- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

LHC as a TeV muon beam dump: Muonphilic scalars at FASER

Roshan Mammen Abraham* and Max Fieg†

  • *Contact author: rmammena@uci.edu
  • †Contact author: mfieg@uci.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 112, 015005 – Published 8 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/11j5-txpc

Abstract

The FASER experiment was designed to study long-lived dark sector particles and neutrinos traveling in the forward direction at the LHC. Neutrinos are predominantly produced from meson decays, which also result in an intense energetic flux of muons in the forward direction regularly observed by FASER. So far, these muons are treated only as backgrounds to neutrino and new physics studies, and extensive effort is required to suppress them. In this study, we consider the opposite scenario and use muons produced in the forward direction to produce new muonphilic scalars, which can then be searched for at the FASER detector. To minimize the backgrounds for this search, we make use of an upgraded preshower component, which is expected to be installed at FASER before the end of Run 3, and is capable of spatially resolving two energetic photons. We find that FASER, and its upgrade, FASER2, can probe currently unconstrained regions of parameter space, including regions that can potentially explain the (g−2)μ anomaly. This highlights the physics opportunities that the intense TeV muon beam at the LHC can bring.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (89)

  1. A. De Rujula and R. Ruckl, Neutrino and muon physics in the collider mode of future accelerators, in SSC Workshop: Superconducting Super Collider Fixed Target Physics (1984), pp. 571–596.
  2. A. De Rujula, E. Fernandez, and J. J. Gomez-Cadenas, Neutrino fluxes at future hadron colliders, Nucl. Phys. B405, 80 (1993).
  3. J. L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling, and S. Trojanowski, ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 97, 035001 (2018).
  4. A. Ariga et al. (FASER Collaboration), Letter of intent for FASER: ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC, arXiv:1811.10243.
  5. A. Ariga et al. (FASER Collaboration), Technical proposal for FASER: ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC, arXiv:1812.09139.
  6. H. Abreu et al. (FASER Collaboration), Detecting and studying high-energy collider neutrinos with FASER at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 61 (2020).
  7. H. Abreu et al. (FASER Collaboration), Technical proposal: FASERnu, arXiv:2001.03073.
  8. H. Abreu et al. (FASER Collaboration), First neutrino interaction candidates at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 104, L091101 (2021).
  9. H. Abreu et al. (FASER Collaboration), First direct observation of collider neutrinos with FASER at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 031801 (2023).
  10. R. Mammen Abraham et al. (FASER Collaboration), First measurement of νe and νμ interaction cross sections at the LHC with FASER’s emulsion detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 021802 (2024).
  11. R. Mammen Abraham et al. (FASER Collaboration), First measurement of the muon neutrino interaction cross section and flux as a function of energy at the LHC with FASER, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 211801 (2025).
  12. H. Abreu et al. (FASER Collaboration), Search for dark photons with the FASER detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 848, 138378 (2024).
  13. R. Mammen Abraham et al. (FASER Collaboration), Shining light on the dark sector: Search for axionlike particles and other new physics in photonic final states with FASER, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2025) 199.
  14. G. Acampora et al. (SND@LHC Collaboration), SND@LHC: The scattering and neutrino detector at the LHC, J. Instrum. 19, P05067 (2024).
  15. R. Albanese et al. (SND@LHC Collaboration), Observation of collider muon neutrinos with the SND@LHC experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 031802 (2023).
  16. F. Jegerlehner and A. Nyffeler, The muon g-2, Phys. Rep. 477, 1 (2009).
  17. G. W. Bennett et al. (Muon g-2 Collaboration), Final report of the muon E821 anomalous magnetic moment measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73, 072003 (2006).
  18. B. Abi et al. (Muon g-2 Collaboration), Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.46 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141801 (2021).
  19. D. P. Aguillard et al. (Muon g-2 Collaboration), Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.20 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 161802 (2023).
  20. T. Blum, A. Denig, I. Logashenko, E. de Rafael, B. L. Roberts, T. Teubner, and G. Venanzoni, The muon (g-2) theory value: Present and future, arXiv:1311.2198.
  21. T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the standard model, Phys. Rep. 887, 1 (2020).
  22. G. Colangelo et al., Prospects for precise predictions of aμ in the standard model, arXiv:2203.15810.
  23. S. Borsanyi et al., Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Nature (London) 593, 51 (2021).
  24. T. Blum et al. (RBC Collaboration and UKQCD Collaboration), Update of Euclidean windows of the hadronic vacuum polarization, Phys. Rev. D 108, 054507 (2023).
  25. A. Bazavov et al. (Fermilab Lattice Collaboration, HPQCDCollaboration, and MILC Collaboration), Light-quark connected intermediate-window contributions to the muon g-2 hadronic vacuum polarization from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 107, 114514 (2023).
  26. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Precise measurement of the e+e−→π+π−(γ) cross section with the Initial State Radiation method at BABAR, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 231801 (2009).
  27. BABAR Collaboration, J. P. Lees et al., Precise Measurement of the e+e−→π+π−(γ) Cross Section with the Initial-State Radiation Method at BABAR, Phys. Rev. D 86, 032013 (2012).
  28. F. V. Ignatov et al. (CMD-3 Collaboration), Measurement of the e+e−→π+π− cross section from threshold to 1.2 GeV with the CMD-3 detector, Phys. Rev. D 109, 112002 (2024).
  29. A. Anastasi et al. (KLOE-2 Collaboration), Combination of KLOE σ(e+e−→π+π−γ(γ)) measurements and determination of aμπ+π− in the energy range 0.10<s<0.95  GeV2, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 173.
  30. B. Batell, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, Exploring portals to a hidden sector through fixed targets, Phys. Rev. D 80, 095024 (2009).
  31. M. Abdughani, Y.-Z. Fan, C.-T. Lu, T.-P. Tang, and Y.-L. S. Tsai, Muonphilic dark matter explanation of gamma-ray galactic center excess: A comprehensive analysis, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 127.
  32. K. Ghorbani, Secluded scalar dark matter and the muon anomalous magnetic moment, J. Phys. G 51, 065204 (2024).
  33. L. Calibbi, R. Ziegler, and J. Zupan, Minimal models for dark matter and the muon g−2 anomaly, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 046.
  34. G. Krnjaic et al., A snowmass whitepaper: Dark matter production at intensity-frontier experiments, arXiv:2207.00597.
  35. R. Aliberti et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the standard model: An update, arXiv:2505.21476.
  36. B. Batell, A. Freitas, A. Ismail, and D. Mckeen, Flavor-specific scalar mediators, Phys. Rev. D 98, 055026 (2018).
  37. B. Batell, A. Freitas, A. Ismail, D. McKeen, and M. Rai, Renormalizable models of flavor-specific scalars, Phys. Rev. D 104, 115032 (2021).
  38. M. Davier and H. Nguyen Ngoc, An unambiguous search for a light Higgs boson, Phys. Lett. B 229, 150 (1989).
  39. J. Liu, N. McGinnis, C. E. M. Wagner, and X.-P. Wang, A light scalar explanation of (g−2)μ and the KOTO anomaly, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 197.
  40. J. D. Bjorken, S. Ecklund, W. R. Nelson, A. Abashian, C. Church, B. Lu, L. W. Mo, T. A. Nunamaker, and P. Rassmann, Search for neutral metastable penetrating particles produced in the SLAC beam dump, Phys. Rev. D 38, 3375 (1988).
  41. L. Marsicano, M. Battaglieri, A. Celentano, R. De Vita, and Y.-M. Zhong, Probing leptophilic dark sectors at electron beam-dump facilities, Phys. Rev. D 98, 115022 (2018).
  42. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Search for a dark leptophilic scalar in e+e− collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 181801 (2020).
  43. G. Krnjaic, G. Marques-Tavares, D. Redigolo, and K. Tobioka, Probing muonphilic force carriers and dark matter at Kaon factories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 041802 (2020).
  44. R. Capdevilla, D. Curtin, Y. Kahn, and G. Krnjaic, Systematically testing singlet models for (g−2)μ, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2022) 129.
  45. X.-H. Jiang and C.-T. Lu, Leptophilic axionlike particles at forward detectors, Phys. Rev. D 111, 035035 (2025).
  46. R. Jackiw and S. Weinberg, Weak interaction corrections to the muon magnetic moment and to muonic atom energy levels, Phys. Rev. D 5, 2396 (1972).
  47. J. P. Leveille, The second order weak correction to (G-2) of the muon in arbitrary gauge models, Nucl. Phys. B137, 63 (1978).
  48. M. Lindner, M. Platscher, and F. S. Queiroz, A call for new physics: The muon anomalous magnetic moment and lepton flavor violation, Phys. Rep. 731, 1 (2018).
  49. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Search for a muonic dark force at BABAR, Phys. Rev. D 94, 011102 (2016).
  50. C.-Y. Chen, M. Pospelov, and Y.-M. Zhong, Muon beam experiments to probe the dark sector, Phys. Rev. D 95, 115005 (2017).
  51. A. Apyan et al., DarkQuest: A dark sector upgrade to SpinQuest at the 120 GeV Fermilab main injector, in Snowmass 2021 (2022).
  52. D. Forbes, C. Herwig, Y. Kahn, G. Krnjaic, C. Mantilla Suarez, N. Tran, and A. Whitbeck, New searches for muonphilic particles at proton beam dump spectrometers, Phys. Rev. D 107, 116026 (2023).
  53. P. Harris, P. Schuster, and J. Zupan, Snowmass white paper: New flavors and rich structures in dark sectors, in Snowmass 2021 (2022).
  54. D. Croon, G. Elor, R. K. Leane, and S. D. McDermott, Supernova muons: New constraints on Z’ bosons, axions and ALPs, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 107.
  55. C. Rella, B. Döbrich, and T.-T. Yu, Searching for muonphilic dark sectors with proton beams, Phys. Rev. D 106, 035023 (2022).
  56. J. Blumlein et al., Limits on the mass of light (pseudo)scalar particles from Bethe-Heitler e+e− and μ+μ− pair production in a proton—iron beam dump experiment, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 07, 3835 (1992).
  57. C. Cesarotti, Y. Kahn, G. Krnjaic, D. Rocha, and J. Spitz, New μ forces from νμ sources, Phys. Rev. D 110, 055032 (2024).
  58. N. Blinov, S. Gori, and N. Hamer, Diphoton signals of muon-philic scalars at DarkQuest, Phys. Rev. D 110, 075006 (2024).
  59. H. Abreu et al. (FASER Collaboration), The FASER detector, J. Instrum. 19, P05066 (2024).
  60. J. L. Feng et al., The forward physics facility at the high-luminosity LHC, J. Phys. G 50, 030501 (2023).
  61. L. A. Anchordoqui et al., The forward physics facility: Sites, experiments, and physics potential, Phys. Rep. 968, 1 (2022).
  62. J. Adhikary et al., Science and project planning for the forward physics facility in preparation for the 2024–2026 European particle physics strategy update, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 430 (2025).
  63. K. R. Dienes, J. L. Feng, M. Fieg, F. Huang, S. J. Lee, and B. Thomas, Extending the discovery potential for inelastic-dipole dark matter with FASER, Phys. Rev. D 107, 115006 (2023).
  64. F. Kling and P. Quílez, ALP searches at the LHC: FASER as a light-shining-through-walls experiment, Phys. Rev. D 106, 055036 (2022).
  65. FASER Collaboration, FASERν2: A forward neutrino experiment at the HL LHC, https://www.snowmass21.org/docs/files/summaries/NF/SNOWMASS21-NF10_NF6-EF6_EF9-IF0_FASERnu2-006.pdf.
  66. H. Burkhardt and I. Efthymiopoulos, Chapter 8: Interface with experiments, CERN Yellow Report (2015), p. 157.
  67. O. Aberle et al., High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC): Technical design report, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2749422.
  68. J. Boyd, The FASER W-Si high precision preshower technical proposal, CERN Tech. Rep., CERN, Geneva, 2022, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2803084.
  69. J. Boyd and J. L. Feng, Request to run FASER in run 4, CERN Tech. Rep., CERN, Geneva, 2023, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2882503.
  70. A. Ariga et al. (FASER Collaboration), FASER’s physics reach for long-lived particles, Phys. Rev. D 99, 095011 (2019).
  71. A. Ariga, R. Balkin, I. Galon, E. Kajomovitz, and Y. Soreq, Hunting muonic forces at emulsion detectors, Phys. Rev. D 109, 035003 (2024).
  72. B. Batell, H. Davoudiasl, R. Marcarelli, E. T. Neil, and S. Trojanowski, Lepton-flavor-violating ALP signals with TeV-scale muon beams, Phys. Rev. D 110, 075039 (2024).
  73. J. L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling, and S. Trojanowski, Axionlike particles at FASER: The LHC as a photon beam dump, Phys. Rev. D 98, 055021 (2018).
  74. F. Kling and S. Trojanowski, Looking forward to test the KOTO anomaly with FASER, Phys. Rev. D 102, 015032 (2020).
  75. F. Kling, S. Li, H. Song, S. Su, and W. Su, Light scalars at FASER, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 001.
  76. H. Abreu et al. (FASER Collaboration), The tracking detector of the FASER experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 1034, 166825 (2022).
  77. F. Kling and S. Trojanowski, Forward experiment sensitivity estimator for the LHC and future hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 104, 035012 (2021).
  78. C. E. Carlson and B. C. Rislow, New physics and the proton radius problem, Phys. Rev. D 86, 035013 (2012).
  79. M. Mitra and D. Sahoo, Methodology to determine the spin-parity of muon-philic X boson in J/ψ→μ−μ+X decay, Phys. Rev. D 104, 015002 (2021).
  80. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, and T. Stelzer, madgraph5: Going beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2011) 128.
  81. K. Jodłowski, F. Kling, L. Roszkowski, and S. Trojanowski, Extending the reach of FASER, MATHUSLA, and SHiP toward smaller lifetimes using secondary particle production, Phys. Rev. D 101, 095020 (2020).
  82. R. Mammen Abraham et al. (FASER Collaboration), Neutrino rate predictions for FASER, Phys. Rev. D 110, 012009 (2024).
  83. T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, A brief introduction to pythia8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 852 (2008).
  84. M. Fieg, F. Kling, H. Schulz, and T. Sjöstrand, Tuning pythia for forward physics experiments, Phys. Rev. D 109, 016010 (2024).
  85. P. A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  86. A. Ferrari, P. R. Sala, A. Fasso, and J. Ranft, fluka: A multi-particle transport code (Program version 2005).
  87. G. Battistoni et al., Overview of the fluka code, Ann. Nucl. Energy 82, 10 (2015).
  88. B. Batell, N. Lange, D. McKeen, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, Muon anomalous magnetic moment through the leptonic Higgs portal, Phys. Rev. D 95, 075003 (2017).
  89. Y. Kahn, G. Krnjaic, N. Tran, and A. Whitbeck, M3: A new muon missing momentum experiment to probe (g −2)μ and dark matter at Fermilab, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2018) 153.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 112, 015005– Published 8 July, 2025
  • Received 3 February 2025
  • Accepted 19 June 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation