- Open Access
Anticommuting quantum spin liquids
Phys. Rev. B 113, 064402 – Published 2 February, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/dhh4-8wkj
Abstract
We discuss a class of lattice quantum Hamiltonians with bond-dependent Ising couplings and a mutually “anticommuting” algebra of extensively many local conserved charges that was explicated by Pujari [arXiv:2407.06236]. This mutual algebra is reminiscent of the spin- Pauli matrix algebra but encoded in the structure of local conserved charges. These models have finite residual entropy density in the ground state with a simple but nontrivial degeneracy counting and concomitant quantum spin liquidity as proved by Pujari [arXiv:2407.06236]. The spin liquidity relies on a geometrically site-interlinked character of the local conserved charges that is rather natural in the presence of an anticommuting structure. One may contrast this with, for example, the bond-interlinked character of the local conserved charges on the hexagonal plaquettes of the Kitaev honeycomb spin- model, which leads to a mutually commuting local algebra. In this work, we make several exact statements on the kinds of many-body orders that can be present within the class of anticommuting quantum spin liquids coexisting with extensive residual ground state entropy. We elucidate the differences between the many-body order in these models and that found in some gapped quantum spin liquids whose canonical example is the Kitaev toric code. The toric code belongs to the more general class of Levin-Wen or string net constructions that possess mutually commuting algebras for the local conserved charges. We also point out a mutually commuting algebra with local support that is naturally expressed as multilinear Majorana forms in the Kitaev representation of these quantum spin liquids. They capture quantum resonances spread across the lattice in anticommuting quantum spin liquids.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (46)
- X.-G. Wen, Topological order: From long-range entangled quantum matter to a unified origin of light and electrons, Condens. Matter Phys. 2013, 1 (2013).
- A. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Ann. Phys. 303, 2 (2003).
- A. Y. Kitaev, Quantum computations: algorithms and error correction, Russ. Math. Surv. 52, 1191 (1997).
- M. A. Levin and X.-G. Wen, String-net condensation: A physical mechanism for topological phases, Phys. Rev. B 71, 045110 (2005).
- S. Pujari, A theorem on extensive ground state entropy, spin liquidity and some related models, arXiv:2407.06236.
- S. Pujari, A theorem on extensive ground state entropy, spin liquidity and some related models, SciPost Physics Core (2025).
- A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond, Ann. Phys. 321, 2 (2006).
- See in particular Secs. 2.1 and 2.2 of Ref. [6].
- See in particular Sec. 2.3 of Ref. [6].
- F. J. Wegner, Duality in generalized ising models and phase transitions without local order parameters, J. Math. Phys. 12, 2259 (1971).
- J. B. Kogut, An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 659 (1979).
- C. Xu and J. E. Moore, Strong-weak coupling self-duality in the two-dimensional quantum phase transition of superconducting arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 047003 (2004).
- J. Fu, J. Knolle, and N. B. Perkins, Three types of representation of spin in terms of majorana fermions and an alternative solution of the kitaev honeycomb model, Phys. Rev. B 97, 115142 (2018)
- A. M. Tsvelik, New fermionic description of quantum spin liquid state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2142 (1992).
- See in particular the second point in Sec. 3.3 and the beginning of Sec. 3.4 in Ref. [6].
- See for example the gedanken in the introduction of Ref. [42].
- S. Mandal and N. Surendran, Exactly solvable kitaev model in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 79, 024426 (2009).
- A. Chaubey (private communication, ICTS, Bengaluru, 2024)
- C. Xu and J. Moore, Reduction of effective dimensionality in lattice models of superconducting arrays and frustrated magnets, Nucl. Phys. B 716, 487 (2005).
- C. Xu and L. Fu, Fractionalization in josephson junction arrays hinged by quantum spin hall edges, Phys. Rev. B 81, 134435 (2010).
- J. Vidal, R. Thomale, K. P. Schmidt, and S. Dusuel, Self-duality and bound states of the toric code model in a transverse field, Phys. Rev. B 80, 081104(R) (2009).
- J. Vidal, K. P. Schmidt, and S. Dusuel, Perturbative approach to an exactly solved problem: Kitaev honeycomb model, Phys. Rev. B 78, 245121 (2008).
- J. Fu, Exact weak bosonic zero modes in a spin/fermion chain, Phys. Rev. B 106, L161412 (2022).
- T. Mizoguchi, Exactly solvable kitaev-type compass model on a decorated honeycomb lattice and its extension, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 91, 124709 (2022).
- T. Mizoguchi, Spin-S decorated honeycomb Kitaev model with S ≤ 1, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 93, 124702 (2024).
- J. Fu, Multipole phases in a type of spin/fermion ladders with local conserved quantities and generalizations, arXiv:2507.04811.
- In the case of Wegner's Ising gauge theory, the two-level () variables live on the links of a square lattice (with a little abuse of notation). Consider the following local (gauge) transformation on some “star” of the square lattice, i.e., the common vertex (“”) where the four links meet on the lattice. Note there are no 4- coupling terms in the Hamiltonian at these star sites in Ising gauge theory which is what distinguishes it from the Xu-Moore model. This local transformation keeps the gauge theoretic Hamiltonian invariant. The local transformation can be implemented through the following gauge transformation generator for (and for ) at a given star-site. For completeness, the gauge transformation for some operator is . Given this local -gauge theory, Elitzur's theorem [43] forbids any spontaneous symmetry breaking. None of the above applies to the Xu-Moore model and thereby to the many-body energetics of the four-spin square lattice ac-QSL of Eq. (9).
- Z. Nussinov and E. Fradkin, Discrete sliding symmetries, dualities, and self-dualities of quantum orbital compass models and superconducting arrays, Phys. Rev. B 71, 195120 (2005).
- Diptiman Sen also pointed out the two-spin conserved quantities to S.P. in a private discussion at IISc Bengaluru, April 2024.
- See for example a lecture by X. Chen [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bn8vA5-o5Mg], where the relevant portion is discussed around the 34:50 timestamp.
- C.-H. Lin, M. Levin, and F. J. Burnell, Generalized string-net models: A thorough exposition, Phys. Rev. B 103, 195155 (2021).
- K. Damle, Melting of three-sublattice order in easyaxis antiferromagnets on triangular and kagome lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 127204 (2015).
- G. Rakala, N. Desai, S. Shivam, and K. Damle, Melting of three-sublattice order in triangular lattice ising antiferromagnets: Power-law order, parafermionic multicriticality, and weakly first order transitions, arXiv:2109.03178.
- T. Scaffidi, D. E. Parker, and R. Vasseur, Gapless symmetry-protected topological order, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041048 (2017).
- R. Thorngren, A. Vishwanath, and R. Verresen, Intrinsically gapless topological phases, Phys. Rev. B 104, 075132 (2021).
- L. Li, M. Oshikawa, and Y. Zheng, Decorated defect construction of gapless-spt states, SciPost Phys. 17, 013 (2024).
- S. Bravyi, G. Duclos-Cianci, D. Poulin, and M. Suchara, Subsystem surface codes with three-qubit check operators, Quantum Info. Comput. 13, 963 (2013).
- S. Pujari, Anticommuting Z2 Quantum spin liquids, audiovisual recording of a seminar [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2F34YisNoKk&t=4700s] where the conjecture is made around the 1:18:20 timestamp.
- H. Bombin, Topological subsystem codes, Phys. Rev. A 81, 032301 (2010).
- H. Bombín, Gauge color codes: optimal transversal gates and gauge fixing in topological stabilizer codes, New J. Phys. 17, 083002 (2015).
- Vijay Shenoy, private discussion, IISc Bengaluru, April 2024.
- S. Pujari, Solvable embedding mechanism for one-dimensional spinless and Majorana fermions in higher-dimensional spin-1/2 magnets, Phys. Rev. B 111, 214421 (2025).
- S. Elitzur, Impossibility of spontaneously breaking local symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 12, 3978 (1975).
- B. Douçot, M. V. Feigel'man, L. B. Ioffe, and A. S. Ioselevich, Protected qubits and Chern-Simons theories in Josephson junction arrays, Phys. Rev. B 71, 024505 (2005).
- J. Dorier, F. Becca, and F. Mila, Quantum compass model on the square lattice, Phys. Rev. B 72, 024448 (2005).
- B. Sriram Shastry and B. Sutherland, Exact ground state of a quantum mechanical antiferromagnet, Physica B+C 108, 1069 (1981).