Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Coulomb correlated multiparticle states of weakly confining GaAs quantum dots

Petr Klenovský*

  • *Contact author: klenovsky@physics.muni.cz

Phys. Rev. B 113, 125410 – Published 10 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/wjw9-blb1

Abstract

We compute the electronic and emission properties of Coulomb–correlated multiparticle states (X0, X±, XX) in weakly confining GaAs/AlGaAs quantum dots using an eight-band k·p model coupled to continuum elasticity and configuration interaction (CI). We evaluate polarization-resolved oscillator strengths and radiative rates both in the dipole approximation and in a quasielectrostatic beyond-dipole (BDA) longitudinal formulation implemented via a Poisson reformulation exactly equivalent to the dyadic Green-tensor kernel. For the dots studied, BDA yields lifetimes in quantitative agreement with experiments, e.g., τX=0.279ns vs 0.267ns (exp.) and τXX=0.101ns vs 0.115ns (exp.). The framework also reproduces electric-field tuning of the multiparticle electronic structure and emission—including the indistinguishability inferred from P=τX/(τX+τXX)—and we assess sensitivity to CI-basis size and to electron–electron and hole–hole exchange.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (86)

  1. H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature (London) 453, 1023 (2008).
  2. I. Aharonovich, D. Englund, and M. Toth, Solid-state single-photon emitters, Nat. Photon. 10, 631 (2016).
  3. P. Senellart, G. Solomon, and A. White, High-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources, Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 1026 (2017).
  4. X. Zhou, L. Zhai, and J. Liu, Epitaxial quantum dots: A semiconductor launchpad for photonic quantum technologies, Photon. Insights 1, R07 (2022).
  5. A. M. Fox, Solid-state quantum emitters, Adv. Quantum Technol. 8, 2300390 (2025).
  6. A. I. Ekimov and A. A. Onushchenko, Quantum size effect in three-dimensional microscopic semiconductor crystals, JETP Lett. 118, S15 (2023).
  7. A. I. Ekimov, A. L. Efros, and A. A. Onushchenko, Quantum size effect in semiconductor microcrystals, Solid State Commun. 56, 921 (1985).
  8. D. Leonard, M. Krishnamurthy, C. M. Reaves, S. P. Denbaars, and P. M. Petroff, Direct formation of quantum-sized dots from uniform coherent islands of InGaAs on GaAs surfaces, Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 3203 (1993).
  9. K. D. Wegner and U. Resch-Genger, The 2023 nobel prize in chemistry: Quantum dots, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 416, 3283 (2024).
  10. A. V. Kuhlmann, J. H. Prechtel, J. Houel, A. Ludwig, D. Reuter, A. D. Wieck, and R. J. Warburton, Transform-limited single photons from a single quantum dot, Nat. Commun. 6, 8204 (2015).
  11. P. Lodahl, A. Ludwig, and R. J. Warburton, A deterministic source of single photons, Phys. Today 75(3), 44 (2022).
  12. P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, and S. Stobbe, Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 347 (2015).
  13. J. Liu, R. Su, Y. Wei, B. Yao, S. F. C. da Silva, Y. Yu, J. Iles-Smith, K. Srinivasan, A. Rastelli, J. Li, and X. Wang, A solid-state source of strongly entangled photon pairs with high brightness and indistinguishability, Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 586 (2019).
  14. H. Wang, Y.-M. He, T.-H. Chung, H. Hu, Y. Yu, S. Chen, X. Ding, M.-C. Chen, J. Qin, X. Yang, R.-Z. Liu, Z.-C. Duan, J.-P. Li, S. Gerhardt, K. Winkler, J. Jurkat, L.-J. Wang, N. Gregersen, Y.-H. Huo, Q. Dai, et al., Towards optimal single-photon sources from polarized microcavities, Nat. Photon. 13, 770 (2019).
  15. N. Tomm, A. Javadi, N. O. Antoniadis, D. Najer, M. C. Löbl, A. R. Korsch, R. Schott, S. R. Valentin, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, and R. J. Warburton, A bright and fast source of coherent single photons, Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 399 (2021).
  16. A. J. Bennett, M. A. Pooley, R. M. Stevenson, M. B. Ward, R. B. Patel, A. B. De La Giroday, N. Sköd, I. Farrer, C. A. Nicoll, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, Electric-field-induced coherent coupling of the exciton states in a single quantum dot, Nat. Phys. 6, 947 (2010).
  17. M. Bayer, G. Ortner, O. Stern, A. Kuther, A. A. Gorbunov, A. Forchel, P. Hawrylak, S. Fafard, K. Hinzer, T. L. Reinecke, S. N. Walck, J. P. Reithmaier, F. Klopf, and F. Schäfer, Fine structure of neutral and charged excitons in self-assembled In(Ga)As/(Al) GaAs quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 65, 195315 (2002).
  18. H. O. Oyoko, C. A. Duque, and N. Porras-Montenegro, Uniaxial stress dependence of the binding energy of shallow donor impurities in GaAs-(Ga,AI)As quantum dots, J. Appl. Phys. 90, 819 (2001).
  19. S. Seidl, M. Kroner, A. Högele, K. Karrai, R. J. Warburton, A. Badolato, and P. M. Petroff, Effect of uniaxial stress on excitons in a self-assembled quantum dot, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 203113 (2006).
  20. R. Singh and G. Bester, Lower bound for the excitonic fine structure splitting in self-assembled quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 196803 (2010).
  21. M. Gong, W. Zhang, G. C. Guo, and L. He, Exciton polarization, Fine-structure splitting, and the asymmetry of quantum dots under uniaxial stress, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 227401 (2011).
  22. J. Martín-Sánchez, R. Trotta, A. Mariscal, R. Serna, G. Piredda, S. Stroj, J. Edlinger, C. Schimpf, J. Aberl, T. Lettner, J. Wildmann, H. Huang, X. Yuan, D. Ziss, J. Stangl, and A. Rastelli, Strain-tuning of the optical properties of semiconductor nanomaterials by integration onto piezoelectric actuators, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 33, 013001 (2018).
  23. K. Gaur, P. Mudi, P. Klenovsky, and S. Reitzenstein, Buried-stressor technology for the epitaxial growth and device integration of site-controlled quantum dots, Mater. Quantum Technol. 5, 022002 (2025).
  24. F. Sbresny, L. Hanschke, E. Schöll, W. Rauhaus, B. Scaparra, K. Boos, E. Zubizarreta Casalengua, H. Riedl, E. del Valle, J. J. Finley, K. D. Jöns, and K. Müller, Stimulated generation of indistinguishable single photons from a quantum ladder system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 093603 (2022).
  25. M. Braskén, M. Lindberg, D. Sundholm, and J. Olsen, Full configuration interaction calculations of electron-hole correlation effects in strain-induced quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 61, 7652 (2000).
  26. N. Baer, S. Schulz, S. Schumacher, P. Gartner, G. Czycholl, and F. Jahnke, Optical properties of self-organized wurtzite InN/GaN quantum dots: A combined atomistic tight-binding and full configuration interaction calculation, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 231114 (2005).
  27. G. Bester, A. Zunger, X. Wu, and D. Vanderbilt, Effects of linear and nonlinear piezoelectricity on the electronic properties of InAsGaAs quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 74, 081305(R) (2006).
  28. S. Tomić and N. Vukmirović, Excitonic and biexcitonic properties of single gan quantum dots modeled by 8-band k·p theory and configuration-interaction method, Phys. Rev. B 79, 245330 (2009).
  29. A. Schliwa, M. Winkelnkemper, and D. Bimberg, Few-particle energies versus geometry and composition of InxGa1−xAs/GaAs self-organized quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 79, 075443 (2009).
  30. A. Mittelstädt, A. Schliwa, and P. Klenovský, Modeling electronic and optical properties of III–V quantum dots—selected recent developments, Light: Sci. Appl. 11, 17 (2022).
  31. R. Winik, D. Cogan, Y. Don, I. Schwartz, L. Gantz, E. R. Schmidgall, N. Livneh, R. Rapaport, E. Buks, and D. Gershoni, On-demand source of maximally entangled photon pairs using the biexciton-exciton radiative cascade, Phys. Rev. B 95, 235435 (2017).
  32. J. Kettler, M. Paul, F. Olbrich, K. Zeuner, M. Jetter, P. Michler, M. Florian, C. Carmesin, and F. Jahnke, Neutral and charged biexciton-exciton cascade in near-telecom-wavelength quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 94, 045303 (2016).
  33. Y. M. He, O. Iff, N. Lundt, V. Baumann, M. Davanco, K. Srinivasan, S. Höfling, and C. Schneider, Cascaded emission of single photons from the biexciton in monolayered WSe2, Nat. Commun. 7, 13409 (2016).
  34. I. Ozfidan, M. Korkusinski, and P. Hawrylak, Theory of biexcitons and biexciton-exciton cascade in graphene quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 91, 115314 (2015).
  35. D. Huber, M. Reindl, J. Aberl, A. Rastelli, and R. Trotta, Semiconductor quantum dots as an ideal source of polarization-entangled photon pairs on-demand: A review, J. Opt. 20, 073002 (2018).
  36. B. U. Lehner, T. Seidelmann, G. Undeutsch, C. Schimpf, S. Manna, M. Gawełczyk, S. F. C. da Silva, X. Yuan, S. Stroj, D. E. Reiter, V. M. Axt, and A. Rastelli, Beyond the four-level model: Dark and hot states in quantum dots degrade photonic entanglement, Nano Lett. 23, 1409 (2023).
  37. X. Yuan, P. Klenovsky, and A. Rastelli, Data set for “GaAs quantum dots under quasi-uniaxial stress experiment and theory (raw data)”, Zenodo (2023), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7748664.
  38. A. Rastelli, S. Stufler, A. Schliwa, R. Songmuang, C. Manzano, G. Costantini, K. Kern, A. Zrenner, D. Bimberg, and O. G. Schmidt, Hierarchical self-assembly of GaAs/AlGaAs quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 166104 (2004).
  39. L. Wang, V. Křápek, F. Ding, F. Horton, A. Schliwa, D. Bimberg, A. Rastelli, and O. G. Schmidt, Self-assembled quantum dots with tunable thickness of the wetting layer: Role of vertical confinement on interlevel spacing, Phys. Rev. B 80, 085309 (2009).
  40. J. D. Plumhof, V. Křápek, L. Wang, A. Schliwa, D. Bimberg, A. Rastelli, and O. G. Schmidt, Experimental investigation and modeling of the fine structure splitting of neutral excitons in strain-free GaAs/AlxGa1−xAs quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 81, 121309(R) (2010).
  41. J. D. Plumhof, R. Trotta, V. Křápek, E. Zallo, P. Atkinson, S. Kumar, A. Rastelli, and O. G. Schmidt, Tuning of the valence band mixing of excitons confined in GaAs/AlGaAs quantum dots via piezoelectric-induced anisotropic strain, Phys. Rev. B 87, 075311 (2013).
  42. Y. H. Huo, B. J. Witek, S. Kumar, J. R. Cardenas, J. X. Zhang, N. Akopian, R. Singh, E. Zallo, R. Grifone, D. Kriegner, R. Trotta, F. Ding, J. Stangl, V. Zwiller, G. Bester, A. Rastelli, and O. G. Schmidt, A light-hole exciton in a quantum dot, Nat. Phys. 10, 46 (2014).
  43. X. Yuan, F. Weyhausen-Brinkmann, J. Martín-Sánchez, G. Piredda, V. Křápek, Y. Huo, H. Huang, C. Schimpf, O. G. Schmidt, J. Edlinger, G. Bester, R. Trotta, and A. Rastelli, Uniaxial stress flips the natural quantization axis of a quantum dot for integrated quantum photonics, Nat. Commun. 9, 3058 (2018).
  44. H. Huang, D. Csontosová, S. Manna, Y. Huo, R. Trotta, A. Rastelli, and P. Klenovský, Electric field induced tuning of electronic correlation in weakly confining quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 104, 165401 (2021).
  45. C. Heyn, M. Klingbeil, C. Strelow, A. Stemmann, S. Mendach, and W. Hansen, Single-dot spectroscopy of GaAs quantum dots fabricated by filling of self-assembled nanoholes, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 5, 1633 (2010).
  46. M. C. Löbl, L. Zhai, J.-P. Jahn, J. Ritzmann, Y. Huo, A. D. Wieck, O. G. Schmidt, A. Ludwig, A. Rastelli, and R. J. Warburton, Correlations between optical properties and voronoi-cell area of quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 100, 155402 (2019).
  47. S. F. C. da Silva, G. Undeutsch, B. Lehner, S. Manna, T. M. Krieger, M. Reindl, C. Schimpf, R. Trotta, and A. Rastelli, GaAs quantum dots grown by droplet etching epitaxy as quantum light sources, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 120502 (2021).
  48. R. Keil, M. Zopf, Y. Chen, B. Höfer, J. Zhang, F. Ding, and O. G. Schmidt, Solid-state ensemble of highly entangled photon sources at rubidium atomic transitions, Nat. Commun. 8, 15501 (2017).
  49. A. Rastelli, R. Songmuang, and O. G. Schmidt, Self-assembled GaAs/AlGaAs quantum dots by molecular beam epitaxy and in situ AsBr3 etching, Phys. E: Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 23, 384 (2004).
  50. L. Zaporski, N. Shofer, J. H. Bodey, S. Manna, G. Gillard, M. H. Appel, C. Schimpf, S. F. C. da Silva, J. Jarman, G. Delamare, G. Park, U. Haeusler, E. A. Chekhovich, A. Rastelli, D. A. Gangloff, M. Atatüre, and C. L. Gall, Ideal refocusing of an optically active spin qubit under strong hyperfine interactions, Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 257 (2023).
  51. C. Zhu, S. C. Boehme, L. G. Feld, A. Moskalenko, D. N. Dirin, R. F. Mahrt, T. Stöferle, M. I. Bodnarchuk, A. L. Efros, P. C. Sercel, M. V. Kovalenko, and G. Rainó, Single-photon superradiance in individual caesium lead halide quantum dots, Nature (London) 626, 535 (2024).
  52. S. Stobbe, P. T. Kristensen, J. E. Mortensen, J. M. Hvam, J. Mørk, and P. Lodahl, Spontaneous emission from large quantum dots in nanostructures: Exciton-photon interaction beyond the dipole approximation, Phys. Rev. B 86, 085304 (2012).
  53. P. Tighineanu, R. S. Daveau, T. B. Lehmann, H. E. Beere, D. A. Ritchie, P. Lodahl, and S. Stobbe, Single-photon superradiance from a quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 163604 (2016).
  54. M. Reindl, J. H. Weber, D. Huber, C. Schimpf, S. F. Covre da Silva, S. L. Portalupi, R. Trotta, P. Michler, and A. Rastelli, Highly indistinguishable single photons from incoherently excited quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 100, 155420 (2019).
  55. G. Bester, X. Wu, D. Vanderbilt, and A. Zunger, Importance of second-order piezoelectric effects in zinc-blende semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 187602 (2006).
  56. A. Beya-Wakata, P. Y. Prodhomme, and G. Bester, First- and second-order piezoelectricity in III-V semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 84, 195207 (2011).
  57. P. Klenovský, P. Steindl, J. Aberl, E. Zallo, R. Trotta, A. Rastelli, and T. Fromherz, Effect of second-order piezoelectricity on the excitonic structure of stress-tuned In(Ga)As/GaAs quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 97, 245314 (2018).
  58. T. B. Bahder, Eight-band k · p model of strained zinc-blende crystals, Phys. Rev. B 41, 11992 (1990).
  59. S. Birner, T. Zibold, T. Andlauer, T. Kubis, M. Sabathil, A. Trellakis, and P. Vogl, Nextnano: General purpose 3-D simulations, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 54, 2137 (2007).
  60. T. Zibold, Semiconductor based quantum information devices: Theory and simulations, Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München, 2007.
  61. G. W. Bryant, Electronic structure of ultrasmall quantum-well boxes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1140 (1987).
  62. P. Klenovský, P. Steindl, and D. Geffroy, Excitonic structure and pumping power dependent emission blue-shift of type-II quantum dots, Sci. Rep. 7, 45568 (2017).
  63. X. Yuan, S. F. Covre da Silva, D. Csontosová, H. Huang, C. Schimpf, M. Reindl, J. Lu, Z. Ni, A. Rastelli, and P. Klenovský, GaAs quantum dots under quasiuniaxial stress: Experiment and theory, Phys. Rev. B 107, 235412 (2023).
  64. I. Vurgaftman, J. R. Meyer, and L. R. Ram-Mohan, Band parameters for III–V compound semiconductors and their alloys, J. Appl. Phys. 89, 5815 (2001).
  65. J. Shumway, A. Franceschetti, and A. Zunger, Correlation versus mean-field contributions to excitons, multiexcitons, and charging energies in semiconductor quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 63, 155316 (2001).
  66. M. Rontani, C. Cavazzoni, D. Bellucci, and G. Goldoni, Full configuration interaction approach to the few-electron problem in artificial atoms, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 124102 (2006).
  67. M. C. Troparevsky and A. Franceschetti, An optimized configuration interaction method for calculating electronic excitations innanostructures, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 055211 (2008).
  68. C. D. Sherrill and H. F. Schaefer, The configuration interaction method: Advances in highly correlated approaches, Adv. Quantum Chem. 34, 143 (1999).
  69. G. D. Purvis and R. J. Bartlett, A full coupled‐cluster singles and doubles model: The inclusion of disconnected triples, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 1910 (1982).
  70. D. Huber, B. U. Lehner, D. Csontosová, M. Reindl, S. Schuler, S. F. Covre da Silva, P. Klenovský, and A. Rastelli, Single-particle-picture breakdown in laterally weakly confining GaAs quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 100, 235425 (2019).
  71. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/wjw9-blb1 for Fig. S1, showing the influence of k · p solver settings on evolution of binding energy as a function of CI basis size, and Fig. S2, showing the influence of electron-hole exchange interaction on calculations of multiparticle states.
  72. G. Hönig, G. Callsen, A. Schliwa, S. Kalinowski, C. Kindel, S. Kako, Y. Arakawa, D. Bimberg, and A. Hoffmann, Manifestation of unconventional biexciton states in quantum dots, Nat. Commun. 5, 5721 (2014).
  73. A. Alshaikh, J. Peng, R. Zierold, R. H. Blick, and C. Heyn, Vertical electric-field-induced switching from strong to asymmetric strong–weak confinement in GaAs cone-shell quantum dots using transparent Al-doped ZnO gates, Nanomaterials 14, 1712 (2024).
  74. T. Takagahara, Theory of exciton doublet structures and polarization relaxation in single quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 62, 16840 (2000).
  75. Y. H. Huo, V. Křápek, A. Rastelli, and O. G. Schmidt, Volume dependence of excitonic fine structure splitting in geometrically similar quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 90, 041304(R) (2014).
  76. V. Křápek, P. Klenovský, and T. Šikola, Excitonic fine structure splitting in type-II quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 92, 195430 (2015).
  77. C. Schimpf, M. Reindl, P. Klenovský, T. Fromherz, S. F. Covre da Silva, J. Hofer, C. Schneider, S. Höfling, R. Trotta, and A. Rastelli, Resolving the temporal evolution of line broadening in single quantum emitters, Opt. Express 27, 35290 (2019).
  78. S. Stobbe, T. W. Schlereth, S. Höfling, A. Forchel, J. M. Hvam, and P. Lodahl, Large quantum dots with small oscillator strength, Phys. Rev. B 82, 233302 (2010).
  79. G. Undeutsch, M. Aigner, A. J. Garcia, J. Reindl, M. Peter, S. Mader, C. Weidinger, S. F. C. da Silva, S. Manna, E. Schöll, and A. Rastelli, Electric-field control of photon indistinguishability in cascaded decays in quantum dots, Nano Lett. 25, 7121 (2025).
  80. M. Ghali, K. Ohtani, Y. Ohno, and H. Ohno, Generation and control of polarization-entangled photons from GaAs island quantum dots by an electric field, Nat. Commun. 3, 661 (2012).
  81. J. W. Luo, R. Singh, A. Zunger, and G. Bester, Influence of the atomic-scale structure on the exciton fine-structure splitting in InGaAs and GaAs quantum dots in a vertical electric field, Phys. Rev. B 86, 161302(R) (2012).
  82. A. J. Bennett, D. C. Unitt, P. Atkinson, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, High performance single photon sources from photolithographically defined pillar microcavities, Opt. Express 13, 50 (2005).
  83. G. A. Narvaez, G. Bester, and A. Zunger, Excitons, biexcitons, and trions in self-assembled (In,Ga)As/GaAs quantum dots: Recombination energies, polarization, and radiative lifetimes versus dot height, Phys. Rev. B 72, 245318 (2005).
  84. P. Senellart, E. Peter, J. Hours, A. Cavanna, and J. Bloch, Few particle effects in the emission of short-radiative-lifetime single quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 72, 115302 (2005).
  85. B. Alén, J. Bosch, D. Granados, J. Martínez-Pastor, J. M. García, and L. González, Oscillator strength reduction induced by external electric fields in self-assembled quantum dots and rings, Phys. Rev. B 75, 045319 (2007).
  86. P. Millington-Hotze, P. Klenovsky, H. E. Dyte, G. Gillard, S. Manna, S. F. C. da Silva, A. Rastelli, and E. A. Chekhovich, Few-electron spin qubits in optically active GaAs quantum dots, arXiv:2504.19257.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation