Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Probing moiré electronic structures through quasiparticle interference

Luke C. Rhodes1,*, Dylan C. Houston1,†, Olivia R. Armitage1, and Peter Wahl1,2

  • *Contact author: lcr23@st-andrews.ac.uk
  • †Present address: School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom.

Phys. Rev. B 111, L121403 – Published 10 March, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.L121403

Abstract

Moiré lattices are a general feature of bilayer structures, where an additional periodic superstructure is generated by either lattice mismatch or from a twist angle. They have been shown to stabilize exotic ground states, including unconventional superconductivity and Mott insulating phases, attributed to strong electron correlations. However, controlling these interactions requires a detailed understanding of the low-energy electronic structure, which is lacking so far. Probing the electronic structure is challenging due to sample inhomogeneity, the low characteristic energy scales involved, and small sample sizes. Through quasiparticle interference (QPI) imaging, scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) can overcome many of these challenges but requires detailed modeling to extract the k-space electronic structure. Here, we present realistic calculations of QPI in twisted bilayer structures, which accounts for the effect of the long-range moiré lattice on the electronic structure as well as its interaction at a defect. These calculations reveal that, while the moiré supercell significantly reduces the size of the Brillouin zone, the QPI scattering vectors retain characteristics of the individual monolayers with distinct perturbations from the twisted geometry that can be directly linked back to the electronic structure. The procedure introduced here provides a general framework to use QPI to determine the low-energy electronic structure in moiré lattice systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (54)

  1. Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature (London) 556, 43 (2018).
  2. Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras et al., Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature (London) 556, 80 (2018).
  3. A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, A. W. Barnard, J. Finney, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. A. Kastner, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Emergent ferromagnetism near three-quarters filling in twisted bilayer graphene, Science 365, 605 (2019).
  4. Y. Cao, J. Y. Luo, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Superlattice-induced insulating states and valley-protected orbits in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 116804 (2016).
  5. K. Kim, A. DaSilva, S. Huang, B. Fallahazad, S. Larentis, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, B. J. LeRoy, A. H. MacDonald, and E. Tutuc, Tunable moiré bands and strong correlations in small-twist-angle bilayer graphene, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 3364 (2017).
  6. Y. Choi, J. Kemmer, Y. Peng, A. Thomson, H. Arora, R. Polski, Y. Zhang, H. Ren, J. Alicea, G. Refael et al., Electronic correlations in twisted bilayer graphene near the magic angle, Nat. Phys. 15, 1174 (2019).
  7. G. Li, A. Luican, J. M. B. Lopes Dos Santos, A. H. Castro Neto, A. Reina, J. Kong, and E. Y. Andrei, Observation of Van Hove singularities in twisted graphene layers, Nat. Phys. 6, 109 (2010).
  8. G. Trambly de Laissardière, D. Mayou, and L. Magaud, Localization of Dirac electrons in rotated graphene bilayers, Nano Lett. 10, 804 (2010).
  9. R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moiré bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12233 (2011).
  10. M. Liao, Z. Wei, L. Du, Q. Wang, J. Tang, H. Yu, F. Wu, J. Zhao, X. Xu, B. Han et al., Precise control of the interlayer twist angle in large scale MoS2 homostructures, Nat. Commun. 11, 2153 (2020).
  11. J. Gu, J. Zhu, P. Knuppel, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Remote imprinting of moiré lattices, Nat. Mater. 23, 219 (2024).
  12. M. Naritsuka, T. Machida, S. Asano, Y. Yanase, and T. Hanaguri, Twisted Bogoliubov quasiparticles in the superconducting NbSe2 monolayer on graphene, arXiv:2405.14662.
  13. Y. Xia, Z. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Superconductivity in twisted bilayer WSe2, Nature (London) 637, 833 (2024).
  14. L. Baldo, T. Löthman, P. Holmvall, and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Defect-induced band restructuring and length scales in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 108, 125141 (2023).
  15. W. Jolie, J. Lux, M. Pörtner, D. Dombrowski, C. Herbig, T. Knispel, S. Simon, T. Michely, A. Rosch, and C. Busse, Suppression of quasiparticle scattering signals in bilayer graphene due to layer polarization and destructive interference, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 106801 (2018).
  16. F. Joucken, C. Bena, Z. Ge, E. Quezada-Lopez, S. Pinon, V. Kaladzhyan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, A. Ferreira, and J. Velasco, Direct visualization of native defects in graphite and their effect on the electronic properties of Bernal-stacked bilayer graphene, Nano Lett. 21, 7100 (2021).
  17. V. Kaladzhyan, S. Pinon, F. Joucken, Z. Ge, E. A. Quezada-Lopez, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Velasco, and C. Bena, Surface states and quasiparticle interference in Bernal and rhombohedral graphite with and without trigonal warping, Phys. Rev. B 104, 155418 (2021).
  18. V. Kaladzhyan, F. Joucken, Z. Ge, E. A. Quezada-Lopez, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Velasco, and C. Bena, Quasiparticle interference patterns in bilayer graphene with trigonal warping, Phys. Rev. B 104, 235425 (2021).
  19. P. Choubey, T. Berlijn, A. Kreisel, C. Cao, and P. J. Hirschfeld, Visualization of atomic-scale phenomena in superconductors: Application to FeSe, Phys. Rev. B 90, 134520 (2014).
  20. A. Kreisel, P. Choubey, T. Berlijn, W. Ku, B. M. Andersen, and P. J. Hirschfeld, Interpretation of scanning tunneling quasiparticle interference and impurity states in cuprates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 217002 (2015).
  21. A. Kreisel, C. A. Marques, L. C. Rhodes, X. Kong, T. Berlijn, R. Fittipaldi, V. Granata, A. Vecchione, P. Wahl, and P. J. Hirschfeld, Quasi-particle interference of the Van Hove singularity in Sr2RuO4, npj Quantum Mater. 6, 100 (2021).
  22. I. Benedičič, M. Naritsuka, L. C. Rhodes, C. Trainer, Y. Nanao, A. B Naden, R. Fittipaldi, V. Granata, M. Lettieri, A. Vecchione et al., Interplay of ferromagnetism and spin-orbit coupling in Sr4Ru3O10, Phys. Rev. B 106, L241107 (2022).
  23. C. A. Marques et al., Spin-orbit coupling induced Van Hove singularity in proximity to a Lifshitz transition in Sr4Ru3O10, npj Quantum Mater. 9, 35 (2024).
  24. W. Ku, T. Berlijn, and C.-C. Lee, Unfolding first-principles band structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 216401 (2010).
  25. V. Popescu and A. Zunger, Extracting E versus k⃗ effective band structure from supercell calculations on alloys and impurities, Phys. Rev. B 85, 085201 (2012).
  26. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.L121403 for additional details regarding the tight binding models, the QPI simulation and the impurity bound state.
  27. L. C. Rhodes, W. Osmolska, C. A. Marques, and P. Wahl, Nature of quasiparticle interference in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 107, 045107 (2023).
  28. M. Naritsuka, I. Benedičič, L. C. Rhodes, C. A. Marques, C. Trainer, Z. Li, A. C Komarek, and P. Wahl, Compass-like manipulation of electronic nematicity in Sr3Ru2O7, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2308972120 (2023).
  29. A. Chandrasekaran, L. C. Rhodes, E. A. Morales, C. A. Marques, P. D. C. King, P. Wahl, and J. J. Betouras, On the engineering of higher-order Van Hove singularities in two dimensions, Nat. Commun. 15, 9521 (2024).
  30. G. Pizzi et al., wannier90 as a community code: New features and applications, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 32, 165902 (2020).
  31. G. M. Rutter, J. N. Crain, N. P. Guisinger, T. Li, P. N. First, and J. A. Stroscio, Scattering and interference in epitaxial graphene, Science 317, 219 (2007).
  32. I. Brihuega, P. Mallet, C. Bena, S. Bose, C. Michaelis, L. Vitali, F. Varchon, L. Magaud, K. Kern, and J. Y. Veuillen, Quasiparticle chirality in epitaxial graphene probed at the nanometer scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 206802 (2008).
  33. P. Mallet, I. Brihuega, S. Bose, M. M. Ugeda, J. M. Gómez-Rodríguez, K. Kern, and J. Y. Veuillen, Role of pseudospin in quasiparticle interferences in epitaxial graphene probed by high-resolution scanning tunneling microscopy, Phys. Rev. B 86, 045444 (2012).
  34. M. M. Ugeda, I. Brihuega, F. Guinea, and J. M. Gómez-Rodríguez, Missing atom as a source of carbon magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 096804 (2010).
  35. L. Sun, L. Rademaker, D. Mauro, A. Scarfato, Á. Pásztor, I. Gutiérrez-Lezama, Z. Wang, J. Martinez-Castro, A. F. Morpurgo, and C. Renner, Determining spin-orbit coupling in graphene by quasiparticle interference imaging, Nat. Commun. 14, 3771 (2023).
  36. J. Voit, L. Perfetti, F. Zwick, H. Berger, G. Margaritondo, G. Grüner, H. Höchst, and M. Grioni, Electronic structure of solids with competing periodic potentials, Science 290, 501 (2000).
  37. I. Gierz, J. Henk, H. Höchst, C. R. Ast, and K. Kern, Illuminating the dark corridor in graphene: Polarization dependence of angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy on graphene, Phys. Rev. B 83, 121408(R) (2011).
  38. P. Puschnig and D. Lüftner, Simulation of angle-resolved photoemission spectra by approximating the final state by a plane wave: From graphene to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon molecules, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 200, 193 (2015).
  39. W. S. Jung, C. S. Leem, C. Kim, S. R. Park, S. Y. Park, B. J. Kim, E. Rotenberg, and C. Kim, Imaging the electron density in solids by using multi-Brillouin-zone angle resolved photoelectron spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 82, 235105 (2010).
  40. H. Boban, M. Qahosh, X. Hou, T. Sobol, E. Beyer, M. Szczepanik, D. Baranowski, S. Mearini, V. Feyer, Y. Mokrousov et al., Scattering makes a difference in circular dichroic angle-resolved photoemission, arXiv:2410.19652.
  41. T. Kosugi, H. Nishi, Y. Kato, and Y. I. Matsushita, Periodicity-free unfolding method of electronic energy spectra, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86, 124717 (2017).
  42. T. Iimori, A. Visikovskiy, H. Imamura, T. Miyamachi, M. Kitamura, K. Horiba, H. Kumigashira, K. Mase, K. Nakatsuji, S. Tanaka et al., Electronic structure of 3∘-twisted bilayer graphene on 4H-SiC(0001), Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, L051001 (2021).
  43. S. Moser, An experimentalist's guide to the matrix element in angle resolved photoemission, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 214, 29 (2017).
  44. S. Pathak, T. Rakib, R. Hou, A. Nevidomskyy, E. Ertekin, H. T. Johnson, and L. K. Wagner, Accurate tight-binding model for twisted bilayer graphene describes topological flat bands without geometric relaxation, Phys. Rev. B 105, 115141 (2022).
  45. J. Kang and O. Vafek, Symmetry, maximally localized Wannier states, and a low-energy model for twisted bilayer graphene narrow bands, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031088 (2018).
  46. M. Koshino, N. F. Q. Yuan, T. Koretsune, M. Ochi, K. Kuroki, and L. Fu, Maximally localized Wannier orbitals and the extended Hubbard model for twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031087 (2018).
  47. M. Feuerbacher, Moiré, Euler and self-similarity—The lattice parameters of twisted hexagonal crystals, Acta. Cryst. A 77, 460 (2021).
  48. L. Zezhong and W. Da, Potential impurity effects in twisted bilayer graphene, Prog. Phys. 43, 151 (2023).
  49. S. Lisi et al., Observation of flat bands in twisted bilayer graphene, Nat. Phys. 17, 189 (2021).
  50. I. Razado-Colambo, J. Avila, J. P. Nys, C. Chen, X. Wallart, M. C. Asensio, and D. Vignaud, NanoARPES of twisted bilayer graphene on SiC absence of velocity renormalization for small angles, Sci. Rep. 6, 27261 (2016).
  51. Q. Li, H. Zhang, Y. Wang, W. Chen, C Bao, Q. Liu, T. Lin, S. Zhang, H. Zhang, K. Watanabe et al., Evolution of the flat band and the role of lattice relaxations in twisted bilayer graphene, Nat. Mater. 23, 1070 (2024).
  52. J. E. Nunn, A. McEllistrim, A. Weston, A. Garcia-Ruiz, M. D. Watson, M. Mucha-Kruczynski, C. Cacho, R. V. Gorbachev, V. I. Fal'ko, and N. R. Wilson, ARPES signatures of few-layer twistronic graphenes, Nano Lett. 23, 5201 (2023).
  53. J. B. Profe, L. C. Rhodes, M. Dürrnagel, R. Bisset, C. A. Marques, S. Chi, T. Schwemmer, R. Thomale, D. M. Kennes, C. A. Hooley et al., Magic angle of Sr2RuO4: Optimizing correlation-driven superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043057 (2024).
  54. http://www.cirrus.ac.uk.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation