Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Perfect quantum state transfer through a chaotic spin chain via many-body scars

Shane Dooley*, Luke Johnston, Patrick Gormley, and Beth Campbell

  • *Contact author: dooleysh@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. B 112, 214304 – Published 1 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hdy9-dr9m

Abstract

Quantum many-body scars (QMBSs) offer a mechanism for weak ergodicity breaking, enabling nonthermal dynamics to persist in a chaotic many-body system. While most studies of QMBS focus on anomalous eigenstate properties or long-lived revivals of local observables, their potential for quantum information processing remains largely unexplored. In this work, we demonstrate that perfect quantum state transfer can be achieved in a strongly interacting, quantum chaotic spin chain by exploiting a sparse set of QMBS eigenstates embedded within an otherwise thermal spectrum. These results show that QMBSs in chaotic many-body systems may be harnessed for information transport tasks typically associated with integrable models.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (58)

  1. L. D'Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys. 65, 239 (2016).
  2. T. Mori, T. N. Ikeda, E. Kaminishi, and M. Ueda, Thermalization and prethermalization in isolated quantum systems: A theoretical overview, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 51, 112001 (2018).
  3. N. Shiraishi and T. Mori, Systematic construction of counterexamples to the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 030601 (2017).
  4. C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papić, Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars, Nat. Phys. 14, 745 (2018).
  5. C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papić, Quantum scarred eigenstates in a Rydberg atom chain: Entanglement, breakdown of thermalization, and stability to perturbations, Phys. Rev. B 98, 155134 (2018).
  6. H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature (London) 551, 579 (2017).
  7. D. Bluvstein, A. Omran, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, A. A. Michailidis, N. Maskara, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, M. Serbyn, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Controlling quantum many-body dynamics in driven Rydberg atom arrays, Science 371, 1355 (2021).
  8. I. Chi Chen, B. Burdick, Y. Yao, P. P. Orth, and T. Iadecola, Error-mitigated simulation of quantum many-body scars on quantum computers with pulse-level control, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043027 (2022).
  9. G.-X. Su, H. Sun, A. Hudomal, J.-Y. Desaules, Z.-Y. Zhou, B. Yang, J. C. Halimeh, Z.-S. Yuan, Z. Papić, and J.-W. Pan, Observation of many-body scarring in a Bose-Hubbard quantum simulator, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023010 (2023).
  10. P. Zhang, H. Dong, Y. Gao, L. Zhao, J. Hao, J.-Y. Desaules, Q. Guo, J. Chen, J. Deng, B. Liu, W. Ren, Y. Yao, X. Zhang, S. Xu, K. Wang, F. Jin, X. Zhu, B. Zhang, H. Li, C. Song, et al., Many-body Hilbert space scarring on a superconducting processor, Nat. Phys. 19, 120 (2023).
  11. L. Zhao, P. R. Datla, W. Tian, M. M. Aliyu, and H. Loh, Observation of quantum thermalization restricted to Hilbert space fragments and Z2k scars, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011035 (2025).
  12. M. Serbyn, D. A. Abanin, and Z. Papić, Quantum many-body scars and weak breaking of ergodicity, Nat. Phys. 17, 675 (2021).
  13. S. Moudgalya, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Quantum many-body scars and Hilbert space fragmentation: A review of exact results, Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 086501 (2022).
  14. A. Chandran, T. Iadecola, V. Khemani, and R. Moessner, Quantum many-body scars: A quasiparticle perspective, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 443 (2023).
  15. S. Moudgalya, S. Rachel, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Exact excited states of nonintegrable models, Phys. Rev. B 98, 235155 (2018).
  16. S. Moudgalya, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Entanglement of exact excited states of Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki models: Exact results, many-body scars, and violation of the strong eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Phys. Rev. B 98, 235156 (2018).
  17. M. Schecter and T. Iadecola, Weak ergodicity breaking and quantum many-body scars in spin-1 XY magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 147201 (2019).
  18. D. Banerjee and A. Sen, Quantum scars from zero modes in an Abelian lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 220601 (2021).
  19. K. Bull, I. Martin, and Z. Papić, Systematic construction of scarred many-body dynamics in 1D lattice models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 030601 (2019).
  20. S. Moudgalya, E. O'Brien, B. A. Bernevig, P. Fendley, and N. Regnault, Large classes of quantum scarred Hamiltonians from matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 102, 085120 (2020).
  21. P. A. McClarty, M. Haque, A. Sen, and J. Richter, Disorder-free localization and many-body quantum scars from magnetic frustration, Phys. Rev. B 102, 224303 (2020).
  22. S. Chattopadhyay, H. Pichler, M. D. Lukin, and W. W. Ho, Quantum many-body scars from virtual entangled pairs, Phys. Rev. B 101, 174308 (2020).
  23. A. Haldar, D. Sen, R. Moessner, and A. Das, Dynamical freezing and scar points in strongly driven Floquet matter: Resonance vs emergent conservation laws, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021008 (2021).
  24. L. Logarić, S. Dooley, S. Pappalardi, and J. Goold, Quantum many-body scars in dual-unitary circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 010401 (2024).
  25. A. Kerschbaumer, M. Ljubotina, M. Serbyn, and J.-Y. Desaules, Quantum many-body scars beyond the PXP model in Rydberg simulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 160401 (2025).
  26. S. Mohapatra, S. Moudgalya, and A. C. Balram, Exact volume-law entangled zero-energy eigenstates in a large class of spin models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 210403 (2025).
  27. H. Katsura, C. Matsui, C. Paletta, and B. Pozsgay, Weak ergodicity breaking with isolated integrable sectors, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023099 (2025).
  28. C.-J. Lin and O. I. Motrunich, Exact quantum many-body scar states in the Rydberg-blockaded atom chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 173401 (2019).
  29. C.-J. Lin, A. Chandran, and O. I. Motrunich, Slow thermalization of exact quantum many-body scar states under perturbations, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033044 (2020).
  30. N. O'Dea, F. Burnell, A. Chandran, and V. Khemani, From tunnels to towers: Quantum scars from lie algebras and q-deformed lie algebras, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043305 (2020).
  31. K. Bull, J.-Y. Desaules, and Z. Papić, Quantum scars as embeddings of weakly broken lie algebra representations, Phys. Rev. B 101, 165139 (2020).
  32. J.-Y. Desaules, F. Pietracaprina, Z. Papić, J. Goold, and S. Pappalardi, Extensive multipartite entanglement from SU(2) quantum many-body scars, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 020601 (2022).
  33. C. M. Langlett, Z.-C. Yang, J. Wildeboer, A. V. Gorshkov, T. Iadecola, and S. Xu, Rainbow scars: From area to volume law, Phys. Rev. B 105, L060301 (2022).
  34. L. Gotta, S. Moudgalya, and L. Mazza, Asymptotic quantum many-body scars, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 190401 (2023).
  35. S. Choi, C. J. Turner, H. Pichler, W. W. Ho, A. A. Michailidis, Z. Papić, M. Serbyn, M. D. Lukin, and D. A. Abanin, Emergent SU(2) dynamics and perfect quantum many-body scars, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 220603 (2019).
  36. S. Dooley and G. Kells, Enhancing the effect of quantum many-body scars on dynamics by minimizing the effective dimension, Phys. Rev. B 102, 195114 (2020).
  37. S. Dooley and G. Kells, Extreme many-body scarring in a quantum spin chain via weak dynamical constraints, Phys. Rev. B 105, 155127 (2022).
  38. S. Dooley, Robust quantum sensing in strongly interacting systems with many-body scars, PRX Quantum 2, 020330 (2021).
  39. S. Dooley, S. Pappalardi, and J. Goold, Entanglement enhanced metrology with quantum many-body scars, Phys. Rev. B 107, 035123 (2023).
  40. S. Bose, Quantum communication through an unmodulated spin chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 207901 (2003).
  41. M. Christandl, N. Datta, A. Ekert, and A. J. Landahl, Perfect state transfer in quantum spin networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 187902 (2004).
  42. M. Christandl, N. Datta, T. C. Dorlas, A. Ekert, A. Kay, and A. J. Landahl, Perfect transfer of arbitrary states in quantum spin networks, Phys. Rev. A 71, 032312 (2005).
  43. S. B. and, Quantum communication through spin chain dynamics: An introductory overview, Contemp. Phys. 48, 13 (2007).
  44. A. Kay, Perfect, efficient, state transfer and its application as a constructive tool, Int. J. Quantum Inf. 8, 641 (2010).
  45. R. J. Chapman, M. Santandrea, Z. Huang, G. Corrielli, A. Crespi, M.-H. Yung, R. Osellame, and A. Peruzzo, Experimental perfect state transfer of an entangled photonic qubit, Nat. Commun. 7, 11339 (2016).
  46. X. Li, Y. Ma, J. Han, T. Chen, Y. Xu, W. Cai, H. Wang, Y. P. Song, Z.-Y. Xue, Z. Q. Yin, and L. Sun, Perfect quantum state transfer in a superconducting qubit chain with parametrically tunable couplings, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 054009 (2018).
  47. L. Xiang, J. Chen, Z. Zhu, Z. Song, Z. Bao, X. Zhu, F. Jin, K. Wang, S. Xu, Y. Zou, H. Li, Z. Wang, C. Song, A. Yue, J. Partridge, Q. Guo, R. Mondaini, H. Wang, and R. T. Scalettar, Enhanced quantum state transfer by circumventing quantum chaotic behavior, Nat. Commun. 15, 4918 (2024).
  48. C. Albanese, M. Christandl, N. Datta, and A. Ekert, Mirror inversion of quantum states in linear registers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 230502 (2004).
  49. We generate the random three-spin Hermitian matrix as ĥ=12(Â+†), where each element of the 8×8 matrix  is a complex number whose real and imaginary parts are independent Gaussian random variables with zero mean and unit variance.
  50. J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991).
  51. M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994).
  52. M. Srednicki, The approach to thermal equilibrium in quantized chaotic systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32, 1163 (1999).
  53. J. R. Garrison and T. Grover, Does a single eigenstate encode the full Hamiltonian? Phys. Rev. X 8, 021026 (2018).
  54. I. Lesanovsky, Many-body spin interactions and the ground state of a dense Rydberg lattice gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 025301 (2011).
  55. S. Ashhab, Quantum state transfer in a disordered one-dimensional lattice, Phys. Rev. A 92, 062305 (2015).
  56. P. M. Poggi, G. De Chiara, S. Campbell, and A. Kiely, Universally robust quantum control, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 193801 (2024).
  57. A. Kerschbaumer, J.-Y. Desaules, M. Ljubotina, and M. Serbyn, Discrete solitons in Rydberg atom chains, arXiv:2507.13196.
  58. S. Dooley, L. Johnston, P. Gormley, and B. Campbell, Data for “Perfect quantum state transfer through a chaotic spin chain via many-body scars,” Figshare dataset (2025), doi: 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.29517941.V1.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation