Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Supercurrents in Josephson junctions with chiral molecular potentials

Oleg Kuliashov1, Alberto Cappellaro2,3,4, Oded Millo5, Yossi Paltiel1, Mikhail Lemeshko4, and Ragheed Alhyder4,*

  • *Contact author: ragheed.alhyder@ista.ac.at

Phys. Rev. B 114, 154510 – Published 17 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/s1jn-fq4d

Abstract

The influence of chiral molecular potentials on phase-coherent transport in superconducting Josephson junctions is investigated. Within a Bogoliubov–de Gennes tight-binding framework, a superconducting-normal-superconducting (SNS) junction functionalized by adsorbed chiral molecules is modeled, where electrostatic gradients generated by the molecules induce spin-orbit coupling in the normal region. The equilibrium charge current-phase relation is found to remain largely insensitive to molecular chirality in symmetric, zero-field configurations. In contrast, the spin-polarized equilibrium current exhibits a pronounced chirality-dependent response, with opposite enantiomers producing distinct and anisotropic spin-polarized Josephson currents. The resulting handedness contrast can be enhanced through control parameters such as molecular orientation and the strength of the induced spin-orbit coupling. The temperature dependence of these currents further shows that the chirality-dependent signatures persist across a range of temperatures well below the superconducting critical temperature. These results identify Josephson interferometry as a phase-sensitive setting for probing chirality-dependent spin structure and highlight spin-polarized superconducting transport as a controlled route toward integrating chiral molecular functionality into superconducting spintronic devices.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (64)

  1. L. D. Barron, True and false chirality and parity violation, Chem. Phys. Lett. 123, 423 (1986).
  2. Y. Saito and H. Hyuga, Colloquium: Homochirality: Symmetry breaking in systems driven far from equilibrium, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 603 (2013).
  3. D. G. Blackmond, The origin of biological homochirality, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 11, a032540 (2019).
  4. C. D. Aiello, J. M. Abendroth, M. Abbas, A. Afanasev, S. Agarwal, A. S. Banerjee, D. N. Beratan, J. N. Belling, B. Berche, A. Botana, J. R. Caram, G. L. Celardo, G. Cuniberti, A. Garcia-Etxarri, A. Dianat, I. Diez-Perez, Y. Guo, R. Gutierrez, C. Herrmann, J. Hihath, et al., A chirality-based quantum leap, ACS Nano 16, 4989 (2022).
  5. D. Patterson, M. Schnell, and J. M. Doyle, Enantiomer-specific detection of chiral molecules via microwave spectroscopy, Nature (London) 497, 475 (2013).
  6. K. Ray, S. P. Ananthavel, D. H. Waldeck, and R. Naaman, Asymmetric scattering of polarized electrons by organized organic films of chiral molecules, Science 283, 814 (1999).
  7. Z. Xie, T. Z. Markus, S. R. Cohen, Z. Vager, R. Gutierrez, and R. Naaman, Spin specific electron conduction through DNA oligomers, Nano Lett. 11, 4652 (2011).
  8. R. Gutierrez, E. Díaz, R. Naaman, and G. Cuniberti, Spin-selective transport through helical molecular systems, Phys. Rev. B 85, 081404(R) (2012).
  9. R. Naaman and D. H. Waldeck, Spintronics and chirality: Spin selectivity in electron transport through chiral molecules, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 66, 263 (2015).
  10. R. Naaman, Y. Paltiel, and D. Waldeck, Chiral molecules and the electron spin, Nat. Rev. Chem. 3, 250 (2019).
  11. R. Naaman, Y. Paltiel, and D. H. Waldeck, Chiral induced spin selectivity gives a new twist on spin-control in chemistry, Acc. Chem. Res. 53, 2659 (2020).
  12. K. Banerjee-Ghosh, O. B. Dor, F. Tassinari, E. Capua, S. Yochelis, A. Capua, S.-H. Yang, S. S. P. Parkin, S. Sarkar, L. Kronik, L. T. Baczewski, R. Naaman, and Y. Paltiel, Separation of enantiomers by their enantiospecific interaction with achiral magnetic substrates, Science 360, 1331 (2018).
  13. O. B. Dor, S. Yochelis, A. Radko, K. Vankayala, E. Capua, A. Capua, S.-H. Yang, L. T. Baczewski, S. S. P. Parkin, R. Naaman, and Y. Paltiel, Magnetization switching in ferromagnets by adsorbed chiral molecules without current or external magnetic field, Nat. Commun. 8, 14567 (2017).
  14. A. M. Guo and Q. F. Sun, Spin-selective transport of electrons in DNA double helix, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 218102 (2012).
  15. A. M. Guo and Q. F. Sun, Sequence-dependent spin-selective tunneling along double-stranded DNA, Phys. Rev. B 86, 115441 (2012).
  16. S. Varela, V. Mujica, and E. Medina, Effective spin-orbit couplings in an analytical tight-binding model of DNA: Spin filtering and chiral spin transport, Phys. Rev. B 93, 155436 (2016).
  17. A. C. Aragonès, E. Medina, M. Ferrer-Huerta, N. Gimeno, M. Teixidó, J. L. Palma, N. Tao, J. M. Ugalde, E. Giralt, I. Díez-Pérez, and V. Mujica, Measuring the spin-polarization power of a single chiral molecule, Small 13, 1602519 (2017).
  18. K. M. Alam and S. Pramanik, Spin filtering with poly-T wrapped single wall carbon nanotubes, Nanoscale 9, 5155 (2017).
  19. H. Lu, J. Wang, C. Xiao, X. Pan, X. Chen, R. Brunecky, J. J. Berry, K. Zhu, M. C. Beard, and Z. V. Vardeny, Spin-dependent charge transport through 2D chiral hybrid lead-iodide perovskites, Sci. Adv. 5, eaay0571 (2019).
  20. M. Atzori and R. Sessoli, The second quantum revolution: Role and challenges of molecular chemistry, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 11339 (2019).
  21. M. Geyer, R. Gutierrez, V. Mujica, and G. Cuniberti, Chirality-induced spin selectivity in a coarse-grained tight-binding model for helicene, J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 27230 (2019).
  22. X. Yang, C. H. van der Wal, and B. J. van Wees, Spin-dependent electron transmission model for chiral molecules in mesoscopic devices, Phys. Rev. B 99, 024418 (2019).
  23. A. Ghazaryan, M. Lemeshko, and A. G. Volosniev, Filtering spins by scattering from a lattice of point magnets, Commun. Phys. 3, 178 (2020).
  24. X. Yang, C. H. van der Wal, and B. J. van Wees, Detecting chirality in two-terminal electronic nanodevices, Nano Lett. 20, 6148 (2020).
  25. A. G. Volosniev, H. Alpern, Y. Paltiel, O. Millo, M. Lemeshko, and A. Ghazaryan, Interplay between friction and spin-orbit coupling as a source of spin polarization, Phys. Rev. B 104, 024430 (2021).
  26. C. Kulkarni, A. K. Mondal, T. K. Das, G. Grinbom, F. Tassinari, M. F. J. Mabesoone, E. W. Meijer, and R. Naaman, Highly efficient and tunable filtering of electrons' spin by supramolecular chirality of nanofiber-based materials, Adv. Mater. 32, 1904965 (2020).
  27. F. Evers, A. Aharony, N. Bar-Gill, O. Entin-Wohlman, P. Hedegård, O. Hod, P. Jelinek, G. Kamieniarz, M. Lemeshko, K. Michaeli, V. Mujica, R. Naaman, Y. Paltiel, S. Refaely-Abramson, O. Tal, J. Thijssen, M. Thoss, J. M. van Ruitenbeek, L. Venkataraman, D. H. Waldeck, et al., Theory of chirality induced spin selectivity: Progress and challenges, Adv. Mater. 34, 2106629 (2022).
  28. S. F. Ozturk, Z. Liu, J. D. Sutherland, and D. D. Sasselov, Origin of biological homochirality by crystallization of an RNA precursor on a magnetic surface, Sci. Adv. 9, eadg8274 (2023).
  29. M. R. Wasielewski, Light-driven spin chemistry for quantum information science, Phys. Today 76(3), 28 (2023).
  30. C. M. Niman, N. Sukenik, T. Dang, J. Nwachukwu, M. A. Thirumurthy, A. K. Jones, R. Naaman, K. Santra, T. K. Das, Y. Paltiel, L. T. Baczewski, and M. Y. El-Naggar, Bacterial extracellular electron transfer components are spin selective, J. Chem. Phys. 159, 145101 (2023).
  31. G. Menichetti, L. Cavicchi, L. Lucchesi, F. Taddei, G. Iannaccone, P. Jarillo-Herrero, C. Felser, F. H. Koppens, and M. Polini, Chirality-induced spin polarization in twisted transition metal dichalcogenides, Newton 1, 100013 (2025).
  32. Y. Kapon, F. Kammerbauer, T. Balland, S. Yochelis, M. Kläui, and Y. Paltiel, Effects of chiral polypeptides on skyrmion stability and dynamics, Nano Lett. 25, 306 (2025).
  33. A. Moharana, Y. Kapon, F. Kammerbauer, D. Anthofer, S. Yochelis, H. Shema, E. Gross, M. Kläui, Y. Paltiel, and A. Wittmann, Chiral-induced unidirectional spin-to-charge conversion, Sci. Adv. 11, eado4285 (2025).
  34. J. Fransson, Chirality-induced spin selectivity: The role of electron correlations, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 7126 (2019).
  35. A. Ghazaryan, Y. Paltiel, and M. Lemeshko, Analytic model of chiral-induced spin selectivity, J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 11716 (2020).
  36. P. Hedegård, Spin dynamics and chirality induced spin selectivity, J. Chem. Phys. 159, 104104 (2023).
  37. R. Alhyder, A. Cappellaro, M. Lemeshko, and A. G. Volosniev, Achiral dipoles on a ferromagnet can affect its magnetization direction, J. Chem. Phys. 159, 104103 (2023).
  38. R. Alhyder, M. Lemeshko, and A. Cappellaro, Quantum transport in the presence of a chiral molecular potential, J. Chem. Phys. 162, 234106 (2025).
  39. M. Di Ventra, R. Gutierrez, and G. Cuniberti, Chirality-induced spin–orbit coupling and spin selectivity, J. Phys. Chem. A 129, 9504 (2025).
  40. B. D. Josephson, Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling, Phys. Lett. 1, 251 (1962).
  41. A. F. Andreev, The thermal conductivity of the intermediate state in superconductors, Sov. Phys. JETP 19, 1228 (1964).
  42. G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk, Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion, Phys. Rev. B 25, 4515 (1982).
  43. C. W. J. Beenakker and H. van Houten, Josephson current through a superconducting quantum point contact shorter than the coherence length, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3056 (1991).
  44. A. A. Golubov, M. Y. Kupriyanov, and E. Il'ichev, The current-phase relation in Josephson junctions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 411 (2004).
  45. J. Clarke and F. K. Wilhelm, Superconducting quantum bits, Nature (London) 453, 1031 (2008).
  46. M. H. Devoret and R. J. Schoelkopf, Superconducting circuits for quantum information: An outlook, Science 339, 1169 (2013).
  47. G. Wendin, Quantum information processing with superconducting circuits: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 106001 (2017).
  48. M. Kjaergaard, M. E. Schwartz, J. Braumüller, P. Krantz, J. I.-J. Wang, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Superconducting qubits: Current state of play, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 369 (2020).
  49. P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, A quantum engineer's guide to superconducting qubits, Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 021318 (2019).
  50. Y. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, Properties of a 2D electron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy, JETP Lett. 39, 78 (1984).
  51. A. Manchon, H. C. Koo, J. Nitta, S. M. Frolov, and R. A. Duine, New perspectives for Rashba spin–orbit coupling, Nat. Mater. 14, 871 (2015).
  52. D. Bercioux and P. Lucignano, Quantum transport in rashba spin–orbit materials: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 106001 (2015).
  53. A. Buzdin, Direct coupling between magnetism and superconducting current in the Josephson φ0 junction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 107005 (2008).
  54. D. Debnath and P. Dutta, Gate-tunable Josephson diode effect in Rashba spin-orbit coupled quantum dot junctions, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174511 (2024).
  55. D. Debnath and P. Dutta, Field-free Josephson diode effect in interacting chiral quantum dot junctions, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 37, 175301 (2025).
  56. P. T. Orban, G. Bassen, E. N. Crites, T. Matsuo, M. A. Siegler, and T. M. McQueen, The superconducting diode effect in Josephson junctions fabricated from a structurally chiral superconductor, Commun. Phys. 9, 124 (2026).
  57. A. Costa, O. Kanehira, H. Matsueda, and J. Fabian, Unconventional Josephson supercurrent diode effect induced by chiral spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B 111, L140506 (2025).
  58. H. Alpern, K. Yavilberg, T. Dvir, N. Sukenik, M. Klang, S. Yochelis, H. Cohen, E. Grosfeld, H. Steinberg, Y. Paltiel, and O. Millo, Magnetic-related states and order parameter induced in a conventional superconductor by nonmagnetic chiral molecules, Nano Lett. 19, 5167 (2019).
  59. H. Alpern, M. Amundsen, R. Hartmann, N. Sukenik, A. Spuri, S. Yochelis, T. Prokscha, V. Gutkin, Y. Anahory, E. Scheer, J. Linder, Z. Salman, O. Millo, Y. Paltiel, and A. Di Bernardo, Unconventional Meissner screening induced by chiral molecules in a conventional superconductor, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 114801 (2021).
  60. C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, and X. Waintal, Kwant: A software package for quantum transport, New J. Phys. 16, 063065 (2014).
  61. T. Kloss, J. Weston, B. Gaury, B. Rossignol, C. Groth, and X. Waintal, Tkwant: A software package for time-dependent quantum transport, New J. Phys. 23, 023025 (2021).
  62. W. Yi, S. Wei, and Z. Guang-Hui, Persistent spin current in a quantum wire with weak Rashba spin–orbit coupling, Chin. Phys. Lett. 23, 3065 (2006).
  63. Q. F. Sun, X. C. Xie, and J. Wang, Persistent spin current in a mesoscopic hybrid ring with spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 196801 (2007).
  64. R. Alhyder, Supercurrents in Josephson junctions with chiral molecular potentials [Data set], Zenodo, Version V1, 2026, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18961933.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation