Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quantum thermalization mechanism and the emergence of symmetry-breaking phases

Sebastián Gómez1,2,*, Ángel L. Corps3,4,†, and Armando Relaño1,4,‡

  • 1Departamento de Estructura de la Materia, Física Térmica y Electrónica, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avenida Complutense s/n, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
  • 2Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, IEM-CSIC, Serrano 123, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
  • 3Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, V Holešovičkách 2, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic
  • 4Grupo Interdisciplinar de Sistemas Complejos (GISC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avenida Complutense s/n, E-28040 Madrid, Spain

  • *Contact author: sebastian.gomez@csic.es
  • †Contact author: corps.angel.l@gmail.com
  • ‡Contact author: armando.relano@fis.ucm.es

APS Open Sci. 1, 000018 – Published 8 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/w77n-lyjd

Abstract

We propose a generalization of the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis accountin g for the emergence of symmetry-breaking phases. It consists of two conditions that any system with a degenerate spectrum must fulfill in order to thermalize. The failure of each condition generates a different nonthermalizing scenario. One is due to the absence of chaos and may indicate that extra constants of motion are required to describe equilibrium states. The other one implies the existence of initial conditions evolving toward symmetry-breaking equilibrium states. If it spreads across an entire spectral region, then this region gives rise to a symmetry-breaking phase. We explore the applicability of this formalism by means of numerical experiments on a three-site Bose-Hubbard model with two noncommuting discrete symmetries.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (105)

  1. J. von Neumann, Beweis des Ergodensatzes und des H-Theorems in der neuen Mechanik, Z. Phys. 57, 30 (1929).
  2. J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991).
  3. M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994).
  4. M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems, Nature (London) 452, 854 (2008).
  5. A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalattore, Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 863 (2011).
  6. C. Gogolin and J. Eisert, Equilibration, thermalisation, and the emergence of statistical mechanics in closed quantum systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 056001 (2016).
  7. L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys. 65, 239 (2016).
  8. P. Reimann, Generalization of von Neumman's approach to thermalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 010403 (2015).
  9. T. Yoshizawa, E. Iyoda, and T. Sagawa, Numerical large deviation analysis of the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 200604 (2018).
  10. S. Sugimoto, R. Hamazaki, and M. Ueda, Test of the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis based on local random matrix theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 120602 (2021).
  11. S. Sugimoto, R. Hamazaki, and M. Ueda, Eigenstate thermalization in long-range interacting systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 030602 (2022).
  12. P. Reimann, Equilibration of isolated macroscopic quantum systems under experimentally realistic conditions, Phys. Scr. 86, 058512 (2012).
  13. P. Reimann, Foundation of statistical mechanics under experimentally realistic conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 190403 (2008).
  14. N. Linden, S. Popescu, A. J. Short, and A. Winter, Quantum mechanical evolution towards thermal equilibrium, Phys. Rev. E 79, 061103 (2009).
  15. N. Linden, S. Popescu, A. J. Short, and A. Winter, On the speed of fluctuations around thermodynamic equilibrium, New J. Phys. 12, 055021 (2010).
  16. P. Reimann, Canonical thermalization, New J. Phys. 12, 055027 (2010).
  17. A. J. Short, Equilibration of quantum systems and subsystems, New J. Phys. 13, 053009 (2011).
  18. A. J. Short and T. C. Farrelly, Quantum equilibration in finite time, New J. Phys. 14, 013063 (2012).
  19. S. Trotzky, Y-A. Chen, A. Flesch, I. P. McCulloch, U. Schollwöck, J. Eisert, and I. Bloch, Probing the relaxation towards equilibrium in an isolated strongly correlated one-dimensional gas, Nat. Phys. 8, 325 (2012).
  20. A. M. Kaufman, M. Eric Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, P. M. Preiss, and M. Greiner, Quantum thermalization through entanglement in an isolated many-body system, Science 353, 794 (2016).
  21. G. Clos, D. Porras, U. Warring, and T. Schaetz, Time-resolved observation of thermalization in an isolated quantum system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 170401 (2016).
  22. Y. Tang, W. Kao, K-Y. Li, S. Seo, K. Mallayya, M. Rigol, S. Gopalakrishnan, and B. L. Lev, Thermalization near integrability in a dipolar quantum Newton's cradle, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021030 (2018).
  23. V. K. B. Kota, A. Relaño, J. Retamosa, and M. Vyas, Thermalization in the two-body random ensemble, J. Stat. Mech. (2011) P10028.
  24. M. Rigol and M. Srednicki, Alternatives to eigenstate thermalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 110601 (2012).
  25. T. N. Ikeda, Y. Watanabe, and M. Ueda, Finite-size scaling analysis of the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis in a one-dimensional interacting Bose gas, Phys. Rev. E 87, 012125 (2013).
  26. W. Beugeling, R. Moessner, and M. Haque, Finite-size scaling of eigenstate thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 89, 042112 (2014).
  27. R. Steinigeweg, A. Khodja, H. Niemeyer, C. Gogolin, and J. Gemmer, Pushing the limits of the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis towards mesoscopic quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 130403 (2014).
  28. H. Kim, T. N. Ikeda, and D. A. Huse, Testing whether all eigenstates obey the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Phys. Rev. E 90, 052105 (2014).
  29. D. Jansen, J. Stoplp, L. Vidmar, and F. Heidrich-Meisner, Eigenstate thermalization and quantum chaos in the Holstein polaron model, Phys. Rev. B 99, 155130 (2019).
  30. M. Brenes, T. LeBlond, J. Goold, and M. Rigol, Eigenstate thermalization in a locally perturbed integrable system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 070605 (2020).
  31. J. Richter, A. Dymarsky, R. Steinigeweg, and J. Gemmer, Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis beyond standard indicators: Emergence of random-matrix behavior at small frequencies, Phys. Rev. E 102, 042127 (2020).
  32. J. Wang, M. H. Lamann, J. Richter, R. Steinigeweg, A. Dymasrky, and J. Gemmer, Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis and its deviations from random-matrix theory beyond thermalization time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 180601 (2022).
  33. T. Kinoshita, T. Wenger, and D. S. Weiss, A quantun Netwon's cradle, Nature (London) 440, 900 (2006).
  34. M. Gring, M. Kuhnert, T. Langen, T. Kitagawa, B. Rauer, M. Schreitl, I. Mazets, D. Adu Smith, E. Demler, and J. Schmiedmayer, Relaxation and prethermalization in an isolated quantum system, Science 337, 1318 (2012).
  35. T. Langen, S. Erne, R. Geiger, B. Rauer, T. Schweigler, W. Rohringer, I. E. Mazets, T. Gasenzer, and J. Schmiedmayer, Experimental observation of a generalized Gibbs ensemble, Science 348, 207 (2015).
  36. M. Rigol, Breakdown of thermalization in finite one-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 100403 (2009).
  37. F. H. L. Essler and M. Fagotti, Quench dynamics and relaxation in isolated integrable quantum spin chains, J. Stat. Mech. (2016) 064002.
  38. M. Mierzejewski and L. Vidmar, Quantitative impact of integrals of motion on the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 040603 (2020).
  39. J.-Y. Choi, S. Hild, J. Zeiher, P. Schauß, A. Rubio-Abadal, T. Yefsah, V. Khemani, D. A. Huse, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Exploring the many-body localization transition in two dimensions, Science 352, 1547 (2016).
  40. J. Smith, A. Lee, P. Richerme, B. Neyenhuis, P. W. Heiss, P. Hauke, M. Heyl, D. A. Huse, and C. Monroe, Many-body localization in a quantum simulator with programmable random disorder, Nat. Phys. 12, 907 (2016).
  41. V. Oganesyan and D. A. Huse, Localization of interacting fermions at high temperature, Phys. Rev. B 75, 155111 (2007).
  42. R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many-body localization and thermalization in quantum statistical mechanics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 15 (2015).
  43. A. L. Corps, R. A. Molina, and A. Relaño, Thouless energy challenges thermalization on the ergodic side of the many-body localization transition, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014201 (2020).
  44. A. L. Corps, R. A. Molina, and A. Relaño, Signatures of a critical point in the many-body localization transition, SciPost Phys. 10, 107 (2021).
  45. C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papić, Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars, Nat. Phys. 14, 745 (2018).
  46. S. Moudgalya, S. Rachel, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Quantum scarred eigenstates in a Rydberg atom chain: Entanglement, breakdown of thermalization, and stability to perturbations, Phys. Rev. B 98, 235155 (2018).
  47. M. Schecter and T. Iadecola, Weak ergodicity breaking and quantum nany-body scars in spin-1 XY magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 147201 (2019).
  48. M. Serbyn, D. A. Abanin, and Z. Papić, Quantum many-body scars and weak breaking of ergodicity, Nat. Phys. 17, 675 (2021).
  49. J. O. Austin-Harris, I. Rana, S. E. Begg, C. Binegar, T. Bilitewski, and Y. Liu, Observation of ergodicity breaking and quantum many-body scars in spinor gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 113401 (2025).
  50. A. Relaño, Thermalization in an interacting spin system in the transition from integrability to chaos, J. Stat. Mech. (2010) P07016.
  51. N. Shiraishi and T. Mori, Systematic construction of counterexamples to the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 030601 (2017); R. Mondiani, K. Mallayya, L. F. Santos, and M. Rigol, Comment on “Systematic construction of counterexamples to the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis”, ibid. 121, 038901 (2018); N. Shiraishi and T. Mori, Shiraishi and Mori reply, ibid. 121, 038902 (2018).
  52. T. R. de Oliveira, C. Charalambous, D. Jonathan, M. Lewenstein, and A. Riera, Equilibration time scales in closed many-body quantum systems, New J. Phys. 20, 033032 (2018).
  53. M. Srednicki, The approach to thermal equilibrium in quantized chaotic systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32, 1163 (1999).
  54. M. L. Mehta, Random Matrices (Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2004).
  55. W. Beugeling, R. Moessner, and M. Haque, Off-diagonal matrix elements of local operators in many-body quantum systems, Phys. Rev. E 91, 012144 (2015).
  56. R. Mondiani and M. Rigol, Eigenstate thermalization in the two-dimensional transverse field Ising model. II. Off-diagonal matrix elements of observables, Phys. Rev. E 96, 012157 (2017).
  57. C. Nation and D. Porras, Off-diagonal observable elements from random matrix theory: Distributions, fluctuations, and eigenstate thermalization, New J. Phys. 20, 103003 (2018).
  58. T. LeBlond and M. Rigol, Eigenstate thermalization for observables that break Hamiltonian symmetries and its counterpart in interacting integrable systems, Phys. Rev. E 102, 062113 (2020).
  59. A. J. Beekman, L. Rademaker, and J. van Wezel, An introduction to spontaneous symmetry breaking, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 11 (2019).
  60. P. W. Anderson, An approximate quantum theory of the antiferromagnetic ground state, Phys. Rev. 86, 694 (1952).
  61. B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, and L. Pierre, Signature of Néel order in exact spectra of quantum antiferromagnets on finite lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2590 (1992).
  62. P. Azaria, B. Delamotte, and D. Mouhanna, Spontaneous symmetry breaking in quantum frustrated antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2483 (1993).
  63. B. Bernu, P. Lecheminant, C. Lhuillier, and L. Pierre, Exact spectra, spin susceptibilities, and order parameter of the quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 50, 10048 (1994).
  64. T. Koma and H. Tasaki, Symmetry breaking and finite size effects in quantum many-body systems, J. Stat. Phys. 76, 745 (1994).
  65. H. Tasaki, Long-range order, “Tower” of states, and symmetry breaking in lattice quantum systems, J. Stat. Phys. 174, 735 (2019).
  66. The scenario becomes even more complicated when considering that the gap between the states belonging to the tower of states decays as 1/N, with N being the number of particles, whereas the mean level spacing decays exponentially. In the case of discrete symmetries, both decays are exponential.
  67. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/w77n-lyjd for an explicit example of the calculation of matrix elements of observables in the reduced eigenspaces.
  68. L. F. Santos and M. Rigol, Onset of quantum chaos in one-dimensional bosonic and fermionic systems and its relation to thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 81, 036206 (2010).
  69. L. F. Santos and M. Rigol, Localization and the effects of symmetries in the thermalization properties of one-dimensional quantum systems, Phys. Rev. E 82, 031130 (2010).
  70. J. M. G. Gómez, K. Kar. V. K. B. Kota, R. A. Molina, A. Relaño, and J. Retamosa, Many-body quantum chaos: Recent developments and applications to nuclei, Phys. Rep. 499, 103 (2011).
  71. A. Gubin and L. F. Santos, Quantum chaos: An introduction via chains of interacting spins 1/2, Am J. Phys 80, 246 (2012).
  72. O. Bohigas, M. J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit, Characterization of chaotic quantum spectra and universality of level fluctuation laws, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1 (1984).
  73. E. T. Jaynes, Information theory and statistical mechanics, Phys. Rev. 106, 620 (1957).
  74. E. T. Jaynes, Information theory and statistical mechanics. II, Phys. Rev. 108, 171 (1957).
  75. M. Rigol, A. Muramatsu, and M. Olshanii, Hard-core bosons on optical superlattices: Dynamics and relaxation in the superfluid and insulating regimes, Phys. Rev. A 74, 053616 (2006).
  76. A. L. Corps and A. Relaño, General theory for discrete symmetry-breaking equilibrium states, Phys. Rev. E 110, 034137 (2024).
  77. Y. Guryanova, S. Popescu, A. J. Short, R. Silva, and P. Skrzypczyk, Thermodynamics of quantum systems with multiple conserved quantities, Nat. Commun. 7, 12049 (2016).
  78. N. Y. Halpern, P. Faist, J. Oppenheim, and A. Winter, Microcanonical and resource-theoretic derivations of the thermal state of a quantum system with noncommuting charges, Nat. Commun. 7, 12051 (2016).
  79. N. Y. Halpern, M. E. Beverland, and A. Kalev, Noncommuting conserved charges in quantum many-body thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 101, 042117 (2020).
  80. F. Kranzl, A. Lasek, M. K. Joshi, A. Kalev, R. Blatt, C. F. Roos, and N. Y. Halper, Experimental observation of thermalization with noncommuting charges, PRX Quantum 4, 020318 (2023).
  81. S. Majidy, W. F. Braasch, A. Lasek, T. Upadyaya, A. Kalev, and N. Yunger Halpern, Noncommuting conserved charges in quantum thermodynamics and beyond, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 689 (2023).
  82. C. Murthy, A. Babakhani, F. Iniguez, M. Srednicki, and N. Yunger Halpern, Non-Abelian eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 140402 (2023).
  83. A. Lasek, J. D. Noh, J. LeSchack, and N. Y. Halpern, Numerical evidence for the non-Abelian eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, arXiv:2412.07838.
  84. R. Patil and M. Rigol, Eigenstate thermalization in spin-1/2 systems with SU(2) symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 111, 205126 (2025).
  85. In this case, it is still possible to prepare an initial region relaxing onto a symmetric equilibrium state in which 〈M̂〉=0, but this necessarily implies a macroscopic superposition of the different branches of the order parameter [76].
  86. M. Tsubota and K. Kasamatsu, Josephson current flowing in cyclically coupled Bose-Einstein condensates, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 1942 (2000).
  87. D. R. Scherer, C. N. Weiler, T. W. Neely, and B. P. Anderson, Vortex formation by merging of multiple trapped Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 110402 (2007).
  88. A. Gallemi, M. Guilleumas, J. Martorell, R. Mayol, A. Polls, and B. Juliá-Díaz, Fragmented condensation in Bose-Hubbard trimes with tunable tunneling, New J. Phys. 17, 073014 (2015).
  89. M. A. Garcia-March, S. van Frank, M. Bonneau, J. Schmiedmayer, M. Lewenstein, and L. F. Santos, Relaxation, chaos, and thermalization in a three-mode model of a Bose–Einstein condensate, New J. Phys. 20, 113039 (2018).
  90. J. de la Cruz, S. Lerma-Hernández, and J. G. Hirsch, Quantum chaos in a system with high degree of symmetries, Phys. Rev. E 102, 032208 (2020).
  91. D. Wozniak, J. Kroha, and A. Posazhennikova, Chaos onset in large rings of Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 106, 033316 (2022).
  92. G. Nakerst and M. Haque, Chaos in the three-site Bose-Hubbard model: Classical versus quantum, Phys. Rev. E 107, 024210 (2023).
  93. K. W. Wittmann, E. R. Castro, A. Foerster, and L. F. Santos, Interacting bosons in a triple well: Preface of many-body quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. E 105, 034204 (2022).
  94. E. R. Castro, K. Wittmann W., J. Chávez-Carlos, I. Roditi, A. Foerster, and J. G. Hirsch, Quantum-classical correspondence in a triple-well bosonic model: From integrability to chaos, Phys. Rev. A 109, 032225 (2024).
  95. G. Arwas, A. Vardi, and D. Cohen, Triangular Bose-Hubbard trimer as a minimal model for a superfluid circuit, Phys. Rev. A 89, 013601 (2014).
  96. A. Peres, New conserved quantities and test for regular spectra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1711 (1984).
  97. K. R. Fratus and M. Srednicki, Eigenstate thermalization in systems with spontaneously broken symmetry, Phys. Rev. E 92, 040103(R) (2015).
  98. A. L. Corps and A. Relaño, Scarred ferromagnetic phase in the long-range transverse-field Ising model, Phys. Rev. B 113, L100304 (2026).
  99. I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Rigurous results on valence-bond ground states in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 799 (1987).
  100. S. Gómez, A. L. Corps and A. Relaño, Data supporting Figs. 1-3 of manuscript at arXiv2506.13370, Zenodo (2026), doi:10.5281/zenodo.19953058.
  101. M. V. Berry and M. Robnik, Semiclassical level spacings when regular and chaotic orbits coexist, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 17, 2413 (1984).
  102. M. Berry and M. Tabor, Level clustering in the regular spectrum, Proc. R. Soc. A 356, 375 (1997).
  103. J. M. G. Gómez, R. A. Molina, A. Relaño, and J. Retamosa, Misleading signatures of quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. E 66, 036209 (2002).
  104. A. L. Corps and A. Relaño, Long-range level correlations in quantum systems with finite Hilbert space dimension, Phys. Rev. E 103, 012208 (2021).
  105. M. C. Gutzwiller, Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics (Springer, New York, 1990).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation