Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Charge pumps, boundary modes, and the necessity of unnecessary criticality

Abhishodh Prakash1,2,* and S. A. Parameswaran1,†

  • *Contact author: abhishodhprakash@hri.res.in, he/him/his
  • †Contact author: sid.parameswaran@physics.ox.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. B 112, L241117 – Published 29 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/kztj-jcyc

Abstract

We link the presence of “unnecessary” quantum critical surfaces within a single gapped phase of matter to the nontrivial topology of families of gapped Hamiltonians that encircle the critical surface. We study a specific set of one-dimensional spin models where each such family forms a one-parameter loop in a two-dimensional phase diagram. Foliating the noncritical region by such loops identifies “radial” and “angular” coordinates in the phase diagram that respectively parametrize different families and different members of a single family. We show that each one-parameter family is a generalized Thouless charge pump, all with the same topological index, and hence the gapped phase undergoes one or more nontrivial boundary phase transitions as we vary the angular coordinate in a loop through members of one family. Tuning the radial coordinate generates loci of boundary critical points that terminate at the end points of the bulk unnecessary critical line within the gapped phase. We discuss broader implications of our results and possible extensions to higher dimensions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (64)

  1. S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2009).
  2. S. L. Sondhi, S. M. Girvin, J. P. Carini, and D. Shahar, Continuous quantum phase transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 315 (1997).
  3. K. G. Wilson, The renormalization group and critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys. 55, 583 (1983).
  4. F. D. M. Haldane, Nobel lecture: Topological quantum matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 040502 (2017).
  5. F. Pollmann, A. M. Turner, E. Berg, and M. Oshikawa, Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B 81, 064439 (2010).
  6. F. Pollmann and A. M. Turner, Detection of symmetry-protected topological phases in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B 86, 125441 (2012).
  7. F. Anfuso and A. Rosch, String order and adiabatic continuity of Haldane chains and band insulators, Phys. Rev. B 75, 144420 (2007).
  8. Z. Bi and T. Senthil, Adventure in topological phase transitions in 3+1-D: Non-Abelian deconfined quantum criticalities and a possible duality, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021034 (2019).
  9. C.-M. Jian and C. Xu, Generic “unnecessary” quantum critical points with minimal degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. B 101, 035118 (2020).
  10. A. Prakash, M. Fava, and S. A. Parameswaran, Multiversality and unnecessary criticality in one dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 256401 (2023).
  11. R. Verresen, J. Bibo, and F. Pollmann, Quotient symmetry protected topological phenomena, arXiv:2102.08967.
  12. Y. He, D. M. Kennes, C. Karrasch, and R. Rausch, Terminable transitions in a topological fermionic ladder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 136501 (2024).
  13. Y. Zhang, X.-Y. Song, and T. Senthil, Dirac spin liquid as an “unnecessary” quantum critical point on square lattice antiferromagnets, SciPost Phys. Core 8, 024 (2025).
  14. A. Prakash and N. G. Jones, Classical origins of Landau-incompatible transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 097103 (2025).
  15. A. Kitaev, Differential forms on the space of statistical mechanics models (2019), talk at the conference in celebration of Dan Freed's 60th birthday, https://web.ma.utexas.edu/topqft/talkslides/kitaev.pdf.
  16. D. J. Thouless, Quantization of particle transport, Phys. Rev. B 27, 6083 (1983).
  17. J. C. Y. Teo and C. L. Kane, Topological defects and gapless modes in insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 82, 115120 (2010).
  18. Y. Kuno and Y. Hatsugai, Interaction-induced topological charge pump, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 042024(R) (2020).
  19. S. Ohyama, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Generalized Thouless pumps in (1+1)-dimensional interacting fermionic systems, Phys. Rev. B 106, 165115 (2022).
  20. S. Bachmann, W. D. Roeck, M. Fraas, and T. Jappens, A classification of G-charge Thouless pumps in 1D invertible states, Commun. Math. Phys. 405, 157 (2024).
  21. A. Kapustin and L. Spodyneiko, Higher-dimensional generalizations of the Thouless charge pump, arXiv:2003.09519.
  22. P.-S. Hsin, A. Kapustin, and R. Thorngren, Berry phase in quantum field theory: Diabolical points and boundary phenomena, Phys. Rev. B 102, 245113 (2020).
  23. C. Cordova, D. S. Freed, H. T. Lam, and N. Seiberg, Anomalies in the space of coupling constants and their dynamical applications I, SciPost Phys. 8, 001 (2020).
  24. C. Cordova, D. S. Freed, H. T. Lam, and N. Seiberg, Anomalies in the space of coupling constants and their dynamical applications II, SciPost Phys. 8, 002 (2020).
  25. X. Wen, M. Qi, A. Beaudry, J. Moreno, M. J. Pflaum, D. Spiegel, A. Vishwanath, and M. Hermele, Flow of higher Berry curvature and bulk-boundary correspondence in parametrized quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B 108, 125147 (2023).
  26. S. Moudgalya and F. Pollmann, Fragility of symmetry-protected topological order on a Hubbard ladder, Phys. Rev. B 91, 155128 (2015).
  27. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/kztj-jcyc for more details, which includes Refs. [50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61].
  28. K. Shiozaki, Adiabatic cycles of quantum spin systems, Phys. Rev. B 106, 125108 (2022).
  29. M. Qi, D. T. Stephen, X. Wen, D. Spiegel, M. J. Pflaum, A. Beaudry, and M. Hermele, Charting the space of ground states with tensor networks, SciPost Phys. 18, 168 (2025).
  30. A. Beaudry, M. Hermele, J. Moreno, M. J. Pflaum, M. Qi, and D. D. Spiegel, Homotopical foundations of parametrized quantum spin systems, Rev. Math. Phys. 36, 2460003 (2024).
  31. P.-S. Hsin and Z. Wang, On topology of the moduli space of gapped Hamiltonians for topological phases, J. Math. Phys. 64, 041901 (2023).
  32. D. Aasen, Z. Wang, and M. B. Hastings, Adiabatic paths of Hamiltonians, symmetries of topological order, and automorphism codes, Phys. Rev. B 106, 085122 (2022).
  33. A. Kapustin and L. Spodyneiko, Higher-dimensional generalizations of Berry curvature, Phys. Rev. B 101, 235130 (2020).
  34. S. Ohyama and S. Ryu, Higher structures in matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 109, 115152 (2024).
  35. S. Ohyama and S. Ryu, Higher Berry connection for matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 111, 035121 (2025).
  36. S. Ohyama and S. Ryu, Higher Berry phase from projected entangled pair states in (2+1) dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 111, 045112 (2025).
  37. O. E. Sommer, X. Wen, and A. Vishwanath, Higher Berry curvature from the wave function. I. Schmidt decomposition and matrix product states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 146601 (2025).
  38. O. E. Sommer, A. Vishwanath, and X. Wen, Higher Berry curvature from the wave function II: Locally parameterized states beyond one dimension, Phys. Rev. B 111, 155110 (2025).
  39. Formally, such pumps are deformation classes of Hamiltonians parametrized over the dP−1 “angular” variables, just as gapped topological phases are deformation classes of gapped Hamiltonians over a point.
  40. The boundary charge returns to its original value at the end of a cycle without a second boundary level crossing, as charge is pumped through the bulk. Since this is impossible in a purely d=0 system, the boundary family is “anomalous” [22, 23, 24].
  41. T. Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension, International Series of Monographs on Physics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 2004).
  42. R. Verresen, R. Thorngren, N. G. Jones, and F. Pollmann, Gapless topological phases and symmetry-enriched quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041059 (2021).
  43. S. Mondal, A. Agarwala, T. Mishra, and A. Prakash, Symmetry-enriched criticality in a coupled spin ladder, Phys. Rev. B 108, 245135 (2023).
  44. P. Lecheminant, A. O. Gogolin, and A. A. Nersesyan, Criticality in self-dual sine-Gordon models, Nucl. Phys. B 639, 502 (2002).
  45. A. Keselman and E. Berg, Gapless symmetry-protected topological phase of fermions in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B 91, 235309 (2015).
  46. This follows from the fact that open boundary conditions on each XXZ leg corresponds to ϕα(x=0,t)=0 in a semi-infinite chain [62, 63].
  47. Recall that 1D O(2) irreps are U(1) neutral, whereas 2D irreps consist of charge ±q states which are exchanged by Z2R [27, 64].
  48. H. J. Schulz, Phase diagrams and correlation exponents for quantum spin chains of arbitrary spin quantum number, Phys. Rev. B 34, 6372 (1986).
  49. H.-L. Zhang, H.-Z. Li, S. Yang, and X.-J. Yu, Quantum phase transition and critical behavior between the gapless topological phases, Phys. Rev. A 109, 062226 (2024).
  50. R. Dijkgraaf, E. Verlinde, and H. Verlinde, C=1 conformal field theories on Riemann surfaces, Commun. Math. Phys. 115, 649 (1988).
  51. R. Bishop, P. Li, R. Zinke, R. Darradi, J. Richter, D. Farnell, and J. Schulenburg, The spin-half XXZ antiferromagnet on the square lattice revisited: A high-order coupled cluster treatment, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 428, 178 (2017).
  52. X.-Y. Song, C. Wang, A. Vishwanath, and Y.-C. He, Unifying description of competing orders in two-dimensional quantum magnets, Nat. Commun. 10, 4254 (2019).
  53. G. Delfino and G. Mussardo, Non-integrable aspects of the multi-frequency sine-Gordon model, Nucl. Phys. B 516, 675 (1998).
  54. M. Fabrizio, A. Gogolin, and A. Nersesyan, Critical properties of the double-frequency sine-Gordon model with applications, Nucl. Phys. B 580, 647 (2000).
  55. M. Nakamura, Identification of topologically different valence bond states in spin ladders, Phys. B: Condens. Matter 329-333, 1000 (2003).
  56. F. Haldane, Demonstration of the “Luttinger liquid” character of Bethe-ansatz-soluble models of 1-D quantum fluids, Phys. Lett. A 81, 153 (1981).
  57. R. Thorngren, A. Vishwanath, and R. Verresen, Intrinsically gapless topological phases, Phys. Rev. B 104, 075132 (2021).
  58. L. Fidkowski and A. Kitaev, Effects of interactions on the topological classification of free fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B 81, 134509 (2010).
  59. X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, Complete classification of one-dimensional gapped quantum phases in interacting spin systems, Phys. Rev. B 84, 235128 (2011).
  60. H. C. Po, L. Fidkowski, T. Morimoto, A. C. Potter, and A. Vishwanath, Chiral Floquet phases of many-body localized bosons, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041070 (2016).
  61. X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).
  62. S. Eggert and I. Affleck, Magnetic impurities in half-integer-spin Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chains, Phys. Rev. B 46, 10866 (1992).
  63. I. Affleck, Edge magnetic field in the XXZ spin-chain, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31, 2761 (1998).
  64. W.-K. Tung, Group Theory in Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1985), Vol. 1.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation