Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Kibble-Zurek dynamics and statistics of topological defects in chiral superfluid He3 films

Noble Gluscevich* and J. A. Sauls†

  • *Contact author: nglusc1@lsu.edu
  • †Contact author: sauls@lsu.edu

Phys. Rev. B 111, 214526 – Published 26 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/tlv7-bvkh

Abstract

In equilibrium, confined films of superfluid He3-A have the chiral axis ℓ̂ locked normal to the surface of the film. There are two degenerate ground states, ℓ̂||±ẑ. However, for a temperature quench, i.e., cool down through the phase transition at a finite rate, causally disconnected regions of order parameter fluctuations develop and evolve into an inhomogeneous ordered phase that hosts both domain walls between time-reversed chiral phases as well as vortices with winding numbers p∈Z. We present simulations based on a time-dependent generalization of Ginzburg-Landau theory for strong-coupling He3 that reveal both types of topological defects to be present following the temperature quench. Results for the dynamics of vortices interacting with antivortices as well as domain walls are presented. The vortex number density as a function of quench rate agrees well with the scaling predicted by Kibble and Zurek. We also present results for the number distribution and compare with other theoretical models for full-counting statistics of the topological defect density. Finally, we present results for an asymmetry in the post-freeze-out populations of inequivalent vortex core structures that are characteristic of a chiral superfluid.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (63)

  1. T. Mizushima and K. Machida, Multifaceted properties of Andreev bound states: Interplay of symmetry and topology, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20150355 (2018).
  2. G. E. Volovik, Topological superfluids, Zh. Eskp. Teor. Fiz. 156, 700 (2019).
  3. Y. Nambu, Fermion-Boson relations in BCS-type theories, Physica D 15, 147 (1985).
  4. G. E. Volovik and M. A. Zubkov, Scalar excitation with Leggett frequency in He3-B and the 125 GeV Higgs particle in top quark condensation models as pseudo-Goldstone bosons, Phys. Rev. D 92, 055004 (2015).
  5. J. A. Sauls and T. Mizushima, On the Nambu Fermion-Boson relations for superfluid He3, Phys. Rev. B 95, 094515 (2017).
  6. M. B. Hindmarsh and T. W. B. Kibble, Cosmic strings, Rep. Prog. Phys. 58, 477 (1995).
  7. M. Hindmarsh, J. A. Sauls, K. Zhang et al., AB transition in superfluid He3 and cosmological phase transitions, J. Low Temp. Phys. 215, 495 (2024).
  8. J. J. Wiman and J. A. Sauls, Strong-coupling and the stripe phase of He3, J. Low Temp. Phys. 184, 1054 (2016).
  9. T. Mizushima and J. A. Sauls, Bosonic surface states and acoustic spectroscopy of confined superfluid He3-B, arXiv:1801.02277.
  10. R. C. Regan, J. J. Wiman, and J. A. Sauls, The vortex phase diagram of rotating superfluid He3-B, Phys. Rev. B 101, 024517 (2020).
  11. T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 9, 1387 (1976).
  12. T. W. B. Kibble, Some implications of a cosmological phase transition, Phys. Rep. 67, 183 (1980).
  13. W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in superfluid helium? Nature (London) 317, 505 (1985).
  14. W. H. Zurek, Cosmic strings in laboratory superfluids and the topological remnants of other phase transitions, Acta Phys. Pol. B 24, 1301 (1993).
  15. C. Bäuerle, Y. M. Bunkov, S. N. Fisher, H. Godfrin, and G. R. Pickett, Laboratory simulation of cosmic string formation in the early universe using superfluid He3, Nature (London) 382, 332 (1996).
  16. V. M. H. Ruutu, V. B. Eltsov, A. J. Gill, T. W. B. Kibble, M. Krusius, Y. G. Makhlin, B. Plaçais, G. E. Volovik, and W. Xu, Vortex formation in neutron-irradiated superfluid He3 as an analogue of cosmological defect formation, Nature (London) 382, 334 (1996).
  17. V. M. Ruutu, V. B. Eltsov, M. Krusius, Y. G. Makhlin, B. Plaçais, and G. E. Volovik, Defect formation in quench-cooled superfluid phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1465 (1998).
  18. V. B. Eltsov and M. Krusius, Broken symmetry and nonequilibrium superfluid He3, in Topological Defects and Non-Equilibrium Symmetry Breaking Phase Transitions, Lecture Notes for the 1999 Les Houches Winter School, edited by H. Godfrin and Y. Bunkov (Elsievier Science, Amsterdam, 2000), pp. 325–344.
  19. A. Maniv, E. Polturak, and G. Koren, Observation of magnetic flux generated spontaneously during a rapid quench of superconducting films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 197001 (2003).
  20. I. Chuang, R. Durrer, N. Turok, and B. Yurke, Cosmology in the laboratory: Defect dynamics in liquid crystals, Science 251, 1336 (1991).
  21. M. J. Bowick, L. Chandar, E. A. Schiff, and A. M. Srivastava, The cosmological Kibble mechanism in the laboratory: String formation in liquid crystals, Science 263, 943 (1994).
  22. P. C. Hendry, N. S. Lawson, R. A. M. Lee, P. V. E. McClintock, and C. D. H. Williams, Generation of defects in superfluid He4 as an analogue of the formation of cosmic strings, Nature (London) 368, 315 (1994).
  23. S. Autti, V. V. Dmitriev, J. T. Mäkinen, A. A. Soldatov, G. E. Volovik, A. N. Yudin, V. V. Zavjalov, and V. B. Eltsov, Observation of half-quantum vortices in topological superfluid He3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 255301 (2016).
  24. J. Rysti, J. T. Mäkinen, S. Autti, T. Kamppinen, G. E. Volovik, and V. B. Eltsov, Suppressing the Kibble-Zurek mechanism by a symmetry-violating bias, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 115702 (2021).
  25. C. N. Weiler, T. W. Neely, D. R. Scherer, A. S. Bradley, M. J. Davis, and B. P. Anderson, Spontaneous vortices in the formation of Bose–Einstein condensates, Nature (London) 455, 948 (2008).
  26. G. Lamporesi, S. Donadello, S. Serafini, F. Dalfovo, and G. Ferrari, Spontaneous creation of Kibble–Zurek solitons in a Bose–Einstein condensate, Nat. Phys. 9, 656 (2013).
  27. K. Lee, S. Kim, T. Kim, and Y. Shin, Universal Kibble-Zurek scaling in an atomic Fermi superfluid, Nat. Phys. 20, 1570 (2024).
  28. W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in condensed matter systems, Phys. Rep. 276, 177 (1996).
  29. N. D. Antunes, L. M. A. Bettencourt, and W. H. Zurek, Vortex string formation in a 3D U(1) temperature quench, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2824 (1999).
  30. A. del Campo, Universal statistics of topological defects formed in a quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 200601 (2018).
  31. F. J. Gómez-Ruiz, J. J. Mayo, and A. del Campo, Full counting statistics of topological defects after crossing a phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 240602 (2020).
  32. The first three cumulants are the mean, κ1=〈n〉, variance, κ2=〈(n−〈n〉)2〉, and skewness κ3=〈(n−〈n〉)3〉. For a discussion of the higher-order cumulants, see Ref. [31].
  33. P. J. Heikkinen, L. V. Levitin, X. Rojas, A. Singh, N. Eng, A. Casey, J. Saunders, A. Vorontsov, N. Zhelev, A. T. Sebastian, and J. M. Parpia, Chiral superfluid helium-3 in the quasi-two-dimensional limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 136001 (2025).
  34. Rotations about the chiral axis reduce to an overall phase factor which can be undone with a gauge transformation.
  35. J. A. Sauls, Surface states, edge currents, and the angular momentum of chiral p-wave superfluids, Phys. Rev. B 84, 214509 (2011).
  36. T. A. Tokuyasu, D. W. Hess, and J. A. Sauls, Vortex states in an unconventional superconductor and the mixed phases of UPt3, Phys. Rev. B 41, 8891 (1990).
  37. J. A. Sauls and M. Eschrig, Vortices in chiral, spin-triplet superconductors and superfluids, New J. Phys. 11, 075008 (2009).
  38. E. Abrahams and T. Tsuneto, Time variation of the Ginzburg-Landau order parameter, Phys. Rev. 152, 416 (1966).
  39. N. B. Kopnin, Vortex dynamics and mutual friction in superconductors and Fermi superfluids, Rep. Prog. Phys. 65, 1633 (2002).
  40. I. S. Aranson, N. B. Kopnin, and V. M. Vinokur, Nucleation of vortices by rapid thermal quench, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2600 (1999).
  41. N. B. Kopnin and E. V. Thuneberg, Time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau analysis of inhomogeneous normal-superfluid transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 116 (1999).
  42. H. Kleinert, Collective quantum fields, Fortschr. Phys. 26, 565 (1978).
  43. The spin basis, {e⃗α|α=x′,y′,z′}, is an orthogonal triad of unit vectors in spin space, while the orbital basis functions, p̂i=ei·p̂, are the direction cosines of the orbital momentum p, defined on the Fermi surface and referenced to the unit vectors {ei|i=x,y,z} in orbital space.
  44. Violation of particle-hole symmetry by the parent Fermi liquid allows for an additional invariant in the Lagrangian that is first order in ∂tA, i.e., KΓ=iΓ[Tr{ȦA†}−Tr{AȦ†}]. This C-violating term is small so we omit it in the dynamical simulations that follow. This term in the Lagrangian is unrelated to the dissipative term that is first order in ∂tA that arises from coupling of the thermal bath of fermionic excitations to nonequilibrium states of the bosonic field, discussed in Sec. 2a2.
  45. D. Rainer and J. W. Serene, Free energy of superfluid He3, Phys. Rev. B 13, 4745 (1976).
  46. J. A. Sauls and J. W. Serene, Potential scattering models for the quasiparticle interactions in liquid He3, Phys. Rev. B 24, 183 (1981).
  47. J. A. Sauls and J. W. Serene, Higher-order strong coupling effects in superfluid He3, Physica B+C 108, 1137 (1981).
  48. J. Wiman, Quantitative superfluid He-three from confinement to bulk, Ph.D. thesis, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 2019.
  49. Note that temperature-dependent scaling of τGL(T) differs from that in Eq. (2) because the latter defines the timescale for pair fluctuations in the critical region in which the order parameter has not yet developed.
  50. In a magnetic field with B||±ℓ and B≥Bc≃2.5mT, the Zeeman energy dominates and is minimized for d̂⊥B, which “unlocks” d̂ from ℓ̂.
  51. This Lagrangian and its extension to p-wave superconductors with tetragonal symmetry was used to investigate the collective modes of the chiral p-wave model for Sr2RuO4 in Ref. [63].
  52. R. Rantanen and V. Eltsov, Competition of vortex core structures in superfluid He3-B, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043112 (2024).
  53. L. V. Levitin, R. G. Bennett, A. Casey, B. Cowan, J. Saunders, D. Drung, T. Schurig, and J. M. Parpia, Phase diagram of the topological superfluid He3 confined in a nanoscale slab geometry, Science 340, 841 (2013).
  54. N. Zhelev, T. S. Abhilash, E. N. Smith, R. G. Bennett, X. Rojas, L. Levitin, J. Saunders, and J. M. Parpia, The A-B transition in superfluid helium-3 under confinement in a thin slab geometry, Nat. Commun. 8, 15963 (2017).
  55. J. C. Strikwerda, Finite Difference Schemes and Partial Differential Equations, 2nd ed. (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2004).
  56. G. E. P. Box and M. E. Muller, A note on the generation of random normal deviates, Ann. Math. Stat. 29, 610 (1958).
  57. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/tlv7-bvkh for an mp4 video animation of the TDGL simulation of a thermal quench from the normal state at T=1.5TctoT=0.5Tc with a quench rate of τ¯GL/τQ=10−2.
  58. J. A. Sauls, The order parameter for the superconducting phases of UPt3, Adv. Phys. 43, 113 (1994).
  59. M. Ichioka, K. Machida, and J. A. Sauls, Vortex states of chiral P-wave superconductors, J. Phys. (IOP) 400, 022031 (2012).
  60. O. Shevtsov and J. A. Sauls, Electrons and Weyl fermions in superfluid He3-A, Phys. Rev. B 94, 064511 (2016).
  61. H. Wu and J. A. Sauls, Weyl Fermions and broken symmetry phases in laterally confined He3 films, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 35, 495402 (2023).
  62. D. G. Lowe, Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints, Intl. J. Comput. Vision 60, 91 (2004).
  63. J. A. Sauls, H. Wu, and S. B. Chung, Anisotropy and strong-coupling effects on the collective mode spectrum of chiral superconductors: Application to Sr2RuO4, Front. Phys. 3, 36 (2015).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation