Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Ground-state preparation via nonlinear quantum dissipation

Alireza Ataei1,*, Olle Eriksson2,3, and Vahid Azimi-Mousolou2,†

  • *Contact author: alireza.ataei@math.uu.se
  • †Contact author: vahid.azimi-mousolou@physics.uu.se

Phys. Rev. B 114, 204407 – Published 6 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nsdt-mntf

Abstract

Ground-state preparation of quantum many-body systems is a fundamental challenge across quantum science, with implications for quantum simulation, quantum computing, and the study of complex quantum matter. The exponential growth of Hilbert space and the complexity of entangled eigenstates motivate the development of new approaches that go beyond conventional strategies based on adiabatic evolution, variational optimization, imaginary-time methods, and engineered dissipative processes. Here, we demonstrate that the recently proposed quantum Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (QLLG) dynamics [Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 266704 (2024)] provides an intrinsic nonlinear dissipative mechanism for real-time ground-state preparation. Unlike engineered dissipative schemes, QLLG encodes relaxation directly into the quantum equation of motion while preserving the underlying quantum structure of the evolution. The QLLG evolution selectively suppresses excited-state contributions, driving the system toward the lowest-energy eigenstate within the accessible symmetry sector. We show that the dynamics admits a monotonic energy functional and a stable ground-state fixed point, and that for generic initial states in an N-qubit Hilbert space the characteristic convergence time scales linearly with N and inversely with the spectral gap. Numerical simulations of an interacting spin chain confirm our analytical predictions. These results establish nonlinear dissipative QLLG dynamics as another avenue for quantum state preparation, opening an alternative route for quantum simulation, computation, and state engineering.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (35)

  1. R. P. Feynman, Simulating physics with computers, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467 (1982).
  2. S. Lloyd, Universal quantum simulators, Science 273, 1073 (1996).
  3. I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum simulation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153 (2014).
  4. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, and M. Sipser, Quantum computation by adiabatic evolution, arXiv:quant-ph/0001106.
  5. T. Albash and D. A. Lidar, Adiabatic quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015002 (2018).
  6. A. Peruzzo, J. McClean, P. Shadbolt, M.-H. Yung, X.-Q. Zhou, P. J. Love, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and J. L. O’Brien, A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor, Nat. Commun. 5, 4213 (2014).
  7. J. R. McClean, J. Romero, R. Babbush, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, New J. Phys. 18, 023023 (2016).
  8. M. Cerezo, A. Arrasmith, R. Babbush, S. C. Benjamin, S. Endo, K. Fujii, J. R. McClean, K. Mitarai, X. Yuan, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, Variational quantum algorithms, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 625 (2021).
  9. W. M. C. Foulkes, L. Mitas, R. J. Needs, and G. Rajagopal, Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of solids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 33 (2001).
  10. G. Vidal, Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in one spatial dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 070201 (2007).
  11. G. H. Low and I. L. Chuang, Optimal Hamiltonian simulation by quantum signal processing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 010501 (2017).
  12. G. H. Low and I. L. Chuang, Hamiltonian simulation by qubitization, Quantum 3, 163 (2019).
  13. A. Gilyén, Y. Su, G. H. Low, and N. Wiebe, Quantum singular value transformation and beyond: Exponential improvements for quantum matrix arithmetics, in Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) (ACM, New York, 2019), pp. 193–204.
  14. Y. Aharonov, L. Davidovich, and N. Zagury, Quantum random walks, Phys. Rev. A 48, 1687 (1993).
  15. A. M. Childs, Universal computation by quantum walk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 180501 (2009).
  16. T. Benoist, L. Hänggli, and C. Rouzé, Deviation bounds and concentration inequalities for quantum noises, Quantum 6, 772 (2022).
  17. M. Motta, C. Sun, A. T. K. Tan, M. J. O'Rourke, E. Ye, A. J. Minnich, F. G. S. L. Brandão, and G. K.-L. Chan, Determining eigenstates and thermal states on a quantum computer using quantum imaginary time evolution, Nat. Phys. 16, 205 (2020).
  18. S.-H. Lin and Y. Tong, Near-optimal ground state preparation, Quantum 4, 372 (2020).
  19. J. B. Larsen, M. D. Grace, A. D. Baczewski, and A. Magann, Feedback-based quantum algorithms for ground state preparation, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033336 (2024).
  20. S. Diehl, A. Micheli, A. Kantian, B. Kraus, H. P. Büchler, and P. Zoller, Quantum states and phases in driven open quantum systems with cold atoms, Nat. Phys. 4, 878 (2008).
  21. Z. Ding, C.-F. Chen, and L. Lin, Single-ancilla ground state preparation via Lindbladians, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033147 (2024).
  22. F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. I. Cirac, Quantum computation and quantum-state engineering driven by dissipation, Nat. Phys. 5, 633 (2009).
  23. Y. Zhan, Z. Ding, J. Huhn, J. Gray, J. Preskill, G. K.-L. Chan, L. Lin, Rapid quantum ground state preparation via dissipative dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 16, 011004 (2026).
  24. C.-F. Chen, M. J. Kastoryano, F. G. S. L. Brandão, and A. Gilyén, Efficient quantum thermal simulation, Nature (London) 646, 561 (2025).
  25. Z. Ding, B. Li, and L. Lin, Efficient quantum Gibbs samplers with Kubo–Martin–Schwinger detailed balance condition, Commun. Math. Phys. 406, 67 (2025).
  26. C. Rouzé, D. S. França, and Á. M. Alhambra, Efficient thermalization and universal quantum computing with quantum Gibbs samplers, Nat. Phys. 22, 1123 (2026).
  27. K. Temme, T. J. Osborne, K. G. Vollbrecht, D. Poulin, and F. Verstraete, Quantum Metropolis sampling, Nature (London) 471, 87 (2011).
  28. X. Mi, A. A. Michailidis, S. Shabani, K. C. Miao, P. V. Klimov, J. Lloyd, E. Rosenberg, R. Acharya, I. Aleiner, D. A. Abanin, et al., Stable quantum-correlated many-body states through engineered dissipation, Science 383, 1332 (2024).
  29. Y. Liu, I. P. Miranda, L. Johnson, A. Bergman, A. Delin, D. Thonig, M. Pereiro, O. Eriksson, V. Azimi-Mousolou, and E. Sjöqvist, Quantum analog of Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 266704 (2024).
  30. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, On the theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 8, 153 (1935).
  31. T. L. Gilbert, A Lagrangian formulation of the gyromagnetic equation of the magnetization field, Phys. Rev. 100, 1243 (1955).
  32. V. Azimi-Mousolou and D. Mirzaei, Numerical solution of quantum Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation, arXiv:2506.19594.
  33. D. Mirzaei, B. Hashemi, and V. Azimi-Mousolou, LREI: A fast numerical solver for quantum Landau-Lifshitz equations, arXiv:2508.21200.
  34. O. Kahn, Molecular Magnetism (Courier Dover Publications, New York, 2021).
  35. M. Pivetta, F. Patthey, I. Di Marco, A. Subramonian, O. Eriksson, S. Rusponi, and H. Brune, Measuring the intra-atomic exchange energy in rare-earth adatoms, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031054 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation