- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

APS Open Science

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Tunneling dynamics and time delay in electron transport through time-dependent barriers with finite-bandwidth reservoirs

Shmuel Gurvitz1,2,* and Dmitri Sokolovski3,4,†

  • *Contact author: shmuel.gurvitz@weizmann.ac.il
  • †Contact author: dgsokol15@gmail.com
PDF

APS Open Sci. 1, 000172 – Published 15 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/tnn1-2j92

Abstract

We study a model system consisting of a tunneling barrier driven by an external harmonic field and coupled to two leads with finite bandwidth. Avoiding Floquet expansions, we derive simple expressions for the time-dependent tunneling current in the adiabatic regime. Our approach relates the barrier modulation to a measurable time delay in the steady-state periodic current. It provides a physically consistent definition of the tunneling time inside the barrier by subtracting the time delay associated with the leads from the total time delay. We find that the tunneling time always vanishes for wide/high barriers. Remarkably, the time delay persists even when the barrier becomes static, i.e., in the limit where the modulation frequency vanishes. This indicates that the time delay obtained through the introduction of an external periodic perturbation actually reflects an intrinsic property of the tunneling dynamics, rather than an effect of the external drive or of a particular system. We apply our results to the analysis of tunneling times in optical experiments and find good agreement with the experimental data.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (34)

  1. A. P. Jauho, N. Wingreen, and Y. Meir, Time-dependent transport in interacting and noninteracting resonant-tunneling systems, Phys. Rev. B 50, 5528 (1994).
  2. A. Croy and U. Saalmann. Propagation scheme for nonequilibrium dynamics of electron transport in nanoscale devices, Phys. Rev. B 80, 245311 (2009).
  3. S. Gurvitz, Single-electron approach for time-dependent electron transport, Phys. Scr. 2015, 014013 (2015).
  4. S. Gurvitz, A. Aharony, and O. Entin-Wohlman, Temporal evolution of resonant transmission under telegraph noise, Phys. Rev. B 94, 075437 (2016).
  5. S. Gurvitz, Generalized Landauer formula for time-dependent potentials and noise-induced zero-bias dc current, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52, 175301 (2019).
  6. L. A. MacColl, Note on the transmission and reflection of wave packets by potential barriers, Phys. Rev. 40, 621 (1932).
  7. T. E. Hartman, Tunneling of a wave packet, J. Appl. Phys. 33, 3427 (1962).
  8. E. Pollak, The tunneling flight time, in Tunnelling in Molecules: Nuclear Quantum Effects From Bio to Physical Chemistry, edited by J. Kästner and S. Kozuch (The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, 2020), pp. 399–424 and references therein.
  9. A. Landsman and U. Keller, Attosecond science and the tunnelling time problem, Phys. Rep. 547, 1 (2015).
  10. R. Ianconescu and E. Pollak, Determination of the mean tunneling flight time in the Büttiker-Landauer oscillating-barrier model as the reflected phase time, Phys. Rev. A 103, 042215 (2021).
  11. G. E. Field, On the status of quantum tunnelling time, Eur. J. Philos. Sci. 12, 57 (2022).
  12. A. Uranga, E. Akhmatskaya, and D. Sokolovski, Imaginary past of a quantum particle moving on imaginary time, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023197 (2024).
  13. M. Büttiker and R. Landauer, Traversal time for tunneling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1739 (1982).
  14. R. Landauer and T. Martin, Barrier interaction time in tunneling, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 217 (1994).
  15. E. Pollak and W. H. Miller, New physical interpretation for time in scattering theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 115 (1984).
  16. R. Landauer, Spatial variation of currents and fields due to localized scatterers in metallic conduction, IBM J. Res. Dev. 1, 223 (1957).
  17. S. Datta, Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems (Cambridge University Press, Oxford, UK, 1995).
  18. J. Bardeen, Tunnelling from a many-particle point of view, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 57 (1961).
  19. C. J. Chen, Introduction to Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2021).
  20. M. W. Wilkinson and J. H. Hannay, Multidimensional tunnelling between excited states, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom. 27, 201 (1987).
  21. S. A. Gurvitz, Novel approach to tunneling problems, Phys. Rev. A 38, 1747 (1988).
  22. S. Gurvitz, P. Semmes, W. Nazarewicz, and T. Vertse, Modified two-potential approach to tunneling problems, Phys. Rev. A 69, 042705 (2004).
  23. M. Zendra, F. Borgonovi, G. L. Celardo, and S. Gurvitz, Nonstandard Hubbard model and electron pairing, Phys. Rev. B 109, 195137 (2024).
  24. M. Zendra, F. Borgonovi, G. L. Celardo, and S. Gurvitz, Many-body tunneling in a double-well potential, Phys. Rev. A 110, 062222 (2024).
  25. Zi-Hao Chen, Yao Wang, Xiao Zheng, Rui-Xue Xu, and YiJing Yan, Universal time-domain Prony fitting decomposition for optimized hierarchical quantum master equations, J. Chem. Phys. 156, 221102 (2022).
  26. H. P. Breuer, E. M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021002 (2016).
  27. R. Y. Chiao, Superluminal (but causal) propagation of wave packets in transparent media with inverted atomic populations, Phys. Rev. A 48, R34 (1993).
  28. A. M. Steinberg, P. G. Kwiat, and R. Y. Chiao, Measurement of the single-photon tunneling time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 708 (1993).
  29. C. Spielmann, R. Szipöcs, A. Stingl, and F. Krausz, Tunneling of optical pulses through photonic band gaps, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2308 (1994).
  30. D. Sokolovski and E. Akhmatskaya, ‘Superluminal paradox’ in wave packet propagation and its quantum mechanical resolution, Ann. Phys. 339, 307 (2013).
  31. J. Ping, Y. Ye, L. Xu, X.-Q. Li, Y. Yan, and S. Gurvitz, Undetectable quantum transfer through a continuum, Phys. Lett. A 377, 676 (2013).
  32. In the 3D case, it represents an integral over the surface through the tunneling barrier, separating the leads [18, 33, 34].
  33. S. A. Gurvitz, Two-potential approach to multi-dimensional tunneling, in Multiple Facets of Quantization and Supermmetry, edited by M. Olshanetsky and A. Vainstein (World Scientific, Singapore, 2002), pp. 91–103.
  34. M. Gawełczyk and M. Zieliński, Bardeen’s tunneling theory applied to intraorbital and interorbital hopping integrals between dopants in silicon, Phys. Rev. B 106, 115426 (2022).

Outline

Information

APS Open Sci. 1, 000172– Published 15 October, 2026
Vol. 1
  • Received 4 August 2025
  • Revised 31 August 2026
  • Accepted 6 October 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation