Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Layer-dependent spin properties of charge carriers in vertically coupled telecom quantum dots

Marius Cizauskas1,2,*, A. Kors3, J. P. Reithmaier3, A. Mark Fox2, M. Benyoucef3,†, Manfred Bayer1, and Alex Greilich1,‡

  • *Contact author: marius.cizauskas@tu-dortmund.de
  • †Contact author: m.benyoucef@physik.uni-kassel.de
  • ‡Contact author: alex.greilich@tu-dortmund.de

Phys. Rev. B 113, 035441 – Published 28 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/xmz7-18rg

Abstract

We investigate the spin properties of charge carriers in vertically coupled InAs/InAlGaAs quantum dots grown by molecular beam epitaxy, emitting at telecom C-band wavelengths, with a silicon δ-doped layer. Using time-resolved pump-probe Faraday ellipticity measurements, we systematically study single-, two-, and four-layer quantum dot (QD) configurations to quantify how vertical coupling affects key spin-coherence parameters. Our measurements reveal distinct layer-dependent effects: (i) Adding a second QD layer flips the resident charge from electrons to holes, consistent with optically induced electron tunneling into lower-energy dots and resultant hole charging. (ii) Starting from the four-layer sample, the pump-probe signal develops an additional nonoscillating, decaying component absent in single- and two-layer samples, attributed to multiple layer growth changing the strain environment, which reduces heavy-hole and light-hole mixing. (iii) With four layers or more, hole spin mode locking (SML) can be observed, enabling quantitative extraction of the hole coherence time T2≈13 ns from SML amplitude saturation. We also extract longitudinal spin relaxation (T1) and transverse (T2*) spin dephasing times, g-factors, and inhomogeneous dephasing parameters for both electrons and holes across all layer configurations. The hole spin dephasing times T2* remain relatively constant (2.3–2.7 ns) across layer counts, while longitudinal relaxation times T1 decrease with increasing layers (from 0.9µs for single-layer to 0.32µs for four-layer samples). These findings provide potential design guidelines for engineering spin coherence in telecom-band QDs for quantum information applications.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (48)

  1. D. A. Vajner, L. Rickert, T. Gao, K. Kaymazlar, and T. Heindel, Quantum communication using semiconductor quantum dots, Adv. Quantum Technol. 5, 2100116 (2022).
  2. T. Miyazawa, K. Takemoto, Y. Nambu, S. Miki, T. Yamashita, H. Terai, M. Fujiwara, M. Sasaki, Y. Sakuma, M. Takatsu, T. Yamamoto, and Y. Arakawa, Single-photon emission at 1.5 µm from an InAs/InP quantum dot with highly suppressed multi-photon emission probabilities, Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 132106 (2016).
  3. P. Holewa, A. Sakanas, U. M. Gur, P. Mrowi'nski, A. Huck, B.-Y. Wang, A. Musiał, K. Yvind, N. Gregersen, M. Syperek, and E. Semenova, Bright quantum dot single-photon emitters at telecom bands heterogeneously integrated on Si, ACS Photon. 9, 2273 (2022).
  4. S. Bauer, D. Wang, N. Hoppe, C. Nawrath, J. Fischer, N. Witz, M. Kaschel, C. Schweikert, M. Jetter, S. L. Portalupi, M. Berroth, and P. Michler, Achieving stable fiber coupling of quantum dot telecom C-band single-photons to an SOI photonic device, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 211101 (2021).
  5. M. H. Rahaman, S. Harper, C.-M. Lee, K.-Y. Kim, M. Buyukkaya, V. Patel, S. Hawkins, J.-H. Kim, S. Addamane, and E. Waks, Efficient, indistinguishable telecom C-band photons using a tapered nanobeam waveguide, ACS Photon. 11, 2738 (2024).
  6. A. V. Mikhailov, V. V. Belykh, D. R. Yakovlev, P. S. Grigoryev, J. P. Reithmaier, M. Benyoucef, and M. Bayer, Electron and hole spin relaxation in InP-based self-assembled quantum dots emitting at telecom wavelengths, Phys. Rev. B 98, 205306 (2018).
  7. E. Evers, N. E. Kopteva, V. Nedelea, A. Kors, R. Kaur, J. P. Reithmaier, M. Benyoucef, M. Bayer, and A. Greilich, Hole spin coherence in InAs/InAlGaAs self-assembled quantum dots emitting at telecom wavelengths, Phys. Status Solidi B 262, 2400174 (2025).
  8. D. S. Smirnov, E. A. Zhukov, D. R. Yakovlev, E. Kirstein, M. Bayer, and A. Greilich, Spin polarization recovery and Hanle effect for charge carriers interacting with nuclear spins in semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 102, 235413 (2020).
  9. X. Li, Q. Xu, and Z. Zhang, Molecular beam epitaxy growth of quantum wires and quantum dots, Nanomaterials 13, 960 (2023).
  10. E. A. Stinaff, M. Scheibner, A. S. Bracker, I. V. Ponomarev, V. L. Korenev, M. E. Ware, M. F. Doty, T. L. Reinecke, and D. Gammon, Optical signatures of coupled quantum dots, Science 311, 636 (2006).
  11. D. Kim, S. E. Economou, C. C. Bădescu, M. Scheibner, A. S. Bracker, M. Bashkansky, T. L. Reinecke, and D. Gammon, Optical spin initialization and non-destructive measurement in a quantum dot molecule, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 236804 (2008).
  12. D. Wigger, J. Schall, M. Deconinck, N. Bart, P. Mrowiński, M. Krzykowski, K. Gawarecki, M. von Helversen, R. Schmidt, L. Bremer, F. Bopp, D. Reuter, A. D. Wieck, S. Rodt, J. Renard, G. Nogues, A. Ludwig, P. Machnikowski, J. J. Finley, S. Reitzenstein, et al., Controlled coherent coupling in a quantum dot molecule revealed by ultrafast four-wave mixing spectroscopy, ACS Photon. 10, 1504 (2023).
  13. I. A. Yugova, M. M. Glazov, E. L. Ivchenko, and A. L. Efros, Pump-probe Faraday rotation and ellipticity in an ensemble of singly charged quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 80, 104436 (2009).
  14. J. H. Prechtel, F. Maier, J. Houel, A. V. Kuhlmann, A. Ludwig, A. D. Wieck, D. Loss, and R. J. Warburton, Electrically tunable hole g factor of an optically active quantum dot for fast spin rotations, Phys. Rev. B 91, 165304 (2015).
  15. L. Sapienza, R. M. Al-Khuzheyri, A. C. Dada, A. Griffiths, E. Clarke, and B. D. Gerardot, Magneto-optical spectroscopy of single charge-tunable InAs/GaAs quantum dots emitting at telecom wavelengths, Phys. Rev. B 93, 155301 (2016).
  16. V. V. Belykh, A. Greilich, D. R. Yakovlev, M. Yacob, J. P. Reithmaier, M. Benyoucef, and M. Bayer, Electron and hole g factors in InAs/InAlGaAs self-assembled quantum dots emitting at telecom wavelengths, Phys. Rev. B 92, 165307 (2015).
  17. V. V. Belykh, D. R. Yakovlev, J. J. Schindler, E. A. Zhukov, M. A. Semina, M. Yacob, J. P. Reithmaier, M. Benyoucef, and M. Bayer, Large anisotropy of electron and hole g factors in infrared-emitting InAs/InAlGaAs self-assembled quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 93, 125302 (2016).
  18. L. M. Roth, B. Lax, and S. Zwerdling, Theory of optical magneto-absorption effects in semiconductors, Phys. Rev. 114, 90 (1959).
  19. V. V. Belykh, D. R. Yakovlev, J. J. Schindler, J. van Bree, P. M. Koenraad, N. S. Averkiev, M. Bayer, and A. Y. Silov, Dispersion of the electron g factor anisotropy in InAs/InP self-assembled quantum dots, J. Appl. Phys. 120, 084301 (2016).
  20. D. Kim, W. Sheng, P. J. Poole, D. Dalacu, J. Lefebvre, J. Lapointe, M. E. Reimer, G. C. Aers, and R. L. Williams, Tuning the exciton g factor in single InAs/InP quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 79, 045310 (2009).
  21. E. A. Zhukov, E. Kirstein, D. S. Smirnov, D. R. Yakovlev, M. M. Glazov, D. Reuter, A. D. Wieck, M. Bayer, and A. Greilich, Spin inertia of resident and photoexcited carriers in singly charged quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 98, 121304(R) (2018).
  22. I. Mikhailov, L. García, and J. Marín, Vertically coupled quantum dots charged by exciton, Microelectron. J. 39, 378 (2008), The Sixth International Conference on Low Dimensional Structures and Devices.
  23. C. Testelin, F. Bernardot, B. Eble, and M. Chamarro, Hole–spin dephasing time associated with hyperfine interaction in quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 79, 195440 (2009).
  24. M. Cizauskas, E. M. Sala, J. Heffernan, A. M. Fox, M. Bayer, and A. Greilich, Spin properties in droplet epitaxy-grown telecom quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 112, 165412 (2025).
  25. R. Hostein, A. Michon, G. Beaudoin, N. Gogneau, G. Patriache, J.-Y. Marzin, I. Robert-Philip, I. Sagnes, and A. Beveratos, Time-resolved characterization of InAsP/InP quantum dots emitting in the C-band telecommunication window, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 073106 (2008).
  26. M. Y. Petrov, I. V. Ignatiev, S. V. Poltavtsev, A. Greilich, A. Bauschulte, D. R. Yakovlev, and M. Bayer, Effect of thermal annealing on the hyperfine interaction in InAs/GaAs quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 78, 045315 (2008).
  27. A. Greilich, A. Pawlis, F. Liu, O. A. Yugov, D. R. Yakovlev, K. Lischka, Y. Yamamoto, and M. Bayer, Spin dephasing of fluorine-bound electrons in ZnSe, Phys. Rev. B 85, 121303(R) (2012).
  28. R. Stockill, C. Le Gall, C. Matthiesen, L. Huthmacher, E. Clarke, M. Hugues, and M. Atatüre, Quantum dot spin coherence governed by a strained nuclear environment, Nat. Commun. 7, 12745 (2016).
  29. T. M. Godden, J. H. Quilter, A. J. Ramsay, Y. Wu, P. Brereton, S. J. Boyle, I. J. Luxmoore, J. Puebla Nunez, A. M. Fox, and M. S. Skolnick, Coherent optical control of the spin of a single hole in an InAs/GaAs quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 017402 (2012).
  30. F. Heisterkamp, E. A. Zhukov, A. Greilich, D. R. Yakovlev, V. L. Korenev, A. Pawlis, and M. Bayer, Longitudinal and transverse spin dynamics of donor-bound electrons in fluorine-doped ZnSe: Spin inertia versus Hanle effect, Phys. Rev. B 91, 235432 (2015).
  31. D. V. Bulaev and D. Loss, Spin relaxation and decoherence of holes in quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 076805 (2005).
  32. L. Chirolli and G. Burkard, Decoherence in solid-state qubits, Adv. Phys. 57, 225 (2008).
  33. H. Wei, M. Gong, G. Guo, and L. He, Atomistic pseudopotential theory of spin relaxation in self-assembled In1−xGaxAs/GaAs quantum dots at zero magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 85, 045317 (2012).
  34. E. A. Zhukov, D. R. Yakovlev, M. Bayer, M. M. Glazov, E. L. Ivchenko, G. Karczewski, T. Wojtowicz, and J. Kossut, Spin coherence of a two-dimensional electron gas induced by resonant excitation of trions and excitons in CdTe/(Cd,Mg)Te quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B 76, 205310 (2007).
  35. A. Greilich, D. R. Yakovlev, A. Shabaev, A. L. Efros, I. A. Yugova, R. Oulton, V. Stavarache, D. Reuter, A. Wieck, and M. Bayer, Mode locking of electron spin coherences in singly charged quantum dots, Science 313, 341 (2006).
  36. I. A. Yugova, M. M. Glazov, D. R. Yakovlev, A. A. Sokolova, and M. Bayer, Coherent spin dynamics of electrons and holes in semiconductor quantum wells and quantum dots under periodical optical excitation: Resonant spin amplification versus spin mode locking, Phys. Rev. B 85, 125304 (2012).
  37. H. J. Krenner, S. Stufler, M. Sabathil, E. C. Clark, P. Ester, M. Bichler, G. Abstreiter, J. J. Finley, and A. Zrenner, Recent advances in exciton-based quantum information processing in quantum dot nanostructures, New J. Phys. 7, 184 (2005).
  38. M. Usman, T. Inoue, Y. Harda, G. Klimeck, and T. Kita, Experimental and atomistic theoretical study of degree of polarization from multilayer InAs/GaAs quantum dot stacks, Phys. Rev. B 84, 115321 (2011).
  39. J. Luo, G. Bester, and A. Zunger, Supercoupling between heavy-hole and light-hole states in nanostructures, Phys. Rev. B 92, 165301 (2015).
  40. X. Marie, T. Amand, P. Le Jeune, M. Paillard, P. Renucci, L. E. Golub, V. D. Dymnikov, and E. L. Ivchenko, Hole spin quantum beats in quantum-well structures, Phys. Rev. B 60, 5811 (1999).
  41. M. A. Semina, A. A. Golovatenko, and A. V. Rodina, Cubic anisotropy of hole Zeeman splitting in semiconductor nanocrystals, Phys. Rev. B 108, 235310 (2023).
  42. H. Yu, S. Lycett, C. Roberts, and R. Murray, Time resolved study of self‐assembled InAs quantum dots, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 4087 (1996).
  43. A. Fiore, P. Borri, W. Langbein, J. M. Hvam, U. Oesterle, R. Houdré, R. P. Stanley, and M. Ilegems, Time-resolved optical characterization of InAs/InGaAs quantum dots emitting at 1.3 µm, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 3430 (2000).
  44. G. Wang, S. Fafard, D. Leonard, J. E. Bowers, J. L. Merz, and P. M. Petroff, Time‐resolved optical characterization of InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 2815 (1994).
  45. J. M. Daniels, P. Machnikowski, and T. Kuhn, Excitons in quantum dot molecules: Coulomb coupling, spin-orbit effects, and phonon-induced line broadening, Phys. Rev. B 88, 205307 (2013).
  46. J. Rautert, T. S. Shamirzaev, S. V. Nekrasov, D. R. Yakovlev, P. Klenovsk'y, Y. G. Kusrayev, and M. Bayer, Optical orientation and alignment of excitons in direct and indirect band gap (In,Al)As/AlAs quantum dots with type-I band alignment, Phys. Rev. B 99, 195411 (2019).
  47. K. Sivalertporn, L. Mouchliadis, A. L. Ivanov, R. Philp, and E. A. Muljarov, Direct and indirect excitons in semiconductor coupled quantum wells in an applied electric field, Phys. Rev. B 85, 045207 (2012).
  48. K. D. Greve, P. L. McMahon, D. Press, T. D. Ladd, D. Bisping, C. Schneider, M. Kamp, L. Worschech, S. Hoefling, A. Forchel, and Y. Yamamoto, Ultrafast coherent control and suppressed nuclear feedback of a single quantum dot hole qubit, Nat. Phys. 7, 872 (2011).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation