum of charmed and bottom baryons, Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 106301 (2024).
  20. K. L. Wang, J. Wang, Y. K. Hsiao, and X. H. Zhong, Excited Ω hyperon in charmful Ωb weak decays, Phys. Rev. D 111, 114028 (2025).
  21. N. Su, H. X. Chen, P. Gubler, and A. Hosaka, Investigation on the Ω(2012) from QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 110, 034007 (2024).
  22. T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, Y. Sarac, and H. Sundu, Interpretation of the newly discovered Ω(2012), Phys. Rev. D 98, 014031 (2018).
  23. M. P. Valderrama, Ω(2012) as a hadronic molecule, Phys. Rev. D 98, 054009 (2018).
  24. Y. H. Lin and B. S. Zou, Hadronic molecular assignment for the newly observed Ω* state, Phys. Rev. D 98, 056013 (2018).
  25. Y. Huang, M. Z. Liu, J. X. Lu, J. J. Xie, and L. S. Geng, Strong decay modes K¯Ξ and K¯Ξπ of the Ω(2012) in the K¯Ξ(1530) and ηΩ molecular scenario, Phys. Rev. D 98, 076012 (2018).
  26. T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, Y. Sarac, and H. Sundu, Nature of the Ω(2012) through its strong decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 894 (2018).
  27. H. H. Zhong, R. H. Ni, M. Y. Chen, X. H. Zhong, and J. J. Xie, Further study of Ω*|1P3/2−⟩ within a chiral quark model, Chin. Phys. C 47, 063104 (2023).
  28. R. Pavao and E. Oset, Coupled channels dynamics in the generation of the Ω(2012) resonance, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 857 (2018).
  29. N. Ikeno, G. Toledo, and E. Oset, Molecular picture for the Ω(2012) revisited, Phys. Rev. D 101, 094016 (2020).
  30. T. Gutsche and V. E. Lyubovitskij, Strong decays of the hadronic molecule Ω*(2012), J. Phys. G 48, 025001 (2020).
  31. A. J. Arifi, D. Suenaga, A. Hosaka, and Y. Oh, Strong decays of multistrangeness baryon resonances in the quark model, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094006 (2022).
  32. S. Q. Luo, B. Chen, Z. W. Liu, and X. Liu, Resolving the low mass puzzle of Λc(2940)+, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 301 (2020).
  33. L. Micu, Decay rates of meson resonances in a quark model, Nucl. Phys. B10, 521 (1969).
  34. S. Q. Luo and X. Liu, Investigating the spectroscopy behavior of undetected 1F-wave charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 108, 034002 (2023).
  35. H. H. Zhong, M. S. Liu, R. H. Ni, M. Y. Chen, X. H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Unified study of nucleon and Δ baryon spectra and their strong decays with chiral dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 116034 (2024).
  36. J. M. Richard, The nonrelativistic three-body problem for baryons, Phys. Rep. 212, 1 (1992).
  37. S. Capstick and N. Isgur, Baryons in a relativized quark model with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 34, 2809 (1986).
  38. M. V. N. Murthy, M. Brack, R. K. Bhaduri, and B. K. Jennings, Spin orbit splitting in the N−Δ spectra and the deformed baryon model, Z. Phys. C 29, 385 (1985).
  39. R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, Strange baryon spectroscopy in the relativistic quark model, Phys. Rev. D 92, 054005 (2015).
  40. M. Pervin and W. Roberts, Strangeness −2 and −3 baryons in a constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. C 77, 025202 (2008).
  41. K. T. Chao, N. Isgur, and G. Karl, Strangeness −2 and −3 baryons in a quark model with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 23, 155 (1981).
  42. Y. Chen and B. Q. Ma, Light flavor baryon spectrum with higher order hyperfine interactions, Nucl. Phys. A831, 1 (2009).
  43. A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, and J. C. Raynal, Naive quark pair creation model and baryon decays, Phys. Rev. D 9, 1415 (1974).
  44. Z. Zhao, D. D. Ye, and A. Zhang, Hadronic decay properties of newly observed Ωc baryons, Phys. Rev. D 95, 114024 (2017).
  45. B. Chen and X. Liu, New Ωc0 baryons discovered by LHCb as the members of 1P and 2S states, Phys. Rev. D 96, 094015 (2017).
  46. B. Chen, K. W. Wei, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Low-lying charmed and charmed-strange baryon states, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 154 (2017).
  47. C. Chen, X. L. Chen, X. Liu, W. Z. Deng, and S. L. Zhu, Strong decays of charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 75, 094017 (2007).
  48. Q. F. Lü, L. Y. Xiao, Z. Y. Wang, and X. H. Zhong, Strong decay of Λc(2940) as a 2P state in the Λc family, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 599 (2018).
  49. B. Chen, K. W. Wei, X. Liu, and A. Zhang, Role of newly discovered Ξb(6227)− for constructing excited bottom baryon family, Phys. Rev. D 98, 031502 (2018).
  50. S. Q. Luo and X. Liu, Newly observed Ωc(3327): A good candidate for a D-wave charmed baryon, Phys. Rev. D 107, 074041 (2023).
  51. Z. G. Luo, X. L. Chen, and X. Liu, Bs1(5830) and Bs2*(5840), Phys. Rev. D 79, 074020 (2009).
  52. J. S. Yu, Z. F. Sun, X. Liu, and Q. Zhao, Categorizing resonances X(1835), X(2120) and X(2370) in the pseudoscalar meson family, Phys. Rev. D 83, 114007 (2011).
  53. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Observation of the Ω(2012) baryon at the LHC, arXiv:2502.18063.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation