Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Page curve and entanglement dynamics in an interacting fermionic chain

Rishabh Jha*, Salvatore R. Manmana, and Stefan Kehrein

  • *Contact author: rishabh.jha@uni-goettingen.de

Phys. Rev. B 111, 235140 – Published 23 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/lt5c-pn14

Abstract

Generic nonequilibrium many-body systems display a linear growth of bipartite entanglement entropy in time, followed by a volume law saturation. In stark contrast, the Page curve dynamics of black-hole physics shows that the entropy peaks at the Page time tPage and then decreases to zero. Here, we investigate such Page-like behavior of the von Neumann entropy in a model of strongly correlated spinless fermions in a typical system-environment setup and characterize the properties of the Page curve dynamics in the presence of interactions using numerically exact matrix product states methods. The two phases of growth, namely, linear growth and bending down, are shown to be separated by a nonanalyticity in the min-entropy before tPage, which separates two different quantum phases, realized as the respective ground states of the corresponding entanglement (or equivalently, modular) Hamiltonian. We confirm and generalize, by introducing interactions, the findings of Phys. Rev. B 109, 224308 (2024) for a free spinless fermionic chain where the corresponding entanglement Hamiltonian undergoes a quantum phase transition at the point of nonanalyticity. However, in the presence of interactions, a scaling analysis gives a nonzero critical time for the nonanalyticity in the thermodynamic limit only for weak to intermediate interaction strengths, while the dynamics leading to the nonanalyticity becomes instantaneous for interactions large enough. We present a physical picture explaining these findings.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (48)

  1. A. K. Srivastava, G. Müller-Rigat, M. Lewenstein, and G. Rajchel-Mieldzioć, Introduction to quantum entanglement in many-body systems, in New Trends and Platforms for Quantum Technologies, edited by R. Aguado, R. Citro, M. Lewenstein, and M. Stern (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024), pp. 225–285.
  2. L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral, Entanglement in many-body systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517 (2008).
  3. J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277 (2010).
  4. R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many-body localization and thermalization in quantum statistical mechanics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 15 (2015).
  5. M. Žnidarič, T. Prosen, and P. Prelovšek, Many-body localization in the Heisenberg XXZ magnet in a random field, Phys. Rev. B 77, 064426 (2008).
  6. J. H. Bardarson, F. Pollmann, and J. E. Moore, Unbounded growth of entanglement in models of many-body localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 017202 (2012).
  7. H. Kim and D. A. Huse, Ballistic spreading of entanglement in a diffusive nonintegrable system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 127205 (2013).
  8. A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Quantum entanglement growth under random unitary dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031016 (2017).
  9. W. W. Ho and D. A. Abanin, Entanglement dynamics in quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B 95, 094302 (2017).
  10. E. Witten, APS medal for exceptional achievement in research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045003 (2018).
  11. E. Martín-Martínez and N. C. Menicucci, Entanglement in curved spacetimes and cosmology, Class. Quantum Grav. 31, 214001 (2014).
  12. E. Bianchi and R. C. Myers, On the architecture of spacetime geometry, Class. Quantum Grav. 31, 214002 (2014).
  13. C. Marletto and V. Vedral, Gravitationally induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240402 (2017).
  14. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Evolution of entanglement entropy in one-dimensional systems, J. Stat. Mech. (2005) P04010.
  15. P. Calabrese, Entanglement and thermodynamics in non-equilibrium isolated quantum systems, Phys. A (Amsterdam, Neth.) 504, 31 (2018).
  16. J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and the second law, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 4, 737 (1972).
  17. J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333 (1973).
  18. J. D. Bekenstein, Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black-hole physics, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3292 (1974).
  19. S. W. Hawking, Gravitational radiation from colliding black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 1344 (1971).
  20. S. W. Hawking, Black holes and thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 13, 191 (1976).
  21. S. W. Hawking, Black hole explosions? Nature (London) 248, 30 (1974).
  22. S. W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975).
  23. J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, The four laws of black hole mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys. 31, 161 (1973).
  24. A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, The entropy of Hawking radiation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 035002 (2021).
  25. D. N. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1291 (1993).
  26. D. N. Page, Information in black hole radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3743 (1993).
  27. S. Kehrein, Page curve entanglement dynamics in an analytically solvable model, Phys. Rev. B 109, 224308 (2024).
  28. M. Saha, M. Kulkarni, and A. Dhar, Generalized hydrodynamic description of the page curve–like dynamics of a freely expanding fermionic gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 230402 (2024).
  29. K. Ganguly, P. Gopalakrishnan, A. Naik, B. K. Agarwalla, and M. Kulkarni, Quantum trajectories and page-curve entanglement dynamics, arXiv:2501.12110.
  30. D. Toniolo and S. Bose, The dynamical α-Rényi entropies of local Hamiltonians grow at most linearly in time, arXiv:2408.00743.
  31. M. Dalmonte, V. Eisler, M. Falconi, and B. Vermersch, Entanglement Hamiltonians: From field theory to lattice models and experiments, Ann. Phys. (Berlin, Ger.) 534, 2200064 (2022).
  32. I. Peschel and V. Eisler, Reduced density matrices and entanglement entropy in free lattice models, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 504003 (2009).
  33. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys. (NY) 326, 96 (2011).
  34. S. Paeckel, T. Köhler, A. Swoboda, S. R. Manmana, U. Schollwöck, and C. Hubig, Time-evolution methods for matrix-product states, Ann. Phys. (NY) 411, 167998 (2019).
  35. S. Paeckel and T. Köhler, Scipal sym-mps, https://www.symmps.eu/.
  36. J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, I. Pižorn, H. Verschelde, and F. Verstraete, Time-dependent variational principle for quantum lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 070601 (2011).
  37. J. Haegeman, C. Lubich, I. Oseledets, B. Vandereycken, and F. Verstraete, Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 94, 165116 (2016).
  38. R. Jha, S. R. Manmana, and S. Kehrein, Page curve and entanglement dynamics in an interacting fermionic chain [Data set], Zenodo (2025), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15482617.
  39. A. J. Daley, A. Kantian, H. P. Buechler, P. Zoller, K. Winkler, G. Thalhammer, F. Lang, R. Grimm, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Repulsively bound atom pairs: Overview, simulations and links, AIP Conf. Proc. 869, 212 (2006).
  40. F. Heidrich-Meisner, S. R. Manmana, M. Rigol, A. Muramatsu, A. E. Feiguin, and E. Dagotto, Quantum distillation: Dynamical generation of low-entropy states of strongly correlated fermions in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A 80, 041603(R) (2009).
  41. Y.-M. Wang and J.-Q. Liang, Repulsive bound-atom pairs in an optical lattice with two-body interaction of nearest neighbors, Phys. Rev. A 81, 045601 (2010).
  42. L. F. Santos and M. I. Dykman, Quantum interference-induced stability of repulsively bound pairs of excitations, New J. Phys. 14, 095019 (2012).
  43. G. Shavit and Y. Oreg, Electron pairing induced by repulsive interactions in tunable one-dimensional platforms, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043283 (2020).
  44. Y. He, D. Pekker, and R. S. K. Mong, One-dimensional repulsive Hubbard model with mass imbalance: Orders and filling anomaly, Phys. Rev. B 104, 195126 (2021).
  45. L. H. Li, S. Kehrein, and S. Gopalakrishnan, Sharp page transitions in generic Hamiltonian dynamics, arXiv:2502.03524.
  46. A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf, and H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2019) 063.
  47. A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 013.
  48. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena, and Y. Zhao, The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 149.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation