Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Electric polarization driven by noncollinear spin alignment investigated by first principles calculations

Sergiy Mankovsky1,2,*, Svitlana Polesya2, Jan Minar3, Hongbin Zhang1, and Hubert Ebert2

  • *Contact author: mankovsky@tmm.tu-darmstadt.de

Phys. Rev. B 114, 144420 – Published 21 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/9fs1-5gxq

Abstract

We present an approach for first principles investigations on the spin-driven electric polarization in type II multiferroics. We propose a parametrization of the polarization with the parameters calculated using the Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker Green's function (KKR-GF) formalism. Within this approach the induced electric polarization of a unit cell is represented in terms of three-site parameters. Those antisymmetric with respect to spin permutation are seen as an ab initio based counterpart to the phenomenological parameters used within the inverse-Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya-interaction (DMI) model. Due to their relativistic origin, these parameters are responsible for the electric polarization induced in the presence of a noncollinear spin alignment in materials with a centrosymmetric crystal structure. Beyond this, our approach gives direct access to the element- or site-resolved electric polarization. To demonstrate the capability of the approach, we consider several examples of the so-called type II multiferroics, for which the magnetoelectric effect is observed either as a consequence of an applied magnetic field (we use Cr2O3 as a prototype), or as a result of a phase transition to a spin-spiral magnetic state, as for instance in MnI2, CuCrO2, and AgCrO2.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (76)

  1. G. A. Smolenskii and I. E. Chupis, Ferroelectromagnets, Phys. Usp. 25, 475 (1982).
  2. D. Khomskii, Classifying multiferroics: Mechanisms and effects, Physics Online J. 2, 20 (2009).
  3. A. P. Pyatakov and A. K. Zvezdin, Magnetoelectric and multiferroic media, Phys. Usp. 55, 557 (2012).
  4. N. Ortega, A. Kumar, J. F. Scott, and R. S. Katiyar, Multifunctional magnetoelectric materials for device applications, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 27, 504002 (2015).
  5. X. Liang, H. Chen, and N. X. Sun, Magnetoelectric materials and devices, APL Mater. 9, 041114 (2021).
  6. S.-W. Cheong and M. Mostovoy, Multiferroics: A magnetic twist for ferroelectricity, Nat. Mater. 6, 13 (2007).
  7. Y. Tokura, S. Seki, and N. Nagaosa, Multiferroics of spin origin, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 076501 (2014).
  8. E. Bousquet and A. Cano, Non-collinear magnetism and multiferroicity: The perovskite case, Phys. Sci. Rev. 8, 479 (2023).
  9. M. Mostovoy, Ferroelectricity in spiral magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 067601 (2006).
  10. M. Mostovoy, K. Nomura, and N. Nagaosa, Theory of electric polarization in multiorbital Mott insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 047204 (2011).
  11. I. V. Solovyev, Basic aspects of ferroelectricity induced by noncollinear alignment of spins, Condens. Matter 10, 21 (2025).
  12. D. Astrov, Magnetoelectric effect in chromium oxide, Sov. Phys.-JETP 13, 729 (1961).
  13. A. Malashevich, S. Coh, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Full magnetoelectric response of Cr2O3 from first principles, Phys. Rev. B 86, 094430 (2012).
  14. E. Bousquet, E. Lelievre-Berna, N. Qureshi, J.-R. Soh, N. A. Spaldin, A. Urru, X. H. Verbeek, and S. F. Weber, On the sign of the linear magnetoelectric coefficient in Cr2O3, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 36, 155701 (2024).
  15. H. Yamaguchi, S. Ohtomo, S. Kimura, M. Hagiwara, K. Kimura, T. Kimura, T. Okuda, and K. Kindo, Spiral-plane flop probed by ESR in the multiferroic triangular-lattice antiferromagnet CuCrO2, Phys. Rev. B 81, 033104 (2010).
  16. M. Frontzek, G. Ehlers, A. Podlesnyak, H. Cao, M. Matsuda, O. Zaharko, N. Aliouane, S. Barilo, and S. V. Shiryaev, Magnetic structure of CuCrO2: A single crystal neutron diffraction study, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24, 016004 (2012).
  17. K. Park, J. Oh, J. C. Leiner, J. Jeong, K. C. Rule, M. D. Le, and J.-G. Park, Magnon-phonon coupling and two-magnon continuum in the two-dimensional triangular antiferromagnet CuCrO2, Phys. Rev. B 94, 104421 (2016).
  18. Y. Oohara, S. Mitsuda, H. Yoshizawa, N. Yaguchi, H. Kuriyama, T. Asano, and M. Mekata, Magnetic phase transition in AgCrO2, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 63, 847 (1994).
  19. A. M. L. Lopes, G. N. P. Oliveira, T. M. Mendonça, J. A. Moreira, A. Almeida, J. P. Araújo, V. S. Amaral, and J. G. Correia, Local distortions in multiferroic AgCrO2 triangular spin lattice, Phys. Rev. B 84, 014434 (2011).
  20. T. Kurumaji, Spiral spin structures and skyrmionsin multiferroics, Phys. Sci. Rev. 5, 20190016 (2020).
  21. H. Katsura, N. Nagaosa, and A. V. Balatsky, Spin current and magnetoelectric effect in noncollinear magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 057205 (2005).
  22. T. Kimura, T. Goto, H. Shintani, K. Ishizaka, T. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Magnetic control of ferroelectric polarization, Nature (London) 426, 55 (2003).
  23. H. J. Xiang, S.-H. Wei, M.-H. Whangbo, and J. L. F. Da Silva, Spin-orbit coupling and ion displacements in multiferroic TbMnO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 037209 (2008).
  24. K. Taniguchi, N. Abe, T. Takenobu, Y. Iwasa, and T. Arima, Ferroelectric polarization flop in a frustrated magnet MnWO4 induced by a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 097203 (2006).
  25. S. Seki, Y. Onose, and Y. Tokura, Spin-driven ferroelectricity in triangular lattice antiferromagnets ACrO2 (A= Cu, Ag, Li, or Na), Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 067204 (2008).
  26. T.-h. Arima, Ferroelectricity induced by proper-screw type magnetic order, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 073702 (2007).
  27. X. Wu, Y. Cai, Q. Xie, H. Weng, H. Fan, and J. Hu, Magnetic ordering and multiferroicity in MnI2, Phys. Rev. B 86, 134413 (2012).
  28. Y. Tokura and S. Seki, Multiferroics with spiral spin orders, Adv. Mater. 22, 1554 (2010).
  29. H. J. Xiang, E. J. Kan, Y. Zhang, M.-H. Whangbo, and X. G. Gong, General theory for the ferroelectric polarization induced by spin-spiral order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 157202 (2011).
  30. I. V. Solovyev, Superexchange theory of electronic polarization driven by relativistic spin-orbit interaction at half filling, Phys. Rev. B 95, 214406 (2017).
  31. J. H. Yang, Z. L. Li, X. Z. Lu, M.-H. Whangbo, S.-H. Wei, X. G. Gong, and H. J. Xiang, Strong Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction and origin of ferroelectricity in Cu2OSeO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 107203 (2012).
  32. Y. S. Chai, S. H. Chun, J. Z. Cong, and K. H. Kim, Magnetoelectricity in multiferroic hexaferrites as understood by crystal symmetry analyses, Phys. Rev. B 98, 104416 (2018).
  33. A. Edström, P. Barone, S. Picozzi, and M. Stengel, Magnetoelectricity of topological solitons in 2D magnets, npj Comput. Mater. 11, 295 (2025).
  34. S. A. Nikolaev and I. V. Solovyev, Microscopic theory of electric polarization induced by skyrmionic order in GaV4S8, Phys. Rev. B 99, 100401(R) (2019).
  35. I. Solovyev, R. Ono, and S. Nikolaev, Magnetically induced polarization in centrosymmetric bonds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 187601 (2021).
  36. I. A. Sergienko and E. Dagotto, Role of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in multiferroic perovskites, Phys. Rev. B 73, 094434 (2006).
  37. H. J. Xiang, P. S. Wang, M.-H. Whangbo, and X. G. Gong, Unified model of ferroelectricity induced by spin order, Phys. Rev. B 88, 054404 (2013).
  38. J. Iniguez, First-principles approach to lattice-mediated magnetoelectric effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 117201 (2008).
  39. M. Ye and D. Vanderbilt, Dynamical magnetic charges and linear magnetoelectricity, Phys. Rev. B 89, 064301 (2014).
  40. S. Mankovsky, S. Polesya, H. Lange, M. Weißenhofer, U. Nowak, and H. Ebert, Angular momentum transfer via relativistic spin-lattice coupling from first principles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 067202 (2022).
  41. S. Mankovsky, H. Lange, S. Polesya, and H. Ebert, Spin-lattice interaction parameters from first principles: Theory and implementation, Phys. Rev. B 107, 144428 (2023).
  42. K.-I. Gondaira and Y. Tanabe, A note on the theory of superexchange interaction, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 21, 1527 (1966).
  43. D. Vanderbilt and R. D. King-Smith, Electric polarization as a bulk quantity and its relation to surface charge, Phys. Rev. B 48, 4442 (1993).
  44. R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polarization of crystalline solids, Phys. Rev. B 47, 1651(R) (1993).
  45. R. Resta, Macroscopic electric polarization as a geometric quantum phase, Europhys. Lett. 22, 133 (1993).
  46. C. Jia, S. Onoda, N. Nagaosa, and J. H. Han, Bond electronic polarization induced by spin, Phys. Rev. B 74, 224444 (2006).
  47. M. E. Rose, Relativistic Electron Theory (Wiley, New York, 1961).
  48. A. H. MacDonald and S. H. Vosko, A relativistic density functional formalism, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 12, 2977 (1979).
  49. E. Engel and R. M. Dreizler, Density Functional Theory – An Advanced Course (Springer, Berlin, 2011).
  50. H. Ebert, J. Braun, D. Ködderitzsch, and S. Mankovsky, Fully relativistic multiple scattering calculations for general potentials, Phys. Rev. B 93, 075145 (2016).
  51. T. Moriya, Theory of absorption and scattering of light by magnetic crystals, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 1042 (1968).
  52. S. Angelov and J. Doumerc, On the correlation between the structure and the exchange interactions in ACrO2 chromites, Solid State Commun. 77, 213 (1991).
  53. I. I. Mazin, Electronic structure and magnetism in the frustrated antiferromagnet LiCrO2: First-principles calculations, Phys. Rev. B 75, 094407 (2007).
  54. A. V. Ushakov, D. A. Kukusta, A. N. Yaresko, and D. I. Khomskii, Magnetism of layered chromium sulfides MCrS2 (M= Li, Na, K, Ag, and Au): A first-principles study, Phys. Rev. B 87, 014418 (2013).
  55. H. Ebert et al., The Munich SPR-KKR package, version 8.5 (2020), https://www.ebert.cup.uni-muenchen.de/en/software-en/13-sprkkr.
  56. H. Ebert, D. Koedderitzsch, and J. Minar, Calculating condensed matter properties using the KKR-Green's function method – Recent developments and applications, Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 096501 (2011).
  57. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  58. S. Mankovsky, S. Polesya, and H. Ebert, Extension of the standard Heisenberg Hamiltonian to multispin exchange interactions, Phys. Rev. B 101, 174401 (2020).
  59. T. Sato, H. Kadowaki, and K. Iio, Successive phase transitions in the hexagonal-layered Heisenberg antiferromagnets MnX2 (X=Br,I), Physica B 213-214, 224 (1995).
  60. T. Kurumaji, S. Seki, S. Ishiwata, H. Murakawa, Y. Tokunaga, Y. Kaneko, and Y. Tokura, Magnetic-field induced competition of two multiferroic orders in a triangular-lattice helimagnet MnI2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 167206 (2011).
  61. F. Ye, Y. Ren, Q. Huang, J. A. Fernandez-Baca, P. Dai, J. W. Lynn, and T. Kimura, Spontaneous spin-lattice coupling in the geometrically frustrated triangular lattice antiferromagnet CuFeO2, Phys. Rev. B 73, 220404(R) (2006).
  62. H. Kadowaki, H. Kikuchi, and Y. Ajiro, Neutron powder diffraction study of the two-dimensional triangular lattice antiferromagnet CuCrO2, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2, 4485 (1990).
  63. M. Poienar, F. Damay, C. Martin, V. Hardy, A. Maignan, and G. André, Structural and magnetic properties of CuCr1−xMgxO2 by neutron powder diffraction, Phys. Rev. B 79, 014412 (2009).
  64. M. Soda, K. Kimura, T. Kimura, M. Matsuura, and K. Hirota, Electric control of spin helicity in multiferroic triangular lattice antiferromagnet CuCrO2 with proper-screw order, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 78, 124703 (2009).
  65. K. Kimura, T. Otani, H. Nakamura, Y. Wakabayashi, and T. Kimura, Lattice distortion coupled with magnetic ordering in a triangular lattice antiferromagnet CuCrO2, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 78, 113710 (2009).
  66. K. Kimura, H. Nakamura, K. Ohgushi, and T. Kimura, Magnetoelectric control of spin-chiral ferroelectric domains in a triangular lattice antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 78, 140401(R) (2008).
  67. K. Kimura, H. Nakamura, S. Kimura, M. Hagiwara, and T. Kimura, Tuning ferroelectric polarization reversal by electric and magnetic fields in CuCrO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 107201 (2009).
  68. E. Mun, M. Frontzek, A. Podlesnyak, G. Ehlers, S. Barilo, S. V. Shiryaev, and V. S. Zapf, High magnetic field evolution of ferroelectricity in CuCrO2, Phys. Rev. B 89, 054411 (2014).
  69. See Supplemental Material at https://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/9fs1-5gxq for additional details on the calculations concerning the spin-order induced polarization in MnI2 (Sec. A) and in Cr2O3 (Sec. B) and it presents a number of additional applications of the scheme presented in the manuscript, to illustrate the wide range of materials and issues that can be addressed by it, which includes Ref. [76].
  70. I. Dzyaloshinskii, On the magneto-electrical effect in antiferromagnets, Sov. Phys.-JETP 10, 628 (1960).
  71. E. Kita, K. Siratori, and A. Tasaki, Experimental determination of the mechanism of ME effect of Cr2O3 from ME susceptibility and electric shift in the antiferromagnetic resonance, J. Appl. Phys. 50, 7748 (1979).
  72. E. Bousquet, N. A. Spaldin, and K. T. Delaney, Unexpectedly large electronic contribution to linear magnetoelectricity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 107202 (2011).
  73. P. J. Brown, J. B. Forsyth, E. Leliévre-Berna, and F. Tasset, Determination of the magnetization distribution in Cr2O3 using spherical neutron polarimetry, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 1957 (2002).
  74. A. Scaramucci, E. Bousquet, M. Fechner, M. Mostovoy, and N. A. Spaldin, Linear magnetoelectric effect by orbital magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 197203 (2012).
  75. H. Ebert, S. Mankovsky, K. Chadova, S. Polesya, J. Minár, and D. Ködderitzsch, Calculating linear response functions for finite temperatures on the basis of the alloy analogy model, Phys. Rev. B 91, 165132 (2015).
  76. A. Yoshimori, A new type of antiferromagnetic structure in the rutile type crystal, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 14, 807 (1959).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation