- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review C

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Extension of the integrated hydrokinetic model to nuclear collision energies relevant for the RHIC Beam-Energy Scan program and the research program at GSI-FAIR

Musfer Adzhymambetov1,* and Yuri Sinyukov1,2,†

  • *Contact author: adzhymambetov@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: sinyukov@bitp.kyiv.ua
PDF

Phys. Rev. C 112, 034906 – Published 15 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2g39-y1d1

Abstract

The present work is devoted to developing the integrated hydrokinetic model (iHKM) for relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions. While the previous cycle of works on this topic focused on ultrarelativistic collisions at the top RHIC and different LHC energies, the current work addresses relativistic collisions at the lower energies, specifically ranging from approximately 2 to 50 GeV per nucleon pair in the center-of-mass colliding system. In such collisions, the formation times for the initial state of dense matter can be up to three orders of magnitude longer than those in ultrarelativistic collisions. This difference reflects a fundamentally distinct nature and formation process, particularly regarding the possible stages of initial state evolution, including thermalization (which may be only partial at very low collision energies), subsequent hydrodynamic expansion, and the final transition of matter evolution into a hadronic cascade. These stages, which are fully realized in ultrarelativistic reactions, can also occur within the energy range of BES RHIC, albeit with distinct timescales. This publication not only advances the theoretical development of iHKM [referred to, if necessary, as the extended version of integrated hydrokinetic model (iHKMe)], but also provides examples of model applications for calculating observables. A systematic description across a wide range of experimental energies, which is preliminary yet quite satisfactory, for spectra, flow, and femtoscopy, will follow this study.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (76)

  1. J. Rafelski, Connecting QGP-heavy ion physics to the early universe, Nucl. Phys. B 243-244, 155 (2013).
  2. J. Adams et al. (STAR Collaboration), Experimental and theoretical challenges in the search for the quark gluon plasma: The STAR collaboration's critical assessment of the evidence from RHIC collisions, Nucl. Phys. A 757, 102 (2005).
  3. K. Adcox et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Formation of dense partonic matter in relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions at RHIC: Experimental evaluation by the PHENIX collaboration, Nucl. Phys. A 757, 184 (2005).
  4. B. B. Back et al. (PHOBOS Collaboration), The PHOBOS perspective on discoveries at RHIC, Nucl. Phys. A 757, 28 (2005).
  5. I. Arsene et al. (BRAHMS Collaboration), Quark gluon plasma and color glass condensate at RHIC? The perspective from the BRAHMS experiment, Nucl. Phys. A 757, 1 (2005).
  6. J. A. Wheeler, On the mathematical description of light nuclei by the method of resonating group structure, Phys. Rev. 52, 1107 (1937).
  7. P. D. B. Collins, An Introduction to Regge Theory and High Energy Physics, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2023)
  8. V. Barone and E. Predazzi, High-Energy Particle Diffraction, Texts and Monographs in Physics Vol. 565 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002).
  9. L. D. Landau, On the multiparticle production in high-energy collisions, Izv. Akad. Nauk Ser. Fiz. 17, 51 (1953).
  10. J. D. Bjorken, Highly relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions: The central rapidity region, Phys. Rev. D 27, 140 (1983).
  11. M. S. Borysova, Y. M. Sinyukov, S. V. Akkelin, B. Erazmus, and I. A. Karpenko, Hydrodynamic source with continuous emission in Au + Au collisions at ss = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C 73, 024903 (2006).
  12. V. Y. Naboka, S. V. Akkelin, I. A. Karpenko, and Y. M. Sinyukov, Initialization of hydrodynamics in relativistic heavy ion collisions with an energy-momentum transport model, Phys. Rev. C 91, 014906 (2015).
  13. V. M. Shapoval, M. D. Adzhymambetov, and Y. M. Sinyukov, Femtoscopy scales and particle production in the relativistic heavy ion collisions from Au+Au at 200 AGeV to Xe+Xe at 5.44 ATeV within the integrated hydrokinetic model, Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 260 (2020).
  14. J. N. Guenther, Overview of the QCD phase diagram: Recent progress from the lattice, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 136 (2021).
  15. V. Y. Naboka, I. A. Karpenko, and Y. M. Sinyukov, Thermalization, evolution, and observables at energies available at the CERN large hadron collider in an integrated hydrokinetic model of A+A collisions, Phys. Rev. C 93, 024902 (2016).
  16. O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, Large N field theories, string theory and gravity, Phys. Rep. 323, 183 (2000).
  17. J. M. Maldacena, TASI 2003 lectures on ads / CFT, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 2003): Recent Trends in String Theory (2003), pp. 155–203, arXiv:hep-th/0309246.
  18. J. Maldacena, The gauge/gravity duality, in Black Holes in Higher Dimensions, edited by G. T. Horowitz (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012), pp. 325–347.
  19. J. Casalderrey-Solana, H. Liu, D. Mateos, K. Rajagopal, and U. A. Wiedemann, Gauge/String Duality, Hot QCD and Heavy Ion Collisions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2014).
  20. A. Bernamonti and R. Peschanski, Time-dependent AdS/CFT correspondence and the Quark-Gluon plasma, Nucl. Phys. B 216, 94 (2011).
  21. O. DeWolfe, S. S. Gubser, C. Rosen, and D. Teaney, Heavy ions and string theory, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 75, 86 (2014).
  22. W. G. Unruh, Notes on black hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D 14, 870 (1976).
  23. L. C. B. Crispino, A. Higuchi, and G. E. A. Matsas, The Unruh effect and its applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 787 (2008).
  24. Y. Sinyukov, A. N. Nazarenko, and I. A. Karpenko, Is early thermalization really needed in A+A collisions? Acta Phys. Pol. B 40, 1109 (2009).
  25. M. Rybczynski, G. Stefanek, W. Broniowski, and P. Bozek, GLISSANDO 2: GLauber initial-state simulation AND more, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1759 (2014).
  26. M. Bleicher et al., Relativistic hadron-hadron collisions in the ultrarelativistic quantum molecular dynamics model, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 25, 1859 (1999).
  27. H. Petersen, J. Steinheimer, G. Burau, M. Bleicher, and H. Stöcker, A fully integrated transport approach to heavy ion reactions with an intermediate hydrodynamic stage, Phys. Rev. C 78, 044901 (2008).
  28. H. Petersen, D. Oliinychenko, M. Mayer, J. Staudenmaier, and S. Ryu, SMASH—A new hadronic transport approach, Nucl. Phys. A 982, 399 (2019).
  29. Y. Nara, N. Otuka, A. Ohnishi, K. Niita, and S. Chiba, Study of relativistic nuclear collisions at AGS energies from P + Be to Au + Au with hadronic cascade model, Phys. Rev. C 61, 024901 (1999).
  30. W. Cassing and E. L. Bratkovskaya, Parton-Hadron-String dynamics: An off-shell transport approach for relativistic energies, Nucl. Phys. A 831, 215 (2009).
  31. O. Buss, T. Gaitanos, K. Gallmeister, H. van Hees, M. Kaskulov, O. Lalakulich, A. B. Larionov, T. Leitner, J. Weil, and U. Mosel, Transport-theoretical description of nuclear reactions, Phys. Rep. 512, 1 (2012).
  32. Y. Nara and A. Ohnishi, Mean-field update in the JAM microscopic transport model: Mean-field effects on collective flow in high-energy heavy-ion collisions at sNN = 2–20 GeV energies, Phys. Rev. C 105, 014911 (2022).
  33. J. Weil et al. (SMASH Collaboration), Particle production and equilibrium properties within a new hadron transport approach for heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 94, 054905 (2016).
  34. M. Omana Kuttan, A. Motornenko, J. Steinheimer, H. Stoecker, Y. Nara, and M. Bleicher, A chiral mean-field equation-of-state in UrQMD: Effects on the heavy ion compression stage, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 427 (2022).
  35. D. Oliinychenko and H. Petersen, Deviations of the energy-momentum tensor from equilibrium in the initial state for hydrodynamics from transport approaches, Phys. Rev. C 93, 034905 (2016).
  36. C. Shen and B. Schenke, Dynamical initial state model for relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 97, 024907 (2018).
  37. Y. Akamatsu, M. Asakawa, T. Hirano, M. Kitazawa, K. Morita, K. Murase, Y. Nara, C. Nonaka, and A. Ohnishi, Dynamically integrated transport approach for heavy-ion collisions at high baryon density, Phys. Rev. C 98, 024909 (2018).
  38. L. Du, U. Heinz, and G. Vujanovic, Hybrid model with dynamical sources for heavy-ion collisions at BES energies, Nucl. Phys. A 982, 407 (2019).
  39. S. V. Akkelin, P. Braun-Munzinger, and Y. M. Sinyukov, Reconstruction of hadronization stage in Pb + Pb collisions at 158A GeV/c, Nucl. Phys. A 710, 439 (2002).
  40. B. Schenke, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, (3+1)D hydrodynamic simulation of relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 82, 014903 (2010).
  41. L.-G. Pang, H. Petersen, and X.-N. Wang, Pseudorapidity distribution and decorrelation of anisotropic flow within the open-computing-language implementation CLVisc hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. C 97, 064918 (2018).
  42. L. Del Zanna, V. Chandra, G. Inghirami, V. Rolando, A. Beraudo, A. De Pace, G. Pagliara, A. Drago, and F. Becattini, Relativistic viscous hydrodynamics for heavy-ion collisions with ECHO-QGP, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2524 (2013).
  43. D. Bazow, U. W. Heinz, and M. Strickland, Massively parallel simulations of relativistic fluid dynamics on graphics processing units with CUDA, Comput. Phys. Commun. 225, 92 (2018).
  44. I. Karpenko, P. Huovinen, and M. Bleicher, A 3+1-dimensional viscous hydrodynamic code for relativistic heavy ion collisions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 3016 (2014).
  45. J. Cimerman, I. Karpenko, B. Tomasik, and P. Huovinen, Next-generation multifluid hydrodynamic model for nuclear collisions at snn from a few GeV to a hundred GeV, Phys. Rev. C 107, 044902 (2023).
  46. S. V. Akkelin and Y. M. Sinyukov, Matching of nonthermal initial conditions and hydrodynamic stage in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 81, 064901 (2010).
  47. W. Israel and J. M. Stewart, Transient relativistic thermodynamics and kinetic theory, Ann. Phys. 118, 341 (1979).
  48. J. Steinheimer, S. Schramm, and H. Stocker, An effective chiral Hadron-Quark equation of state, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 38, 035001 (2011).
  49. P. F. Kolb and U. W. Heinz, Hydrodynamic description of ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions, arXiv:nucl-th/0305084.
  50. P. Huovinen and H. Petersen, Particlization in hybrid models, Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 171 (2012).
  51. D. Molnar and Z. Wolff, Self-consistent conversion of a viscous fluid to particles, Phys. Rev. C 95, 024903 (2017).
  52. F. Cooper and G. Frye, Comment on the single particle distribution in the hydrodynamic and statistical thermodynamic models of multiparticle production, Phys. Rev. D 10, 186 (1974).
  53. A. Monnai, B. Schenke, and C. Shen, Equation of state at finite densities for QCD matter in nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C 100, 024907 (2019).
  54. H. Grad, On the kinetic theory of rarefied gases, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 2, 331 (1949).
  55. I. A. Karpenko, P. Huovinen, H. Petersen, and M. Bleicher, Estimation of the shear viscosity at finite net-baryon density from A+A collision data at sNN=7.7–200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C 91, 064901 (2015).
  56. Y. M. Sinyukov, Model of the mixed phase direct transition into free hadronic gas and transverse momenta of pions in ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions. (In russian), Z. Phys. C 43, 401 (1989).
  57. N. S. Amelin, R. Lednicky, T. A. Pocheptsov, I. P. Lokhtin, L. V. Malinina, A. M. Snigirev, I. A. Karpenko, and Y. M. Sinyukov, A fast hadron freeze-out generator, Phys. Rev. C 74, 064901 (2006).
  58. L. V. Bravina et al., Equilibrium and nonequilibrium effects in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Nucl. Phys. A 661, 600 (1999).
  59. A. Schäfer, I. Karpenko, X.-Y. Wu, J. Hammelmann, and H. Elfner (SMASH Collaboration), Particle production in a hybrid approach for a beam energy scan of Au+Au/Pb+Pb collisions between sNN = 4.3 GeV and sNN = 200.0 GeV, Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 230 (2022).
  60. M. Stefaniak, K. Werner, H. P. Zbroszczyk, and J. Jahan, Equation of state within the EPOS3 model, Phys. Rev. C 108, 014905 (2023).
  61. H. Holopainen, H. Niemi, and K. J. Eskola, Event-by-event hydrodynamics and elliptic flow from fluctuating initial state, Phys. Rev. C 83, 034901 (2011).
  62. D. Oliinychenko, A. Sorensen, V. Koch, and L. McLerran, Sensitivity of Au+Au collisions to the symmetric nuclear matter equation of state at 2–5 nuclear saturation densities, Phys. Rev. C 108, 034908 (2023).
  63. H. Wolter et al. (TMEP Collaboration), Transport model comparison studies of intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 125, 103962 (2022).
  64. P. K. Kovtun, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 111601 (2005).
  65. O. Garcia-Montero, J. Staudenmaier, A. Schäfer, J. M. Torres-Rincon, and H. Elfner, Role of proton-antiproton regeneration in the late stages of heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 105, 064906 (2022).
  66. F. Becattini, M. Bleicher, T. Kollegger, M. Mitrovski, T. Schuster, and R. Stock, Hadronization and hadronic freeze-out in relativistic nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C 85, 044921 (2012).
  67. J. Adam et al. (STAR Collaboration), Bulk properties of the system formed in Au+Au collisions at sNN =14.5 GeV at the BNL STAR detector, Phys. Rev. C 101, 024905 (2020).
  68. L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR Collaboration), Beam-energy-dependent two-pion interferometry and the freeze-out eccentricity of pions measured in heavy ion collisions at the STAR detector, Phys. Rev. C 92, 014904 (2015).
  69. G. Bertsch, M. Gong, and M. Tohyama, Pion interferometry in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 37, 1896 (1988).
  70. S. Pratt, Pion interferometry of Quark-Gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D 33, 1314 (1986).
  71. Q.-f. Li, J. Steinheimer, H. Petersen, M. Bleicher, and H. Stocker, Effects of a phase transition on HBT correlations in an integrated Boltzmann+hydrodynamics approach, Phys. Lett. B 674, 111 (2009).
  72. D. Das, HBT radii: Comparative studies on collision systems and beam energies, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2018, 3794242 (2018).
  73. S. V. Akkelin and Y. M. Sinyukov, The HBT interferometry of expanding sources, Phys. Lett. B 356, 525 (1995).
  74. Y. M. Sinyukov, V. M. Shapoval, and V. Y. Naboka, On mT dependence of femtoscopy scales for meson and baryon pairs, Nucl. Phys. A 946, 227 (2016).
  75. V. M. Shapoval and Y. M. Sinyukov, Kaon and pion maximal emission times extraction from the femtoscopy analysis of 5.02A TeV LHC collisions within the integrated hydrokinetic model, Nucl. Phys. A 1016, 122322 (2021).
  76. Y. Sinyukov, Y. M. Sinyukov, V. Shapoval, and M. Adzhymambetov, Space–time structure of particle emission and femtoscopy scales in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions, Universe 9, 433 (2023).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. C 112, 034906– Published 15 September, 2025
  • Received 28 May 2025
  • Accepted 8 August 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation