Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

General amplitude of near-threshold hadron scattering for exotic hadrons

Katsuyoshi Sone* and Tetsuo Hyodo†,‡

  • *Contact author: sone-katsuyoshi@ed.tmu.ac.jp
  • †Contact author: hyodo@tmu.ac.jp
  • ‡Present address: Research Center for Nuclear Physics (RCNP), Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan.

Phys. Rev. C 112, 065207 – Published 19 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qp1j-slqg

Abstract

We discuss the general behavior of the scattering amplitude with channel couplings near the two-body threshold. It is known that the Flatté amplitude, which is often used in the analysis of experimental data involving exotic hadrons, has some constraint in the near-threshold energy region. While the M-matrix gives the general expression of the scattering amplitude, it is not smoothly connected to the Flatté amplitude, due to the property of the determinant of the amplitude in channel space. In this paper, based on the effective field theory, we propose new parametrization of the scattering amplitude which gives the general expression near the threshold and has a well-defined limit reproducing the Flatté amplitude. We show that the nonresonant background contribution exists in the general amplitude even in the first order in the momentum. Finally, we quantitatively evaluate the cross sections by changing the strength of the background contribution. We find that the interference with the background term may induce a dip structure of the cross section near the threshold, in addition to the peak and threshold cusp structures.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (39)

  1. F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018); 94, 029901(E) (2022).
  2. N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C.-P. Shen, C.E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C.-Z. Yuan, The XYZ states: Experimental and theoretical status and perspectives, Phys. Rep. 873, 1 (2020).
  3. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Progr. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  4. J. R. Taylor, Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory on Nonrelativistic Collisions (Wiley, New York, 1972).
  5. T. Hyodo and M. Niiyama, QCD and the strange baryon spectrum, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120, 103868 (2021).
  6. S. M. Flatte, Coupled-channels analysis of the πη and KK¯ systems near KK¯ threshold, Phys. Lett. B 63, 224 (1976).
  7. D. V. Bugg, V. V. Anisovich, A. Sarantsev, and B. S. Zou, Coupled-channels analysis of data on p¯p→3π0,ηηπ0, and ηπ0π0 at rest, with the N/D method, Phys. Rev. D 50, 4412 (1994).
  8. S. Teige et al. (E852 Collaboration), Properties of the a0 (980) meson, Phys. Rev. D 59, 012001 (1998).
  9. M. N. Achasov et al., The ϕ→ηπ0γ decay, Phys. Lett. B 479, 53 (2000).
  10. M. N. Achasov et al., The ϕ(1020)→π0π0γ decay, Phys. Lett. B 485, 349 (2000).
  11. J. M. Link et al. (FOCUS Collaboration), Study of the D0→K+K−π+π− decay, Phys. Lett. B 610, 225 (2005).
  12. M. Ablikim et al. (BES Collaboration), Resonances in J/ψ→ϕπ+π− and ϕK+K−, Phys. Lett. B 607, 243 (2005).
  13. F. Ambrosino et al. (KLOE Collaboration), Study of the decay ϕ→f0(980)γ→π+π−γ with the KLOE detector, Phys. Lett. B 634, 148 (2006).
  14. A. Garmash et al. (Belle Collaboration), Evidence for large direct CP violation in B±→ρ(770)0K± from analysis of three-body charmless B±→K±π±π± decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 251803 (2006).
  15. F. Ambrosino et al. (KLOE Collaboration), Dalitz plot analysis of e+e−→π0π0γ events at s≃Mϕ with the KLOE detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 49, 473 (2007).
  16. D. V. Bugg, Reanalysis of data on a0(1450) and a0(980), Phys. Rev. D 78, 074023 (2008).
  17. F. Ambrosino et al. (KLOE Collaboration), Study of the a0(980) meson via the radiative decay ϕ→ηπ0γ with the KLOE detector, Phys. Lett. B 681, 5 (2009).
  18. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Measurement of branching ratio and Bs0 lifetime in the decay Bs0→J/ψf0(980) at CDF, Phys. Rev. D 84, 052012 (2011).
  19. G. S. Adams et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Amplitude analyses of the decays χc1→ηπ+π− and χc1→η′π+π−, Phys. Rev. D 84, 112009 (2011).
  20. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Study of the lineshape of the χc1(3872) state, Phys. Rev. D 102, 092005 (2020).
  21. V. Baru, J. Haidenbauer, C. Hanhart, A. E. Kudryavtsev, and U.-G. Meissner, Flatte-like distributions and the a0(980)/f0(980) mesons, Eur. Phys. J. A 23, 523 (2005).
  22. A. Esposito, L. Maiani, A. Pilloni, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, From the line shape of the X(3872) to its structure, Phys. Rev. D 105, L031503 (2022).
  23. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Study of the doubly charmed tetraquark Tcc+, Nat. Commun. 13, 3351 (2022).
  24. V. Baru, X.-K. Dong, M.-L. Du, A. Filin, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, J. Nieves, and Q. Wang, Effective range expansion for narrow near-threshold resonances, Phys. Lett. B 833, 137290 (2022).
  25. A. M. Badalian, L. P. Kok, M. I. Polikarpov, and Y. A. Simonov, Resonances in coupled channels in nuclear and particle physics, Phys. Rep. 82, 31 (1982).
  26. P. Artoisenet and E. Braaten, Gluon fragmentation into quarkonium at next-to-leading order, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2015) 121.
  27. K. Sone and T. Hyodo, Near-threshold hadron scattering with effective field theory, EPJ Web Conf. 291, 05004 (2024).
  28. T. D. Cohen, B. A. Gelman, and U. van Kolck, An effective field theory for coupled channel scattering, Phys. Lett. B 588, 57 (2004).
  29. E. Braaten, M. Kusunoki, and D. Zhang, Scattering models for ultracold atoms, Ann. Phys. 323, 1770 (2008).
  30. X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, Explaining the many threshold structures in the heavy-quark hadron spectrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 152001 (2021).
  31. T. Kinugawa and T. Hyodo, Compositeness of Tcc and X(3872) by considering decay and coupled-channels effects, Phys. Rev. C 109, 045205 (2024).
  32. L. Castillejo, R. H. Dalitz, and F. J. Dyson, Low's scattering equation for the charged and neutral scalar theories, Phys. Rev. 101, 453 (1956).
  33. V. Baru, C. Hanhart, Y. S. Kalashnikova, A. E. Kudryavtsev, and A. V. Nefediev, Interplay of quark and meson degrees of freedom in a near-threshold resonance, Eur. Phys. J. A 44, 93 (2010).
  34. Y. Kamiya and T. Hyodo, Structure of hadron resonances with a nearby zero of the amplitude, Phys. Rev. D 97, 054019 (2018).
  35. V. Baru, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, and A. Nefediev, How does the X(3872) show up in e+e− collisions: Dip versus peak, Phys. Rev. D 109, L111501 (2024).
  36. J. A. Oller, E. Oset, and J. R. Pelaez, Meson meson interaction in a nonperturbative chiral approach, Phys. Rev. D 59, 074001 (1999); 60, 099906(E) (1999); 75, 099903(E) (2007).
  37. T. Nishibuchi and T. Hyodo, Analysis of the Ξ(1620) resonance and K¯Λ scattering length with a chiral unitary approach, Phys. Rev. C 109, 015203 (2024).
  38. L.-Y. Dai and M. R. Pennington, Comprehensive amplitude analysis of γγ→π+π−,π0π0, and K¯K below 1.5 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 90, 036004 (2014).
  39. M. Hoferichter, D. R. Phillips, and C. Schat, Roy-Steiner equations for γγ→ππ, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1743 (2011).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation