- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review B

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Tunable enhancement of magnetization dynamics by selection of the crystallographic orientation of the hybrid interface of exchange-coupled α−Fe2O3/permalloy heterostructures

Hassan Al-Hamdo1,*,†, Tobias Wagner2,*, Philipp Schwenke1, Gutenberg Kendzo1, Maximilian Dausend1, Laura Scheuer1, Misbah Yaqoob1, Vitaliy I. Vasyuchka1, Philipp Pirro1 et al.

Olena Gomonay2 and Mathias Weiler1

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: h.alhamdo@rptu.de.
PDF

Phys. Rev. B 111, L180401 – Published 1 May, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.L180401

Abstract

We investigate spin dynamics in α−Fe2O3/Ni80Fe20 (Py) heterostructures, uncovering a robust mechanism for designing the ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) frequency through control of crystal orientation, temperature, and applied magnetic field. Employing cryogenic ferromagnetic resonance spectroscopy, we demonstrate that the relative orientation of the Néel vector of α−Fe2O3 and the magnetization of the Py layer is highly tunable across the Morin transition temperature (TM). Central to our findings is the pivotal role of crystal orientation in governing the spin dynamics, with the reorientation of the Néel vector serving as a complementary mechanism that further modulates the system's behavior. Our experiments and corroborating theoretical model reveal distinct resonance behavior for different crystal orientations, highlighting the pivotal role of the mutual Néel vector and magnetization geometry in dictating FMR frequencies. In this way, we can tune the FMR frequencies up to a tenfold increase by manipulating the mutual Néel vector/magnetization configuration. Our study comprises all common α−Fe2O3 crystal orientations and develops a unified theoretical description of the ensuing spin dynamics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (62)

  1. K. Li, Y. Wu, Z. Guo, Y. Zheng, G. Han, J. Qiu, P. Luo, L. An, and T. Zhou, Exchange coupling and its applications in magnetic data storage, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 7, 13 (2007).
  2. C. Chappert, A. Fert, and F. N. Van Dau, The emergence of spin electronics in data storage, Nat. Mater. 6, 813 (2007).
  3. B. Dieny, V. S. Speriosu, S. S. P. Parkin, B. A. Gurney, D. R. Wilhoit, and D. Mauri, Giant magnetoresistive in soft ferromagnetic multilayers, Phys. Rev. B 43, 1297 (1991).
  4. J. Nogués and I. K. Schuller, Exchange bias, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 192, 203 (1999).
  5. V. Skumryev, S. Stoyanov, Y. Zhang, G. Hadjipanayis, D. Givord, and J. Nogués, Beating the superparamagnetic limit with exchange bias, Nature (London) 423, 850 (2003).
  6. V. S. Luong, A. T. Nguyen, Q. K. Hoang, T. N. Nguyen, A. T. Nguyen, T. A. Nguyen, and V. C. Giap, Magnetoresistive performances in exchange-biased spin valves and their roles in low-field magnetic sensing applications, J. Sci.: Adv. Mater. Devices 3, 399 (2018).
  7. Y.-H. Huang, C.-Y. Yang, C.-W. Cheng, A. Lee, C.-H. Tseng, H. Wu, Q. Pan, X. Che, C.-H. Lai, K.-L. Wang et al., A spin-orbit torque ratchet at ferromagnet/antiferromagnet interface via exchange spring, Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2111653 (2022).
  8. Y.-C. Lau, D. Betto, K. Rode, J. Coey, and P. Stamenov, Spin–orbit torque switching without an external field using interlayer exchange coupling, Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 758 (2016).
  9. J. Železný, P. Wadley, K. Olejník, A. Hoffmann, and H. Ohno, Spin transport and spin torque in antiferromagnetic devices, Nat. Phys. 14, 220 (2018).
  10. K. Takano, R. H. Kodama, A. E. Berkowitz, W. Cao, and G. Thomas, Interfacial uncompensated antiferromagnetic spins: Role in unidirectional anisotropy in polycrystalline Ni81Fe19/CoO bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1130 (1997).
  11. L. Néel, Propriétés magnétiques de l'état métallique et énergie d'interaction entre atomes magnétiques, Ann. Phys. 11, 232 (1936).
  12. T. Nagamiya, K. Yosida, and R. Kubo, Antiferromagnetism, Adv. Phys. 4, 1 (1955).
  13. S. M. Rezende, A. Azevedo, and R. L. Rodríguez-Suárez, Introduction to antiferromagnetic magnons, J. Appl. Phys. 126, 151101 (2019).
  14. W. H. Meiklejohn and C. P. Bean, New magnetic anisotropy, Phys. Rev. 102, 1413 (1956).
  15. M. Finazzi, Interface coupling in a ferromagnet/antiferromagnet bilayer, Phys. Rev. B 69, 064405 (2004).
  16. R. D. McMichael, M. D. Stiles, P. J. Chen, and W. F. Egelhoff, Jr., Ferromagnetic resonance studies of NiO-coupled thin films of Ni80Fe20, Phys. Rev. B 58, 8605 (1998).
  17. M. C. Schlenker, Étude des pertes par hystérésis oscillante dans des couches minces multiples avec couplage ferro-antiferromagnétique, J. Phys. Colloq. 29, C2-157 (1968).
  18. A. D. Lamirand, M. M. Soares, A. Y. Ramos, H. C. N. Tolentino, M. De Santis, J. C. Cezar, A. De Siervo, and M. Jamet, Robust perpendicular exchange coupling in an ultrathin CoO/PtFe double layer: Strain and spin orientation, Phys. Rev. B 88, 140401(R) (2013).
  19. S. K. Mishra, F. Radu, S. Valencia, D. Schmitz, E. Schierle, H. A. Dürr, and W. Eberhardt, Dual behavior of antiferromagnetic uncompensated spins in NiFe/IrMn exchange biased bilayers, Phys. Rev. B 81, 212404 (2010).
  20. R. Prosen, J. Holmen, and B. Gran, Rotatable anisotropy in thin permalloy films, J. Appl. Phys. 32, S91 (1961).
  21. J. Lommel and C. Graham, Jr., Rotatable anisotropy in composite films, J. Appl. Phys. 33, 1160 (1962).
  22. H. Al-Hamdo, T. Wagner, Y. Lytvynenko, G. Kendzo, S. Reimers, M. Ruhwedel, M. Yaqoob, V. I. Vasyuchka, P. Pirro, J. Sinova et al., Coupling of ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic spin dynamics in Mn2Au/NiFe thin film bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 046701 (2023).
  23. J. Kohlhepp and W. de Jonge, Influence of the FM/AM interface morphology on the exchange coupling in epitaxial Co (001)/fct-Mn (001), J. Appl. Phys. 95, 6840 (2004).
  24. H. Jung, O. Traistaru, and H. Fujiwara, Effect of the kinds of ferromagnetic layers on exchange coupling strength in IrMn/FM films, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 6849 (2004).
  25. A. K. Singh and R. Chandra, Thickness dependent interfacial magnetic coupling in [La2NiMnO6/LaMnO3] multilayers, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 448, 180 (2018).
  26. A. Beiranvand, M. Liedke, C. Haalisto, V. Lähteenlahti, A. Schulman, S. Granroth, H. Palonen, M. Butterling, A. Wagner, H. Huhtinen et al., Tuned AFM–FM coupling by the formation of vacancy complex in Gd0.6Ca0.4MnO3 thin film lattice, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 33, 255803 (2021).
  27. T. Pokhil, D. Song, and E. Linville, Magnetic force microscope study of antiferromagnet–ferromagnet exchange coupled films, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 6887 (2002).
  28. J. Beik Mohammadi, J. M. Jones, S. Paul, B. Khodadadi, C. K. A. Mewes, T. Mewes, and C. Kaiser, Broadband ferromagnetic resonance characterization of anisotropies and relaxation in exchange-biased IrMn/CoFe bilayers, Phys. Rev. B 95, 064414 (2017).
  29. W. Stoecklein, S. S. P. Parkin, and J. C. Scott, Ferromagnetic resonance studies of exchange-biased permalloy thin films, Phys. Rev. B 38, 6847 (1988).
  30. J. Scott, Ferromagnetic resonance studies in the bilayer system Ni0.80Fe0.20/Mn0.50Fe0.50: Exchange anisotropy, J. Appl. Phys. 57, 3681 (1985).
  31. V. Speriosu, S. Parkin, and C. Wilts, Standing spinwaves in FeMn/NiFe/FeMn exchange-bias structures, IEEE Trans. Magn. 23, 2999 (1987).
  32. N. Curry, G. Johnston, P. Besser, and A. Morrish, Neutron diffraction measurements on pure and doped synthetic hematite crystals, Philos. Mag. 12, 221 (1965).
  33. P. Besser, A. Morrish, and C. Searle, Magnetocrystalline anisotropy of pure and doped hematite, Phys. Rev. 153, 632 (1967).
  34. G. Muench, S. Arajs, and E. Matijević, The morin transition in small α−Fe2O3 particles, Phys. Status Solidi A 92, 187 (1985).
  35. R. Chevallier, Propriétés magnétiques de l'oxyde ferrique rhomboédrique (Fe2O3α), J. Phys. Radium 12, 172 (1951).
  36. F. Morin, Magnetic susceptibility of αFe2O3 and αFe2O3 with added titanium, Phys. Rev. 78, 819 (1950).
  37. C. Guillaud, Magnetic properties of iron oxide α-Fe2O3, J. Phys. Radium 12, 489 (1951).
  38. D. Schroeer and R. Nininger, Jr., Morin transition in α−Fe2O3 microcyrstals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 632 (1967).
  39. P. Flanders and J. Remeika, Magnetic properties of hematite single crystals, Philos. Mag. 11, 1271 (1965).
  40. N. Popov, M. Ristić, M. Bošković, M. Perović, S. Musić, D. Stanković, and S. Krehula, Influence of Sn doping on the structural, magnetic, optical and photocatalytic properties of hematite (α-Fe2O3) nanoparticles, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 161, 110372 (2022).
  41. S. Krehula, M. Ristić, M. Reissner, S. Kubuki, and S. Musić, Synthesis and properties of indium-doped hematite, J. Alloys Compd. 695, 1900 (2017).
  42. N. Shimomura, S. P. Pati, Y. Sato, T. Nozaki, T. Shibata, K. Mibu, and M. Sahashi, Morin transition temperature in (0001)-oriented α-Fe2O3 thin film and effect of Ir doping, J. Appl. Phys. 117, 17C736 (2015).
  43. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.L180401 for detailed information on the properties and characterization of the α−Fe2O3 crystals used in this study, including angle-dependent FMR measurements, the fabrication methods and deposition conditions employed for growing Py films on the main crystallographic plane of α−Fe2O3, as well as additional experimental data from crystal orientations not presented in the main text. Furthermore, the Supplemental Material provides an in-depth description of the theoretical models utilized to generate the dashed blue lines shown in Fig. 1, accompanied by supplemental data and including Refs. [44, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61].
  44. H. Maier-Flaig, S. T. Goennenwein, R. Ohshima, M. Shiraishi, R. Gross, H. Huebl, and M. Weiler, Note: Derivative divide, a method for the analysis of broadband ferromagnetic resonance in the frequency domain, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89, 076101 (2018).
  45. R. Damon and J. Eshbach, Magnetostatic modes of a ferromagnetic slab, J. Appl. Phys. 31, S104 (1960).
  46. Y. Zhao, Q. Song, S.-H. Yang, T. Su, W. Yuan, S. S. Parkin, J. Shi, and W. Han, Experimental investigation of temperature-dependent gilbert damping in permalloy thin films, Sci. Rep. 6, 22890 (2016).
  47. T. Klemmer, K. Ellis, and B. Van Dover, Ferromagnetic resonance frequency of a thin Mo-permalloy film, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 5846 (2000).
  48. R. Lebrun, A. Ross, O. Gomonay, V. Baltz, U. Ebels, A.-L. Barra, A. Qaiumzadeh, A. Brataas, J. Sinova, and M. Kläui, Long-distance spin-transport across the Morin phase transition up to room temperature in ultra-low damping single crystals of the antiferromagnet α−Fe2O3, Nat. Commun. 11, 6332 (2020).
  49. S. G. Chou, P. E. Stutzman, S. Wang, E. J. Garboczi, W. F. Egelhoff, and D. F. Plusquellic, High-resolution terahertz optical absorption study of the antiferromagnetic resonance transition in hematite (α−Fe2O3), J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 16161 (2012).
  50. A. H. Morrish, Canted Antiferromagnetism: Hematite (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995).
  51. T. Dannegger, A. Deák, L. Rózsa, E. Galindez-Ruales, S. Das, E. Baek, M. Kläui, L. Szunyogh, and U. Nowak, Magnetic properties of hematite revealed by an ab initio parameterized spin model, Phys. Rev. B 107, 184426 (2023).
  52. A. Rohrbach, J. Hafner, and G. Kresse, Ab initio study of the (0001) surfaces of hematite and chromia: Influence of strong electronic correlations, Phys. Rev. B 70, 125426 (2004).
  53. A. Hill, F. Jiao, P. Bruce, A. Harrison, W. Kockelmann, and C. Ritter, Neutron diffraction study of mesoporous and bulk hematite, α−Fe2O3, Chem. Mater. 20, 4891 (2008).
  54. M. Białek, J. Zhang, H. Yu, and J.-P. Ansermet, Antiferromagnetic resonance in α−Fe2O3 up to its Néel temperature, Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 032401 (2022).
  55. M. Hamdi, F. Posva, and D. Grundler, Spin wave dispersion of ultra-low damping hematite (α−Fe2O3) at GHz frequencies, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 054407 (2023).
  56. H. Wang, R. Yuan, Y. Zhou, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, S. Liu, H. Jia, D. Yu, J.-P. Ansermet, C. Song et al., Long-distance coherent propagation of high-velocity antiferromagnetic spin waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 096701 (2023).
  57. R. Lebrun, A. Ross, O. Gomonay, S. A. Bender, L. Baldrati, F. Kronast, A. Qaiumzadeh, J. Sinova, A. Brataas, R. Duine et al., Anisotropies and magnetic phase transitions in insulating antiferromagnets determined by a spin-Hall magnetoresistance probe, Commun. Phys. 2, 50 (2019).
  58. A. El Kanj, O. Gomonay, I. Boventer, P. Bortolotti, V. Cros, A. Anane, and R. Lebrun, Antiferromagnetic magnon spintronic based on nonreciprocal and nondegenerated ultra-fast spin-waves in the canted antiferromagnet α−Fe2O3, Sci. Adv. 9, eadh1601 (2023).
  59. G. Nahrwold, J. M. Scholtyssek, S. Motl-Ziegler, O. Albrecht, U. Merkt, and G. Meier, Structural, magnetic, and transport properties of permalloy for spintronic experiments, J. Appl. Phys. 108, 013907 (2010).
  60. E. Petrovský, E. Herrero-Bervera, T. Harinarayana, and D. Ivers, The Earth's Magnetic Interior (Springer, Berlin, 2011), Vol. 1.
  61. F. Kraushofer, Z. Jakub, M. Bichler, J. Hulva, P. Drmota, M. Weinold, M. Schmid, M. Setvin, U. Diebold, P. Blaha et al., Atomic-scale structure of the hematite α−Fe2O3(11¯02) “R-cut” surface, J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 1657 (2018).
  62. H. Al-Hamdo, T. Wagner, P. Schwenke, G. Kendzo, M. Dausend, L. Scheuer, M. Yaqoob, V. I. Vasyuchka, P. Pirro, O. Gomonay, and M. Weiler, Zenodo, 2025, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14860707.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. B 111, L180401– Published 1 May, 2025
  • Received 12 February 2025
  • Accepted 10 April 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation