Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Shape dependence of Edelstein and magnetoelectric effects in the V-shaped model

Shuhei Kanda* and Satoru Hayami

  • *Contact author: kanda@phys.sci.hokudai.ac.jp

APS Open Sci. 1, 000189 – Published 28 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qjfd-tbyj

Abstract

We theoretically investigate the shape dependence and microscopic mechanism of the magnetoelectric (ME) effect, including both nonmagnetic (Edelstein-type) and magnetic origins, in a V-shaped one-dimensional chain model. Numerical calculations based on the Kubo formula reveal that the nonmagnetic-driven ME response is maximized at an apex angle of θ≈0.6π. To clarify its origin, we derive a low-energy effective Hamiltonian in the s-orbital subspace and demonstrate that the polarity induced by the V-shaped geometry manifests as an effective spin-orbit interaction. An analytical derivation of the Green’s function shows that the geometric effect can be described as a T-matrix contribution associated with local symmetry breaking. This scattering-theoretical representation enables us to identify the contributions of local geometric symmetry breaking to the ME response. Using a multipole-basis representation, we identify symmetry-based selection rules for the ME tensor and show that the coupling between the effective spin-orbit interaction and the orbital angular momentum generated across the apex plays an essential role. The resulting angular dependence, sinθsinθ/2, peaks at θ=2tan−12≈0.608π, in good agreement with the numerical results. We also analyze a ferromagnetic V-shaped model including the Zeeman interaction and show that the magnetic-driven ME response originates from the spin magnetization induced by the coupling between the electric-field-driven charge-potential gradient and the Zeeman term. These results reveal distinct ME mechanisms depending on the presence or absence of time-reversal symmetry and clarify the microscopic origin of shape-dependent ME responses in V-shaped chains.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (90)

  1. W. Cai, U. K. Chettiar, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, Optical cloaking with metamaterials, Nat. Photon. 1, 224 (2007).
  2. C. M. Soukoulis and M. Wegener, Optical metamaterials—More bulky and less lossy, Science 330, 1633 (2010).
  3. C. M. Soukoulis and M. Wegener, Past achievements and future challenges in the development of three-dimensional photonic metamaterials, Nat. Photon. 5, 523 (2011).
  4. N. I. Zheludev and Y. S. Kivshar, From metamaterials to metadevices, Nat. Mater. 11, 917 (2012).
  5. H.-H. Hsiao, C. H. Chu, and D. P. Tsai, Fundamentals and applications of metasurfaces, Small Methods 1, 1600064 (2017).
  6. M. Matsubara, T. Kobayashi, H. Watanabe, Y. Yanase, S. Iwata, and T. Kato, Polarization-controlled tunable directional spin-driven photocurrents in a magnetic metamaterial with threefold rotational symmetry, Nat. Commun. 13, 6708 (2022).
  7. M. Hild, L. E. Golub, A. Fuhrmann, M. Otteneder, M. Kronseder, M. Matsubara, T. Kobayashi, D. Oshima, A. Honda, T. Kato, J. Wunderlich, C. Back, and S. D. Ganichev, Terahertz spin ratchet effect in magnetic metamaterials, Phys. Rev. B 107, 155419 (2023).
  8. G. Cavanna, H. Taketani, H. Watanabe, D. Pan, A. Honda, D. Oshima, T. Kato, and M. Matsubara, Scaling-dependent tunability of spin-driven photocurrents in magnetic metamaterials, Nanophotonics 14, 5611 (2025).
  9. M. Kuwata-Gonokami, N. Saito, Y. Ino, M. Kauranen, K. Jefimovs, T. Vallius, J. Turunen, and Y. Svirko, Giant optical activity in quasi-two-dimensional planar nanostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 227401 (2005).
  10. N. Yu, P. Genevet, M. A. Kats, F. Aieta, J.-P. Tetienne, F. Capasso, and Z. Gaburro, Light propagation with phase discontinuities: Generalized laws of reflection and refraction, Science 334, 333 (2011).
  11. J. C. Gartside, A. Vanstone, T. Dion, K. D. Stenning, D. M. Arroo, H. Kurebayashi, and W. R. Branford, Reconfigurable magnonic mode-hybridisation and spectral control in a bicomponent artificial spin ice, Nat. Commun. 12, 2488 (2021).
  12. D. Sekine, Y. Sato, and M. Matsubara, Nonlinear optical detection of mesoscopic magnetic toroidal dipoles, Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 162905 (2022).
  13. S. Link, M. B. Mohamed, and M. A. El-Sayed, Simulation of the optical absorption spectra of gold nanorods as a function of their aspect ratio and the effect of the medium dielectric constant, J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 3073 (1999).
  14. P. K. Jain, K. S. Lee, I. H. El-Sayed, and M. A. El-Sayed, Calculated absorption and scattering properties of gold nanoparticles of different size, shape, and composition: Applications in biological imaging and biomedicine, J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 7238 (2006).
  15. J. Cai, P. Ruffieux, R. Jaafar, M. Bieri, T. Braun, S. Blankenburg, M. Muoth, A. P. Seitsonen, M. Saleh, X. Feng, K. Müllen, and R. Fasel, Atomically precise bottom-up fabrication of graphene nanoribbons, Nature (London) 466, 470 (2010).
  16. Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature (London) 556, 80 (2018).
  17. R. S. K. Houtsma, J. de la Rie, and M. Stöhr, Atomically precise graphene nanoribbons: Interplay of structural and electronic properties, Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 6541 (2021).
  18. S. Hayami and H. Kusunose, Microscopic description of electric and magnetic toroidal multipoles in hybrid orbitals, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87, 033709 (2018).
  19. S. Hayami, M. Yatsushiro, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Classification of atomic-scale multipoles under crystallographic point groups and application to linear response tensors, Phys. Rev. B 98, 165110 (2018).
  20. H. Watanabe and Y. Yanase, Group-theoretical classification of multipole order: Emergent responses and candidate materials, Phys. Rev. B 98, 245129 (2018).
  21. M. Yatsushiro, H. Kusunose, and S. Hayami, Multipole classification in 122 magnetic point groups for unified understanding of multiferroic responses and transport phenomena, Phys. Rev. B 104, 054412 (2021).
  22. H. Kusunose and S. Hayami, Generalization of microscopic multipoles and cross-correlated phenomena by their orderings, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 34, 464002 (2022).
  23. R. Oiwa and H. Kusunose, Systematic analysis method for nonlinear response tensors, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 91, 014701 (2022).
  24. S. Hayami and H. Kusunose, Unified description of electronic orderings and cross correlations by complete multipole representation, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 93, 072001 (2024).
  25. H. Kusunose, R. Oiwa, and S. Hayami, Complete multipole basis set for single-centered electron systems, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 89, 104704 (2020).
  26. S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Bottom-up design of spin-split and reshaped electronic band structures in antiferromagnets without spin-orbit coupling: Procedure on the basis of augmented multipoles, Phys. Rev. B 102, 144441 (2020).
  27. X. Gao, X. Han, W.-P. Cao, H. O. Li, H. F. Ma, and T. J. Cui, Ultrawideband and high-efficiency linear polarization converter based on double V-shaped metasurface, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 63, 3522 (2015).
  28. Y. Xie, C. Yang, Y. Wang, Y. Shen, X. Deng, B. Zhou, and J. Cao, Anomalous refraction and reflection characteristics of bend V-shaped antenna metasurfaces, Sci. Rep. 9, 6700 (2019).
  29. J. Hu, S. Bandyopadhyay, Y.-H. Liu, and L.-Y. Shao, A review on metasurface: From principle to smart metadevices, Front. Phys. 8, 586087 (2021).
  30. L. Billot, M. Mortier, and L. Aigouy, Near-field observation of surface plasmon polaritons launched by V-shaped nanorods on a gold surface, Appl. Opt. 54, 9326 (2015).
  31. A. Babynina, M. Fedoruk, P. Kühler, A. Meledin, M. Döblinger, and T. Lohmüller, Bending gold nanorods with light, Nano Lett. 16, 6485 (2016).
  32. V. Edelstein, Spin polarization of conduction electrons induced by electric current in two-dimensional asymmetric electron systems, Solid State Commun. 73, 233 (1990).
  33. T. Furukawa, Y. Shimokawa, K. Kobayashi, and T. Itou, Observation of current-induced bulk magnetization in elemental tellurium, Nat. Commun. 8, 954 (2017).
  34. R. González-Hernández, P. Ritzinger, K. Výborný, J. Železný, and A. Manchon, Non-relativistic torque and Edelstein effect in non-collinear magnets, Nat. Commun. 15, 7663 (2024).
  35. A. Popoola, R. Kashikar, A. Azmy, I. Spanopoulos, H. Jafari, J. Sławińska, S. Witanachchi, S. Lisenkov, and I. Ponomareva, Mechanically and electrically tunable Rashba-Edelstein effect in ferroelectric semiconductors, CsGeX3(X=I,Br,Cl), Phys. Rev. Mater. 9, 084412 (2025).
  36. I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear Hall effect induced by Berry curvature dipole in time-reversal invariant materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 216806 (2015).
  37. L. Xu, M. Yang, S. J. Wang, and Y. P. Feng, Electronic and optical properties of the monolayer group-IV monochalcogenides MX (M=Ge,Sn; X=S,Se,Te), Phys. Rev. B 95, 235434 (2017).
  38. Q. Ma, S.-Y. Xu, H. Shen, D. MacNeill, V. Fatemi, T.-R. Chang, A. M. Mier Valdivia, S. Wu, Z. Du, C.-H. Hsu, et al., Observation of the nonlinear Hall effect under time-reversal-symmetric conditions, Nature (London) 565, 337 (2019).
  39. H. Wang and X. Qian, Ferroelectric nonlinear anomalous Hall effect in few-layer WTe2, npj Comput. Mater. 5, 119 (2019).
  40. M. Nakamura, S. Horiuchi, F. Kagawa, N. Ogawa, T. Kurumaji, Y. Tokura, and M. Kawasaki, Shift current photovoltaic effect in a ferroelectric charge-transfer complex, Nat. Commun. 8, 281 (2017).
  41. N. Ogawa, M. Sotome, Y. Kaneko, M. Ogino, and Y. Tokura, Shift current in the ferroelectric semiconductor SbSI, Phys. Rev. B 96, 241203(R) (2017).
  42. D. Shin, S. A. Sato, H. Hübener, U. De Giovannini, N. Park, and A. Rubio, Dynamical amplification of electric polarization through nonlinear phononics in 2D SnTe, npj Comput. Mater. 6, 182 (2020).
  43. M. S. Okyay, S. A. Sato, K. W. Kim, B. Yan, H. Jin, and N. Park, Second harmonic Hall responses of insulators as a probe of Berry curvature dipole, Commun. Phys. 5, 303 (2022).
  44. R. Resta and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polarization: A modern approach, in Physics of Ferroelectrics: A Modern Perspective (Springer, Berlin, 2007), pp. 31–68.
  45. C. Cui, F. Xue, W.-J. Hu, and L.-J. Li, Two-dimensional materials with piezoelectric and ferroelectric functionalities, npj 2D Mater. Appl. 2, 18 (2018).
  46. Y. Poplavko, Piezoelectric intrinsic polarity modeling and determination, APL Mater. 13, 061113 (2025).
  47. V. Dubovik and V. Tugushev, Toroid moments in electrodynamics and solid-state physics, Phys. Rep. 187, 145 (1990).
  48. N. A. Spaldin, M. Fiebig, and M. Mostovoy, The toroidal moment in condensed-matter physics and its relation to the magnetoelectric effect, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 434203 (2008).
  49. Y. V. Kopaev, Toroidal ordering in crystals, Phys. Usp. 52, 1111 (2009).
  50. M. Fiebig, Revival of the magnetoelectric effect, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38, R123 (2005).
  51. S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, and Y. Motome, Emergent spin-valley-orbital physics by spontaneous parity breaking, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 28, 395601 (2016).
  52. H. Saito, K. Uenishi, N. Miura, C. Tabata, H. Hidaka, T. Yanagisawa, and H. Amitsuka, Evidence of a new current-induced magnetoelectric effect in a toroidal magnetic ordered state of UNi4B, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87, 033702 (2018).
  53. Y. Gao, D. Vanderbilt, and D. Xiao, Microscopic theory of spin toroidization in periodic crystals, Phys. Rev. B 97, 134423 (2018).
  54. L. Ding, X. Xu, H. O. Jeschke, X. Bai, E. Feng, A. S. Alemayehu, J. Kim, F.-T. Huang, Q. Zhang, X. Ding, N. Harrison, V. Zapf, D. Khomskii, I. I. Mazin, S.-W. Cheong, and H. Cao, Field-tunable toroidal moment in a chiral-lattice magnet, Nat. Commun. 12, 5339 (2021).
  55. M. Yatsushiro, R. Oiwa, H. Kusunose, and S. Hayami, Analysis of model-parameter dependences on the second-order nonlinear conductivity in PT-symmetric collinear antiferromagnetic metals with magnetic toroidal moment on zigzag chains, Phys. Rev. B 105, 155157 (2022).
  56. A. Kirikoshi and S. Hayami, Finite-q antiferrotoroidal and ferritoroidal order in a distorted kagome structure, Phys. Rev. B 111, L201112 (2025).
  57. Y. Tokura and N. Nagaosa, Nonreciprocal responses from non-centrosymmetric quantum materials, Nat. Commun. 9, 3740 (2018).
  58. H. Isobe and N. Nagaosa, Toroidal scattering and nonreciprocal transport by magnetic impurities, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 91, 115001 (2022).
  59. T. Yamanaka, Y. Ihara, and S. Hayami, Nonlinear nonreciprocal electric conductivity driven by magnetic field gradients, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 94, 083705 (2025).
  60. K. Sawada and N. Nagaosa, Optical magnetoelectric effect in multiferroic materials: Evidence for a Lorentz force acting on a ray of light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 237402 (2005).
  61. S. Miyahara and N. Furukawa, Nonreciprocal directional dichroism and toroidalmagnons in helical magnets, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 023712 (2012).
  62. J. Mund, D. R. Yakovlev, A. N. Poddubny, R. M. Dubrovin, M. Bayer, and R. V. Pisarev, Toroidal nonreciprocity of optical second harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. B 103, L180410 (2021).
  63. J. C. Slater and G. F. Koster, Simplified LCAO method for the periodic potential problem, Phys. Rev. 94, 1498 (1954).
  64. A. M. Essin, J. E. Moore, and D. Vanderbilt, Magnetoelectric polarizability and axion electrodynamics in crystalline insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 146805 (2009).
  65. S. Coh, D. Vanderbilt, A. Malashevich, and I. Souza, Chern-Simons orbital magnetoelectric coupling in generic insulators, Phys. Rev. B 83, 085108 (2011).
  66. K. Tazuke, T. Morimoto, and S. Kitamura, Formulation of the orbital magnetic moment in multiorbital tight-binding models: Application to the inverse Faraday effect, Phys. Rev. B 112, 155134 (2025).
  67. P.-O. Löwdin, Studies in perturbation theory. IV. Solution of eigenvalue problem by projection operator formalism, J. Math. Phys. 3, 969 (1962).
  68. H. Feshbach, Unified theory of nuclear reactions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 1076 (1964).
  69. J. Leinaas and T. Kuo, Convergence properties of the Brillouin-Wigner type of perturbation expansion, Ann. Phys. 111, 19 (1978).
  70. N. Hatano and G. Ordonez, Time-reversal symmetric resolution of unity without background integrals in open quantum systems, J. Math. Phys. 55, 122106 (2014).
  71. A. Altland and B. D. Simons, Condensed Matter Field Theory, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).
  72. J. Ōiké and R. Peters, Impact of electron correlations on the nonlinear Edelstein effect, Phys. Rev. B 110, 165111 (2024).
  73. B. A. Lippmann and J. Schwinger, Variational principles for scattering processes. I, Phys. Rev. 79, 469 (1950).
  74. J. L. Beeby, Electronic structure of alloys, Phys. Rev. 135, A130 (1964).
  75. S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, H. Kusunose, and Y. Motome, Electric toroidal quadrupoles in the spin-orbit-coupled metal Cd2Re2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 147602 (2019).
  76. H. Kusunose, R. Oiwa, and S. Hayami, Symmetry-adapted modeling for molecules and crystals, Phys. Rev. B 107, 195118 (2023).
  77. R. Oiwa, A. Inda, S. Hayami, T. Nomoto, R. Arita, and H. Kusunose, Symmetry-adapted closest Wannier modeling based on complete multipole basis set, Phys. Rev. B 112, 035116 (2025).
  78. L. Huang and C. Yue, Barycentric rational function approximation made simple: A fast analytic continuation method for Matsubara Green’s functions, Phys. Rev. B 111, 125139 (2025).
  79. Y. Yanase, Magneto-electric effect in three-dimensional coupled zigzag chains, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 83, 014703 (2014).
  80. S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, and Y. Motome, Spontaneous multipole ordering by local parity mixing, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 84, 064717 (2015).
  81. S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, and Y. Motome, Asymmetric magnon excitation by spontaneous toroidal ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85, 053705 (2016).
  82. Y. Suzuki, Tunneling spin current in systems with spin degeneracy, Phys. Rev. B 105, 075201 (2022).
  83. S. Kanda and S. Hayami, Revisiting magnetoelectric response in collinear antiferromagnetic zigzag chains: A downfolding approach beyond conventional low-energy models, Phys. Rev. B 114, 165141 (2026).
  84. A. I. Tursina, S. N. Nesterenko, E. V. Murashova, I. V. Chernyshev, H. Noël, and Y. D. Seropegin, CeRu2Al10 with the YbFe2Al10 structure type, Acta Crystallogr. E 61, i12 (2005).
  85. H. Kato, R. Kobayashi, T. Takesaka, T. Nishioka, M. Matsumura, K. Kaneko, and N. Metoki, Magnetic structure determination of CeT2Al10 (T = Ru and Os): Single crystal neutron diffraction studies, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 80, 073701 (2011).
  86. M. Shinozaki, G. Motoyama, T. Mutou, S. Nishigori, A. Yamaguchi, K. Fujiwara, K. Miyoshi, and A. Sumiyama, Study for current-induced magnetization in ferrotoroidal ordered state of Ce3TiBi5, JPS Conf. Proc. 30, 011189 (2020).
  87. M. Shinozaki, G. Motoyama, M. Tsubouchi, M. Sezaki, J. Gouchi, S. Nishigori, T. Mutou, A. Yamaguchi, K. Fujiwara, K. Miyoshi, and Y. Uwatoko, Magnetoelectric effect in the antiferromagnetic ordered state of Ce3TiBi5 with Ce zig-zag chains, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 89, 033703 (2020).
  88. S. Suzuki, K. Takubo, K. Kuga, W. Higemoto, T. U. Ito, T. Tomita, Y. Shimura, Y. Matsumoto, C. Bareille, H. Wadati, S. Shin, and S. Nakatsuji, High-temperature antiferromagnetism in Yb based heavy fermion systems proximate to a Kondo insulator, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023140 (2021).
  89. K. Sudo, Y. Yanagi, M. Akaki, H. Tanida, and M. Kimata, Large spontaneous nonreciprocal charge transport in a zero-magnetization antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 016503 (2026).
  90. S. Kanda and S. Hayami, Dataset for: “Shape dependence of Edelstein and magnetoelectric effects in the V-shaped model”, Zenodo, 2026, 10.5281/zenodo.23495185.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation