Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Complex and tunable heating in conformal field theories with structured drives via classical ergodicity breaking

Liang-Hong Mo1,2,3, Roderich Moessner1, and Hongzheng Zhao2,1,*

  • *Contact author: hzhao@pku.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. B 112, 184304 – Published 6 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/dvlw-hl7t

Abstract

Emission and absorption of energy are fundamental aspects of nonequilibrium dynamics. The heating induced by driving a many-body system is perhaps the most straightforward diagnostic of the process of equilibration, or the lack thereof. Gapless systems are particularly susceptible to drive-induced heating, and the capacity to control such heating is of experimental importance. Our study addresses this challenge in the framework of conformal field theory (CFT), for which we study families of structured drives up to the aperiodic Thue-Morse sequence. Concretely, we consider a class of spatially inhomogeneous Hamiltonians, where the operator evolution is governed by a nonlinear classical dynamical system K. The existence of invariant regions and fixed points of K leads to different levels of ergodicity breaking. Upon bridging the gap between this dynamical system and the driven CFT, we classify various dynamical phases of matter, including the heating and nonheating phases, as well as a prethermal phase with a controllably slow heating rate. We further generalize the discussion to η-random multipolar driving, characterized by ηth-order multipolar correlation in time. A “triply tunable” parametric dependence of the prethermal lifetime arises as K−2(η−ξ), where K quantifies the deviation from the preimages of the fixed points of K, the multipolar order η, and the order of the preimages ξ. Upon sacrificing Hermiticity by considering SU(2) deformed CFTs, we find another nonheating phase with a nonzero measure, inaccessible via purely unitary CFTs. This is underpinned by an emergent compact subspace in the generic SL(2,C) group structure, which we also identify in the transfer matrix in non-Hermitian systems with binary disorder.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (95)

  1. V. Khemani, A. Lazarides, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Phase structure of driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 250401 (2016).
  2. D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Floquet time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 090402 (2016).
  3. N. Y. Yao, A. C. Potter, I.-D. Potirniche, and A. Vishwanath, Discrete time crystals: Rigidity, criticality, and realizations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 030401 (2017).
  4. C. Schweizer, F. Grusdt, M. Berngruber, L. Barbiero, E. Demler, N. Goldman, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Floquet approach to z2 lattice gauge theories with ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Nat. Phys. 15, 1168 (2019).
  5. J. Choi, H. Zhou, H. S. Knowles, R. Landig, S. Choi, and M. D. Lukin, Robust dynamic Hamiltonian engineering of many-body spin systems, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031002 (2020).
  6. S. Geier, N. Thaicharoen, C. Hainaut, T. Franz, A. Salzinger, A. Tebben, D. Grimshandl, G. Zürn, and M. Weidemüller, Floquet Hamiltonian engineering of an isolated many-body spin system, Science 374, 1149 (2021).
  7. F. Kranzl, S. Birnkammer, M. K. Joshi, A. Bastianello, R. Blatt, M. Knap, and C. F. Roos, Observation of magnon bound states in the long-range, anisotropic Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031017 (2023).
  8. Z. Fu, R. Moessner, H. Zhao, and M. Bukov, Engineering hierarchical symmetries, Phys. Rev. X 14, 041070 (2024).
  9. S. Nandy, A. Sen, and D. Sen, Aperiodically driven integrable systems and their emergent steady states, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031034 (2017).
  10. P. T. Dumitrescu, R. Vasseur, and A. C. Potter, Logarithmically slow relaxation in quasiperiodically driven random spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 070602 (2018).
  11. E. Boyers, P. J. D. Crowley, A. Chandran, and A. O. Sushkov, Exploring 2D synthetic quantum Hall physics with a quasiperiodically driven qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 160505 (2020).
  12. P. J. D. Crowley, I. Martin, and A. Chandran, Half-integer quantized topological response in quasiperiodically driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 100601 (2020).
  13. H. Zhao, F. Mintert, R. Moessner, and J. Knolle, Random multipolar driving: Tunably slow heating through spectral engineering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 040601 (2021).
  14. C. I. Timms, L. M. Sieberer, and M. H. Kolodrubetz, Quantized Floquet topology with temporal noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 270601 (2021).
  15. D. M. Long, P. J. D. Crowley, and A. Chandran, Nonadiabatic topological energy pumps with quasiperiodic driving, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 106805 (2021).
  16. H. Zhao, J. Knolle, R. Moessner, and F. Mintert, Suppression of interband heating for random driving, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 120605 (2022).
  17. G. Guarnieri, M. T. Mitchison, A. Purkayastha, D. Jaksch, B. Buča, and J. Goold, Time periodicity from randomness in quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 106, 022209 (2022).
  18. L. J. I. Moon, P. M. Schindler, Y. Sun, E. Druga, J. Knolle, R. Moessner, H. Zhao, M. Bukov, and A. Ajoy, Experimental observation of a time rondeau crystal: Temporal disorder in spatiotemporal order, arXiv:2404.05620.
  19. G. He, B. Ye, R. Gong, C. Yao, Z. Liu, K. W. Murch, N. Y. Yao, and C. Zu, Experimental realization of discrete time quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011055 (2025).
  20. H. Schmid, Y. Peng, G. Refael, and F. von Oppen, Self-similar phase diagram of the Fibonacci-driven quantum Ising model, arXiv:2410.18219.
  21. S. Pilatowsky-Cameo, I. Marvian, S. Choi, and W. W. Ho, Hilbert-space ergodicity in driven quantum systems: Obstructions and designs, Phys. Rev. X 14, 041059 (2024).
  22. S. Kumar and S. Choudhury, Prethermalization in aperiodically driven classical spin systems, Phys. Rev. E 110, 064150 (2024).
  23. S. Pilatowsky-Cameo, S. Choi, and W. W. Ho, Critically slow Hilbert-space ergodicity in quantum morphic drives, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 140402 (2025).
  24. J. Wu, C. Liu, D. Bulmash, and W. W. Ho, Geometric quantum drives: Hyperbolically driven quantum systems and beyond, arXiv:2503.08242.
  25. H. Zhao, F. Mintert, and J. Knolle, Floquet time spirals and stable discrete-time quasicrystals in quasiperiodically driven quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B 100, 134302 (2019).
  26. D. V. Else, W. W. Ho, and P. T. Dumitrescu, Long-lived interacting phases of matter protected by multiple time-translation symmetries in quasiperiodically driven systems, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021032 (2020).
  27. Z. Ma, J. Yan, H. Zhao, and L.-Y. Peng, Stable time rondeau crystals in dissipative many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B 112, L140301 (2025).
  28. P. Bordia, H. Lüschen, U. Schneider, M. Knap, and I. Bloch, Periodically driving a many-body localized quantum system, Nat. Phys. 13, 460 (2017).
  29. D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Colloquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 021001 (2019).
  30. K. S. C. Decker, C. Karrasch, J. Eisert, and D. M. Kennes, Floquet engineering topological many-body localized systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 190601 (2020).
  31. D. A. Abanin, J. H. Bardarson, G. De Tomasi, S. Gopalakrishnan, V. Khemani, S. A. Parameswaran, F. Pollmann, A. C. Potter, M. Serbyn, and R. Vasseur, Distinguishing localization from chaos: Challenges in finite-size systems, Ann. Phys. 427, 168415 (2021).
  32. D. A. Abanin, W. De Roeck, and F. Huveneers, Exponentially slow heating in periodically driven many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 256803 (2015).
  33. T. Mori, T. Kuwahara, and K. Saito, Rigorous bound on energy absorption and generic relaxation in periodically driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 120401 (2016).
  34. T. Mori, H. Zhao, F. Mintert, J. Knolle, and R. Moessner, Rigorous bounds on the heating rate in Thue-Morse quasiperiodically and randomly driven quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 050602 (2021).
  35. T. Kuwahara, T. Mori, and K. Saito, Floquet-Magnus theory and generic transient dynamics in periodically driven many-body quantum systems, Ann. Phys. 367, 96 (2016).
  36. P. Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Sénéchal, Conformal Field Theory (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2012).
  37. A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalattore, Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 863 (2011).
  38. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, J. Stat. Mech. (2004) P06002.
  39. A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Infinite conformal symmetry in two-dimensional quantum field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 241, 333 (1984).
  40. B. Nienhuis, Critical behavior of two-dimensional spin models and charge asymmetry in the Coulomb gas, J. Stat. Phys. 34, 731 (1984).
  41. X. Wen, S. Ryu, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Evolution operators in conformal field theories and conformal mappings: Entanglement Hamiltonian, the sine-square deformation, and others, Phys. Rev. B 93, 235119 (2016).
  42. X. Wen and J.-Q. Wu, Quantum dynamics in sine-square deformed conformal field theory: Quench from uniform to nonuniform conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. B 97, 184309 (2018).
  43. B. Lapierre, K. Choo, A. Tiwari, C. Tauber, T. Neupert, and R. Chitra, Fine structure of heating in a quasiperiodically driven critical quantum system, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033461 (2020).
  44. W. Berdanier, M. Kolodrubetz, R. Vasseur, and J. E. Moore, Floquet dynamics of boundary-driven systems at criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 260602 (2017).
  45. R. Fan, Y. Gu, A. Vishwanath, and X. Wen, Emergent spatial structure and entanglement localization in Floquet conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031036 (2020).
  46. D. S. Ageev, A. A. Bagrov, and A. A. Iliasov, Deterministic chaos and fractal entropy scaling in floquet conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. B 103, L100302 (2021).
  47. B. Lapierre, T. Numasawa, T. Neupert, and S. Ryu, Floquet engineered inhomogeneous quantum chaos in critical systems, Phys. Rev. B 112, 104317 (2025).
  48. D. Das, S. R. Das, A. Kundu, and K. Sengupta, Exactly solvable Floquet dynamics for conformal field theories in dimensions greater than two, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 095.
  49. H. Jiang and M. Mezei, New horizons for inhomogeneous quenches and Floquet CFT, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 025.
  50. X. Wen, Y. Gu, A. Vishwanath, and R. Fan, Periodically, quasi-periodically, and randomly driven conformal field theories (II): Furstenberg's theorem and exceptions to heating phases, SciPost Phys. 13, 082 (2022).
  51. J. Fang, Q. Zhou, and X. Wen, Phase transitions in quasiperiodically driven quantum critical systems: Analytical results, Phys. Rev. B 111, 094304 (2025).
  52. F. Axel, J. Allouche, M. Kleman, M. Mendes-France, and J. Peyriere, Vibrational modes in a one dimensional “quasi-alloy”: The Morse case, J. Phys. (Paris) Colloq. 47, C3-181 (1986).
  53. F. Axel and J. Peyrière, Spectrum and extended states in a harmonic chain with controlled disorder: Effects of the Thue-Morse symmetry, J. Stat. Phys. 57, 1013 (1989).
  54. Y. Avishai and D. Berend, Transmission through a Thue-Morse chain, Phys. Rev. B 45, 2717 (1992).
  55. Z.-H. Liu, Y. Liu, G.-H. Liang, C.-L. Deng, K. Chen, Y.-H. Shi, T.-M. Li, L. Zhang, B.-J. Chen, C.-P. Fang et al., Prethermalization by random multipolar driving on a 78-qubit superconducting processor, arXiv:2503.21553.
  56. C.-N. Yang and T.-D. Lee, Statistical theory of equations of state and phase transitions. I. Theory of condensation, Phys. Rev. 87, 404 (1952).
  57. H. Li, X.-H. Yu, M. Nakagawa, and M. Ueda, Yang-Lee zeros, semicircle theorem, and nonunitary criticality in Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 216001 (2023).
  58. P.-Y. Chang, J.-S. You, X. Wen, and S. Ryu, Entanglement spectrum and entropy in topological non-Hermitian systems and nonunitary conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033069 (2020).
  59. L. Fei, S. Giombi, I. R. Klebanov, and G. Tarnopolsky, Generalized F-theorem and the ε expansion, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2015) 155.
  60. B. Lapierre, K. Choo, C. Tauber, A. Tiwari, T. Neupert, and R. Chitra, Emergent black hole dynamics in critical Floquet systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023085 (2020).
  61. X. Wen and J.-Q. Wu, Floquet conformal field theory, arXiv:1805.00031.
  62. X. Wen, R. Fan, and A. Vishwanath, Floquet's refrigerator: Conformal cooling in driven quantum critical systems, arXiv:2211.00040.
  63. X. Wen, R. Fan, A. Vishwanath, and Y. Gu, Periodically, quasiperiodically, and randomly driven conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023044 (2021).
  64. K. Choo, B. Lapierre, C. Kuhlenkamp, A. Tiwari, T. Neupert, and R. Chitra, Thermal and dissipative effects on the heating transition in a driven critical system, SciPost Phys. 13, 104 (2022).
  65. B. Lapierre, P. Pelliconi, S. Ryu, and J. Sonner, Driven nonunitary dynamics of quantum critical systems, Phys. Rev. B 112, 104322 (2025).
  66. P. Ginsparg, Applied conformal field theory, arXiv:hep-th/9108028.
  67. When r=1, we consider open boundary conditions since the ground state of H0 will be annihilated by the deformed Hamiltonian H with the periodic boundary [50, 61].
  68. With this deformation, the Hamiltonian H can be written as a real linear combination of the generator of SL(r)(2,R), which is isomorphic to an r-fold cover of the SL(2,R) group [50, 95].
  69. M. Kolář, M. K. Ali, and F. Nori, Generalized Thue-Morse chains and their physical properties, Phys. Rev. B 43, 1034 (1991).
  70. W. M. Goldman, The modular group action on real SL(2)-characters of a one-holed torus, Geom. Topol. 7, 443 (2003).
  71. η=0 reduces to the purely randomly drive, and the scaling t*∼(1/K)2 also matches with the result reported in Ref. [50].
  72. Here we only consider the case with ℓ1∈even, while the odd case can be reduced to the even case with a global π phase.
  73. J. Yan, R. Moessner, and H. Zhao, Prethermalization in aperiodically kicked many-body dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 109, 064305 (2024).
  74. This deformation is referred to as SU(2)-type, since by absorbing the imaginary unit into the Virasoro generators, one readily finds that the set {L0,iL+,iL−} forms the generators of the SU(2) Lie algebra.
  75. The above parameters do not satisfy the open boundary constraint f1(x)T(x)=f¯1(x)T¯(x) at x=0,L, which implies no momentum flow across the boundary.
  76. A. Mollabashi, N. Shiba, T. Takayanagi, K. Tamaoka, and Z. Wei, Pseudo-Entropy in free quantum field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 081601 (2021).
  77. Y. Nakata, T. Takayanagi, Y. Taki, K. Tamaoka, and Z. Wei, New holographic generalization of entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. D 103, 026005 (2021).
  78. K. Doi, J. Harper, A. Mollabashi, T. Takayanagi, and Y. Taki, Pseudoentropy in dS/CFT and timelike entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 031601 (2023).
  79. P. Caputa, B. Chen, T. Takayanagi, and T. Tsuda, Thermal pseudo-entropy, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2025) 003.
  80. J. Dressel, M. Malik, F. M. Miatto, A. N. Jordan, and R. W. Boyd, Colloquium: Understanding quantum weak values: Basics and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 307 (2014).
  81. L.-H. Mo, Z. Xiao, R. Moessner, and H. Zhao, Non-Hermitian delocalization in 1D via emergent compactness, arXiv:2412.12490.
  82. H. Schmid, Y. Peng, G. Refael, and F. von Oppen, Self-similar phase diagram of the Fibonacci-driven quantum Ising model, arXiv:2410.18219.
  83. M. Ritter, D. M. Long, Q. Yue, A. Chandran, and A. J. Kollár, Autonomous stabilization of Floquet states using static dissipation, arXiv:2410.12908.
  84. S. H. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2024).
  85. A. Russomanno, Spatiotemporally ordered patterns in a chain of coupled dissipative kicked rotors, Phys. Rev. B 108, 094305 (2023).
  86. J. Yan, Bifurcations and intermittency in coupled dissipative kicked rotors, Chaos 35, 073143 (2025).
  87. P. W. Claeys and A. Lamacraft, Ergodic and nonergodic dual-unitary quantum circuits with arbitrary local Hilbert space dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 100603 (2021).
  88. E. Granet, C. Zhang, and H. Dreyer, Volume-law to area-law entanglement transition in a nonunitary periodic Gaussian circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 230401 (2023).
  89. P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958).
  90. F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Anderson transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1355 (2008).
  91. X.-C. Zhou, B.-C. Yao, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Wei, Q. Zhou, and X.-J. Liu, The fundamental localization phases in quasiperiodic systems: A unified framework and exact results, arXiv:2503.24380.
  92. M. K. Joshi, C. Kokail, R. van Bijnen, F. Kranzl, T. V. Zache, R. Blatt, C. F. Roos, and P. Zoller, Exploring large-scale entanglement in quantum simulation, Nature (London) 624, 539 (2023).
  93. F. Fang, K. Wang, V. S. Liu, Y. Wang, R. Cimmino, J. Wei, M. Bintz, A. Parr, J. Kemp, K.-K. Ni et al., Probing critical phenomena in open quantum systems using atom arrays, arXiv:2402.15376.
  94. https://github.com/LianghongMo/DrivenCFT.git.
  95. E. Witten, Coadjoint orbits of the Virasoro group, Commun. Math. Phys. 114, 1 (1988).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation