Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Nature of the high-pressure insulating state in Sr2IrO4: Mott picture

Guoren Zhang1,2,3, Hanif Hadipour4, and Eva Pavarini3

Phys. Rev. B 111, L121101 – Published 4 March, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.L121101

Abstract

At ambient pressure, the t2g5 layered perovskite Sr2IrO4 is a correlated small-gap insulator. In the Mott picture, applying uniform pressure should therefore quickly close the gap; experimentally, however, the insulating state persists even under extreme pressures, suggesting that a mechanism other than Mott is at work. Yet, given the complexity of the system, it is unclear to what extent the Mott picture can be really excluded. Here, we thus reexamine the problem. We show that, surprisingly, the pressure-induced enhancement of the screened Coulomb interaction—combined with lattice distortions and spin-orbit driven jeff=1/2 orbital ordering—can hold the system close to the metal-insulator transition up to very high pressure.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (58)

  1. T. Shimura, Y. Inaguma, T. Nakamura, M. Itoh, and Y. Morii, Structure and magnetic properties of Sr2−xAxIrO4 (A=Ca and Ba), Phys. Rev. B 52, 9143 (1995).
  2. G. Cao and P. Schlottmann, The challenge of spin-orbit-tuned ground states in iridates: A key issues review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 042502 (2018).
  3. H. Kim, J. K. Kim, J. Kwon, J. Kim, H. J. Kim, S. Ha, K. Kim, W. Lee, J. Kim, G. Y. Cho, H. Heo, J. Jang, C. J. Sahle, A. Longo, J. Strempfer, G. Fabbris, Y. Choi, D. Haskel, J. Kim, J-. Kim, and B. J. Kim, Quantum spin nematic phase in a square-lattice iridate, Nature (London) 625, 264 (2024).
  4. D. Kim, B. Sohn, Y. Lee, J. Song, M. K. Kim, M. Kim, T. W. Noh, and C. Kim, Strain tunable electronic ground states in two-dimensional iridate thin films, Appl. Surf. Sci. 657, 159801 (2024).
  5. L. Wang, H. Liu, V. Zimmermann, A. K. Yogi, M. Isobe, M. Minola, M. Hepting, G. Khaliullin, and B. Keimer, Spin-orbit excitons in a correlated metal: Raman scattering study of Sr2RhO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 116502 (2024).
  6. D. Choi, C. Yue, D. Azoury, Z. Porter, J. Chen, F. Petocchi, E. Baldini, B. Lv, M. Mogi, Y. Su, S. D. Wilson, M. Eckstein, P. Werner, and N. Gedik, Light-induced insulator-metal transition in Sr2IrO4 reveals the nature of the insulating ground state, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2323013121 (2024).
  7. E. Paris, Y. Tseng, E. M. Pärschke, W. Zhang, M. H. Upton, A. Efimenko, K. Rolfs, D. E. McNally, L. Maurel, M. Naamneh, M. Caputo, V. N. Strocov, Z. Wang, D. Casa, C. W. Schneider, E. Pomjakushina, K. Wohlfeld, M. Radovic, and T. Schmitt, Strain engineering of the charge and spin-orbital interactions in Sr2IrO4, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 24764 (2020).
  8. S. Pandey, H. Zhang, J. Yang, A. F. May, J. J. Sanchez, Z. Liu, J.-H. Chu, J.-W. Kim, P. J. Ryan, H. Zhou, and J. Liu, Controllable emergent spatial spin modulation in Sr2IrO4 by in situ shear strain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 027203 (2022).
  9. B. J. Kim, H. Jin, S. J. Moon, J.-Y. Kim, B.-G. Park, C. S. Leem, J. Yu, T. W. Noh, C. Kim, S.-J. Oh, J.-H. Park, V. Durairaj, G. Cao, and E. Rotenberg, Novel Jeff=1/2 Mott state induced by relativistic spin-orbit coupling in Sr2IrO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 076402 (2008).
  10. B. J. Kim, H. Ohsumi, T. Komesu, S. Sakai, T. Morita, H. Takagi, and T. Arima, Phase-sensitive observation of a spin-orbital Mott state in Sr2IrO4, Science 323, 1329 (2009).
  11. H. Jin, H. Jeong, T. Ozaki, and J. Yu, Anisotropic exchange interactions of spin-orbit-integrated states in Sr2IrO4, Phys. Rev. B 80, 075112 (2009).
  12. F. Wang and T. Senthil, Twisted Hubbard model for Sr2IrO4: Magnetism and possible high temperature superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 136402 (2011).
  13. H. Zhang, K. Haule, and D. Vanderbilt, Effective J=1/2 insulating state in Ruddlesden-Popper iridates: An LDA+DMFT study, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 246402 (2013).
  14. G. Zhang and E. Pavarini, Multiorbital nature of doped Sr2IrO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 036504 (2023).
  15. N. Samani, G. Zhang, and E. Pavarini, Map of crystal-field effects in correlated layered t2gn perovskites, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 236505 (2024).
  16. B. Zwartsenberg, R. P. Day, E. Razzoli, M. Michiardi, M. X. Na, G. Zhang, J. D. Denlinger, I. Vobornik, C. Bigi, B. J. Kim, I. S. Elfimov, E. Pavarini, and A. Damascelli, Constraints on the two-dimensional pseudospin-12 Mott insulator description of Sr2IrO4, Phys. Rev. B 105, 245130 (2022).
  17. C. Chen, Y. Zhou, X. Chen, T. Han, C. An, Y. Zhou, Y. Yuan, B. Zhang, S. Wang, R. Zhang, L. Zhang, C. Zhang, Z. Yang, L. E. DeLong, and G. Cao, Persistent insulating state at megabar pressures in strongly spin-orbit coupled Sr2IrO4, Phys. Rev. B 101, 144102 (2020).
  18. D. Haskel, G. Fabbris, M. Zhernenkov, P. P. Kong, C. Q. Jin, G. Cao, and M. van Veenendaal, Pressure tuning of the spin-orbit coupled ground state in Sr2IrO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 027204 (2012).
  19. D. A. Zocco, J. J. Hamlin, B. D. White, B. J. Kim, J. R. Jeffries, S. T. Weir, Y. K. Vohra, J. W. Allen, and M. B. Maple, Persistent non-metallic behavior in Sr2IrO4 and Sr3Ir2O7 at high pressures, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26, 255603 (2014).
  20. D. Haskel, G. Fabbris, J. H. Kim, L. S. I. Veiga, J. R. L. Mardegan, C. A. Escanhoela, Jr., S. Chikara, V. Struzhkin, T. Senthil, B. J. Kim, G. Cao, and J.-W. Kim, Possible quantum paramagnetism in compressed Sr2IrO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 067201 (2020).
  21. E. Pavarini, S. Biermann, A. Poteryaev, A. I. Lichtenstein, A. Georges, and O. K. Andersen, Mott transition and suppression of orbital fluctuations in orthorhombic 3d1 perovskites, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 176403 (2004).
  22. E. Pavarini, A. Yamasaki, J. Nuss, and O. K. Andersen, How chemistry controls electron localization in 3d1 perovskites: a Wannier-function study, New J. Phys. 7, 188 (2005).
  23. K. Samanta, F. M. Ardito, N. M. Souza-Neto, and E. Granado, First-order structural transition and pressure-induced lattice/phonon anomalies in Sr2IrO4, Phys. Rev. B 98, 094101 (2018).
  24. The masses are here defined as m*=1−ImΣ(iω0)/ω0, where ω0=π/β is the lowest Matsubara frequency and β=1/kBT. Limit cases: In the Mott insulating phase m*→∞, while for occupied and empty bands, m*→1.
  25. R. Arita, J. Kuneš, A. V. Kozhevnikov, A. G. Eguiluz, and M. Imada, Ab initio studies on the interplay between spin-orbit interaction and Coulomb correlation in Sr2IrO4 and Ba2IrO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 086403 (2012).
  26. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.L121101 for more details on the RL/S ratio, hopping integrals and cRPA calculations.
  27. See, e.g., Dynamical Mean-Field Theory of Correlated Electrons, edited by E. Pavarini, E. Koch, A. I. Lichtenstein, and D. Vollhardt (Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, 2022), Vol. 12.
  28. P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, G. K. H. Madsen, D. Kvasnicka, and J. Luitz, WIEN2k: An Augmented Plane Wave + Local Orbitals Program for Calculating Crystal Properties (Technische Universität Wien, Austria, 2001); P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, P. Sorantin, and S. Trickey, Full-potential, linearized augmented plane wave programs for crystalline systems, Comput. Phys. Commun. 59, 399 (1990).
  29. A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, Wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 685 (2008).
  30. See, e.g., E. Pavarini, in The LDA+DMFT approach, in The LDA+DMFT Approach to Strongly Correlated Materials, edited by E. Pavarini, E. Koch, D. Vollhardt, and A. Lichtenstein, Modeling and Simulation (Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, 2011), Vol. 1.
  31. E. Pavarini, Solving the strong-correlation problem in materials, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 44, 597 (2021).
  32. E. Gull, A. J. Millis, A. I. Lichtenstein, A. N. Rubtsov, M. Troyer, and P. Werner, Continuous-time Monte Carlo methods for quantum impurity models, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 349 (2011).
  33. E. Gorelov, M. Karolak, T. O. Wehling, F. Lechermann, A. I. Lichtenstein, and E. Pavarini, Nature of the Mott transition in Ca2RuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 226401 (2010).
  34. G. Zhang, E. Gorelov, E. Sarvestani, and E. Pavarini, Fermi surface of Sr2RuO4: Spin-orbit and anisotropic Coulomb interaction effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 106402 (2016).
  35. G. Zhang and E. Pavarini, Mott transition, spin-orbit effects, and magnetism in Ca2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B 95, 075145 (2017).
  36. G. Zhang and E. Pavarini, Optical conductivity, Fermi surface, and spin-orbit coupling effects in Sr2RhO4, Phys. Rev. B 99, 125102 (2019).
  37. E. Sarvestani, G. Zhang, E. Gorelov, and E. Pavarini, Effective masses, lifetimes, and optical conductivity in Sr2RuO4 and Sr3Ru2O7: Interplay of spin-orbit, crystal-field, and Coulomb tetragonal tensor interactions, Phys. Rev. B 97, 085141 (2018).
  38. G. Zhang and E. Pavarini, Magnetic superexchange couplings in Sr2IrO4, Phys. Rev. B 104, 125116 (2021).
  39. J. Dai, E. Calleja, G. Cao, and K. McElroy, Local density of states study of a spin-orbit-coupling induced Mott insulator Sr2IrO4, Phys. Rev. B 90, 041102(R) (2014).
  40. We performed the calculation for several functionals [generalized gradient approximation (GGA), local density approximation (LDA), LDA+U, and GGA+U, spin-polarized and not], obtaining similar results, albeit slightly different (of maximum 1∘) rotation angles; the largest angles are obtained in GGA. We use these values for consistency with Ref. [23], where GGA was also used.
  41. F. Aryasetiawan, M. Imada, A. Georges, G. Kotliar, S. Biermann, and A. I. Lichtenstein, Frequency-dependent local interactions and low-energy effective models from electronic structure calculations, Phys. Rev. B 70, 195104 (2004).
  42. F. Aryasetiawan, K. Karlsson, O. Jepsen, and U. Schönberger, Calculations of Hubbard U from first-principles, Phys. Rev. B 74, 125106 (2006).
  43. A. Schindlmayr, C. Friedrich, E. Şaşıoğlu, and S. Blügel, First-principles calculation of electronic excitations in solids with SPEX, Z. Phys. Chem. 224, 357 (2010).
  44. H. Okabe, N. Takeshita, M. Isobe, E. Takayama-Muromachi, T. Muranaka, and J. Akimitsu, Pressure-induced metal-insulator transition in the spin-orbit Mott insulator Ba2IrO4, Phys. Rev. B 84, 115127 (2011).
  45. S. Fujiyama, H. Ohsumi, K. Ohashi, D. Hirai, B. J. Kim, T. Arima, M. Takata, and H. Takagi, Spin and orbital contributions to magnetically ordered moments in 5d layered perovskite Sr2IrO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 016405 (2014).
  46. G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, Mott insulators in the strong spin-orbit coupling limit: From Heisenberg to a quantum compass and Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017205 (2009).
  47. B. H. Kim, G. Khaliullin, and B. I. Min, Magnetic couplings, optical spectra, and spin-orbit exciton in 5d electron Mott insulator Sr2IrO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 167205 (2012).
  48. N. A. Bogdanov, V. M. Katukuri, J. Romhányi, V. Yushankhai, V. Kataev, B. Büchner, J. van den Brink, and L. Hozoi, Orbital reconstruction in nonpolar tetravalent transition-metal oxide layers, Nat. Commun. 6, 7306 (2015).
  49. S. Agrestini, C.-Y. Kuo, M. Moretti Sala, Z. Hu, D. Kasinathan, K.-T. Ko, P. Glatzel, M. Rossi, J.-D. Cafun, K. O. Kvashnina, A. Matsumoto, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, L. H. Tjeng, and M. W. Haverkort, Long-range interactions in the effective low-energy Hamiltonian of Sr2IrO4: A core-to-core resonant inelastic x-ray scattering study, Phys. Rev. B 95, 205123 (2017).
  50. I. V. Solovyev, V. V. Mazurenko, and A. A. Katanin, Validity and limitations of the superexchange model for the magnetic properties of Sr2IrO4 and Ba2IrO4 mediated by the strong spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B 92, 235109 (2015).
  51. C. Lane, Y. Zhang, J. W. Furness, R. S. Markiewicz, B. Barbiellini, J. Sun, and A. Bansil, First-principles calculation of spin and orbital contributions to magnetically ordered moments in Sr2IrO4, Phys. Rev. B 101, 155110 (2020).
  52. T. Ishikawa, T. Toriyama, T. Konishi, H. Sakurai, and Y. Ohta, Reversed crystal-field splitting and spin-orbital ordering in α−Sr2CrO4, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86, 033701 (2017).
  53. S. Boseggia, R. Springell, H. C. Walker, H. M. Rønnow, Ch. Rüegg, H. Okabe, M. Isobe, R. S. Perry, S. P. Collins, and D. F. McMorrow, Robustness of basal-plane antiferromagnetic order and the Jeff=1/2 state in single-layer iridate spin-orbit Mott insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 117207 (2013).
  54. J. M. Tomczak, T. Miyake, and F. Aryasetiawan, Realistic many-body models for manganese monoxide under pressure, Phys. Rev. B 81, 115116 (2010).
  55. S. K. Panda, H. Jiang, and S. Biermann, Pressure dependence of dynamically screened Coulomb interactions in NiO: Effective Hubbard, Hund, intershell, and intersite components, Phys. Rev. B 96, 045137 (2017).
  56. M. Aghajani, H. Hadipour, and M. Akhavan, Pressure dependence of effective Coulomb interaction parameters in BaFe2As2 by first-principle calculation, Physica C 548, 61 (2018).
  57. www.gauss-centre.eu.
  58. P. Thörnig, JURECA: Data centric and booster modules implementing the modular supercomputing architecture at Jülich supercomputing centre, J. large-scale res. facilit. 7, A182 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation