Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Transparency-controlled multiple charge transfer in superconducting junctions with local shot-noise scanning tunneling spectroscopy

Yudai Sato1,2,3,4, Maialen Ortego Larrazabal1,5, Jian-Feng Ge1,6, Ingmar Swart5, Doohee Cho7, Wolfgang Belzig8, Juan Carlos Cuevas9,10, Milan P. Allan1,2,3,4,*, and Jiasen Niu1,2,3,4,†

  • *Contact author: milan.allan@lmu.de
  • †Contact author: niu@physics.leidenuniv.nl

Phys. Rev. B 114, 204508 – Published 26 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/81fz-49c6

Abstract

Charge transport in superconducting junctions at finite voltages is governed by Andreev reflections, including multiple Andreev reflections, which are processes that enable multiple charge transfer, a hallmark that shot noise can directly quantify. Since the effective charge extracted from shot-noise measurements varies with the transparency of the junction, systematic control of transparency is essential but experimentally challenging. Here, we present shot-noise scanning tunneling microscopy measurements enabled by a newly developed amplifier, allowing access to different transparency regimes. We perform shot-noise measurements on Pb(111) with tunable transparency at 2.2 K and observe that the shot noise evolves from a single-electron tunneling regime to multiple charge-transfer regimes as transparency increases. Our results are quantitatively consistent with theoretical simulations of Andreev reflections and multiple Andreev reflections for a single-channel system. These results establish junction transparency as the key parameter governing the evolution of charge transport and demonstrate that noise STM is a powerful platform for investigating microscopic charge transport mechanisms with controlled junction transparency at the atomic scale.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (34)

  1. T. M. Klapwijk, G. E. Blonder, and M. Tinkham, Explanation of subharmonic energy gap structure in superconducting contacts, Physica B+C 109-110, 1657 (1982).
  2. Y. M. Blanter and M. Büttiker, Shot noise in mesoscopic conductors, Phys. Rep. 336, 1 (2000).
  3. P. Dieleman, H. G. Bukkems, T. M. Klapwijk, M. Schicke, and K. H. Gundlach, Observation of Andreev reflection enhanced shot noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3486 (1997).
  4. R. Cron, M. F. Goffman, D. Esteve, and C. Urbina, Multiple-charge-quanta shot noise in superconducting atomic contacts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4104 (2001).
  5. Y. Ronen, Y. Cohen, J. H. Kang, A. Haim, M. T. Rieder, M. Heiblum, D. Mahalu, and H. Shtrikman, Charge of a quasiparticle in a superconductor, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 1743 (2016).
  6. T. Hoss, C. Strunk, T. Nussbaumer, R. Huber, U. Staufer, and C. Schönenberger, Multiple Andreev reflection and giant excess noise in diffusive superconductor/normal-metal/superconductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B 62, 4079 (2000).
  7. F. Lefloch, C. Hoffmann, M. Sanquer, and D. Quirion, Doubled full shot noise in quantum coherent superconductor-semiconductor junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 067002 (2003).
  8. K. M. Bastiaans, D. Cho, D. Chatzopoulos, M. Leeuwenhoek, C. Koks, and M. P. Allan, Imaging doubled shot noise in a Josephson scanning tunneling microscope, Phys. Rev. B 100, 104506 (2019).
  9. K. M. Bastiaans, D. Chatzopoulos, J.-F. Ge, D. Cho, W. O. Tromp, J. M. van Ruitenbeek, M. H. Fischer, P. J. de Visser, D. J. Thoen, E. F. C. Driessen, T. M. Klapwijk, and M. P. Allan, Direct evidence for Cooper pairing without a spectral gap in a disordered superconductor above Tc, Science 374, 608 (2021).
  10. U. Thupakula, V. Perrin, A. Palacio-Morales, L. Cario, M. Aprili, P. Simon, and F. Massee, Coherent and incoherent tunneling into Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states revealed by atomic scale shot-noise spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 247001 (2022).
  11. R. de-Picciotto, M. Reznikov, M. Heiblum, V. Umansky, G. Bunin, and D. Mahalu, Direct observation of a fractional charge, Nature (London) 389, 162 (1997).
  12. L. Saminadayar, D. C. Glattli, Y. Jin, and B. Etienne, Observation of the e/3 fractionally charged Laughlin quasiparticle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2526 (1997).
  13. X. Jehl, M. Sanquer, R. Calemczuk, and D. Mailly, Detection of doubled shot noise in short normal-metal/superconductor junctions, Nature (London) 405, 50 (2000).
  14. W.-T. Liao, S. K. Dutta, R. E. Butera, C. J. Lobb, F. C. Wellstood, and M. Dreyer, Multiple Andreev reflection effects in asymmetric STM Josephson junctions, arXiv:2601.09889.
  15. G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk, Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion, Phys. Rev. B 25, 4515 (1982).
  16. J.-F. Ge, K. M. Bastiaans, J. Niu, T. Benschop, M. Ortego Larrazabal, and M. P. Allan, Direct visualization of quasiparticle concentration around superconducting vortices, Appl. Phys. Lett. 125, 252601 (2024).
  17. J. F. Ge, K. M. Bastiaans, D. Chatzopoulos, D. Cho, W. O. Tromp, T. Benschop, J. Niu, G. Gu, and M. P. Allan, Single-electron charge transfer into putative Majorana and trivial modes in individual vortices, Nat. Commun. 14, 3341 (2023).
  18. J. Niu, K. M. Bastiaans, J. F. Ge, R. Tomar, J. Jesudasan, P. Raychaudhuri, M. Karrer, R. Kleiner, D. Koelle, A. Barbier, Eduard F. C. Driessen, Y. M. Blanter, and M. P. Allan, Why shot noise does not generally detect pairing in mesoscopic superconducting tunnel junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 076001 (2024).
  19. J. C. Cuevas, A. Martín-Rodero, and A. Levyyeyati, Shot noise and coherent multiple charge transfer in superconducting quantum point contacts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4086 (1999).
  20. J. C. Cuevas and W. Belzig, Full counting statistics of multiple Andreev reflections, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 187001 (2003).
  21. J. C. Cuevas and W. Belzig, dc transport in superconducting point contacts: A full-counting-statistics view, Phys. Rev. B 70, 214512 (2004).
  22. K. M. Bastiaans, T. Benschop, D. Chatzopoulos, D. Cho, Q. Dong, Y. Jin, and M. P. Allan, Amplifier for scanning tunneling microscopy at MHz frequencies, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89, 093709 (2018).
  23. M. Ortego Larrazabal, J. Niu, J.-F. Ge, Y. Sato, J. P. Cuperus, T. Benschop, K. M. Bastiaans, A. Mozes, I. Swart, and M. P. Allan, Cryogenic amplifier with high sensitivity and stability for noise-STM, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 97, 023701 (2026).
  24. F. Massee, Q. Dong, A. Cavanna, Y. Jin, and M. Aprili, Atomic scale shot-noise using cryogenic MHz circuitry, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89, 093708 (2018).
  25. J. Niu, M. Ortego Larrazabal, T. Gozlinski, Y. Sato, K. M. Bastiaans, T. Benschop, J.-F. Ge, Y. M. Blanter, G. Gu, I. Swart, and M. P. Allan, Equivalence of pseudogap and pairing energy in a cuprate high-temperature superconductor, arXiv:2409.15928.
  26. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/81fz-49c6 for the measurement methods (Sec. I), the simulation in SIN configuration (Sec. II), and the additional figures for results in the SIN junction (Sec. III).
  27. R. C. Dynes, V. Narayanamurti, and J. P. Garno, Direct measurement of quasiparticle-lifetime broadening in a strong-coupled superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1509 (1978).
  28. M. Octavio, M. Tinkham, G. E. Blonder, and T. M. Klapwijk, Subharmonic energy-gap structure in superconducting constrictions, Phys. Rev. B 27, 6739 (1983).
  29. M. P. Anantram and S. Datta, Current fluctuations in mesoscopic systems with Andreev scattering, Phys. Rev. B 53, 16390 (1996).
  30. M. Ruby, B. W. Heinrich, J. I. Pascual, and K. J. Franke, Experimental demonstration of a two-band superconducting state for lead using scanning tunneling spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 157001 (2015).
  31. K. J. Franke, G. Schulze, and J. I. Pascual, Competition of superconducting phenomena and Kondo screening at the nanoscale, Science 332, 940 (2011).
  32. M. T. Randeria, B. E. Feldman, I. K. Drozdov, and A. Yazdani, Scanning Josephson spectroscopy on the atomic scale, Phys. Rev. B 93, 161115(R) (2016).
  33. J. C. Cuevas, A. Martín-Rodero, and A. Levyyeyati, Hamiltonian approach to the transport properties of superconducting quantum point contacts, Phys. Rev. B 54, 7366 (1996).
  34. Y. Sato, M. Ortego Larrazabal, J.-F. Ge, I. Swart, D. Cho, W. Belzig, J. C. Cuevas, M. P. Allan, and J. Niu, Data for “Transparency-controlled multiple charge transfer in superconducting junctions with local shot-noise scanning tunneling spectroscopy,” Zenodo, 2026, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23038819.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation