Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Hund-projected Kanamori model: An effective description of Hund's metals near the Mott insulating regime

Johan Carlström

Phys. Rev. B 113, 165135 – Published 17 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/v7zb-8ndn

Abstract

Hund's coupling plays a decisive role in shaping electron correlations of multi-orbital systems, giving rise to a class of materials—Hund's metals—that combine local-moment physics with metallic transport. Here, we derive an effective low-energy description of such a system near the Mott insulating regime, starting from the multi-orbital Hubbard-Kanamori Hamiltonian and projecting onto the high-spin manifold favored by Hund's first rule. The resulting Hund-projected Kanamori model captures the interplay between carrier motion and magnetic correlations in the presence of strong Hund's coupling. In the undoped limit, the model reduces to a spin-N/2 Heisenberg system with suppressed quantum fluctuations, approaching the classical limit for realistic five-band configurations. Upon doping, carrier motion couples strongly to the spin background and drives ferromagnetic correlations through a Hund-enhanced kinetic mechanism analogous to, but much stronger than, Nagaoka ferromagnetism. Owing to its reduced sign problem, the model can be addressed with advanced path-integral methods to determine quasiparticle structure and effective interactions between carriers—quantities that are challenging to obtain with other methods. This framework establishes a microscopic bridge between the Kanamori model and the emergent magnetic and transport phenomena characteristic of Hund's metals.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (44)

  1. P. W. Anderson, The resonating valence bond state in La2CuO4 and superconductivity, Science 235, 1196 (1987).
  2. P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17 (2006).
  3. D. J. Scalapino, A common thread: The pairing interaction for unconventional superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1383 (2012).
  4. Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature (London) 556, 80 (2018).
  5. Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature (London) 556, 43 (2018).
  6. Z. Zhang, Y. Wang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. Ueno, E. Tutuc, and B. J. LeRoy, Flat bands in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Phys. 16, 1093 (2020).
  7. H. Pan, F. Wu, and S. Das Sarma, Band topology, Hubbard model, Heisenberg model, and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in twisted bilayer WSe2, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033087 (2020).
  8. F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, and A. H. MacDonald, Hubbard model physics in transition metal dichalcogenide moiré bands, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026402 (2018).
  9. Y. Xu, K. Kang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, A tunable bilayer Hubbard model in twisted WSe2, Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 934 (2022).
  10. W. F. Brinkman and T. M. Rice, Single-particle excitations in magnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. B 2, 1324 (1970).
  11. C. L. Kane, P. A. Lee, and N. Read, Motion of a single hole in a quantum antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 39, 6880 (1989).
  12. J. Koepsell, J. Vijayan, P. Sompet, F. Grusdt, T. A. Hilker, E. Demler, G. Salomon, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Imaging magnetic polarons in the doped Fermi-Hubbard model, Nature (London) 572, 358 (2019).
  13. J. Koepsell, D. Bourgund, P. Sompet, S. Hirthe, A. Bohrdt, Y. Wang, F. Grusdt, E. Demler, G. Salomon, C. Gross, and I. Bloch, Microscopic evolution of doped Mott insulators from polaronic metal to Fermi liquid, Science 374, 82 (2021).
  14. J. R. Schrieffer, X. G. Wen, and S. C. Zhang, Dynamic spin fluctuations and the bag mechanism of high-Tc superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 39, 11663 (1989).
  15. S. A. Trugman, Interaction of holes in a Hubbard antiferromagnet and high-temperature superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 37, 1597 (1988).
  16. C. Glittum, A. Štrkalj, D. Prabhakaran, P. A. Goddard, C. D. Batista, and C. Castelnovo, A resonant valence bond spin liquid in the dilute limit of doped frustrated Mott insulators, Nat. Phys. 21, 1211 (2025).
  17. Y. Nagaoka, Ferromagnetism in a narrow, almost half-filled s band, Phys. Rev. 147, 392 (1966).
  18. J. O. Haerter and B. S. Shastry, Kinetic antiferromagnetism in the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 087202 (2005).
  19. J. Carlström, In situ controllable magnetic phases in doped twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043126 (2022).
  20. Z. Tao, W. Zhao, B. Shen, T. Li, P. Knüppel, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Observation of spin polarons in a frustrated moiré Hubbard system, Nat. Phys. 20, 783 (2024).
  21. S.-S. Zhang, W. Zhu, and C. D. Batista, Pairing from strong repulsion in triangular lattice Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 97, 140507(R) (2018).
  22. J. Carlström, High-temperature phase separation and charge-magnon liquid in kinetic antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 106702 (2025).
  23. A. Auerbach, Interacting Electrons and Quantum Magnetism (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994).
  24. A. Georges, L. de' Medici, and J. Mravlje, Strong correlations from Hund's coupling, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 4, 137 (2013).
  25. L. de' Medici, J. Mravlje, and A. Georges, Janus-faced influence of Hund's rule coupling in strongly correlated materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 256401 (2011).
  26. Y. Kamihara, T. Watanabe, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, Iron-based layered superconductor La[O1−xFx]FeAs (x=0.05−0.12) with Tc=26K, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 3296 (2008).
  27. L. de' Medici, S. R. Hassan, M. Capone, and X. Dai, Orbital-selective Mott transition out of band degeneracy lifting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 126401 (2009).
  28. V. Stanev and Z. Tešanović, Three-band superconductivity and the order parameter that breaks time-reversal symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 81, 134522 (2010).
  29. V. Grinenko, D. Weston, F. Caglieris, C. Wuttke, C. Hess, T. Gottschall, I. Maccari, D. Gorbunov, S. Zherlitsyn, J. Wosnitza, et al., State with spontaneously broken time-reversal symmetry above the superconducting phase transition, Nat. Phys. 17, 1254 (2021).
  30. L. de' Medici, G. Giovannetti, and M. Capone, Selective Mott physics as a key to iron superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 177001 (2014).
  31. S. Lafuerza, H. Gretarsson, F. Hardy, T. Wolf, C. Meingast, G. Giovannetti, M. Capone, A. S. Sefat, Y.-J. Kim, P. Glatzel, and L. de' Medici, Evidence of Mott physics in iron pnictides from x-ray spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 96, 045133 (2017).
  32. H. Gretarsson, A. Lupascu, J. Kim, D. Casa, T. Gog, W. Wu, S. R. Julian, Z. J. Xu, J. S. Wen, G. D. Gu, R. H. Yuan, Z. G. Chen, N.-L. Wang, S. Khim, K. H. Kim, M. Ishikado, I. Jarrige, S. Shamoto, J.-H. Chu, I. R. Fisher, et al., Revealing the dual nature of magnetism in iron pnictides and iron chalcogenides using x-ray emission spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 84, 100509(R) (2011).
  33. K. Nakamura, R. Arita, and M. Imada, Ab initio derivation of low-energy model for iron-based superconductors LaFeAsO and LaFePO, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 093711 (2008).
  34. T. Miyake, K. Nakamura, R. Arita, and M. Imada, Comparison of ab initio low-energy models for LaFePO, laFeAsO, BaFe2As2, LiFeAs, FeSe, and FeTe: Electron correlation and covalency, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 79, 044705 (2010).
  35. Z. P. Yin, K. Haule, and G. Kotliar, Kinetic frustration and the nature of the magnetic and paramagnetic states in iron pnictides and iron chalcogenides, Nat. Mater. 10, 932 (2011).
  36. K. A. Chao, J. Spałek, and A. M. Oleś, Canonical perturbation expansion of the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 18, 3453 (1978).
  37. T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. 58, 1098 (1940).
  38. N. V. Prokof'ev, B. V. Svistunov, and I. S. Tupitsyn, Exact, complete, and universal continuous-time worldline Monte Carlo approach to the statistics of discrete quantum systems, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 87, 310 (1998).
  39. E. Blomquist and J. Carlström, Unbiased description of magnetic polarons in a Mott insulator, Commun. Phys. 3, 172 (2020).
  40. E. Blomquist and J. Carlström, Evidence of attraction between charge carriers in a doped Mott insulator, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013272 (2021).
  41. D. Sutter, C. G. Fatuzzo, S. Moser, M. Kim, R. Fittipaldi, A. Vecchione, V. Granata, Y. Sassa, F. Cossalter, G. Gatti, et al., Hallmarks of Hunds coupling in the Mott insulator Ca2RuO4, Nat. Commun. 8, 15176 (2017).
  42. J. Mravlje, M. Aichhorn, T. Miyake, K. Haule, G. Kotliar, and A. Georges, Coherence-incoherence crossover and the mass-renormalization puzzles in Sr2RuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 096401 (2011).
  43. S. Nakatsuji and Y. Maeno, Quasi-two-dimensional Mott transition system Ca2−xSrxRuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2666 (2000).
  44. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18458352.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation