Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Strong-coupling quantum thermodynamics using a superconducting flux qubit

Rishabh Upadhyay1,2,*, Bayan Karimi1,3, Diego Subero1, Christoforus Dimas Satrya1, Joonas T. Peltonen1, Yu-Cheng Chang1, and Jukka P. Pekola1

  • *Contact author: rishabh.upadhyay@aalto.fi

Phys. Rev. Applied 25, 044030 – Published 13 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3v35-y762

Abstract

Thermodynamics in quantum circuits aims to find improved functionalities of thermal machines, highlight fundamental phenomena peculiar to quantum nature in thermodynamics, and point out limitations in quantum information processing due to the coupling of the system to its environment. An important aspect in achieving some of these goals is the regime of strong coupling, which has remained until now a domain of theoretical works only. Our aim is to demonstrate strong coupling features in heat transport using a superconducting flux qubit, which is capable of reaching strong- to deep-ultrastrong-coupling regimes, as shown in previous studies. Here, we show experimental evidence of strong coupling by observing a hybridized state of the qubit with two cavities coupled to it, leading to a triplet-like thermal transport via this combined system around the minimum energy of the qubit at power levels of tens of femtowatts, exceeding by an order of magnitude those in earlier experiments. We also demonstrate a nearly 100% on-off switching ratio of heat current mediated by photons by applying magnetic flux to the qubit. Our experiment opens a way towards testing debated questions in strong-coupling thermodynamics, such as what heat is in this regime. We also present a theoretical model that aligns with our experimental findings and explains the mechanism behind heat transport in our device. Furthermore, our experiment opens possibilities for quantum thermodynamics, aiming to realize true quantum heat engines and refrigerators with enhanced power and efficiency, by leveraging ultrastrong coupling between the system and its environment in future experiments.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (51)

  1. J. P. Pekola, Towards quantum thermodynamics in electronic circuits, Nat. Phys. 11, 118 (2015).
  2. S. Deffner and S. Campbell, Quantum Thermodynamics: An Introduction to the Thermodynamics of Quantum Information (Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, CA, 2019).
  3. J. P. Pekola and B. Karimi, Colloquium: Quantum heat transport in condensed matter systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 041001 (2021).
  4. S. Vinjanampathy and J. Anders, Quantum thermodynamics, Contemp. Phys. 57, 545 (2016).
  5. F. Giazotto, T. T. Heikkilä, A. Luukanen, A. M. Savin, and J. P. Pekola, Opportunities for mesoscopics in thermometry and refrigeration: Physics and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 217 (2006).
  6. A. Ronzani, B. Karimi, J. Senior, Y.-C. Chang, J. T. Peltonen, C. Chen, and J. P. Pekola, Tunable photonic heat transport in a quantum heat valve, Nat. Phys. 14, 991 (2018).
  7. F. Giazotto and M. J. Martínez-Pérez, The Josephson heat interferometer, Nature 492, 401 (2012).
  8. K. Y. Tan, M. Partanen, R. E. Lake, J. Govenius, S. Masuda, and M. Möttönen, Quantum-circuit refrigerator, Nat. Commun. 8, 15189 (2017).
  9. D. Subero, O. Maillet, D. S. Golubev, G. Thomas, J. T. Peltonen, B. Karimi, M. Marín-Suárez, A. L. Yeyati, R. Sánchez, S. Park, et al., Bolometric detection of Josephson inductance in a highly resistive environment, Nat. Commun. 14, 7924 (2023).
  10. J. Senior, A. Gubaydullin, B. Karimi, J. T. Peltonen, J. Ankerhold, and J. P. Pekola, Heat rectification via a superconducting artificial atom, Commun. Phys. 3, 40 (2020).
  11. M. Kjaergaard, M. E. Schwartz, J. Braumüller, P. Krantz, J. I.-J. Wang, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Superconducting qubits: Current state of play, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 369 (2020).
  12. J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box, Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007).
  13. A. Wallraff, D. I. Schuster, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, R.-S. Huang, J. Majer, S. Kumar, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nature 431, 162 (2004).
  14. J. Clarke and F. K. Wilhelm, Superconducting quantum bits, Nature 453, 1031 (2008).
  15. B. Karimi and J. P. Pekola, Otto refrigerator based on a superconducting qubit: Classical and quantum performance, Phys. Rev. B 94, 184503 (2016).
  16. R. Kosloff and A. Levy, Quantum heat engines and refrigerators: Continuous devices, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 65, 365 (2014).
  17. P. A. Erdman, V. Cavina, R. Fazio, F. Taddei, and V. Giovannetti, Maximum power and corresponding efficiency for two-level heat engines and refrigerators: Optimality of fast cycles, New J. Phys. 21, 103049 (2019).
  18. P. Menczel, T. Pyhäranta, C. Flindt, and K. Brandner, Two-stroke optimization scheme for mesoscopic refrigerators, Phys. Rev. B 99, 224306 (2019).
  19. J. Majer, J. M. Chow, J. M. Gambetta, J. Koch, B. R. Johnson, J. A. Schreier, L. Frunzio, D. I. Schuster, A. A. Houck, A. Wallraff, et al., Coupling superconducting qubits via a cavity bus, Nature 449, 443 (2007).
  20. T. P. Orlando, J. E. Mooij, L. Tian, C. H. Van Der Wal, L. Levitov, S. Lloyd, and J. J. Mazo, Superconducting persistent-current qubit, Phys. Rev. B 60, 15398 (1999).
  21. J. E. Mooij, T. P. Orlando, L. Levitov, L. Tian, C. H. Van der Wal, and S. Lloyd, Josephson persistent-current qubit, Science 285, 1036 (1999).
  22. F. Yan, S. Gustavsson, A. Kamal, J. Birenbaum, A. P. Sears, D. Hover, T. J. Gudmundsen, D. Rosenberg, G. Samach, S. Weber, et al., The flux qubit revisited to enhance coherence and reproducibility, Nat. Commun. 7, 12964 (2016).
  23. J. Bourassa, J. M. Gambetta, A. A. Abdumalikov Jr, O. Astafiev, Y. Nakamura, and A. Blais, Ultrastrong coupling regime of cavity QED with phase-biased flux qubits, Phys. Rev. A 80, 032109 (2009).
  24. T. Miyanaga, A. Tomonaga, H. Ito, H. Mukai, and J.-S. Tsai, Ultrastrong tunable coupler between superconducting LC resonators, Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 064041 (2021).
  25. T. Niemczyk, F. Deppe, H. Huebl, E. P. Menzel, F. Hocke, M. J. Schwarz, J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, D. Zueco, T. Hümmer, E. Solano, et al., Circuit quantum electrodynamics in the ultrastrong-coupling regime, Nat. Phys. 6, 772 (2010).
  26. R. Upadhyay, G. Thomas, Y.-C. Chang, D. S. Golubev, A. Guthrie, A. Gubaydullin, J. T. Peltonen, and J. P. Pekola, Robust strong-coupling architecture in circuit quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 044045 (2021).
  27. F. Yoshihara, T. Fuse, Z. Ao, S. Ashhab, K. Kakuyanagi, S. Saito, T. Aoki, K. Koshino, and K. Semba, Inversion of qubit energy levels in qubit-oscillator circuits in the deep-strong-coupling regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 183601 (2018).
  28. F. Yoshihara, T. Fuse, S. Ashhab, K. Kakuyanagi, S. Saito, and K. Semba, Characteristic spectra of circuit quantum electrodynamics systems from the ultrastrong- to the deep-strong-coupling regime, Phys. Rev. A 95, 053824 (2017).
  29. G. Falci, A. Ridolfo, P. G. Di Stefano, and E. Paladino, Ultrastrong coupling probed by coherent population transfer, Sci. Rep. 9, 9249 (2019).
  30. W. Dou, M. A. Ochoa, A. Nitzan, and J. E. Subotnik, Universal approach to quantum thermodynamics in the strong coupling regime, Phys. Rev. B 98, 134306 (2018).
  31. M. Perarnau-Llobet, H. Wilming, A. Riera, R. Gallego, and J. Eisert, Strong coupling corrections in quantum thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 120602 (2018).
  32. Á. Rivas, Strong coupling thermodynamics of open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 160601 (2020).
  33. P. Talkner and P. Hänggi, Colloquium: Statistical mechanics and thermodynamics at strong coupling: Quantum and classical, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 041002 (2020).
  34. J. D. Teufel, D. Li, M. S. Allman, K. Cicak, A. J. Sirois, J. D. Whittaker, and R. W. Simmonds, Circuit cavity electromechanics in the strong-coupling regime, Nature 471, 204 (2011).
  35. F. Yoshihara, T. Fuse, S. Ashhab, K. Kakuyanagi, S. Saito, and K. Semba, Superconducting qubit–oscillator circuit beyond the ultrastrong-coupling regime, Nat. Phys. 13, 44 (2017).
  36. M.-S. Choi, Exotic quantum states of circuit quantum electrodynamics in the ultra-strong coupling regime, Adv. Quantum Technol. 3, 2000085 (2020).
  37. W.-M. Huang and W.-M. Zhang, Strong-coupling quantum thermodynamics far from equilibrium: Non-Markovian transient quantum heat and work, Phys. Rev. A 106, 032607 (2022).
  38. M. Ding, Z. Tu, and X. Xing, Strong coupling thermodynamics and stochastic thermodynamics from the unifying perspective of time-scale separation, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013015 (2022).
  39. S. J. Bosman, M. F. Gely, V. Singh, A. Bruno, D. Bothner, and G. A. Steele, Multi-mode ultra-strong coupling in circuit quantum electrodynamics, Npj Quantum Inf. 3, 46 (2017).
  40. A. Sergeev and V. Mitin, Electron-phonon interaction in disordered conductors: Static and vibrating scattering potentials, Phys. Rev. B 61, 6041 (2000).
  41. F. C. Wellstood, C. Urbina, and J. Clarke, Hot-electron effects in metals, Phys. Rev. B 49, 5942 (1994).
  42. L. B. Wang, O.-P. Saira, D. S. Golubev, and J. P. Pekola, Crossover between electron-phonon and boundary-resistance limits to thermal relaxation in copper films, Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 024051 (2019).
  43. M. Nahum, T. M. Eiles, and J. M. Martinis, Electronic microrefrigerator based on a normal-insulator-superconductor tunnel junction, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 3123 (1994).
  44. J. P. Pekola, J. M. Kyynäräinen, M. M. Leivo, and A. J. Manninen, NIS chip refrigeration, Cryogenics 39, 653 (1999).
  45. Y.-C. Chang, B. Karimi, J. Senior, A. Ronzani, J. T. Peltonen, H.-S. Goan, C.-D. Chen, and J. P. Pekola, Utilization of the superconducting transition for characterizing low-quality-factor superconducting resonators, Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 0 (2019).
  46. E. T. Jaynes and F. W. Cummings, Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser, Proc. IEEE 51, 89 (2005).
  47. A. O. Niskanen, Y. Nakamura, and J. P. Pekola, Information entropic superconducting microcooler, Phys. Rev. B 76, 174523 (2007).
  48. R. Upadhyay, D. S. Golubev, Y.-C. Chang, G. Thomas, A. Guthrie, J. T. Peltonen, and J. P. Pekola, Microwave quantum diode, Nat. Commun. 15, 630 (2024).
  49. F. Pobell, Matter and Methods at low Temperatures (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007), Vol. 2.
  50. G. J. Dolan, Offset masks for lift-off photoprocessing, Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 337 (1977).
  51. B. Karimi, G. O. Steffensen, A. P. Higginbotham, C. M. Marcus, A. Levy Yeyati, and J. P. Pekola, Bolometric detection of Josephson radiation, Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 1613 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation