Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quantum correlation dynamics and in-medium 3↔3 collisions of fermions

Wolfgang Cassing

Phys. Rev. C 112, 024601 – Published 1 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ytpz-vljz

Abstract

It is the aim of this study to quantify the role of in-medium 3↔3 collisions for systems of fermions which initially are out-of equilibrium. The formulation of the three-body dynamics is based on the equations of motion method for identical fermions—also denoted as quantum correlation dynamics—and presented in detail. The on-shell two-body collision integral is briefly reviewed and the on-shell three-two-body collision integral is derived on the basis of the same two-body interaction in leading order. The resulting equations obey particle number as well as energy-momentum conservation. For a quantification of the relative impact of three-body interactions a model study is employed for a homogeneous system in space in a finite box with periodic boundary conditions. Here, spin-isospin symmetric nuclear matter systems are addressed with momentum distributions that are given by shifted Fermi spheres (without overlap) as encountered in the initial phase of nucleus-nucleus collisions after contact. The results for the relaxation times—employing an effective two-body interaction—are compared to Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck (BUU) transport calculations in the continuum limit. It is found that the additional three-body interactions reduce the relaxation times up to a factor of 3 at 130 MeV/nucleon. Furthermore, it is shown in BUU transport calculations that an enhanced stopping by 3↔3 collisions shows up in the angular distribution of energetic nucleons (>60MeV), e.g., in central Rh4597 collisions at 40 MeV/nucleon that lead to the formation of a compound nucleus. The angular distribution of the energetic nucleons changes from a slightly forward peaked angular distribution to a slightly sidewards peaked angular distribution which might be controlled experimentally.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (40)

  1. P. Bonche, S. Koonin, and J. W. Negele, Phys. Rev. C 13, 1226 (1976).
  2. J. W. Negele, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 913 (1982).
  3. M. Tohyama and M. Gong, Z. Phys. A 332, 269 (1989).
  4. M. Gong and M. Tohyama, Z. Phys. A 335, 153 (1990).
  5. L. W. Nordheim, Proc. Roy. Soc. A (London) 119, 689 (1928).
  6. E. A. Uehling and G. Uhlenbeck, Phys. Rev. 43, 552 (1933).
  7. G. F. Bertsch, H. Kruse, and S. Das Gupta, Phys. Rev. C 29, 673 (1984); 33, 1107(E) (1986).
  8. J. Aichelin and G. Bertsch, Phys. Rev. C 31, 1730 (1985).
  9. G. F. Bertsch and S. Das Gupta, Phys. Rep. 160, 189 (1988).
  10. W. Cassing, Transport Theories for Strongly-Interacting Systems, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 989 (Springer, Cham, 2021), pp. 1–248.
  11. W. Cassing, V. Metag, U. Mosel, and K. Niita, Phys. Rep. 188, 363 (1990).
  12. L. P. Kadanoff and G. Baym, Quantum Statistical Mechanics (W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, 1962).
  13. P. Danielewicz, Ann. Phys. 152, 305 (1984).
  14. C. M. Ko, Q. Li, and R.-C. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1084 (1987).
  15. B. Blättel, V. Koch, W. Cassing, and U. Mosel, Phys. Rev. C 38, 1767 (1988).
  16. W. Botermans and R. Malfliet, Phys. Rep. 198, 115 (1990).
  17. H. Wolter et al. (TMEP Collaboration), Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 125, 103962 (2022).
  18. W. Cassing, Nucl. Phys. A 700, 618 (2002).
  19. S. M. Dawid, Z. T. Draper, A. D. Hanlon, B. Hörz, C. Morningstar, F. Romero-López, S. R. Sharpe, and S. Skinner, arXiv:2502.14348.
  20. S. J. Wang and W. Cassing, Ann. Phys. 159, 328 (1985).
  21. R. Balescu, Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, New York, Sydney, Toronto, 1975).
  22. R. Krieg, Ph.D. thesis, University of Erlangen, 1991 (unpublished).
  23. T. Gherega, R. Krieg, P. G. Reinhard, and C. Toepffer, Nucl. Phys. A 560, 166 (1993).
  24. M. Tohyama and P. Schuck, Eur. Phys. J. A 45, 257 (2010).
  25. M. Tohyama and P. Schuck, Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 77 (2014).
  26. P. Schuck, D. S. Delion, J. Dukelsky, M. Jemai, E. Litvinova, G. Roepke, and M. Tohyama, Phys. Rep. 929, 1 (2021).
  27. E. Litvinova and P. Schuck, Phys. Rev. C 100, 064320 (2019); 107, 029903(E) (2023).
  28. M. Tohyama and P. Schuck, Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 74 (2019).
  29. M. Tohyama and P. Schuck, Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 186 (2017).
  30. P. Schuck and M. Tohyama, Phys. Rev. B 93, 165117 (2016).
  31. W. Cassing and S. Wang, Z. Phys. A 328, 423 (1987).
  32. W. Cassing, K. Niita, and S. Wang, Z. Phys. A 331, 439 (1988).
  33. W. Cassing and A. Pfitzner, Z. Phys. A 337, 175 (1990).
  34. W. Cassing and A. Pfitzner, Z. Phys. A 342, 161 (1992).
  35. F. V. De Blasio, W. Cassing, M. Tohyama, P. F. Bortignon, and R. A. Broglia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1663 (1992).
  36. B. D. Day, Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, 495 (1978).
  37. K. A. Brueckner, Phys. Rev. 97, 1353 (1955).
  38. J. Cugnon, T. Mizutani, and J. Vandermeulen, Nucl. Phys. A 352, 505 (1981).
  39. A. Lang, H. Babovsky, W. Cassing, U. Mosel, H.-G. Reusch, and K. Weber, J. Comput. Phys. 106, 391 (1993).
  40. O. Linnyk, E. L. Bratkovskaya, and W. Cassing, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 87, 50 (2016).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation